Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't take someone's kids away just because the parents are poor. A lot of them are probably already on a waiting list or receiving services and there's nothing else to be done. I agree it's a pretty rough start for a kid.I wish someone in Washington would figure out that the economy isn't really all that much better. It's like 1984 or Brave New World everytime I hear that shit. I thought maybe it was just our area--we're rural and backward.Our homeless shelters have been overbooked for years now. And it's summer. Wait til it's ten below.We're seeing more at our Outreach needing help.
I'm noticing more and more coming to feedings in vehicles, that's a sign they are newly homeless or about to be.
It's all over, there is a tent city in our area, I don't go there but the men of the Outreach do and they tell me it's growing each week. Entire families living there and I don't understand why it's being allowed to have children there. Tent cities are bad news
You can't take someone's kids away just because the parents are poor. A lot of them are probably already on a waiting list or receiving services and there's nothing else to be done. I agree it's a pretty rough start for a kid.I wish someone in Washington would figure out that the economy isn't really all that much better. It's like 1984 or Brave New World everytime I hear that shit. I thought maybe it was just our area--we're rural and backward.Our homeless shelters have been overbooked for years now. And it's summer. Wait til it's ten below.We're seeing more at our Outreach needing help.
I'm noticing more and more coming to feedings in vehicles, that's a sign they are newly homeless or about to be.
It's all over, there is a tent city in our area, I don't go there but the men of the Outreach do and they tell me it's growing each week. Entire families living there and I don't understand why it's being allowed to have children there. Tent cities are bad news
More MORE MORE government spending was supposed to help the poor.
Instead, it helped kleptocrats, and drove private sector jobs out of the country.... and wrecked the future of the US unless it is undone very soon.
Oh, shaddup Daws. She knows more than Timmy, that's for sure.Oh so you're a welfare queen !I call bullflop! If you have kids there's all kinds of programs to help .
Very few programs will prevent homelessness.
They can put a roof over your head.
No they can't. Once again some doofus libturd is blabbering about something he knows little of. I deal with these agencies all the time.
Can't compare because all we have is a twice a month food pantry. No soup kitchens. No nuttin. I think your state probably does different than mine. The State here steps in to find emergency housing or find a relative or friend the kids can stay with, or whatever, but it doesn't take custody if the parents are trying and cooperating.You can't take someone's kids away just because the parents are poor. A lot of them are probably already on a waiting list or receiving services and there's nothing else to be done. I agree it's a pretty rough start for a kid.I wish someone in Washington would figure out that the economy isn't really all that much better. It's like 1984 or Brave New World everytime I hear that shit. I thought maybe it was just our area--we're rural and backward.Our homeless shelters have been overbooked for years now. And it's summer. Wait til it's ten below.
I'm noticing more and more coming to feedings in vehicles, that's a sign they are newly homeless or about to be.
It's all over, there is a tent city in our area, I don't go there but the men of the Outreach do and they tell me it's growing each week. Entire families living there and I don't understand why it's being allowed to have children there. Tent cities are bad news
Well, yes you can take them away. I've seen it happen. If a parent is unable to provide shelter, food and the necessities of life the state can step in. Look at food lines, see any young mother with infants? In those cases the state steps in immediately
Can't compare because all we have is a twice a month food pantry. No soup kitchens. No nuttin. I think your state probably does different than mine. The State here steps in to find emergency housing or find a relative or friend the kids can stay with, or whatever, but it doesn't take custody if the parents are trying and cooperating.You can't take someone's kids away just because the parents are poor. A lot of them are probably already on a waiting list or receiving services and there's nothing else to be done. I agree it's a pretty rough start for a kid.I wish someone in Washington would figure out that the economy isn't really all that much better. It's like 1984 or Brave New World everytime I hear that shit. I thought maybe it was just our area--we're rural and backward.I'm noticing more and more coming to feedings in vehicles, that's a sign they are newly homeless or about to be.
It's all over, there is a tent city in our area, I don't go there but the men of the Outreach do and they tell me it's growing each week. Entire families living there and I don't understand why it's being allowed to have children there. Tent cities are bad news
Well, yes you can take them away. I've seen it happen. If a parent is unable to provide shelter, food and the necessities of life the state can step in. Look at food lines, see any young mother with infants? In those cases the state steps in immediately
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Glad they made it back home. Yes, we've talked about CPS before, and I think your state does see things differently than mine.Can't compare because all we have is a twice a month food pantry. No soup kitchens. No nuttin. I think your state probably does different than mine. The State here steps in to find emergency housing or find a relative or friend the kids can stay with, or whatever, but it doesn't take custody if the parents are trying and cooperating.You can't take someone's kids away just because the parents are poor. A lot of them are probably already on a waiting list or receiving services and there's nothing else to be done. I agree it's a pretty rough start for a kid.I wish someone in Washington would figure out that the economy isn't really all that much better. It's like 1984 or Brave New World everytime I hear that shit. I thought maybe it was just our area--we're rural and backward.
It's all over, there is a tent city in our area, I don't go there but the men of the Outreach do and they tell me it's growing each week. Entire families living there and I don't understand why it's being allowed to have children there. Tent cities are bad news
Well, yes you can take them away. I've seen it happen. If a parent is unable to provide shelter, food and the necessities of life the state can step in. Look at food lines, see any young mother with infants? In those cases the state steps in immediately
It probably depends on individual state laws but I know they will step in here if the child lacks shelter and food. We worked with a young woman who lost her child to the state, it took about nine months but finally got them reunited. It's a long and frustrating process
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Right . But the definition of "homeless " is not "living in a tent city ." Those kids have a roof over thier heads .
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Right . But the definition of "homeless " is not "living in a tent city ." Those kids have a roof over thier heads .
Again you don't know what you're talking about, homeless by definition can include having to stay with relatives due to the inability to afford shelter of your own. I do this all the time Timmy, you're clueless and using the thread to rant on "red states" while homelessness is a chronic problem in every state
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Right . But the definition of "homeless " is not "living in a tent city ." Those kids have a roof over thier heads .
Again you don't know what you're talking about, homeless by definition can include having to stay with relatives due to the inability to afford shelter of your own. I do this all the time Timmy, you're clueless and using the thread to rant on "red states" while homelessness is a chronic problem in every state
That's what I said ! Homeless has a specific definition vs the common use of the word.
So it's ok to blame Obama but not red states .
More like "red state -villes"
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Right . But the definition of "homeless " is not "living in a tent city ." Those kids have a roof over thier heads .
Again you don't know what you're talking about, homeless by definition can include having to stay with relatives due to the inability to afford shelter of your own. I do this all the time Timmy, you're clueless and using the thread to rant on "red states" while homelessness is a chronic problem in every state
That's what I said ! Homeless has a specific definition vs the common use of the word.
So it's ok to blame Obama but not red states .
Take your whines about red states and scram. I'm weary of it and you. Furthermore instead of whining about it get off your ass and go help someone.
Massoftwoshits have their fare share of homeless, Timmy
Homeless family population in Boston rises 25 percent - The Boston Globe
Right . But the definition of "homeless " is not "living in a tent city ." Those kids have a roof over thier heads .
Again you don't know what you're talking about, homeless by definition can include having to stay with relatives due to the inability to afford shelter of your own. I do this all the time Timmy, you're clueless and using the thread to rant on "red states" while homelessness is a chronic problem in every state
That's what I said ! Homeless has a specific definition vs the common use of the word.
So it's ok to blame Obama but not red states .
Take your whines about red states and scram. I'm weary of it and you. Furthermore instead of whining about it get off your ass and go help someone.
You don't know what I do to help.
You righties are so two faced . You'll start a thread complaining about homeless numbers , when you would Also eliminate all programs to prevent it !
