bendog
Diamond Member
Well, it was an instruction for the district court to give him a do over in stating a non-discriminatory basis for the question. And the Trumpbots were all aghast at the 'traitor' Roberts. LOLWhat Barr thinks is irrelevant.And Barr thinks Trump should get a do over from Roberts for failing to come up with a non-discriminatory reason for the question in the first place. LOL
And I think Roberts will give him his mulligan.
The ruling itself required the lower court to conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding a non-discriminatory reason, so yeah.
But, that's not a mulligan. It's a remand for further findings.
.