Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herI see that since you can’t show where she has been disrespectful, we can only assume she isn’tI did not claim it. I asked you a question. You are insane. Or insanely dishonest.
She disagreed with the Trump collective, and that is rude and disrespectful.
People that have no ability to think for themselves cannot take it when someone says something not covered by their talking points...thus they attack the messenger instead
It really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
Go fuck yourself, sick loser.You're very ill.It is not a freedom of speech issue, the government has not tried to stop him from saying it.
What it is, is a "why are you having sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl" issue...but you do not seem to find it odd for a grown man to have sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl so I guess it is something you experience yourself.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I am not the one that made sexual comments about her or defended said comments.
those are the very ill people, but you more than likely agree with them
It's a tad indelicate, but he has the right to be a tad indelicate.
I have no issue with freedom of speech.
It is not a freedom of speech issue, the government has not tried to stop him from saying it.
What it is, is a "why are you having sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl" issue...but you do not seem to find it odd for a grown man to have sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl so I guess it is something you experience yourself.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
When you belittle men and women of integrity who work hard and you will never hear of while uplifting charlatans who will never produce anything but angst, jealousies, pettiness, and eventually violence and death as an agenda then it has a right to be brought up. Funny how the accomplishment of the 16 year old sounds identical to agendas being pushed to steal her neighbor's wealth.She has gotten the worlds attention and generated a global youth movementShe has accomplished little to nothing.----------------------------- she is just a little 'david hogg' , les wait and see the results of her show before you start crowing GGator .IMDB.Com ^ | 09/25/2019 |
Granted, most of her credits are from 2019. But you should know that this girl comes from a whole family of actors
Wow, she is a little star. no wonder you people are so jealous of her
She is a world wide phenomenon. She has people in this country talking about her.
just think, she is 16 and has accomplished more than you have your whole life.
Screeching that you are angry because the world has not bowed to your demands is not an accomplishment.
Yes the pleasure cruise across the atlantic sound great but is actually a fairly mundane accomplishment which many people have been doing for ceturies if not not millenia.
She has also drawn the wrath of the conservative movement
Quite an accomplishment for a 16 year old
inciting fear, she must be a demofk.It does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herI see that since you can’t show where she has been disrespectful, we can only assume she isn’tI did not claim it. I asked you a question. You are insane. Or insanely dishonest.
She disagreed with the Trump collective, and that is rude and disrespectful.
People that have no ability to think for themselves cannot take it when someone says something not covered by their talking points...thus they attack the messenger instead
It really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
It's a tad indelicate, but he has the right to be a tad indelicate.
I have no issue with freedom of speech.
It is not a freedom of speech issue, the government has not tried to stop him from saying it.
What it is, is a "why are you having sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl" issue...but you do not seem to find it odd for a grown man to have sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl so I guess it is something you experience yourself.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I don't find her appealing. Take another step toward reported, why don't you?
So did Miley Cyrus.She has gotten the worlds attention and generated a global youth movementShe has accomplished little to nothing.----------------------------- she is just a little 'david hogg' , les wait and see the results of her show before you start crowing GGator .IMDB.Com ^ | 09/25/2019 |
Granted, most of her credits are from 2019. But you should know that this girl comes from a whole family of actors
Wow, she is a little star. no wonder you people are so jealous of her
She is a world wide phenomenon. She has people in this country talking about her.
just think, she is 16 and has accomplished more than you have your whole life.
Screeching that you are angry because the world has not bowed to your demands is not an accomplishment.
Yes the pleasure cruise across the atlantic sound great but is actually a fairly mundane accomplishment which many people have been doing for ceturies if not not millenia.
She has also drawn the wrath of the conservative movement
Quite an accomplishment for a 16 year old
------------------------------------------- 'reagan' and old man 'bush' and then other 'bushes' and 'mcstain' types helped destroy the USA in 1986 with their first AMNESTY Nosmo . Anyway , the jerks I just mentioned were responsible for making me and my Deplorable Brothers and Sisters Nosmo . ----------------- Go TRUMP !!Regan dealt with grace and dignity. Trump and his mouth breathing acolytes act like the love child of time share salesmen and professional wrestlers--------------------------------------- TRUMPS Deplorables are a product of 'republican conservatives' and in my case a product of 'bush and 'juan mcstain' type republican conservatives . And also included would be 'reagan' type conservatives for those that can remember that far back Nosmo .They are not Conservatives. Conservatives have political principles.What I can’t believe is the hostility directed at this young woman from conservatives
If you disagree with her on climate change, show where she is wrong.
But the conservative hate and smear campaign is going full throttle attacking both the 16 year old and her parents
These creatures are Trumpians. And like their demigod, they always punch down.
As I said LOCAL climatde change not global climate change.Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herI see that since you can’t show where she has been disrespectful, we can only assume she isn’t
She disagreed with the Trump collective, and that is rude and disrespectful.
People that have no ability to think for themselves cannot take it when someone says something not covered by their talking points...thus they attack the messenger instead
It really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
We are seeing mass extinction. Not in man but in other creatures. Eventually, it will catch up with us
It's a tad indelicate, but he has the right to be a tad indelicate.
I have no issue with freedom of speech.
It is not a freedom of speech issue, the government has not tried to stop him from saying it.
What it is, is a "why are you having sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl" issue...but you do not seem to find it odd for a grown man to have sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl so I guess it is something you experience yourself.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I don't find her appealing. Take another step toward reported, why don't you?
Yet you defend sexual comments about her...why is that?
oh, and feel free to report me little man. Either shit or get off the pot
As I said LOCAL climatde change not global climate change.Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herShe disagreed with the Trump collective, and that is rude and disrespectful.
People that have no ability to think for themselves cannot take it when someone says something not covered by their talking points...thus they attack the messenger instead
It really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
We are seeing mass extinction. Not in man but in other creatures. Eventually, it will catch up with us
You are quite wrong.
There is always mass extinction of one kind or another of one speceis or another somehwere.
Clearly thought she is not referring to that. Science does not support her.
Except it does ageree with me because that is an ESTIMATEAs I said LOCAL climatde change not global climate change.Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herIt really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
We are seeing mass extinction. Not in man but in other creatures. Eventually, it will catch up with us
You are quite wrong.
There is always mass extinction of one kind or another of one speceis or another somehwere.
Clearly thought she is not referring to that. Science does not support her.
Seems science does not agree with you on the extinction thing..
The Extinction Crisis
We're currently experiencing the worst spate of species die-offs since the loss of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Although extinction is a natural phenomenon, it occurs at a natural “background” rate of about one to five species per year. Scientists estimate we're now losing species at up to 1,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day
It is not a freedom of speech issue, the government has not tried to stop him from saying it.
What it is, is a "why are you having sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl" issue...but you do not seem to find it odd for a grown man to have sexual thoughts about a 16 year old girl so I guess it is something you experience yourself.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I don't find her appealing. Take another step toward reported, why don't you?
Yet you defend sexual comments about her...why is that?
oh, and feel free to report me little man. Either shit or get off the pot
I've not defended anything of the sort, Nancy.
I have a name for you: Nick Sandman.What I can’t believe is the hostility directed at this young woman from conservatives
If you disagree with her on climate change, show where she is wrong.
But the conservative hate and smear campaign is going full throttle attacking both the 16 year old and her parents
Except it does ageree with me because that is an ESTIMATEAs I said LOCAL climatde change not global climate change.Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking her
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
We are seeing mass extinction. Not in man but in other creatures. Eventually, it will catch up with us
You are quite wrong.
There is always mass extinction of one kind or another of one speceis or another somehwere.
Clearly thought she is not referring to that. Science does not support her.
Seems science does not agree with you on the extinction thing..
The Extinction Crisis
We're currently experiencing the worst spate of species die-offs since the loss of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Although extinction is a natural phenomenon, it occurs at a natural “background” rate of about one to five species per year. Scientists estimate we're now losing species at up to 1,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day
It's amazing to see someone strut in the gutter.------------------------------------------- 'reagan' and old man 'bush' and then other 'bushes' and 'mcstain' types helped destroy the USA in 1986 with their first AMNESTY Nosmo . Anyway , the jerks I just mentioned were responsible for making me and my Deplorable Brothers and Sisters Nosmo . ----------------- Go TRUMP !!Regan dealt with grace and dignity. Trump and his mouth breathing acolytes act like the love child of time share salesmen and professional wrestlers--------------------------------------- TRUMPS Deplorables are a product of 'republican conservatives' and in my case a product of 'bush and 'juan mcstain' type republican conservatives . And also included would be 'reagan' type conservatives for those that can remember that far back Nosmo .They are not Conservatives. Conservatives have political principles.What I can’t believe is the hostility directed at this young woman from conservatives
If you disagree with her on climate change, show where she is wrong.
But the conservative hate and smear campaign is going full throttle attacking both the 16 year old and her parents
These creatures are Trumpians. And like their demigod, they always punch down.
You must be a castrated shaman of some kind, or twinkle-toed. Jimmy Carter?
Considered one of the great books of the 20th Century.
Lolita - Wikipedia
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I don't find her appealing. Take another step toward reported, why don't you?
Yet you defend sexual comments about her...why is that?
oh, and feel free to report me little man. Either shit or get off the pot
I've not defended anything of the sort, Nancy.
Do not lie, the proof is just a few post up. You called it "indelicate" which means you have no problem with it other than the wording. Then you defended having sexual attractions towards 16 year olds and attacked me for not being sexually attracted to 16 year olds.
keep digging the hole deeper.
So, which part of her do you find the most sexually appealing...
I don't find her appealing. Take another step toward reported, why don't you?
Yet you defend sexual comments about her...why is that?
oh, and feel free to report me little man. Either shit or get off the pot
I've not defended anything of the sort, Nancy.
Do not lie, the proof is just a few post up. You called it "indelicate" which means you have no problem with it other than the wording. Then you defended having sexual attractions towards 16 year olds and attacked me for not being sexually attracted to 16 year olds.
Visiting hours are over. You have arts and crafts therapy over in "D" ward.
Now run along.
These things show up locallyAs I said LOCAL climatde change not global climate change.Many, many have died due to climate change. Massive drought in the Sudan, hurricanes, wildfires.......all made worse by climate changeIt does not support her and she is not more knowledgeable.I’m afraid science does support her and she demonstrates more knowledge of the issue than the conservatives who are so visciously attacking herShe disagreed with the Trump collective, and that is rude and disrespectful.
People that have no ability to think for themselves cannot take it when someone says something not covered by their talking points...thus they attack the messenger instead
It really has nothing to do with Trump she was addressing the UN.
Most people are attacking her message and it needs to be attacked. SHe is not well informed and is essentially repeating whatever she has been told to.
Science does not support her and she is simply being used by cllimate alarmists to present ridiculous emotional arguments as opposed to reasonable information.
Regardless of who she is or how old she is if you make someone into a poster chiild for a cause you open them up to ridicule.
She claims people are DYING RIGHT now. Sure they are there are always people dying somehwere for some reason. But so far no one can point to deaths caused by global climate change. Starvation and famine from local drought caused by local climate change? Sure but not for the reasons she is claiming.
She claims we are at the beginings of a mass extinction. Is that possible? Sure. Is is supported by science? NO.
She said the world is burning? Is it? No.
Greta has not tried to inform the world of the scientific consensus which is that the climate IS changing and man has SOME affect on these changes.
She is adopting a ridiculous alarmist stance predicting doom and gloom exactly like an evangelical preacher predicting the rapture. And with just as much crediblity and scientific support.
We are seeing mass extinction. Not in man but in other creatures. Eventually, it will catch up with us
You are quite wrong.
There is always mass extinction of one kind or another of one speceis or another somehwere.
Clearly thought she is not referring to that. Science does not support her.
