"Thank you" Alabama for helping to turn sane women AGAINST the GOP

Status
Not open for further replies.
D6pIDb0WwAYWzKf


I wonder if any of those “Pro life“ guys tried to get their mistresses to have an abortion.

We’ve seen that happen with Republicans before.

Where are the African Americans? Doesn’t Alabama have a lot of black people living there?
Racist, sexist, misandrist post.
Look who's going all PC on us.....:71:
oh-so-whats-good-for-the-goose-aint-so-good-for-the-gander.jpg



Tell me, why can a woman, after the sex act, "choose" not to be a parent, yet a man can't?

You want equal rights? Well? I'll be pro-choice for women, if you be pro-choice for men. But I have never met a woman that is pro-choice for men. NOT ONE. Every single woman on the plant is a hypocrite, EVERY SINGLE ONE. None of them believe in equal rights, they all want special rights for women.

FPPSuyl.png
Let us know when a male cannot physically just walk away after a pregnancy begins and then we can have a serious discussion on pregancies and abortion.....

I was talking about in instances where the woman decides to keep the kid but the MAN wants to abort. :20:

Not much CHOICE there, is it, huh? Not much equal rights, eh?
It’s never been about choice. It’s about avoiding the consequence of said choice, or seeing the child to term if the mother seems the supplemental income profitable. This isn’t the handmaidens tale where women are being forced to conceive. In all but the rarest of cases it’s completely voluntary.
 
Last edited:
No, the intention is to force the SC to grow some balls and make a decision.



maybe someday the GOP could "grow some ballz" and stop petitioning their government to control their wimminz.
A vagina, isn’t a liscence to kill. Sorry. But murder is wrong regardless of what sex you are. Feel free to turn in your victim card. We’re in the age of “equality”. So you won’t be needing it anymore. Responsibility, agency, and self determination is all you need.
 
Racist, sexist, misandrist post.
Look who's going all PC on us.....:71:
oh-so-whats-good-for-the-goose-aint-so-good-for-the-gander.jpg



Tell me, why can a woman, after the sex act, "choose" not to be a parent, yet a man can't?

You want equal rights? Well? I'll be pro-choice for women, if you be pro-choice for men. But I have never met a woman that is pro-choice for men. NOT ONE. Every single woman on the plant is a hypocrite, EVERY SINGLE ONE. None of them believe in equal rights, they all want special rights for women.

FPPSuyl.png
Let us know when a male cannot physically just walk away after a pregnancy begins and then we can have a serious discussion on pregancies and abortion.....

I was talking about in instances where the woman decides to keep the kid but the MAN wants to abort. :20:

Not much CHOICE there, is it, huh? Not much equal rights, eh?
It’s never been about choice. It’s about avoiding the consequence of said choice, or seeing the child to term if the mother seems the supplemental income profitable. This isn’t the handmaidens take where women are being forced to conceive. In all but the rarest of cases it’s conometely voluntary.

Shut up.

Men aren't allowed to have sex for pleasure and then make a mistake, only women are allowed to have that type of liberal pathology.

Stop calling out the greedy transparent man haters.
 
No, the intention is to force the SC to grow some balls and make a decision.



maybe someday the GOP could "grow some ballz" and stop petitioning their government to control their wimminz.
A vagina, isn’t a liscence to kill. Sorry. But murder is wrong regardless of what sex you are. Feel free to turn in your victim card. We’re in the age of “equality”. So you won’t be needing it anymore. Responsibility, agency, and self determination is all you need.

They don't understand your last sentence.
 
Once again, the GOP shows that white, older, right wing males want to rule over women's rights......Regardless of what the eventual SCOTUS decision will be, the GOP has once again shown their misogynist view.
/——/ They were not turned away by the democRATs infanticide abortion bills?
 
Look who's going all PC on us.....:71:
oh-so-whats-good-for-the-goose-aint-so-good-for-the-gander.jpg



Tell me, why can a woman, after the sex act, "choose" not to be a parent, yet a man can't?

You want equal rights? Well? I'll be pro-choice for women, if you be pro-choice for men. But I have never met a woman that is pro-choice for men. NOT ONE. Every single woman on the plant is a hypocrite, EVERY SINGLE ONE. None of them believe in equal rights, they all want special rights for women.

FPPSuyl.png
Let us know when a male cannot physically just walk away after a pregnancy begins and then we can have a serious discussion on pregancies and abortion.....

I was talking about in instances where the woman decides to keep the kid but the MAN wants to abort. :20:

Not much CHOICE there, is it, huh? Not much equal rights, eh?
It’s never been about choice. It’s about avoiding the consequence of said choice, or seeing the child to term if the mother seems the supplemental income profitable. This isn’t the handmaidens take where women are being forced to conceive. In all but the rarest of cases it’s conometely voluntary.

Shut up.

Men aren't allowed to have sex for pleasure and then make a mistake, only women are allowed to have that type of liberal pathology.

Stop calling out the greedy transparent man haters.
Maybe we could compromise. I have a list of folks needing snuffed out that would make my life a hell of a lot easier. So let’s just legalize murder for all; and let it work itself out In the wash...
 
Let’s back up.

In Roe v. Wade, decided in 1973, the Supreme Court found that a woman’s decision to keep or terminate a pregnancy was her own to make, in consultation with her medical provider, and was legally protected by a constitutional right to privacy. The decision was 7-2.



No, the intention is to force the SC to grow some balls and make a decision.



maybe someday the GOP could "grow some ballz" and stop petitioning their government to control their wimminz.
A vagina, isn’t a liscence to kill. Sorry. But murder is wrong regardless of what sex you are. Feel free to turn in your victim card. We’re in the age of “equality”. So you won’t be needing it anymore. Responsibility, agency, and self determination is all you need.



your ignorant & irrational hysteria isn't a license to kill privacy from government intrusion.
 
Last edited:
By playing the abortion card, Republicans have solidified their standing in the Bible Belt. States they already run

Success in swing states......Virginia, Florida, NC, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona will depend on the women’s vote

Many women are hesitant about abortion. But callously forcing women to bear children from rape or incest will be their worst nightmare
What card? We are saving lives

Republicans across the land are cringing that they now have to defend these punitive abortion laws after claiming for decades that they didn’t support them

Republicans will do well in Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma, but they already do

Women voters in strongholds like Texas, Arizona, Georgia and Florida will revolt and possibly flip those states

Republicans in the rest of the country will lose seats
Lol so flip and vote for infanticide , open borders, free health care for the world.. would they rafter live in a great country or live in chaos ? Gross culture, no freedom, 90% income tax, home invasions, no protection, slavery?

I’d go for a end of abortion and be more responsible.. I know you hate that word lol
 
face it, dumbos...



there is NOTHING "conservative" about government control of human reproduction.
 
Let’s back up.

In Roe v. Wade, decided in 1973, the Supreme Court found that a woman’s decision to keep or terminate a pregnancy was her own to make, in consultation with her medical provider, and was legally protected by a constitutional right to privacy. The decision was 7-2.



No, the intention is to force the SC to grow some balls and make a decision.



maybe someday the GOP could "grow some ballz" and stop petitioning their government to control their wimminz.
A vagina, isn’t a liscence to kill. Sorry. But murder is wrong regardless of what sex you are. Feel free to turn in your victim card. We’re in the age of “equality”. So you won’t be needing it anymore. Responsibility, agency, and self determination is all you need.



your irrational hysteria isn't a license to kill privacy from government intrusion.
Nah. You can dwindle in the past. I, and a great many others like me, will move forward. Murder isn’t private, no matter where the victim is located. Women wanted “equality”. Get ready. Because here it comes. For EVERYONE. Ain’t that a bitch for the homocidal, abortion aficionados..
 
face it, dumbos...



there is NOTHING "conservative" about government control of human reproduction.
No ones controlling your reproduction. That’s on you. However the government is tasked with ensuring everyone’s rights. You don’t want your child to have rights? Don’t conceive.
 
Last edited:
words mean things... it's about legal terminology and the constitution, dummy.


fascists play games with emo words like "murder" to seek government control over private reproduction.
 
sorry, simpleton.. zygotes do not reach THE LEGAL DEFINITION of "persons" described in our constitution.


funny-cartoon-sperm-egg-representing-260nw-84194806.jpg
 
face it, dumbos...



there is NOTHING "conservative" about government control of human reproduction.

Face it prog, there's nothing Constitutional about Roe.

It was supposed to end the debate, instead it make it meaner and longer lived.

Handle it at the State level, and let our national politics move on.
 
words mean things... it's about legal terminology and the constitution, dummy.


fascists play games with emo words like "murder" to seek government control over private reproduction.
Save it for the SC sweetie. We in Alabama have done our part. The people have spoken. Sweet home Alabama. Love it. Or leave it...
 
face it, dumbos...



there is NOTHING "conservative" about government control of human reproduction.

Face it prog, there's nothing Constitutional about Roe.

It was supposed to end the debate, instead it make it meaner and longer lived.

Handle it at the State level, and let our national politics move on.

It was handled at the state level before Roe v Wade

This week has only made matters worse
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top