The abuse of Greta

The Purge said:
If you check out her photos young Greta is being escorted around the country by her handler – far left activist Luisa-Marie Neubauer.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
This Is What I Wanted To Know
The Bottom Of The Page Is ONE
Telling Us Who Luisa-Marie Neubauer's Handler's Are:

View attachment 280971

So, her handlers are some of the most philanthropic people on the planet?

Thanks for the information.
You mean the are some of the most political douchebags on the planet.

You claim to be a libertarian, and you're defending Soros? The guy is a communist.

Any libertarian would tell you it is his money and he is free to do what he wants with it.

Though, he was not who I was referring to as being philanthropic.
 
Think its ok for a young person to speak in support of what they believe to be true, your not required too believe it your self. why would many of you treat a child in such an unkind manner.

Could you repeat this in English?
 
Go fuck yourself, sick loser.

So, in recap. You attack me for calling out those that make sexual post about this 16 year old, but say not a damn thing about those post.

I think that is all we need to know about you. I am sorry for calling out your buddies
No matter how the debate starts out, you always end up making it personal and head for the gutter. That says everything about you.

Once again, I am not the one making sexual references about a 16 year old. I am not that one that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year old.

Yet, here you are going after me and by your silence giving your stamp of approval to those statements.
So? There's nuts everywhere. You sure get sidetracked easily.

Somethings are worth pointing out even if they are off topic. The fact you attack me for calling out sexual statements about 16 year olds but have nothing bad to say about said comments is worth pointing out.

Why did you choose to attack me and not the person that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year olds?
I don't respond to every idiot that isn't conversing with me.
 
So, in recap. You attack me for calling out those that make sexual post about this 16 year old, but say not a damn thing about those post.

I think that is all we need to know about you. I am sorry for calling out your buddies
No matter how the debate starts out, you always end up making it personal and head for the gutter. That says everything about you.

It's all he's got.

Yep, not being attracted to 16 year olds is all I have. But I can live with that. Do you have trouble controlling your sexual attraction to 16 year olds?
Easily manipulated, huh.

Not at all, which is why I am not attracted to 16 year olds. How about you? do you find them appealing?
I was attracted to a lot of 16 year olds....
.....about 54 years ago.
 
So, in recap. You attack me for calling out those that make sexual post about this 16 year old, but say not a damn thing about those post.

I think that is all we need to know about you. I am sorry for calling out your buddies
No matter how the debate starts out, you always end up making it personal and head for the gutter. That says everything about you.

Once again, I am not the one making sexual references about a 16 year old. I am not that one that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year old.

Yet, here you are going after me and by your silence giving your stamp of approval to those statements.
So? There's nuts everywhere. You sure get sidetracked easily.

Somethings are worth pointing out even if they are off topic. The fact you attack me for calling out sexual statements about 16 year olds but have nothing bad to say about said comments is worth pointing out.

Why did you choose to attack me and not the person that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year olds?
I don't respond to every idiot that isn't conversing with me.

yet you went out of your way to attack me...so that was more important to you than calling out people for their sexual comments about a 16 year old.

Why was I more important to you?
 
No matter how the debate starts out, you always end up making it personal and head for the gutter. That says everything about you.

Once again, I am not the one making sexual references about a 16 year old. I am not that one that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year old.

Yet, here you are going after me and by your silence giving your stamp of approval to those statements.
So? There's nuts everywhere. You sure get sidetracked easily.

Somethings are worth pointing out even if they are off topic. The fact you attack me for calling out sexual statements about 16 year olds but have nothing bad to say about said comments is worth pointing out.

Why did you choose to attack me and not the person that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year olds?
I don't respond to every idiot that isn't conversing with me.

yet you went out of your way to attack me...so that was more important to you than calling out people for their sexual comments about a 16 year old.

Why was I more important to you?
I like to needle you.
 
Once again, I am not the one making sexual references about a 16 year old. I am not that one that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year old.

Yet, here you are going after me and by your silence giving your stamp of approval to those statements.
So? There's nuts everywhere. You sure get sidetracked easily.

Somethings are worth pointing out even if they are off topic. The fact you attack me for calling out sexual statements about 16 year olds but have nothing bad to say about said comments is worth pointing out.

Why did you choose to attack me and not the person that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year olds?
I don't respond to every idiot that isn't conversing with me.

yet you went out of your way to attack me...so that was more important to you than calling out people for their sexual comments about a 16 year old.

Why was I more important to you?
I like to needle you.

So, needling me was more important than calling out someone for sexual comments about a 16 year old.

you have messed up priorities in my mind.
 
Republicans add to the debt, just like Democrats, the last President to lower the debt was Coolidge, he was a Conservative.
Who's spent more since Coolidge?

Democrats or Republicans?

Be honest.

I have no idea, many have claimed a Democratic President and a Republican Congress usually add more debt. We should not add to the debt at all but I realize both parties will continue to add to the debt.
 
So? There's nuts everywhere. You sure get sidetracked easily.

Somethings are worth pointing out even if they are off topic. The fact you attack me for calling out sexual statements about 16 year olds but have nothing bad to say about said comments is worth pointing out.

Why did you choose to attack me and not the person that said a man has to be castrated not to be sexually attracted to a 16 year olds?
I don't respond to every idiot that isn't conversing with me.

yet you went out of your way to attack me...so that was more important to you than calling out people for their sexual comments about a 16 year old.

Why was I more important to you?
I like to needle you.

So, needling me was more important than calling out someone for sexual comments about a 16 year old.

you have messed up priorities in my mind.
Whatever.
 
I for one tend to not listen to people that do not respect others. To me she was disrespectful to the U.N. other than that, I wish her well and I hope she has a good trip back home.
So, I take it, you never listen to Trump then? Based on your stated standard that is.

For the most part, no. I don't like the way he runs his administration. His tweets are annoying, he should ban himself from Twitter. He needs to learn to control his responses. Many are just plain wrong.
 
,.l
Yup.

I feel the same about any kid attacked, whether they they are passionate about a political slogan or passionate about the environment. How about you? Are you partisanly selective?

So relieved that Coyote is here with her superior morals! Where can we see the tirades about abuse of Barron Trump, whose sin was being related to Donald J. Trump? I don't recall seeing any posts. The morals seem to be quite selective regarding when they assert themselves.

Where this rule come out of anyway? People have been making kids since day one, for any reason. It was irresponsible as fuck for leftists to choose the retarded girl as their idol.

You don’t recall seeing any posts because you are either too fucking lazy or too incompetent to actually look for them. A number of folks on here that are disgusted with the level of attacks on Greta were also disgusted with the baseless attacks on Barron. It shouldn’t be a partisan issue.


She's the one who came over and started taunting, "how dare you" in some evil twisted way, lashing out saying she won't forgive anyone. Hey, she opened herself up for ridicule.

Hmm sounds a lot like the Catholic kid that smirked and taunted a Native American. I guess according to your standards of behavior that justifies adults shredding his character.

No, had she been polite, then there would be no need for opposition to throw barbs. Just saying that whenever one taunts and starts with their snarky behavior, theyd better be ready.
Then that would justify the abuse heaped on the Catholic kid. I disagree.
 
"Only in MAGA land would people compare the Covington Catholic boys to Greta Thunberg. The latter campaigns to save the planet, while the former do tomahawk chops and wear MAGA hats and hire PR firms to save their own asses. Your side's activists suck, truly..."

by Time Wise
What happened to little aoc ?
Go threaten a little girl and her families lives for doing home spun comedy and then get back to us ..silenced with threats of violence for just kidding around on you tube



Greta, the catlick boy , Hogg,

All exploited and abused by the sicko misfit left for whatever agenda of the day they're crying about
It's all about shutting down free speech.
 
,.l
So relieved that Coyote is here with her superior morals! Where can we see the tirades about abuse of Barron Trump, whose sin was being related to Donald J. Trump? I don't recall seeing any posts. The morals seem to be quite selective regarding when they assert themselves.

Where this rule come out of anyway? People have been making kids since day one, for any reason. It was irresponsible as fuck for leftists to choose the retarded girl as their idol.

You don’t recall seeing any posts because you are either too fucking lazy or too incompetent to actually look for them. A number of folks on here that are disgusted with the level of attacks on Greta were also disgusted with the baseless attacks on Barron. It shouldn’t be a partisan issue.


She's the one who came over and started taunting, "how dare you" in some evil twisted way, lashing out saying she won't forgive anyone. Hey, she opened herself up for ridicule.

Hmm sounds a lot like the Catholic kid that smirked and taunted a Native American. I guess according to your standards of behavior that justifies adults shredding his character.

No, had she been polite, then there would be no need for opposition to throw barbs. Just saying that whenever one taunts and starts with their snarky behavior, theyd better be ready.
Then that would justify the abuse heaped on the Catholic kid. I disagree.
The Catholic kid wasn't rude.
 
bripat9643 said:
You mean the are some of the most political douchebags on the planet.

You claim to be a libertarian, and you're defending Soros? The guy is a communist.
GG & RW Are Just Blabbing For Troll Value Now
 
koshergrl said:
It's all about shutting down free speech.
Yep
It Always Is
The Little Fascists Are Going To MAKE The Governments Do What They Want
....Collectively
With Out Regard To The Will Of Their Peoples
 
The Purge said:
If you check out her photos young Greta is being escorted around the country by her handler – far left activist Luisa-Marie Neubauer.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
This Is What I Wanted To Know
The Bottom Of The Page Is ONE
Telling Us Who Luisa-Marie Neubauer's Handler's Are:

View attachment 280971

So, her handlers are some of the most philanthropic people on the planet?

Thanks for the information.
You mean the are some of the most political douchebags on the planet.

You claim to be a libertarian, and you're defending Soros? The guy is a communist.

Any libertarian would tell you it is his money and he is free to do what he wants with it.

Though, he was not who I was referring to as being philanthropic.
That's true, it is his money, but he's still a Stalinist douchebag. You called him "one the most philanthropic people on the planet." Donating money to leftwing propaganda organs is hardly what I would call "philanthropic."
 

Forum List

Back
Top