The definitive guide to the 2nd Amendment

[P@triot]

we have a Ninth Amendment; all I need is a petty cash fund, for that purpose.

And...uh....how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

 

[P@triot]

This country is not armed well enough

You are the enemy of my Country. And my Oath I took long ago that I am still bound to tells me that you shall not succeed.

Yes... Rustic is the enemy of Cuba (or whatever other oppressive nation your dumb ass aligns itself with). But you are the enemy of the U.S. And your veiled threats against others on USMB is not going unnoticed.

People like Rustic have already succeeded. Everyone who upholds and defends the U.S. Constitution already has.

 

[danielpalos]

we have a Ninth Amendment; all I need is a petty cash fund, for that purpose.

And...uh....how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

because, you are too clueless and Causeless to be anything more than frivolous.

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Article of Amendment is about the security of a free State; it says so, in the first clause that matters, not the second clause that follows.

So Daniel now wants everyone to believe that prefatory clause maters but not the operative clause.

 

[P@triot]

You said it. You said none of the amendments protect individual rights. Now explain how the first only protects you if you are a member of a regulated group.

stop with your spam. we are discussing our Second Amendment, not Your diversions.

In other words, you painted yourself into a corner with your bullshit, hadit called you out on it, and now you’re trying to divert from that reality. Typical leftist.

 

[P@triot]

we have a Ninth Amendment; all I need is a petty cash fund, for that purpose.

And...uh....how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

because, you are too clueless and Causeless to be anything more than frivolous.

Personal attacks without addressing the subject matter is a violation of USMB policy. So I ask again - how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

You clearly had no clue what the 9th Amendment even said when you made that ignorant comment.

 

[P@triot]

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Article of Amendment is about the security of a free State; it says so, in the first clause that matters, not the second clause that follows.

So Daniel now wants everyone to believe that prefatory clause maters but not the operative clause.

the first clause is Express, not implied.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This country is not armed well enough

You are the enemy of my Country. And my Oath I took long ago that I am still bound to tells me that you shall not succeed.

Yes... Rustic is the enemy of Cuba (or whatever other oppressive nation your dumb ass aligns itself with). But you are the enemy of the U.S. And your veiled threats against others on USMB is not going unnoticed.

People like Rustic have already succeeded. Everyone who upholds and defends the U.S. Constitution already has.

And what exactly am I threatening to do again? I do expose your bunch for what you. I remember that Hitler, Stalin, Moa, and many others also claimed to be Patriots. Much like your bunch does today. You just defend the parts of the Constitution that agrees with you and condemn the parts that don't. I defend the entire thing. You want to rewrite it to suit your own ends, cupcake. I paid the price and people like me also paid for it with out blood and life. I keep a copy of it on my desk and the reason I rip your sorry asses so bad is it's at my finger tips. The reason you are ripped up so badly is that you misinterpret it over and over again by only reading part of it that suits your own agenda. Your bunch are about as much patriots as every other world wanna be dictator like Mousilini and Stalin. They called themselves "Socialists" but were in fact "Dictators". You call yourself "Patriot" when you are in fact a "Traitor". Therefore, you are the enemy of the state.

 

[Rustic]

This country is not armed well enough

You are the enemy of my Country. And my Oath I took long ago that I am still bound to tells me that you shall not succeed.

Yes... Rustic is the enemy of Cuba (or whatever other oppressive nation your dumb ass aligns itself with). But you are the enemy of the U.S. And your veiled threats against others on USMB is not going unnoticed.

People like Rustic have already succeeded. Everyone who upholds and defends the U.S. Constitution already has.

And what exactly am I threatening to do again? I do expose your bunch for what you. I remember that Hitler, Stalin, Moa, and many others also claimed to be Patriots. Much like your bunch does today. You just defend the parts of the Constitution that agrees with you and condemn the parts that don't. I defend the entire thing. You want to rewrite it to suit your own ends, cupcake. I paid the price and people like me also paid for it with out blood and life. I keep a copy of it on my desk and the reason I rip your sorry asses so bad is it's at my finger tips. The reason you are ripped up so badly is that you misinterpret it over and over again by only reading part of it that suits your own agenda. Your bunch are about as much patriots as every other world wanna be dictator like Mousilini and Stalin. They called themselves "Socialists" but were in fact "Dictators". You call yourself "Patriot" when you are in fact a "Traitor". Therefore, you are the enemy of the state.

Yes, we know you’re a gun grabber...

 

[Daryl Hunt]

we have a Ninth Amendment; all I need is a petty cash fund, for that purpose.

And...uh....how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

because, you are too clueless and Causeless to be anything more than frivolous.

Personal attacks without addressing the subject matter is a violation of USMB policy. So I ask again - how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

You clearly had no clue what the 9th Amendment even said when you made that ignorant comment.

Well, viewing my trusty book on my desk, I am quite familiar with the 9th. Now, instead of just insulting, let's hear how you came to this conclusion. Otherwise, the only clueless statement here is yours. Just remember, I have the Amendment at my fingertips.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This country is not armed well enough

You are the enemy of my Country. And my Oath I took long ago that I am still bound to tells me that you shall not succeed.

Yes... Rustic is the enemy of Cuba (or whatever other oppressive nation your dumb ass aligns itself with). But you are the enemy of the U.S. And your veiled threats against others on USMB is not going unnoticed.

People like Rustic have already succeeded. Everyone who upholds and defends the U.S. Constitution already has.

And what exactly am I threatening to do again? I do expose your bunch for what you. I remember that Hitler, Stalin, Moa, and many others also claimed to be Patriots. Much like your bunch does today. You just defend the parts of the Constitution that agrees with you and condemn the parts that don't. I defend the entire thing. You want to rewrite it to suit your own ends, cupcake. I paid the price and people like me also paid for it with out blood and life. I keep a copy of it on my desk and the reason I rip your sorry asses so bad is it's at my finger tips. The reason you are ripped up so badly is that you misinterpret it over and over again by only reading part of it that suits your own agenda. Your bunch are about as much patriots as every other world wanna be dictator like Mousilini and Stalin. They called themselves "Socialists" but were in fact "Dictators". You call yourself "Patriot" when you are in fact a "Traitor". Therefore, you are the enemy of the state.

Yes, we know you’re a gun grabber...

So, you ran out of an argument since I hit you dead on the head. So you resort to your normal bag of short sentence lie. Good for you. I don't expect anything more from a traitor.

 

[Rustic]

This country is not armed well enough

You are the enemy of my Country. And my Oath I took long ago that I am still bound to tells me that you shall not succeed.

Yes... Rustic is the enemy of Cuba (or whatever other oppressive nation your dumb ass aligns itself with). But you are the enemy of the U.S. And your veiled threats against others on USMB is not going unnoticed.

People like Rustic have already succeeded. Everyone who upholds and defends the U.S. Constitution already has.

And what exactly am I threatening to do again? I do expose your bunch for what you. I remember that Hitler, Stalin, Moa, and many others also claimed to be Patriots. Much like your bunch does today. You just defend the parts of the Constitution that agrees with you and condemn the parts that don't. I defend the entire thing. You want to rewrite it to suit your own ends, cupcake. I paid the price and people like me also paid for it with out blood and life. I keep a copy of it on my desk and the reason I rip your sorry asses so bad is it's at my finger tips. The reason you are ripped up so badly is that you misinterpret it over and over again by only reading part of it that suits your own agenda. Your bunch are about as much patriots as every other world wanna be dictator like Mousilini and Stalin. They called themselves "Socialists" but were in fact "Dictators". You call yourself "Patriot" when you are in fact a "Traitor". Therefore, you are the enemy of the state.

Yes, we know you’re a gun grabber...

So, you ran out of an argument since I hit you dead on the head. So you resort to your normal bag of short sentence lie. Good for you. I don't expect anything more from a traitor.

Your wanting into other peoples personal lives, Someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your fucking business.

But then again I don’t expect anything else from other progressive gun grabber like yourself

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Article of Amendment is about the security of a free State; it says so, in the first clause that matters, not the second clause that follows.

So Daniel now wants everyone to believe that prefatory clause maters but not the operative clause.

the first clause is Express, not implied.

The second clause is express, not implied.

 

[P@triot]

You just defend the parts of the Constitution that agrees with you and condemn the parts that don't. I defend the entire thing.

Oh yeah...as illustrated by your insistence of pissing on the 2nd Amendment.

 

[P@triot]

I keep a copy of it on my desk

If only you would read the fuck’n thing, instead of using it as a placemat.

 

[P@triot]

Well, viewing my trusty book on my desk, I am quite familiar with the 9th.

Quite familiar, my ass. I guarantee you couldn’t cite it without having looked it up 30 minutes ago after I mentioned it in a response.

 

[P@triot]

we have a Ninth Amendment; all I need is a petty cash fund, for that purpose.

And...uh....how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

because, you are too clueless and Causeless to be anything more than frivolous.

Personal attacks without addressing the subject matter is a violation of USMB policy. So I ask again - how exactly does the 9th Amendment prove your point that I don’t have a 2nd Amendment right?

You clearly had no clue what the 9th Amendment even said when you made that ignorant comment.

Now, instead of just insulting, let's hear how you came to this conclusion.

Dude...what “conclusion”?!? You can’t even follow the fuck’n conversation here. Good grief you are ignorant. I’m not the one who “drew a conclusion”. Asshat Daniel was the one. All I did was call him out on it and asked him exactly HOW the 9th Amendment eliminates my 2nd Amendment rights. He couldn’t answer of course. And your ignorant ass won’t be able to either.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Article of Amendment is about the security of a free State; it says so, in the first clause that matters, not the second clause that follows.

So Daniel now wants everyone to believe that prefatory clause maters but not the operative clause.

the first clause is Express, not implied.

The second clause is express, not implied.

the first clause says our Second Amendment is about the security of a free State.

 

[hadit]

Our Second Article of Amendment is about the security of a free State; it says so, in the first clause that matters, not the second clause that follows.

So Daniel now wants everyone to believe that prefatory clause maters but not the operative clause.

the first clause is Express, not implied.

The second clause is express, not implied.

the first clause says our Second Amendment is about the security of a free State.

And the second clause says that the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. So, regardless of the purpose, an individual has the right to own firearms.

In today's language, people can own guns. Thus again your argument is nuetured.