The end of white America is now clearly in sight

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Even White Hispanics are probably not the best, and brightest from Spain.

It seems many of them left Spain because they couldn't make it, and, or because they were degenerates who could feed off of colonialism.

The same holds true for British colonials who dominate the U.S South.
Had, the U.S not lured in more elite Irish, Italian, and Polish Catholics, German, and Scandinavians, or Jews, it's very likely the U.S would've been lower.

 

[Reasonable]

An informative story at the BBC....

How young Americans are set to change the US forever - BBC News
Non-whites are the major source of population increase for the US for some time now.
The Hispanic population will become the predominant ethnic group within 50 years at the current rate.
Even the Asian rate of population growth exceeds the growth rate of the white ethnic group.

The white population median age is now 43 and growing older. It's simply a matter of time.

And with the decline in white people from rural America and traditionalists regions who historically have been Patriots, so will go the inclination to preserve the framework of the USA as founded.

It won't matter to most of us since we'll be gone......but in 200 years I would venture a guess that the USA will be dramatically different than it has been for the last 200 or so. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing probably depends on your point of view.

This info fuels the rage of all racist groups in America, coincidentally all Trump supporters.

 

[Reasonable]

The key is building the Wall, deport third worlders, end multiculturalism and go back making it a crime again to marry negroes. Lastly, make this best seller book a curriculum in every school in America in order to educate the masses on becoming racially aware and the dangers of race mixing.

My Awakening: A Path To Racial Understanding

Like anyone is surprised you're a David Duke fan.
So what time is your Klan meeting this week?

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Even White Hispanics are probably not the best, and brightest from Spain.

It seems many of them left Spain because they couldn't make it, and, or because they were degenerates who could feed off of colonialism.

The same holds true for British colonials who dominate the U.S South.
Had, the U.S not lured in more elite Irish, Italian, and Polish Catholics, German, and Scandinavians, or Jews, it's very likely the U.S would've been lower.

You really are that stupid! I thought you were just being facetious in your racial and historical misconceptions, but now I see that you really are dumber than a box of rocks!

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

 

[rightwinger]

Very true. Acknowledging that the nobility were no different than anyone else was a huge step.
But beyond 1776, this country was created and managed for the benefit of white males. We killed 600,000 Americans just trying to end slavery. We were one of the last modern societies to give women the vote. We openly discriminated against minorities for 100 years after the Civil War

Yes, White males are outraged
The country they created and dominated for two hundred years was slipping away as they were forced to open the doors to others

Wow, yeah we were soooooo far behind...


"Most independent countries enacted women's suffrage in the interwar era, including Canada in 1917, Britain in 1918 and the United States in 1920. "


Women's suffrage - Wikipedia



This is the difference between a conservative and a liberal.

A conservative, biased in FAVOR of America, reads that and thinks, "America was right with the times, probably slowed down a hair by the checks and balances of a Federal system."


A liberals, such as yourself, see America as "one of the last modern societies to give women the vote.".


Also, relevant to your position.


"Late adopters in Europe included Spain in 1931, France in 1944, Italy in 1946, Greece in 1952, Switzerland in 1971, as well as several small countries."



Mmmm....

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Very true. Acknowledging that the nobility were no different than anyone else was a huge step.
But beyond 1776, this country was created and managed for the benefit of white males. We killed 600,000 Americans just trying to end slavery. We were one of the last modern societies to give women the vote. We openly discriminated against minorities for 100 years after the Civil War

Yes, White males are outraged
The country they created and dominated for two hundred years was slipping away as they were forced to open the doors to others

Wow, yeah we were soooooo far behind...


"Most independent countries enacted women's suffrage in the interwar era, including Canada in 1917, Britain in 1918 and the United States in 1920. "


Women's suffrage - Wikipedia



This is the difference between a conservative and a liberal.

A conservative, biased in FAVOR of America, reads that and thinks, "America was right with the times, probably slowed down a hair by the checks and balances of a Federal system."


A liberals, such as yourself, see America as "one of the last modern societies to give women the vote.".


Also, relevant to your position.


"Late adopters in Europe included Spain in 1931, France in 1944, Italy in 1946, Greece in 1952, Switzerland in 1971, as well as several small countries."



Mmmm....

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Kudos for you to admitting that your point about sexism was unfairly harsh towards America.


The nation was not established to "be controlled by white males".

That was a given at the time.


It was to be more free and democratic than "other modern societies" most of which were, by our standards, brutal imperial regimes.


And it was.


Your natural inclination is to be unfairly harsh in judging America, as demonstrated above with sexism. YOu are now doing it with racism.

This is not a rhetorical question. Why are you so harsh in your judgements of America?

I agree that there were no other nations not being controlled by white males. Some were controlled by Queens but the rest of the government was all white and male and Christian

Our nation obviously was set up and run by white male Christians. But that does not excuse the violence and abuse of power by white males to maintain control. It is a long and sordid history that led us to our current state.

Now we have white males complaining that the world no longer belongs to them. They no longer have top jobs in politics and business set aside just for them. The OP even complains about race mixing and we are in the 21st century and just had a mixed race President

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Even White Hispanics are probably not the best, and brightest from Spain.

It seems many of them left Spain because they couldn't make it, and, or because they were degenerates who could feed off of colonialism.

The same holds true for British colonials who dominate the U.S South.
Had, the U.S not lured in more elite Irish, Italian, and Polish Catholics, German, and Scandinavians, or Jews, it's very likely the U.S would've been lower.

You really are that stupid! I thought you were just being facetious in your racial and historical misconceptions, but now I see that you really are dumber than a box of rocks!

Typical obnoxious anti-racist big mouth, there's loads of these on this forum.

Why should we think that colonials were the best, and brightest of Europe?

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

race mixing doesnt eradicate different peoples, it , if anything creates more. and no two mixed people look alike. My daughter looks like a straight up black woman, albeit with a bit lighter skin(she's a lot darker than halle berry but lighter than michelle obama) but my son has straight brown hair and looks like a deeply tanned white boy.

 

[rightwinger]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

The law of natural selection

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

race mixing doesnt eradicate different peoples, it , if anything creates more. and no two mixed people look alike. My daughter looks like a straight up black woman, albeit with a bit lighter skin(she's a lot darker than halle berry but lighter than michelle obama) but my son has straight brown hair and looks like a deeply tanned white boy.

Race mixing will destroy diversity, like it did in Latin America.

No 2 mixed race people look alike?

Well, come to the village of Brewster here, where Mestizo Guatemalans hardly differ in appearance.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

The law of natural selection

No, actually we've made it too easy for stupid people to have more kids.

We will dearly pay the price for it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

race mixing doesnt eradicate different peoples, it , if anything creates more. and no two mixed people look alike. My daughter looks like a straight up black woman, albeit with a bit lighter skin(she's a lot darker than halle berry but lighter than michelle obama) but my son has straight brown hair and looks like a deeply tanned white boy.

My grandsons do not even look like brothers. One is tall, and light-skinned with wavy hair and the other is shorter, very skinny, dark tan skin and mostly straight hair. They are both as handsome as can be, but I might be just a little biased.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

race mixing doesnt eradicate different peoples, it , if anything creates more. and no two mixed people look alike. My daughter looks like a straight up black woman, albeit with a bit lighter skin(she's a lot darker than halle berry but lighter than michelle obama) but my son has straight brown hair and looks like a deeply tanned white boy.

My grandsons do not even look like brothers. One is tall, and light-skinned with wavy hair and the other is shorter, very skinny, dark tan skin and mostly straight hair. They are both as handsome as can be, but I might be just a little biased.

i fyou dont mind me asking, what is their ethnic mixture?

 

[skews13]

An informative story at the BBC....

How young Americans are set to change the US forever - BBC News
Non-whites are the major source of population increase for the US for some time now.
The Hispanic population will become the predominant ethnic group within 50 years at the current rate.
Even the Asian rate of population growth exceeds the growth rate of the white ethnic group.

The white population median age is now 43 and growing older. It's simply a matter of time.

And with the decline in white people from rural America and traditionalists regions who historically have been Patriots, so will go the inclination to preserve the framework of the USA as founded.

It won't matter to most of us since we'll be gone......but in 200 years I would venture a guess that the USA will be dramatically different than it has been for the last 200 or so. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing probably depends on your point of view.

As a matter of evolution and population transience, this is true. But this doesn't necessarily mean the end of white America. By 2045, the white population will still represent half of the country. It will only be slightly less than half by 2070.

Now you have to take into account of world population trends as a whole, and demographic movement from America by other than whites, the movement to America from Europe by whites, the total number of the population that has become interracially mixed with whites and other demographics, and the eventual decline in one or more current minority demographics.

You were correct that we will be gone by then, and cannot accurately predict the effects of demographics in the population beyond 100 years. This being more factors such as climate change, diseases, and other environmental factors that also decides these changes.

 

[bitter clinging swiftie]

another thing is that some races in america(particularly blacks) have an exponentially higher death rate and young ages than white americans, too.

 

[mudwhistle]

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Eradicating people through raci

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Eradicating people is wrong whether by genocide, or by multiculturalism.

Both are more similar than you'd expect, in both cases greed is a main factor.

Furthermore both are expansionist, colonialism, and globalism aren't far removed from one another.

Colonialism uses intolerance to build expansion, and wealth.

Globalism uses tolerance to build expansion, and wealth.

It's all garbage, elites brainwashing idiots to throw away people's heritages.

It is merely letting nature take its course. Allowing people to breed with the person they choose

Don't hide from the fact that it is a result of purposeful democrat policies.

That is cowardice.

THis is your party, your agenda, leading towards YOUR goal of total control.


Own it, don't be a coward and claim it is some sort of accident.

You can tell the direction they're going by their new leaders.......

Perez wins DNC chairmanship - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

LMAO.......race mixing will not end the white race, black race or any other race. thats why the "muh white genocide" argument is stupid. Example, chuck norris's parents are both 1/2 irish american and 1/2 indian...would you describe him as anything other than white? aned hispanicas come in all colors. Felix trinidad is hispanic, but he is black. Canelo Alverez is hispanic, but would anyone say he aint white?

At one point they will all become so mixed, they won't look, or have much different backgrounds.
That is if we tolerate it.
Which unfortunately is pretty common to tolerate eradicating unique, and diverse peoples from the face of the Earth.

race mixing doesnt eradicate different peoples, it , if anything creates more. and no two mixed people look alike. My daughter looks like a straight up black woman, albeit with a bit lighter skin(she's a lot darker than halle berry but lighter than michelle obama) but my son has straight brown hair and looks like a deeply tanned white boy.

My grandsons do not even look like brothers. One is tall, and light-skinned with wavy hair and the other is shorter, very skinny, dark tan skin and mostly straight hair. They are both as handsome as can be, but I might be just a little biased.

i fyou dont mind me asking, what is their ethnic mixture?

I am white/Native American. My wife is white. The other grandfather is Hispanic/Native American and the other grandmother is African American.

 

[Correll]

Wow, yeah we were soooooo far behind...


"Most independent countries enacted women's suffrage in the interwar era, including Canada in 1917, Britain in 1918 and the United States in 1920. "


Women's suffrage - Wikipedia



This is the difference between a conservative and a liberal.

A conservative, biased in FAVOR of America, reads that and thinks, "America was right with the times, probably slowed down a hair by the checks and balances of a Federal system."


A liberals, such as yourself, see America as "one of the last modern societies to give women the vote.".


Also, relevant to your position.


"Late adopters in Europe included Spain in 1931, France in 1944, Italy in 1946, Greece in 1952, Switzerland in 1971, as well as several small countries."



Mmmm....

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Wow, yeah we were soooooo far behind...


"Most independent countries enacted women's suffrage in the interwar era, including Canada in 1917, Britain in 1918 and the United States in 1920. "


Women's suffrage - Wikipedia



This is the difference between a conservative and a liberal.

A conservative, biased in FAVOR of America, reads that and thinks, "America was right with the times, probably slowed down a hair by the checks and balances of a Federal system."


A liberals, such as yourself, see America as "one of the last modern societies to give women the vote.".


Also, relevant to your position.


"Late adopters in Europe included Spain in 1931, France in 1944, Italy in 1946, Greece in 1952, Switzerland in 1971, as well as several small countries."



Mmmm....

My country right or wrong never serves the countries needs
Real citizenship is acknowledging what is wrong with the country and trying to fix it

This particular thread is about the loss of power among white males. Our countries treatment of women and minorities is not something we should be proud of. Having a level playing field where white males have to compete on an equal basis with women and minorities and non-Christians is something to strive for

Bemoaning the fact that white males no longer get to call all the shots is not something our society needs

Which is not what I did.

YOU said that the US was "one of the last modern societies" to give women the right to vote.

I looked it up.

We were TWO year after Britain.

WHich would render your claim an very unfair characterization.

Then I posted that we were decades before France, or Spain OR Italy.

Which made your claim just WRONG.


You are unfairly harsh in judging America. ON the women's voting issue, I have demonstrated it beyond question.


As an example.


WHY ARE YOU LIKE THAT?

Point taken
They were in the same time period

But it does not negate my point that our nation was established as a nation to be controlled by white males. Our legacy of racism and sexism is not something to be proud of. Racist posts like the OP moaning about the breeding of whites shows we still have a long way to go

Kudos for you to admitting that your point about sexism was unfairly harsh towards America.


The nation was not established to "be controlled by white males".

That was a given at the time.


It was to be more free and democratic than "other modern societies" most of which were, by our standards, brutal imperial regimes.


And it was.


Your natural inclination is to be unfairly harsh in judging America, as demonstrated above with sexism. YOu are now doing it with racism.

This is not a rhetorical question. Why are you so harsh in your judgements of America?

I agree that there were no other nations not being controlled by white males. Some were controlled by Queens but the rest of the government was all white and male and Christian

Our nation obviously was set up and run by white male Christians. But that does not excuse the violence and abuse of power by white males to maintain control. It is a long and sordid history that led us to our current state.

Now we have white males complaining that the world no longer belongs to them. They no longer have top jobs in politics and business set aside just for them. The OP even complains about race mixing and we are in the 21st century and just had a mixed race President

1. The long history of fighting against discrimination led to legal equality for everyone, and massive discrimination in favor of traditionally disadvantaged groups.

2. THe current state is that liberals are trying to transform the alliance against white discrimination and bigotry into a permanent political alliance for power, even though that battle was won quite some time ago.

3. As evidenced by your next point, where you mis characterize the actions of white males who are unhappy about that continued discrimination in favor of traditionally disadvantaged groups. IT is a fairly vile act for you to call wanting equal treatment to be wanting set asides.

 

[FJO]

White folks created the greatest nation in history. They can't be all-bad, no? Why is the OP and others hatin on em so much?

Source of hate is envy.

That's why.