Supreme Court Allows Semi Automatic Gun Ban

[Auld Phart]

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

and how does your response speak to the decision of the supreme court?

oh wait... it doesn't.

now, if you want to address these issues rationally, which NRA brainwashed tend not to want to do, I would think we can all agree that no one who is not in the military needs to have a weapon that fires that many shots at a time without re-loading.

and I think other than the true NRA brainwashed, we can all agree that if someone is on the terrorist watch list, if they try to buy a gun a little red flag should go off

the gun owners in my life are all ok with that type of legislation.

so now do you want to actually comment on the decision or do you want to fling more nonsense?.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

and how does your response speak to the decision of the supreme court?

oh wait... it doesn't.

now, if you want to address these issues rationally, which NRA brainwashed tend not to want to do, I would think we can all agree that no one who is not in the military needs to have a weapon that fires that many shots at a time without re-loading.

and I think other than the true NRA brainwashed, we can all agree that if someone is on the terrorist watch list, if they try to buy a gun a little red flag should go off

the gun owners in my life are all ok with that type of legislation.

so now do you want to actually comment on the decision or do you want to fling more nonsense?.

and I think other than the true NRA brainwashed, we can all agree that if someone is on the terrorist watch list, if they try to buy a gun a little red flag should go off

People like the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, or singer Cat Stevens?

Both were on the no fly list

 

[JBond]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

Thank God for the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban and how it prevented the Mass Shootings at Columbine and Jonesboro, oh wait it did not prevent those mass shootings!

Also you can buy a full automatic weapon and that is another misconception from the left as usual!

What happened was that the semi automatic replaced the fully automatic weapons.

People like me said back then that it wouldn't do anything to stop the carnage. We were right.

My point is that if we ban the semi automatic or assault weapons and there's nothing that does the same thing to replace it, we won't have such horrendous massacres we've had.

Banning certain weapons does work.

No one has a Thompson machine gun anymore. It was banned in the 1930.

Fully automatic weapons were banned in the 1980s, republican ronald reagan signed the legislation into law.

Keep in mind that it went into effect in May 1986. Which means that the republican controlled senate at the time, wrote a bill, voted on it and passed it. So republicans at one time did put the safety of Americans before money.

I find it interesting that no matter what you gun nuts say, it's constitutional to ban a type of weapon and that the supreme court upholds those bans.

I guess all the claims of destroying the second amendment
and taking away rights is just exactly what I've known it to be all my life.

Nothing but a bunch of garbage.

Again, they are not banned. Stop saying stupid shit.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Charleston church mass killer used two handguns. No assault weapon.

The Roseburg, Oregon mass killer used five handguns. No assault weapon.

The Virginia Tech mass killer used two handguns. No assault weapon.

The Isla Vista mass killer used two knives, three handguns, and a BMW sedan. No assault weapon.

The Fort Hood mass killer used two handguns. No assault weapon.

The Washington Navy Yard mass killer used a shotgun and a handgun. No assault weapon.

Yeah.......but.......well......

So what.

 

[Skull Pilot]

It is stoopid to deny less guns means less homicides. It is just plain common sense that less guns means less homicides.

Just like less swimming pools would mean less drownings.

Or less cars would mean less accidental deaths.

To deny reality is to undermine your integrity and look like an idiot.

OK So today in the USA the Murder rate is almost exactly what it was in 1950.

Are there more guns now or less guns?

The murder rate is declining, when it used to be climbing.

You are exposing your innumeracy.

No you said more guns more murder

The murder rate is the same as it was in 1950 are there more guns now or less?

 

[easyt65]

Speaking of "gun free zones", do you really want people carrying guns where a lot of heavy drinking is going on?

Even before Gun-Free Zones I don't remember seeing many people 'packing' in bars and have never seen bar patrons sporting AR-15s.

 

[Skull Pilot]

no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones

Could you link us to those studies please? Not media reports, but the actual primary research.

So Pulse was not a gun free zone? Or was it not the deadliest shooting?

Here's what I responded to, it was above, perhaps you missed it.

"no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones"

I'd like to see the primary research. Don't know what that answer is, but a claim on a chat board ain't verification. Nor is a media report interpretation of any data.

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

What was the most deadly shooting in the US?

Pulse

Pulse was a gun free zone


What was the second most deadly shooting in the US?

Blacksburg VA

Virginia Tech was a gun free zone

So thereby it is scientifically proven that the deadliest shootings in the USA were in gun free zones

 

[BreezeWood]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

.
to reduce their availability entirely and putting any person in jail who has one in their possession ... not too hard to understand.

.

 

[Auld Phart]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

.
to reduce their availability entirely and putting any person in jail who has one in their possession ... not too hard to understand.

.

You want to take MY AR-15, because someone else might murder someone with theirs?

Should I give up my car because of drunk drivers?

Fill in my pool to prevent people from drowning?

Stop taking my meds because someone OD'd?


and you seriously believe criminals still won't get them if they are banned?

Read up on the effects of the 18th Amendment, and get back to me.

 

[BreezeWood]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

.
to reduce their availability entirely and putting any person in jail who has one in their possession ... not too hard to understand.

.

You want to take MY AR-15, because someone else might murder someone with theirs?

Should I give up my car because of drunk drivers?

Fill in my pool to prevent people from drowning?

Stop taking my meds because someone OD'd?


and you seriously believe criminals still won't get them if they are banned?

Read up on the effects of the 18th Amendment, and get back to me.

.

You want to take MY AR-15 ...

yes, and everyone else that feels they need one.

.

 

[Auld Phart]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

.
to reduce their availability entirely and putting any person in jail who has one in their possession ... not too hard to understand.

.

You want to take MY AR-15, because someone else might murder someone with theirs?

Should I give up my car because of drunk drivers?

Fill in my pool to prevent people from drowning?

Stop taking my meds because someone OD'd?


and you seriously believe criminals still won't get them if they are banned?

Read up on the effects of the 18th Amendment, and get back to me.

.

You want to take MY AR-15 ...

yes, and everyone else that feels they need one.

.

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

 

[g5000]

You don't NEED an Olympic sized swimming pool. Hand it over.

You don't NEED that Big Gulp. Hand it over.

You don't NEED that "assault weapon". Hand it over.

You don't NEED to whine about Donald Trump. Hand over your keyboard.

You don't NEED midget porn. Hand it over.

You don't NEED a car that can go 50 mph over the speed limit. Hand it over.

You NEED 151 proof alcohol. Hand it over.

You don't NEED a million dollars. Hand it over.


Fucking liberals.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Could you link us to those studies please? Not media reports, but the actual primary research.

So Pulse was not a gun free zone? Or was it not the deadliest shooting?

Here's what I responded to, it was above, perhaps you missed it.

"no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones"

I'd like to see the primary research. Don't know what that answer is, but a claim on a chat board ain't verification. Nor is a media report interpretation of any data.

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

What was the most deadly shooting in the US?

Pulse

Pulse was a gun free zone


What was the second most deadly shooting in the US?

Blacksburg VA

Virginia Tech was a gun free zone

So thereby it is scientifically proven that the deadliest shootings in the USA were in gun free zones

Ah, so you claim that based upon two incidents, thanks.

 

[Fenton Lum]

You don't NEED an Olympic sized swimming pool. Hand it over.

You don't NEED that Big Gulp. Hand it over.

You don't NEED that "assault weapon". Hand it over.

You don't NEED to whine about Donald Trump. Hand over your keyboard.

You don't NEED midget porn. Hand it over.

You don't NEED a car that can go 50 mph over the speed limit. Hand it over.

You NEED 151 proof alcohol. Hand it over.

You don't NEED a million dollars. Hand it over.


Fucking liberals.

Someone's swallowed a whole lotta bullshit. But that's usually how one gets to this level of myopic hate.

 

[JQPublic1]

If you ASSAULT someone with any weapon does it make that weapon an 'assault weapon'? If some guy uses a machete or a hammer to kill 10 people, are they 'assault' machetes and 'assault' hammers? The word 'assault' is a liberal label placed on these guns. A gun, like any tool in your toolbox, can be used for a variety of different jobs and should not be defined as being for 1 reason only - the worst possible one, at that.

Have you ever stopped to wonder if someone else benefits from you're being all wound up about your guns and an alleged threat of "liberals" coming for them?

I guess you regressives don't know the difference between all wound up and steadfast. The ignorance of you regressives can only be combated by education. Of course the willfully ignorant are lost causes.

You folks show us the difference all day, every day.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So Pulse was not a gun free zone? Or was it not the deadliest shooting?

Here's what I responded to, it was above, perhaps you missed it.

"no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones"

I'd like to see the primary research. Don't know what that answer is, but a claim on a chat board ain't verification. Nor is a media report interpretation of any data.

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

What was the most deadly shooting in the US?

Pulse

Pulse was a gun free zone


What was the second most deadly shooting in the US?

Blacksburg VA

Virginia Tech was a gun free zone

So thereby it is scientifically proven that the deadliest shootings in the USA were in gun free zones

Ah, so you claim that based upon two incidents, thanks.

So you deny that the deadliest shootings in the US have taken place in gun free zones?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Here's what I responded to, it was above, perhaps you missed it.

"no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones"

I'd like to see the primary research. Don't know what that answer is, but a claim on a chat board ain't verification. Nor is a media report interpretation of any data.

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

What was the most deadly shooting in the US?

Pulse

Pulse was a gun free zone


What was the second most deadly shooting in the US?

Blacksburg VA

Virginia Tech was a gun free zone

So thereby it is scientifically proven that the deadliest shootings in the USA were in gun free zones

Ah, so you claim that based upon two incidents, thanks.

So you deny that the deadliest shooting in the US have taken place in gun free zones?

I would like to see a scientific analysis of US mass shootings over the years and all the identifiable parameters involved. You don't have that. If you want to assert these two instances were conducted in "gun free" zones, I have no need to push back on that, just isn't what I was looking for, not what it sounded like someone had found at firth blush. As for any extrapolation from a total of two instances, that would just be unwise. It's wonderful for political shit slinging, but it leads nowhere in terms of understanding a serious societal problem.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

Thank God for the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban and how it prevented the Mass Shootings at Columbine and Jonesboro, oh wait it did not prevent those mass shootings!

Also you can buy a full automatic weapon and that is another misconception from the left as usual!

What happened was that the semi automatic replaced the fully automatic weapons.

People like me said back then that it wouldn't do anything to stop the carnage. We were right.

My point is that if we ban the semi automatic or assault weapons and there's nothing that does the same thing to replace it, we won't have such horrendous massacres we've had.

Banning certain weapons does work.

No one has a Thompson machine gun anymore. It was banned in the 1930.

Fully automatic weapons were banned in the 1980s, republican ronald reagan signed the legislation into law.

Keep in mind that it went into effect in May 1986. Which means that the republican controlled senate at the time, wrote a bill, voted on it and passed it. So republicans at one time did put the safety of Americans before money.

I find it interesting that no matter what you gun nuts say, it's constitutional to ban a type of weapon and that the supreme court upholds those bans.

I guess all the claims of destroying the second amendment
and taking away rights is just exactly what I've known it to be all my life.

Nothing but a bunch of garbage.

1. Prove I am a Gun Nut because I do not own any form of a Semi-Automatic Weapon.

2. Tell me again how the Automatic Weapon has been completely ban when it has not:

"Most people can buy machine guns in lots of states," Howard said. "But, and this is one of those classic big ‘buts,’ they have to get through a background check by FBI that is as thorough as if you are getting clearance to become a federal agent."

Finally:

Why is it that Limp Wrist Progressive Liberals like yourself keep on spewing lies about something you have no clue about?

What was banned was being able to buy weapons like Uzi's but you can still buy a Machine Gun and you better tell Gun Nuts like Nancy Pelosi to get to work or will you lie about what she said too?

Why Democrats aren't pushing an assault weapons ban

 

[Skull Pilot]

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

What was the most deadly shooting in the US?

Pulse

Pulse was a gun free zone


What was the second most deadly shooting in the US?

Blacksburg VA

Virginia Tech was a gun free zone

So thereby it is scientifically proven that the deadliest shootings in the USA were in gun free zones

Ah, so you claim that based upon two incidents, thanks.

So you deny that the deadliest shooting in the US have taken place in gun free zones?

I would like to see a scientific analysis of US mass shootings over the years and all the identifiable parameters involved. You don't have that. If you want to assert these two instances were conducted in "gun free" zones, I have no need to push back on that, just isn't what I was looking for, not what it sounded like someone had found at firth blush. As for any extrapolation from a total of two instances, that would just be unwise. It's wonderful for political shit slinging, but it leads nowhere in terms of understanding a serious societal problem.

You don't need a scientist all you have to do is look at the shootings and where they happened and how many people died and the most deadly shootings in this country have happened in gun free zones

I never postulated on why or what in society makes this so and I do not have to in order for the statement I made to be a proven fact

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

.
to reduce their availability entirely and putting any person in jail who has one in their possession ... not too hard to understand.

.

You want to take MY AR-15, because someone else might murder someone with theirs?

Should I give up my car because of drunk drivers?

Fill in my pool to prevent people from drowning?

Stop taking my meds because someone OD'd?


and you seriously believe criminals still won't get them if they are banned?

Read up on the effects of the 18th Amendment, and get back to me.

Yes to everyone of those you listed and remember to ask the criminal and terrorist nicely to obey the laws and when they laugh ask again because everyone knows criminals and terrorists obey the laws...

 

[JBond]

yes, and everyone else that feels they need one

I love righteous assholes that think they know what's best for everyone. Too scared and stupid to take guns from criminals, but love leaving citizens defenseless.