The Homosexual Dilemma

[Seawytch]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He didn't say you were, he said you were like a born again Christian...a Born Again Libertarian.

From the ultimate one trick pony, every thread turns into a gay thread. Thanks for that clarification. It's not like you two geniuses consistently advocate liberalism, what a great point. LOL.

Save this thread actually is about gays.

Do try and keep up.

Right, and my answer, simpleton, is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace. Let the odd screwball who limits who they do business with harm themselves. Only government can enforce discrimination. A free market rewards those who don't discriminate.

The fact that no country in the entire world, not a single fucking one, uses his solutions never seems to cross his tiny mind, nor does he wonder why that might be so. Color me shocked.

 

[Skylar]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

Save that they aren't. Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights.

Rights aren't a matter of sale. They aren't a commodity to be purchased, or traded. Which renders them unquantifiable to someone who looks at the world in terms of economics. Which is why we don't use economic measures as the metric of rights.

 

[JakeStarkey]

This is one of the most uninformed comments we will read today, " is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace."

The solid statement of the day, "Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights."

 

[Skylar]

This thread is about marriage equality. We know you claim that you are against all people getting a "gubmit" marriage

So if your standard is that if one's view is known then they should STFU, why don't you go first?

The view is....this isn't about your hysteric obsession with government. This is about gay rights. Everything isn't everything. This thread isn't about every topic. Its about gay, their role in society, their rights, and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

If you want to discuss gay rights, well bob's your uncle. If you don't, there are other threads.

 

[Skylar]

This is one of the most uninformed comments we will read today, " is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace."

Some people don't get that rights aren't a commodity.

 

[kaz]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

Of course all PA laws should be abolished, but expanding them is not a step to accomplishing that. They are all beyond worthless, they enable government power.

 

[kaz]

He didn't say you were, he said you were like a born again Christian...a Born Again Libertarian.

From the ultimate one trick pony, every thread turns into a gay thread. Thanks for that clarification. It's not like you two geniuses consistently advocate liberalism, what a great point. LOL.

Save this thread actually is about gays.

Do try and keep up.

Right, and my answer, simpleton, is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace. Let the odd screwball who limits who they do business with harm themselves. Only government can enforce discrimination. A free market rewards those who don't discriminate.

The fact that no country in the entire world, not a single fucking one, uses his solutions never seems to cross his tiny mind, nor does he wonder why that might be so. Color me shocked.

I don't wonder why it's so at all. That's clear. Politicians control small minded, cowardly simpletons with fear.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

Of course all PA laws should be abolished, but expanding them is not a step to accomplishing that. They are all beyond worthless, they enable government power.

I hate Ayn Rand kids. Such worthless little fuckers, and cocky to boot.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He didn't say you were, he said you were like a born again Christian...a Born Again Libertarian.

From the ultimate one trick pony, every thread turns into a gay thread. Thanks for that clarification. It's not like you two geniuses consistently advocate liberalism, what a great point. LOL.

Save this thread actually is about gays.

Do try and keep up.

Right, and my answer, simpleton, is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace. Let the odd screwball who limits who they do business with harm themselves. Only government can enforce discrimination. A free market rewards those who don't discriminate.

The fact that no country in the entire world, not a single fucking one, uses his solutions never seems to cross his tiny mind, nor does he wonder why that might be so. Color me shocked.

I don't wonder why it's so at all. That's clear. Politicians control small minded, cowardly simpletons with fear.

So not a single country in the world does what you believe they should and they're the ones who are stupid? Got it.

 

[kaz]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

Save that they aren't. Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights.

Rights aren't a matter of sale. They aren't a commodity to be purchased, or traded. Which renders them unquantifiable to someone who looks at the world in terms of economics. Which is why we don't use economic measures as the metric of rights.

And you will protect rights with your socialist ideology no matter how many rights you have to crush to do it. Instead of walking across to the competitor of a discriminator and solving the problem, you run to government to get them to use their guns to do it. And then they use their guns to force endless innocent businesses to prove they aren't discriminating.

Government has no legitimate authority to use force to compel any of it's citizens to do business with another citizen.

 

[kaz]

From the ultimate one trick pony, every thread turns into a gay thread. Thanks for that clarification. It's not like you two geniuses consistently advocate liberalism, what a great point. LOL.

Save this thread actually is about gays.

Do try and keep up.

Right, and my answer, simpleton, is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace. Let the odd screwball who limits who they do business with harm themselves. Only government can enforce discrimination. A free market rewards those who don't discriminate.

The fact that no country in the entire world, not a single fucking one, uses his solutions never seems to cross his tiny mind, nor does he wonder why that might be so. Color me shocked.

I don't wonder why it's so at all. That's clear. Politicians control small minded, cowardly simpletons with fear.

So not a single country in the world does what you believe they should and they're the ones who are stupid? Got it.

The United States

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

Save that they aren't. Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights.

Rights aren't a matter of sale. They aren't a commodity to be purchased, or traded. Which renders them unquantifiable to someone who looks at the world in terms of economics. Which is why we don't use economic measures as the metric of rights.

And you will protect rights with your socialist ideology no matter how many rights you have to crush to do it. Instead of walking across to the competitor of a discriminator and solving the problem, you run to government to get them to use their guns to do it. And then they use their guns to force endless innocent businesses to prove they aren't discriminating.

Government has no legitimate authority to use force to compel any of it's citizens to do business with another citizen.

No one is using their guns you little drama queen. Fuck you kids are dumb.

 

[kaz]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

Of course all PA laws should be abolished, but expanding them is not a step to accomplishing that. They are all beyond worthless, they enable government power.

I hate Ayn Rand kids. Such worthless little fuckers, and cocky to boot.

If I have my way, you can still make your own choices. If you have your way, my right to make my choices is removed.

And you call me cocky? LOL, you're the cock.

 

[kaz]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

Save that they aren't. Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights.

Rights aren't a matter of sale. They aren't a commodity to be purchased, or traded. Which renders them unquantifiable to someone who looks at the world in terms of economics. Which is why we don't use economic measures as the metric of rights.

And you will protect rights with your socialist ideology no matter how many rights you have to crush to do it. Instead of walking across to the competitor of a discriminator and solving the problem, you run to government to get them to use their guns to do it. And then they use their guns to force endless innocent businesses to prove they aren't discriminating.

Government has no legitimate authority to use force to compel any of it's citizens to do business with another citizen.

No one is using their guns you little drama queen. Fuck you kids are dumb.

Try not doing what they want, then you will see the guns. Fuck you leftists are dumb.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Save this thread actually is about gays.

Do try and keep up.

Right, and my answer, simpleton, is to give gays the greatest protection, the protection of the marketplace. Let the odd screwball who limits who they do business with harm themselves. Only government can enforce discrimination. A free market rewards those who don't discriminate.

The fact that no country in the entire world, not a single fucking one, uses his solutions never seems to cross his tiny mind, nor does he wonder why that might be so. Color me shocked.

I don't wonder why it's so at all. That's clear. Politicians control small minded, cowardly simpletons with fear.

So not a single country in the world does what you believe they should and they're the ones who are stupid? Got it.

The United States

It's nothing like what you believe it should be, obviously, so get the fuck out and go live in AynRandLand.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

Of course all PA laws should be abolished, but expanding them is not a step to accomplishing that. They are all beyond worthless, they enable government power.

I hate Ayn Rand kids. Such worthless little fuckers, and cocky to boot.

If I have my way, you can still make your own choices. If you have your way, my right to make my choices is removed.

And you call me cocky? LOL, you're the cock.

Your choices are limited, for the benefit of others. Welcome to adulthood my little fucking infant. Whoever raised you should be spanked good and hard for giving the world such a selfish little moron.

 

[kaz]

This thread is about marriage equality. We know you claim that you are against all people getting a "gubmit" marriage

So if your standard is that if one's view is known then they should STFU, why don't you go first?

The view is....this isn't about your hysteric obsession with government. This is about gay rights. Everything isn't everything. This thread isn't about every topic. Its about gay, their role in society, their rights, and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

If you want to discuss gay rights, well bob's your uncle. If you don't, there are other threads.

Right, my hysteric obsession with less government is nuts, but your hysteric obsession with more government is perfectly fine.

There don't need to be any gay laws. Just like there didn't need to be an Equal Rights Amendment for women. We are all people. And our interests are all best served by a free marketplace.

You may now return to your normally scheduled program, hysterical obsession with government as the solution to all our problems.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'd prefer to just skip the entire schtick, and stick with the topic of gay rights and the imaginary 'homosexual dillema'.

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

Save that they aren't. Protecting and preserving rights are the best protection for gay rights.

Rights aren't a matter of sale. They aren't a commodity to be purchased, or traded. Which renders them unquantifiable to someone who looks at the world in terms of economics. Which is why we don't use economic measures as the metric of rights.

And you will protect rights with your socialist ideology no matter how many rights you have to crush to do it. Instead of walking across to the competitor of a discriminator and solving the problem, you run to government to get them to use their guns to do it. And then they use their guns to force endless innocent businesses to prove they aren't discriminating.

Government has no legitimate authority to use force to compel any of it's citizens to do business with another citizen.

No one is using their guns you little drama queen. Fuck you kids are dumb.

Try not doing what they want, then you will see the guns. Fuck you leftists are dumb.

We don't use guns that way asswipe. Grow up.

 

[kaz]

So why don't you address my point if that's what you keep saying you want? Free markets are the best protection for gay rights.

In some places they might be...in others not so much. For people living in large metropolitan areas with lots of choices, absolutely...in rural areas with often only one choice in services, not so much.

And if that were truly the case, ALL PA laws should be abolished, not just the gay ones...but there is no move to end them all is there, Kaz? Okay...one guy, Rand Paul, said something once on Rachel Maddow and has been walking it back ever since.

Of course all PA laws should be abolished, but expanding them is not a step to accomplishing that. They are all beyond worthless, they enable government power.

I hate Ayn Rand kids. Such worthless little fuckers, and cocky to boot.

If I have my way, you can still make your own choices. If you have your way, my right to make my choices is removed.

And you call me cocky? LOL, you're the cock.

Your choices are limited, for the benefit of others. Welcome to adulthood my little fucking infant. Whoever raised you should be spanked good and hard for giving the world such a selfish little moron.

With your endless stream of angry, ranting vulgarity and insults without any content to back it up, I wouldn't be calling anyone an "infant" if I were you.