Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thank God regionalism will buy people time for survival before the great blowoff occurs. A world where the lower IQ's rule over the higher IQ's. There has to be a reason!
Any appellate court is going to have to be drugged and smashed to ignore the testimony of Cohen as a vital part of conviction process.
They may or they may not.
I'll wait and see what happens before I make a judgment on it.
In the end they are still judges that have a public image to uphold we'll see how far the shame factor goes.
Good grief this is a popular article for Trump supporters.
1. The judge? Cause you don't like him?
He was vetted before the case. Everyone knows he donated a few bucks to Dems and his daughter is the Democrat anti christ blah blah blah.
None of which is a reason to disqualifying the judge. Unless you have a precedent for removal under similar conditions.
2. Turley is lying. Trump and his team knew the underlying charges for months before the trial.
The jury was also instructed on the underlying crimes.
Trump also lied when he said "what crimes?"
3. The judge has every right to bar unrelated testimony and it's the judges job to explain the law, not a member of the defense.
4. The jury did not have to agree on the predicate crimes because Trump was not charged with those crimes.
People like Turley make a lot money telling Trump supporters what they want to hear.
It is not a requirement for you to be able to see it. Appeals courts do overturn jury decisions however..... And the SCOTUS is available should they choose to be ultimately.Why would Cohen's testimony be 'reversible'? The jury had the ability to assess his credibility and decide for themselves if his testimony was useful.
Appeals courts are generally loathe to overturn the judgment of a jury.
I can't see any constitutional or rights based issue that would mandate the involvement of the least productive SCOTUS in generations.
If it was anyone but Trump the trial would never have existed.
Most people have a sense of fairness and usually they understand the drift of what's going on behind the scenes.
If the same level of scrutiny was applied to Washington DC across the board every single legislator would be a a felon. The same for the New York State elected body. This is really the bugaboo in public opinion that you cannot chase away by claiming a technical victory.
It's also hard to ignore the fact that Alvin Bragg initially refused to bring charges until something happened in between that initial decision and the reversal of that decision to influence that decision. I think we all know what that was.
In the meantime follow the plan.... Keep using the words convicted felon because they feel so good to you when you use them and you are able to convince yourself with them.
That was the plan after all.
www.law.com
As you can see you have also been infected by the hysteria.
He is not yet convicted not until the appeal process has been heard out.
Again, your speculation is not proof of Trumps innocence.Of course he's being treated differently The fact that 90% of the New York state legislature hasn't also been dragged in front of Bragg for the very samke thing indicates a difference of treatment.
You forgot sexual assaulter and fraudster.The TDS, you know the convicted felon and twice impeached person, who can be identified as P01135809, is deeply embedded inside the
eunuchs that follow their leader.
,
It is not a requirement for you to be able to see it. Appeals courts do overturn jury decisions however..... And the SCOTUS is available should they choose to be ultimately.
Send that to a lawyer who agrees with you. Got one?Does this clear it up for you?
The law showing that falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony.
NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov
www.nysenate.gov
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Grand jury indictment presenting the case of falsifying business records in the first degree.
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice
from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
Arraignment document that has transcripts of Trump pleading not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
THE CLERK: Donald J. Trump, the grand jury of New
23 York County has filed indictment 71543 of 2023 charging you
24 with the crimes of 34 counts of falsifying business records
25 in the first degree.
How do you plead to this indictment, guilty or not
2 guilty?
3 DEFENDANT MR. TRUMP: Not guilty.
This is the verdict sheet showing the conviction for 34 counts of falsifying business records.
Here is a fox news article broadcasting what Trump was found guilty of.
Trump guilty on all counts in New York criminal trial
Former President Trump was found guilty on all counts in his historic and unprecedented criminal trial, making him the first former president of the United States to be convicted of a crime.www.google.com
Former President Trump was found guilty on all counts in his historic and unprecedented criminal trial, making him the first former president of the United States to be convicted of a crime.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged former President Donald Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts.
Jurors found the former president guilty on all counts.
Why would I do that?Send that to a lawyer who agrees with you. Got one?
Why would I do that?
We already have a jury that agrees with me.
Because, there’s not one who agreed with your word salading!Why would I do that?
We already have a jury that agrees with me.
I know. It's unreal.Laughing......they seem obsessed with pretending the verdict just never happened.
Because, there’s not one who agreed with your word salading!
Nobody got trump to be a convicted felon. He did that himself.
I explained what the jurors did. And, there was no legal charge!Except the legal system including the jurors.
There is no underlying felony.What was the underlying "felony"? The Double Secret One
Kangaroo mulberry bush again. You keep making shit up. Post the charge from the court case!!There is no underlying felony.
The felony is 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
Their are underlying crimes. Trump said he didn't know what they were. What a liar.
Did you believe him?
Who cares? Verdicts are a dime a dozen in Kangaroonia. The real verdict will happen in November.Laughing......they seem obsessed with pretending the verdict just never happened.
I explained what the jurors did. And, there was no legal charge!
You have to be trolling at this point. Good grief.I asked already what the felony charge was, you failed! Again, no lawyer knows that answer. So you are just mixing salads
