Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
What was the "child" doing with a gun?
Defending himself against the terrorists in BLM....
You all have the strangest concept of self-defense. You're not defending yourself if you grab a gun, drive 20 miles to the melee in order to insert yourself into a volatile situation where you then use your weapon that you're not old enough to have to defend private property that's not even your own.

From my perspective that makes him the terrorist. It's questionable whether he could legally be in possession of the weapon he was carrying since he's not yet 18 and if he was indeed committing a crime by having it then everything that happened afterwards happened while he was in the commission of a crime.
I see it as someone who was trained with a rifile since he was a baby, going to protect business and elderly from getting attacked from the democrat mob. And did a great job, the new shot heard round the world.
Still illegal for him to be in possession of a firearm in Wisconsin.
And what does that have to do with this thread?
It's a pity you don't understand, comrade.
He was charged with murder that’s what we’re talking about are you saying he doesn’t have a right to self-defense because he’s 17 answer the question dude what are you afraid of?

This has been addressed. We will have to wait for everything to sort itself out but you generally can not claim self defense while committing a crime.
You can claim self defense when attacked----the druggy whacked him with a skateboard ---good riddance to him and righteous kill..second idiot trying to pull a gun out of his pants (also reportedly a felon and marxist) shot in arm another excellent legal shot...kid should have fired a second shot and killed him though..... and all of this after the mob of violent marxist communists chased down the kid as he tried to get away from them.

Turn the kid loose and give him a medal for being more of a man then most of the men we have nowadays.
maybe the "druggie" was attempting a citizens arrest, as the vigilante had just killed a man.
He killed a man in self defense, we was chased and dodged a Molotov cocktail being thrown at him. Was he supposed to burn to death because he supports trump lol
You're lying about the molotov cocktail. Here's what was thrown at him ...

EgWzph3UEAANso_
Was used as a weapon.
LOLOL

A plastic bag is a weapon?? Lemme guess ... you think that's a hammer, amirite?

rotfl-gif.288736
Not sure what weapon was in the bag. Appeared to lit up, and it was thrown as a weapon to produce harm.
And it didn't harm him. It landed on the ground. I don't know that he ever even saw it as he had his back to the guy. Self defense is a reasonable fear of a life-threatening attack or great bodily harm. Good luck to him in court claiming he was in fear for his life over a plastic bag on the ground.

:abgg2q.jpg:
View attachment 380655So your saying the first loser didn’t intend harm? Interesting.. why was he chasing him? What If Kyle was to tired to run ddI he have a right to defend him self?
Those are images of folks trying to disarm a murderer. Totally legal and not self-defense on his part. It's what the police should have been doing had they not stood down.
The first guy was alive. And was shot in self defense. He chased a man with the intent to do bodily harm.
The teen murderer confessed he killed him as he ran away.
Eye witness said he was chased by a mob
“But what I can say is prior to the first shooting that I witnessed I did see a number of individuals pursuing the 17-year-old alleged shooter, and actually the individual who was shot I did see him advance on him very closely,” McGinniss added. “And you can see that in the video, although it’s a bit far away. I was actually, maybe, six or seven feet behind them. So I saw it up close.”
Good luck in court comrade.
LOL

It's on video, ya lyin' Russian ... he was chased by one little guy with a plastic bag.
With the intention to do bodily harm he also called him the N-word twice.
Great, post the video where he can be seen and heard calling the teen murderer the n-word...
1:06 mark.. shoot me nicca shoot me nicca, Democrat privilege
You posted no link to a video. Try harder next time.

Thanks for showing the forum you lied again, Jizzy. :eusa_liar:

The guy he yelled that at is not wearing the light green shirt and dark pants the teen murderer was wearing. Also, the teen murderer was not wearing a mask; whereas this guy was.

The guy shot was saying the n word, and how do you know who he was talking too the camera does show what he was seeing..
 
He left his mom's house with a rifle looking for someone to shoot.

You already posted this propaganda, and I already 'spanked that ass' / debunked your BS...you just ignored it and decided to spew the same BS again.

Try READING it this time instead of RUNNING FROM IT:

-----------------

NOW look who is spreading lies and propaganda...

If the shooter was looking for someone to shoot he didn't have to go all the way to the car dealership - there were plenty of places and plenty of people in between his house and the car dealership.

A reporter has declare publicly that he interviewed the young man earlier before the shooting, that he had stated he was there to help protect property and keep the peace. The guy was there before the shooting and had ample opportunity to kill protestors already there but did not do so. So much for your BS about him just being there with the intent of killing someone.

The police have said they talked to the guy and that he was there to help deter violence...again, so much for yoru BS propaganda.

If he was there simply to kill people, why did he wait until he was attacked and beaten? Why not just shoot the terrorists who approached him, who threatened him? Why did he wait to shoot until after HE became their VICTIM? AGAIN, so much for your lies and BS propaganda.

Fail. You're done, and is so is your pro-terrorist conspiracy theory.
You aren't posting, you interpreting. Incorrectly at that.

He left his mom's basement with a rifle looking for someone to shoot. That's premeditated murder, or "murder 1" in most places. At 17 he will be charged as an adult, and receive at minimum 20 years in prison. His life is over. Please think about this before you imitate him.
 
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
It will be up to a jury of his peers. Was he justified, or was he looking for trouble?
I think a proper judge will dismiss it at arrangement
yeah, that would certainly require some kind of arrangement.
Arraignment
 
Wrong. Left his mom's house with a rifle looking for someone to shoot.
NOW look who is spreading lies and propaganda...

If the shooter was looking for someone to shoot he didn't have to go all the way to the car dealership - there were plenty of places and plenty of people in between his house and the car dealership.

A reporter has declare publicly that he interviewed the young man earlier before the shooting, that he had stated he was there to help protect property and keep the peace. The guy was there before the shooting and had ample opportunity to kill protestors already there but did not do so. So much for your BS about him just being there with the intent of killing someone.

The police have said they talked to the guy and that he was there to help deter violence...again, so much for yoru BS propaganda.

If he was there simply to kill people, why did he wait until he was attacked and beaten? Why not just shoot the terrorists who approached him, who threatened him? Why did he wait to shoot until after HE became their VICTIM? AGAIN, so much for your lies and BS propaganda.

Fail. You're done, and is so is your pro-terrorist conspiracy theory.

.
He left his mom's house with a rifle looking for someone to shoot. You don't deter violence by shooting people. It's premeditated murder. He will be tried as an adult and get 20+ years. His life is over. Think before you imitate him.
You could use that argument on anyone who ever bought a gun and used it to defend himself. It's obvious horseshit.
Nope. The protestors didn't come looking for him, he went looking for them with a rifle. Premeditated murder.
 
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
It will be up to a jury of his peers. Was he justified, or was he looking for trouble?
I think a proper judge will dismiss it at arrangement
yeah, that would certainly require some kind of arrangement.
video is very clear. the engaging parties were the bullies, they attacked him, the kid. clear as glass. I just want folks like you to deny that. why the kid was there is immaterial. he has every right as the bullies had to be there. Unless of course you think they own the street?

He may have a right to be there. He does not have the right to be in possession of a rifle at 17 years old. Federal Law prohibits it. Which means he is not a law abiding gun owner. He can’t own any guns at his age. He was committing a felony. Possession of a weapon by an underaged individual. So now the only charge possible is Murder. In addition to the Felony possession of a firearm charges.
 
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
It will be up to a jury of his peers. Was he justified, or was he looking for trouble?
I think a proper judge will dismiss it at arrangement
yeah, that would certainly require some kind of arrangement.
video is very clear. the engaging parties were the bullies, they attacked him, the kid. clear as glass. I just want folks like you to deny that. why the kid was there is immaterial. he has every right as the bullies had to be there. Unless of course you think they own the street?

He may have a right to be there. He does not have the right to be in possession of a rifle at 17 years old. Federal Law prohibits it. Which means he is not a law abiding gun owner. He can’t own any guns at his age. He was committing a felony. Possession of a weapon by an underaged individual. So now the only charge possible is Murder. In addition to the Felony possession of a firearm charges.
It’s a mild misdemeanor and it does not restrict his rights to self-defense
 
Looks like it was on fire, it would be interesting to see what it was View attachment 380720
That's the light from behind it. You've already been shown it was just a plastic bag on the ground, not burned up; and you were shown it was not lit as it was thrown.

Of course, I'm pointing this out to the liar who falsely claimed the victim called the shooter the n-word.
 

Watch the videos ya fucken idiot.

He is 17. That means it is a Felony for him to have a Rifle. While you are committing a crime. Such as a Felony. You can not claim Self Defense.
It’s a mild misdemeanor.. and he still has a right to self defense

Right. And the McMichaels were just in the street. They weren’t doing nothing. Right?
 
After Rittenhouse is exonerated on all charges reelected president Trump will invite him and his family to the White House where he will award the patriot Rittenhouse with a medal of honor.
 
As the Democrat Political Violence increases, so will the self defense violence.
One of the attackers was using his skateboard as a club and, the other attacker clearly had a gun.
He used self defense to save his own life.
In some states the use of deadly force can be used to stop arsonist.

They don't allow you to cross state lines and start shooting into crowds.

This punk's going to prison.
 
He left his mom's house with a rifle looking for someone to shoot.

You already posted this propaganda, and I already 'spanked that ass' / debunked your BS...you just ignored it and decided to spew the same BS again.

Try READING it this time instead of RUNNING FROM IT:

-----------------

NOW look who is spreading lies and propaganda...

If the shooter was looking for someone to shoot he didn't have to go all the way to the car dealership - there were plenty of places and plenty of people in between his house and the car dealership.

A reporter has declare publicly that he interviewed the young man earlier before the shooting, that he had stated he was there to help protect property and keep the peace. The guy was there before the shooting and had ample opportunity to kill protestors already there but did not do so. So much for your BS about him just being there with the intent of killing someone.

The police have said they talked to the guy and that he was there to help deter violence...again, so much for yoru BS propaganda.

If he was there simply to kill people, why did he wait until he was attacked and beaten? Why not just shoot the terrorists who approached him, who threatened him? Why did he wait to shoot until after HE became their VICTIM? AGAIN, so much for your lies and BS propaganda.

Fail. You're done, and is so is your pro-terrorist conspiracy theory.
You aren't posting, you interpreting. Incorrectly at that.

He left his mom's basement with a rifle looking for someone to shoot. That's premeditated murder, or "murder 1" in most places. At 17 he will be charged as an adult, and receive at minimum 20 years in prison. His life is over. Please think about this before you imitate him.

Negative, dumbass. I pointed out FACTS...you were debunked, your narrative destroyed, you are desperate.

FAIL!
 
As the Democrat Political Violence increases, so will the self defense violence.
One of the attackers was using his skateboard as a club and, the other attacker clearly had a gun.
He used self defense to save his own life.
In some states the use of deadly force can be used to stop arsonist.

They don't allow you to cross state lines and start shooting into crowds.

This punk's going to prison.

You mean the crowd that was trying to beat him?..that crowd?
 
Looks like it was on fire, it would be interesting to see what it was View attachment 380720
That's the light from behind it. You've already been shown it was just a plastic bag on the ground, not burned up; and you were shown it was not lit as it was thrown.

Of course, I'm pointing this out to the liar who falsely claimed the victim called the shooter the n-word.
One lie at a time.. are you saying “ it’s just a bag” can you throw a empty plastic bag that far?

and you admit he said the n world?Right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top