The Democrats have made it clear they hate me just because I'm a white male...

[bripat9643]

Q

Maybe they hate you because you're an asshole?

Quit projecting.

 

[bripat9643]

Haven't we all known people like Blackrook?

Where everything that is bad in his life is always the fault of everyone else?

Imagining that millions of people all hate him?

Never taking any personal responsibility for why bad things happen to him.

Yeah, we have heard of such people. They are the Democrat constituency.

 

[bripat9643]

Farrakhan's group is all Democrat, and they outnumber the KKK by a wide margin.

The KKK loves his separatist rhetoric because they believe black nationalists have the power to destroy multiculturalism.

Democrats love him because he frequently talks about the need to kill whitey.

Farrakhan is not a separatist...he is a black nationalist. He has also said he loves America and would not wish the worst on his home country. However he does reserve the right to express his indignation at the rampant racism that lingers everywhere.
If the KKK has interpeted his message as hateful rhetoric similar to theirs...they are mistaken...

Those fking democrats

The KKK has infiltrated both parties...but it seems there is a stronger GOP connection nowadays than a Democratic one.

That's because the Democrat party evolved into the anti-white party.

Really? Anti- RW white male maybe but the Democratic Party is stll controlled by White American patriots.

No it's not. It's controlled by traitors who want to destroy this country.

 

[JQPublic1]

Really? Anti- RW white male maybe but the Democratic Party is stll controlled by White American patriots.

Hardly patriots, but yes, by whites; whites that are willing to sellout their own race for power.

Patriots believe all Americans should be afforded Constitutional protections. Thanks for telling us how un- American you are.

 

[JQPublic1]

Farrakhan is not a separatist...he is a black nationalist. He has also said he loves America and would not wish the worst on his home country. However he does reserve the right to express his indignation at the rampant racism that lingers everywhere.
If the KKK has interpeted his message as hateful rhetoric similar to theirs...they are mistaken...

Those fking democrats

The KKK has infiltrated both parties...but it seems there is a stronger GOP connection nowadays than a Democratic one.

That's because the Democrat party evolved into the anti-white party.

Really? Anti- RW white male maybe but the Democratic Party is stll controlled by White American patriots.

No it's not. It's controlled by traitors who want to destroy this country.

How so?

 

[JQPublic1]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

 

[otto105]

...I don't get why someone would hate me for that.

But anyway, white males have caught on that Democrats hate us, which is one of the reasons we overwhelmingly vote Republican nowadays.

Nobody hates you because you're white. We hate you because like most whiney republican men you start threads complaining about your sad plight of being a white man in your white identity party.

 

[frigidweirdo]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

 

[Kosh]

...I don't get why someone would hate me for that.

But anyway, white males have caught on that Democrats hate us, which is one of the reasons we overwhelmingly vote Republican nowadays.

No they hate you as you do not conform to the far left religion.

The hatred of the far left of anything not far left is all over this board.

As is the hatred of you of the far right of anything not of the far right.

Says the far left drone troll that embraces hatred of anything not far left.

But then again even someone that is left of center would be far right to you!

Silly far left drone troll!

 

[Kosh]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

You far left drones want the US to be more like Europe and Canada so the US needs to be more white to do that!

 

[ScienceRocks]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

You far left drones want the US to be more like Europe and Canada so the US needs to be more white to do that!

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan aint white and they're very advanced social democracies.

 

[Kosh]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

You far left drones want the US to be more like Europe and Canada so the US needs to be more white to do that!

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan aint white and they're very advanced social democracies.

They are white as they are non-black based on the far left standard of what is white.

And if you look they are not very diverse nations.

But then again I said Europe, so you have shown you do not even know where Europe is on a map.

Another far left post fail.

 

[JQPublic1]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

But I cant help noticing that white people commit more than 3 times as many violent crimes as blacks but that number isn't reflected in the prison population. There aren't 3 times as many whites as there are blacks in the prison system as inmates. That alone shows a disparity in judicial outcomes .

 

[frigidweirdo]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

But I cant help noticing that white people commit more than 3 times as many violent crimes as blacks but that number isn't reflected in the prison population. There aren't 3 times as many whites as there are blacks in the prison system as inmates. That alone shows a disparity in judicial outcomes .

Well, the problem is you have to look at OTHER statistics in order to be able to say such things.

If say 20% of white people commit crimes that end up with a slap on the wrist, because they're not violent crimes, and they're not worth that much, and 20% of black people commit murder, you're going to have MORE black people in prisons, aren't you?

When black people commit 40% of murders, for their 12% of population, you're going to see a much higher rate of black people in prisons.

 

[JQPublic1]

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

No..Hispanics have a column of their own. Some Hispanics are black also.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Only 58.4???? That a high percentage of mostly white on white murders....I'd guess about 90 to 95 percent.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

Yeah but only about 2 to 3%% of blacks are commiting murder and other violence. 98% never commit any violent crimes.

 

[JQPublic1]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

But I cant help noticing that white people commit more than 3 times as many violent crimes as blacks but that number isn't reflected in the prison population. There aren't 3 times as many whites as there are blacks in the prison system as inmates. That alone shows a disparity in judicial outcomes .

Well, the problem is you have to look at OTHER statistics in order to be able to say such things.

If say 20% of white people commit crimes that end up with a slap on the wrist, because they're not violent crimes, and they're not worth that much, and 20% of black people commit murder, you're going to have MORE black people in prisons, aren't you?

When black people commit 40% of murders, for their 12% of population, you're going to see a much higher rate of black people in prisons.

You're making a false equivalency. The metro chart indicates ONLY. VIOLENTcrime and whites are arrested 3 times more than blacks are for those crime... But the system handles whites differently than it does blacks in general. Good lawyers might be the difference as opposed to overloaded public defenders.
But there is a disparity.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

No..Hispanics have a column of their own. Some Hispanics are black also.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Only 58.4???? That a high percentage of mostly white on white murders....I'd guess about 90 to 95 percent.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

Yeah but only about 2 to 3%% of blacks are commiting murder and other violence. 98% never commit any violent crimes.

Yes, I know they have a column of their own, however there will be more than 100% of people there.


Demography of the United States - Wikipedia

73.6% of people are white
12.6% of people are black
0.8% of people are native American.
5.1% of people are Asian
4.7% are some other race
3% two or more races.

That's 99.8% of people. No Hispanics. Huh, where are the Hispanics then?

Hispanic isn't considered a race, there are black and white hispanics, they are considered black and white.

Your chart has an extra space for Hispanics, but they're still considered in white and black.

 

[frigidweirdo]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

But I cant help noticing that white people commit more than 3 times as many violent crimes as blacks but that number isn't reflected in the prison population. There aren't 3 times as many whites as there are blacks in the prison system as inmates. That alone shows a disparity in judicial outcomes .

Well, the problem is you have to look at OTHER statistics in order to be able to say such things.

If say 20% of white people commit crimes that end up with a slap on the wrist, because they're not violent crimes, and they're not worth that much, and 20% of black people commit murder, you're going to have MORE black people in prisons, aren't you?

When black people commit 40% of murders, for their 12% of population, you're going to see a much higher rate of black people in prisons.

You're making a false equivalency. The metro chart indicates ONLY. VIOLENTcrime and whites are arrested 3 times more than blacks are for those crime... But the system handles whites differently than it does blacks in general. Good lawyers might be the difference as opposed to overloaded public defenders.
But there is a disparity.

Well you might be right, but you're not making the case for this, you're just saying you think this is the case.

 

[SmokeALib]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

You far left drones want the US to be more like Europe and Canada so the US needs to be more white to do that!

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan aint white and they're very advanced social democracies.

They eat buried cabbage.

 

[SmokeALib]

But then again, those whiter states which didn't have slavery, which spend more on education, are the states with lower murder rates. Is it because they're white, is it because they don't have people with a chip on their shoulder about slavery and segregation and have seen discrimination in their life time on a large scale, is it because the invest in their people? What is it?

I have a sincere question. What do you make of table 55a of the UCR. It puts a different light on who is actually commiting the most violence in metropolitan areas. White folks don't look so good here.

Table 55

View attachment 149790

Note the huge uptick in white violence in metro areas. Why is no one talking about that?

Well, White people includes Hispanics, and they make up 73.6% of the US population.

72.8% of crimes are committed by white people, but only 58.4% of murders, 48.7% of robberies, rapes are slightly higher than their population, with many other crimes around that level or a little lower.

Black people make up 12.6% of the population, 40% of murders, 17.2% is their lowest figure, and that's for Arson. So, the rate for black people is quite high.

But again, this is just something simple. What I'd like to see are breakdowns of crimes in counties, the amount of poverty, the level of poverty, the education rates, the gang crime levels, and so on, in order to put them all together. I've done it for London, but I can't find the statistics in the US.

But I cant help noticing that white people commit more than 3 times as many violent crimes as blacks but that number isn't reflected in the prison population. There aren't 3 times as many whites as there are blacks in the prison system as inmates. That alone shows a disparity in judicial outcomes .

You just proved your own post incorrect lol. Thanks.