Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,060
- 87,511
I am thinking video of Trump watching the riots.
Maybe. But it's gotta be more than just watching. Maybe on camera rooting for the insurgents. Maybe cheering for them to catch Pence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am thinking video of Trump watching the riots.
Joe Biden actually grabbed a Senate Staffer by her pussyI won’t argue with that. The dude just plowed through “grab them by the ****y” on video as if it were a normal thing.
Yeah. My biggest concern was that it would be a typical politician hearing, replete with pontificating and grandstanding. Y'know, come to think of it, the fact that they have clearly avoided the standard pontificating and grandstanding tells me they know they usually pontificate and grandstand. So that's been a positive, otherwise I'd be tuning out quickly.I like their confidence. And their caution thus far.
I've noted their prudence in public communications. Also noted the minimalist grandstanding in the hearings themselves. In short, they are guarding their credibility, their gravitas. Which makes me kinda sort suspect they're holding an ace. May not be a silver-bullet....I doubt they'd try that...but I think it may leave a mark. IMHO
No, the righties have been telling you that exact thing from the very start.But you know less than nothing about the hearings. So your opinion of them therefore means less than nothing.
You guys never seem to get this simple principle.
Have fun playing with yourselfTo an ignorant crybaby who knows nothing about the hearings, we call it anything anything we like. Its not as if you would be able to tell the difference.
Are you ever going to actually debate the topic, or is this ^ weak trash the best we can expect from you?I can accept this as you are easily politically pawned.
How long have you been on this board?
Nevermind. You've learned very little.
And my hopes for JFK Jr. are dashed.Not sure how this fits in.
![]()
Former Meadows aide to testify in surprise Jan. 6 committee hearing
Capitol riot investigators, citing "recently obtained evidence," changed course after deciding to pause their public events until July.www.politico.com
The Jan. 6 select committee is set to hear from a onetime top aide to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows on Tuesday, an abruptly scheduled hearing whose announcement riveted Washington.
Cassidy Hutchinson will testify publicly, according to two people familiar with the committee’s plans, after providing crucial testimony to the panel about significant exchanges among top Donald Trump’s inner circle in the weeks before the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Hutchinson replaced her attorney earlier this month as the select committee’s hearings began; her former attorney was the Trump White House’s chief ethics lawyer, and her new attorney is a longtime ally of former Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
Earlier Monday the select panel announced a surprise hearing, with about 24 hours’ notice, “to present recently obtained evidence and receive witness testimony.” That statement included no details on the testimony or witnesses — and the sudden schedule change intensified intrigue in Washington, where the panel has mounted a carefully choreographed set of hearings about the former president’s election subversion.
It’s unclear why the panel expedited Hutchinson’s hearing, or whether she will appear alongside other significant witnesses. Hutchinson was present during meetings between Meadows and multiple House Republicans who aided Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election. Snippets of her video deposition supported the committee’s contention that several of those Republicans later sought presidential pardons
Only among Trump Humpers.Damn the people aren't outraged... Trump's approval keeps going up.... we need a "SURPRISE" session....
* Schiff's bogus "evidence" X 2.
The Bipartisan committee is doing a wonderful jobThe Nancy Pelosi's selected committee is a freaking JOKE!!!
0.00000000000! micro seconds.
“New” evidence for something already ruled to be not so.
The endless cycles of liberal causes.
So Russian Collusion wasn't a marketing success, you pin head propagandist?We will see. From a marketing perspective it puts a lot on the expectations. Democrats are terrible at marketing so I would not be surprised if it’s not an A bomb.
What did he do that is illegal? You got some US code to cite? How about some evidence? Did you go out and buy you some shiny new Russian Collusion Narrative from your pal and Biden's investor Vlad Putin again?Do you have a link to this ruling that said the insurrection never happened or is this just something you’ve pulled out of your ass?
Every time Donald Trump does something that’s illegal, you pretend it never happened. How’s that working for you so far?
Joe Biden has his day coming up next year.Do you have a link to this ruling that said the insurrection never happened or is this just something you’ve pulled out of your ass?
Every time Donald Trump does something that’s illegal, you pretend it never happened. How’s that working for you so far?
At this point, no one can seriously think the minds of Trump's cult will be opened by anything short of him making a public announcement admitting the Big Lie was a big hoax. That he lied because his enormous ego did not allow for him to graciously acknowledge defeat, and because he saw convincing The Following of the Big Lie as a fund raising opportunity so he could fleece the flock.Seems scheduled pretty sudden… apparently the Jan 6 Committee is excited to present something to your open minds. I bet it’s a pretty big bombshell… any takers?