Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 70,015
- 34,927
Oh now the claim is that it can't be a coup unless they fired weaponsWrong, you only believe her because you really want that to be true…How many weapons were fired by Trump supporters that day?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh now the claim is that it can't be a coup unless they fired weaponsWrong, you only believe her because you really want that to be true…How many weapons were fired by Trump supporters that day?
They’ll never call him because it doesn’t fit their narrative.Because that is the least damning thing brought up
Let me know when Engel testifies by the way
I wouldn’t bet on it. This is Blasé Fraud part 2.Too bad for you the SS agents she claimed to have been quoting are willing to testify it didn't happen.
I wonder if Nazi Piglosi's Clown Show will call them?![]()
Well, did they?Oh now the claim is that it can't be a coup unless they fired weapons
No the agent's statement. Not what someone else tweeted.
Oh, saying "Yep!" to a question of whether Trump incited an insurrection is an assertion, a claim, an attempted rebuttal, for which proof needs to be provided and only conjecture was provided.It wasn't a rebuttal. You literally asked a yes/no question, ya rabid little dummy.
ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX, MEDIAite...No it is the Committee who failed to have the lead agent to testify is what YOU are ignoring.
The Hearsay woman isn't credible yet YOU don't seem to have realized that.
Meanwhile MEDIAite
“A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel,” tweeted NBC News Chief White House Correspondent Peter Alexander on Tuesday."
===
It is being considered real.
You said, "Really?"Oh, saying "Yep!" to a question of whether Trump incited an insurrection is an assertion, a claim, an attempted rebuttal, for which proof needs to be provided and only conjecture was provided.
Not falling for that.
ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX, MEDIAite...
You’re really telling someone else their childish? Really?You said, "Really?"
I said "yep!"
Look at your behavior. So childish. Trump has really done a number on you.
No the agent's statement. Not what someone else tweeted.
Because liars need to lie.The question really should be asked is WHY the Joke 6 committee didn't ask Lead Agent Bobby Engels to testify about it instead of the Hearsay woman who was never there.
Yet another ironic post from a child.^^^Look at your behavior. So childish.
The question was "Did he?" incite an insurrection. You answered "Yep!" with no supporting evidence.You said, "Really?"
I said "yep!"
Look at your behavior. So childish. Trump has really done a number on you.
Yes, I am going to run right out and compile the evidence for a squealing little dumbass who won't even watch the hearings.The question was "Did he?" incite an insurrection. You answered "Yep!" with no supporting evidence.
Heh. No. He's done a number on you, actually. You're the one frothing at the mouth at any negative uncorroborated claim made against him.Look at your behavior. So childish. Trump has really done a number on you.
Show us YOUR proof she didn't know what she said was a lie.
See how that works when you are dealing with hearsay?
When I'm mentioning people who were directly mentioned by this witness as having been quoted as willing to debunk her claims about them, it is imperative that you provide evidence for your claims.Yes, I am going to run right out and compile the evidence for a squealing little dumbass who won't even watch the hearings.
Sure. I'll get right on that.
I am? Huh. Funny. Your posts have the tone of an excitable 3 year old. I post "Yep!", and you pee your panties.Heh. No. He's done a number on you, actually. You're the one frothing at the mouth at any negative uncorroborated claim made against him.