Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,578
- 10,160
- 950
It’s never been about choice. It’s about avoiding the consequence of said choice, or seeing the child to term if the mother seems the supplemental income profitable. This isn’t the handmaidens tale where women are being forced to conceive. In all but the rarest of cases it’s completely voluntary.Let us know when a male cannot physically just walk away after a pregnancy begins and then we can have a serious discussion on pregancies and abortion.....Look who's going all PC on us.....Racist, sexist, misandrist post.![]()
I wonder if any of those “Pro life“ guys tried to get their mistresses to have an abortion.
We’ve seen that happen with Republicans before.
Where are the African Americans? Doesn’t Alabama have a lot of black people living there?![]()
![]()
Tell me, why can a woman, after the sex act, "choose" not to be a parent, yet a man can't?
You want equal rights? Well? I'll be pro-choice for women, if you be pro-choice for men. But I have never met a woman that is pro-choice for men. NOT ONE. Every single woman on the plant is a hypocrite, EVERY SINGLE ONE. None of them believe in equal rights, they all want special rights for women.
![]()
I was talking about in instances where the woman decides to keep the kid but the MAN wants to abort.
Not much CHOICE there, is it, huh? Not much equal rights, eh?
Last edited: