The electoral college, the founders had it right

[Harpy Eagle]

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

Once again, you're whining about the votes of Wyoming having 3 times the influence of Texas or California.
You're wrong.

Not in the context of the Senate or the EC. The only place they are equal is the House.

Texas has 34 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 25.26 million. 1 per 743,000
California has 53 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 37.35 million. 1 per 705,000
Wyoming has 1 Electoral Vote based on 2010 population of 564 thousand. 1 per 564,000​

It seems simple to me, I’m not sure why others don’t get it.

It is simple when you lie about the number of EC votes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

Once again, you're whining about the votes of Wyoming having 3 times the influence of Texas or California.
You're wrong.

Not in the context of the Senate or the EC. The only place they are equal is the House.

Texas has 34 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 25.26 million. 1 per 743,000
California has 53 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 37.35 million. 1 per 705,000
Wyoming has 1 Electoral Vote based on 2010 population of 564 thousand. 1 per 564,000​

Wyoming has 3 EC votes, not one

And only 1 is based on their population.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This is another stupid argument. The rules state electoral votes and not popular votes. This is how the candidates campaign. Many in MA didn’t vote because they knew it was a lost cause but I bet many may have had they known each vote counts. Candidates would have campaigned differently and people may have voted differently. Like 70 mil didn’t even vote.

In Football most pts win not most yards. If it were most yards then teams would play and prepare differently.

Only stupid people bring up the fact that HRC won the popular vote. If some jackass argued that the Falcons are better than the Packers because they had 400 yards of total offense but lost 24-10 where as the Packers only had 300 yards but won, that person would be laughed out of the room.

 

[rightwinger]

The founders did not create the electoral college

 

[Wyatt earp]

No it doesn't.
Look at the House seats in each state.

The topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS.

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

They have 3 EC votes ..one for the people two for the state, how complicated is that for you to understand?


.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No it doesn't.
Look at the House seats in each state.

The topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS.

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

55 EC votes is a huge #. As in over 20% of what one needs to win.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

Once again, you're whining about the votes of Wyoming having 3 times the influence of Texas or California.
You're wrong.

Not in the context of the Senate or the EC. The only place they are equal is the House.

Texas has 34 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 25.26 million. 1 per 743,000
California has 53 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 37.35 million. 1 per 705,000
Wyoming has 1 Electoral Vote based on 2010 population of 564 thousand. 1 per 564,000​

Wyoming has 3 EC votes, not one

And only 1 is based on their population.

It does not matter, they still have 3, thus they have one EC per 193,000 people as opposed to Cali having one EC per 709,000 people or Texas having one EC per 736,000 people.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS.

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

55 EC votes is a huge #. As in over 20% of what one needs to win.

non sequitur much?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The founders did not create the electoral college

It’s the 12th amendment. They also didn’t say people born here should automatically be citizens by your logic

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS.

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

They have 3 EC votes ..one for the people two for the state, how complicated is that for you to understand?


.

I am not the one confused here, you are.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

55 EC votes is a huge #. As in over 20% of what one needs to win.

non sequitur much?

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

 

[rightwinger]

The founders did not create the electoral college

It’s the 12th amendment. They also didn’t say people born here should automatically be citizens by your logic

Never claimed they did

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

They have 3 EC votes ..one for the people two for the state, how complicated is that for you to understand?


.

I am not the one confused here, you are.

You’re the one who said 300 lives are meaningless. You seem pretty confused to me.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The founders did not create the electoral college

It’s the 12th amendment. They also didn’t say people born here should automatically be citizens by your logic

Never claimed they did

So you agree they should not be citizens automatically?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

55 EC votes is a huge #. As in over 20% of what one needs to win.

non sequitur much?

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

It was a fact you gave. one totally irrelevant to the discussion, but it was a fact. Congrats, that might be a first for you, posting a fact that is.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

They have 3 EC votes ..one for the people two for the state, how complicated is that for you to understand?


.

I am not the one confused here, you are.

You’re the one who said 300 lives are meaningless. You seem pretty confused to me.

Whenever you get desperate you start to lie about me. Why is that?

I never spoke of lives, I spoke of votes. Do try and keep it honest and keep the lies to a minimum this time.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Once again, you're whining about the votes of Wyoming having 3 times the influence of Texas or California.
You're wrong.

Not in the context of the Senate or the EC. The only place they are equal is the House.

Texas has 34 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 25.26 million. 1 per 743,000
California has 53 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 37.35 million. 1 per 705,000
Wyoming has 1 Electoral Vote based on 2010 population of 564 thousand. 1 per 564,000​

Wyoming has 3 EC votes, not one

And only 1 is based on their population.

It does not matter, they still have 3, thus they have one EC per 193,000 people as opposed to Cali having one EC per 709,000 people or Texas having one EC per 736,000 people.

Bullshit each state gets two regardless of their size , why does California get 55 and Alaska only gets 3 ? Alaska is way bigger then California .


.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

55 EC votes is a huge #. As in over 20% of what one needs to win.

non sequitur much?

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

It was a fact you gave. one totally irrelevant to the discussion, but it was a fact. Congrats, that might be a first for you, posting a fact that is.

So 20% is not enough for you?

 

[Wyatt earp]

House seats are determined by population, Senate seats are not.

Once again, the topic of the discussion is the Electoral College, the House seats are not determined by the EC, just the POTUS

You are trying to push a narrative that's not true .


.

Explain how it is not true?

Cali has just over 39,000,000 citizens. They have 55 EC votes. So, each EC vote is allotted to 709,000 people.
Wyoming has just over 579,000 citizens. They have 3 EC votes. So each EC vote is allotted to 193,000 people.

That gives the each citizen of Wyoming 3.6 times more say in who become POTUS than the people of Cali.

They have 3 EC votes ..one for the people two for the state, how complicated is that for you to understand?


.

I am not the one confused here, you are.

Of course you are not confused you are trying to push a late night comedians ignorant angle to the masses..


.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Not in the context of the Senate or the EC. The only place they are equal is the House.

Texas has 34 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 25.26 million. 1 per 743,000
California has 53 Electoral Votes based on 2010 population of 37.35 million. 1 per 705,000
Wyoming has 1 Electoral Vote based on 2010 population of 564 thousand. 1 per 564,000​

Wyoming has 3 EC votes, not one

And only 1 is based on their population.

It does not matter, they still have 3, thus they have one EC per 193,000 people as opposed to Cali having one EC per 709,000 people or Texas having one EC per 736,000 people.

Bullshit each state gets two regardless of their size , why does California get 55 and Alaska only gets 3 ? Alaska is way bigger then California .


.

Landmass is not a factor in determining EC votes, why would it be? Land does not vote, only people vote.