- Thread starter
- #421
Moreso, history is going with that
That the last GOP budget was 162 billion in defict and the 2009 one with Obama adding 500 billion to the dem lead congress busget was a defict of 1.4 trillion?
I agree
And
That Tarp led by GWB as well as being Bi partisan saved the economy from its self induces collapse? ( not including the part of Tarp Obama used we never got back)
I agree
And that GWB had no more to do with the collapse than BHO did?
I agree
Because if he did then you have to blame the dem controlled congress even more as they write the laws as well as the budgets
And that the jobs that have been created have more to do with fracking than stimulus?
I agree
Five quarters of negative GDP
Housing market collapse
Losing 700,000 + jobs a month
Financial sector collapsing
Auto industry collapsing
You can make all the arguments you want on whether any of this was Bush's fault. What you can't argue is Bush's response as the American economy went into freefall. Bush's initial response was denial, it was followed by rhetoric that he needed to wait for the economy to self correct..........it didn't
It was not till the Fall of 2008 that Bush finally started to take the economic collapse seriously. He stopped listening to Cheney and started listening to Paulson
Bush did finally initiate TARP, but with no collateral being required. The Bush TARP was marginally effective and the Banks and auto companies were still begging for money when Obama took office
Obama saved the banks, saved the auto industry and passed a major stimulus package that reversed the trends of negative GDP and negative employment
HMMM what did GWB do to cause that?
Marginally effective?
Dude we were done without it
there trillions that event savfed the middle class will never be known
10s of trillion in 401ks alone
The auto industry?
better get your facts straight
The tax payer and GWB "saved" the auto industry against the will of the people
and as far as the job loss?
that did not stop for another year
again what did GWB do to cause it?
At the end of 2008, General Motors and Chrysler were bleeding billions of dollars a month, and nobody in the private sector wanted to lend to them. Even the supposedly liberal Brookings Institution put out a report saying they should be allowed to go bust, with their factories and machinery being sold off to the highest bidder. Today, things look very different. A few weeks ago, General Motors reported that it made $7.6 billion in profit last year. Even Chrysler, which is now controlled by Fiat, made money in 2011. So Biden was telling the truth when he said, in reference to the Republican candidates, that the President made the tough call [he] was right, and they were dead wrong.
The only problem with Bidens history lesson is that the man with steel in his spine he referred to should have been George W. Bush, not Barack Obama. Lest we forget, it was Bush rather than Obama who initiated the government rescue of the auto companies.
An Inconvenient Truth: It Was George W. Bush Who Bailed Out the Automakers : The New Yorker