Samson
Póg Mo Thóin
NoTeaPartyPleez said:Oh, I can almost smell the hypocrisy now
Good to know at least one of your senses work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoTeaPartyPleez said:Oh, I can almost smell the hypocrisy now
what to bring up?
your main assertion was that parents making their teenage daughter continuing with pregnancy is BAD, whereas in reality it is the best thing that can be done in this situation - strictly from physiological and medical point of view.
forcing a teenager to undergo abortion against her will is extremely vicious and though I do not consider it is that often happening it might happen and the legal situation in this case should be outlined as well. It is difficult for me to picture providers jumping on and going forward with an abortion when the teenager clearly does not want it and parents do.
Does not mean it can not happen, though.
So what was I supposed to refute?
The best thing they can do is LET HER DECIDE WHAT TO DO with own body. They should be there to support, advise and correct what they can but in the end, it should be her that decides.
Abortion is no small thing but neither is child birth.
No way. It is not her body, first of all, it is a separate human being inside her body.
A teenager has no idea how the abortion will impact her life and her chances of future possibility to become pregnant neither does she have any idea on psychiatry problems which will inevitably follow - they always do - and should be helped in getting the pregnancy to the term with a possibility of further adoption if the family can not help in raising the child.
Abortion can and should be considered ONLY in a case of grave danger to her health
Free people around the country are leaving your tyrannical shitholes to live near freedom and life loving humans.
With all of these Red States slipping abortion restrictions into their budgets and creating laws requiring transvaginal probes for women seeking to terminate their pregnancy, we in the Blue States say thanks for the opportunity to serve the sheer tsunami of women coming into the New Jersey/New York area in order to obtain abortions.
It will be a veritable boom in lodging, shuttle transportation, restaurants and retail much as we saw in 1970.
Again, thanks...or maybe I should say, "Thank ya'll!"
With all of these Red States slipping abortion restrictions into their budgets and creating laws requiring transvaginal probes for women seeking to terminate their pregnancy, we in the Blue States say thanks for the opportunity to serve the sheer tsunami of women coming into the New Jersey/New York area in order to obtain abortions.
It will be a veritable boom in lodging, shuttle transportation, restaurants and retail much as we saw in 1970.
Again, thanks...or maybe I should say, "Thank ya'll!"
Liberal Democrat Dream Scenario....liberate women & fathers to kill their babies...and be proud and profitable.
No, it should NOT be different from existing law because she is a minor. That is wrong.
IF you want abortion to be limited to the health of the mother only, then the abortion law itself needs to be changed (though you are going to need an amendment for that). Existing law should apply to the minor the same as it applies to an 18 year old child.
You want to know emotional distress, a parent FORCING a 17 year old to carry to term when she does not want to would be FAR more detrimental. It would not even be in the same ballpark. Why the hell would she have the right to abort of she were 18 but suddenly the ability to control herself is ripped away at 17. That is asinine.
what to bring up?
your main assertion was that parents making their teenage daughter continuing with pregnancy is BAD, whereas in reality it is the best thing that can be done in this situation - strictly from physiological and medical point of view.
forcing a teenager to undergo abortion against her will is extremely vicious and though I do not consider it is that often happening it might happen and the legal situation in this case should be outlined as well. It is difficult for me to picture providers jumping on and going forward with an abortion when the teenager clearly does not want it and parents do.
Does not mean it can not happen, though.
So what was I supposed to refute?
Woa does that really happen? I think you lie.
think again
Woa does that really happen? I think you lie.
think again
Never read it or heard of it to normal teens. She would fight back a doctor. I would think, provvide a link and not some asshole in ohio that beat the girls into a miscarriage
Teach your daughters some facts about birth control and maybe they won't be needing to come to the big city to get their "little problem" taken care of.
With all of these Red States slipping abortion restrictions into their budgets and creating laws requiring transvaginal probes for women seeking to terminate their pregnancy, we in the Blue States say thanks for the opportunity to serve the sheer tsunami of women coming into the New Jersey/New York area in order to obtain abortions.
It will be a veritable boom in lodging, shuttle transportation, restaurants and retail much as we saw in 1970.
Again, thanks...or maybe I should say, "Thank ya'll!"
Liberal Democrat Dream Scenario....liberate women & fathers to kill their babies...and be proud and profitable.
I wonder why the liberals have such a low opinion of women. They make it seem like women are incapable of rational thought. Curious really.
wow, something to be proud of...are all blue states made up of such sick and twisted people?
Hey, it's the Republican way! Just think of all the jobs created and profits to be calculated based on someone else's misery!
If you find this repugnant, then please step up as a private citizen to offer your support of all the unwanted children that will be born out of these new restrictions, because their mommas and daddies won't be able to afford them. Step up or shut up.
Anyone who believes in Late Term Abortion is a complete and utter Idiot.
If a woman can't decide by week 20 to keep a baby then I suggest she may be a Brainless Lib.
no kidding, 20 weeks is almost a FIVE MONTH old baby... yet they still scream over some laws in other states
liberals are brain dead robots or at least this Op is
The far right has you so focused on the 20-week stipulation that you're not paying attention to the fine details. I suggest you look into the actual state laws going into effect and stop acting like a trained seal at GOP-Sea World. See the Guttmacher information I just posted for Texas.