Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Regressive Left yes, not liberals.Antifa chant: "No Trump, no wall, no USA at all."
That clearly represents one (1) end of the current political spectrum.
Feeble denials & deflections notwithstanding.
.
And the left continues to enable them, although more and more some are seeing the truth, that antifa are the violent ones.
They know they're enabling it, and because they agree with so much of it, they'd rather deflect and deny.
.
Imagine trying to get anyone to arrive at "largely agreed upon solutions" right now.The Regressive Left yes, not liberals.Antifa chant: "No Trump, no wall, no USA at all."
That clearly represents one (1) end of the current political spectrum.
Feeble denials & deflections notwithstanding.
.
And the left continues to enable them, although more and more some are seeing the truth, that antifa are the violent ones.
They know they're enabling it, and because they agree with so much of it, they'd rather deflect and deny.
.
The extreme left includes prejudice but wants a total upheaval of the system to combat institutionalized greed ect...
If people want a revolution, they better have some largely agreed upon solutions, which probably wont happen.
Sure they were....the city of Charlottesville voted to remove the statues....why did the KKK and NAZIS from out of town think it was their business?The KKK and white supremacists are simply exercising their constitutionally protected rights to protect statues of DEMOCRATS.
Antifa is trying to erase the racist history of the DEMOCRAT party.
Truth hurts?
Liar.........the city council took it upon themselves. You are claiming that the entire city populace voted in unison to remove the Lee statute and that makes you a liar........not that I didn't already know that.
And the city council is elected by the city populace. Just as they are in, say, New Orleans, which removed statues and a monument without incident. That's because the yellow-pole beaters and the James Fieldses were not yet organized to beat people with poles and run over people with cars.
The point is entirely valid --- what the fuck is James Fields from western Ohio doing running people down to oppose Charlottesvillé's decision? What the fuck business is it of David Duke's? Why can't Charlottesville make its own decisions about its own property just as New Orleans did?
Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)
Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.
Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil
^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.
When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.
No comparison, the KKK and white supremacist are by far the most notorious of the two groups and I have no use for their hatred and bigotry. ANTIFA is a young organization that is trying to suppress free speech by using violence.
I am against the violence used by any group, we all need to follow the rule of law and we must allow the most despicable speech to remain a free country.
Pelosi, who I think is one of the worst politicians in my lifetime has come out and condemns the ANTIFA violence on Sunday. A civil country has no room for this crap.
Pelosi condemns 'antifa' after Berkeley clashes
In the long run, Pelosi is wrong.
And you are wrong that ANTIFA "is trying to suppress free speech".
Using violence to stop another group from voicing and opinion is a trying to supress speech and expression.
Pelosi condemning a groups violence is the correct thing to do. I know you believe violence is the answer as long as you don't lift a finger, however others have higher morals and a deeper appreciation for the Constitution.
so we didn't kill nazis in WWII
again... one group marching out of hate.
another group protesting against that hate.
small percentage of opposition group has some violence.
not representative of the entire group of protesters.
and no justification for likening them to lowlife scum with torches screaming "blood and soil and jews will not replace us".
but keep defending the disgusting cross burners
It's time you got onboard with the growing list of Dimocrats that are condemning the Antifa inbreds.
Where did you get your U.S. Government education? It really sucked. Of course the governed have options to challenge. One is to run for office to replace those who voted to move the statues with a campaign promise to reverse said ruling. Another is a petition to get the City Council to change their mind....show up at meetings...let them know en mass how the citizens disagree. Another is to offer to buy the statue and move it to private yet still quite visible property then the city no longer has a say. These are all completely legal, legit, and doable options.Sure they were....the city of Charlottesville voted to remove the statues....why did the KKK and NAZIS from out of town think it was their business?The KKK and white supremacists are simply exercising their constitutionally protected rights to protect statues of DEMOCRATS.
Antifa is trying to erase the racist history of the DEMOCRAT party.
Truth hurts?
Liar.........the city council took it upon themselves. You are claiming that the entire city populace voted in unison to remove the Lee statute and that makes you a liar........not that I didn't already know that.
And the city council is elected by the city populace. Just as they are in, say, New Orleans, which removed statues and a monument without incident. That's because the yellow-pole beaters and the James Fieldses were not yet organized to beat people with poles and run over people with cars.
The point is entirely valid --- what the fuck is James Fields from western Ohio doing running people down to oppose Charlottesvillé's decision? What the fuck business is it of David Duke's? Why can't Charlottesville make its own decisions about its own property just as New Orleans did?
And, of course, once a government body makes a decision, the rights of the governed to challenge no longer apply. That is your logic.
What a putz
Where did you get your U.S. Government education? It really sucked. Of course the governed have options to challenge. One is to run for office to replace those who voted to move the statues with a campaign promise to reverse said ruling. Another is a petition to get the City Council to change their mind....show up at meetings...let them know en mass how the citizens disagree. Another is to offer to buy the statue and move it to private yet still quite visible property then the city no longer has a say. These are all completely legal, legit, and doable options.Sure they were....the city of Charlottesville voted to remove the statues....why did the KKK and NAZIS from out of town think it was their business?The KKK and white supremacists are simply exercising their constitutionally protected rights to protect statues of DEMOCRATS.
Antifa is trying to erase the racist history of the DEMOCRAT party.
Truth hurts?
Liar.........the city council took it upon themselves. You are claiming that the entire city populace voted in unison to remove the Lee statute and that makes you a liar........not that I didn't already know that.
And the city council is elected by the city populace. Just as they are in, say, New Orleans, which removed statues and a monument without incident. That's because the yellow-pole beaters and the James Fieldses were not yet organized to beat people with poles and run over people with cars.
The point is entirely valid --- what the fuck is James Fields from western Ohio doing running people down to oppose Charlottesvillé's decision? What the fuck business is it of David Duke's? Why can't Charlottesville make its own decisions about its own property just as New Orleans did?
And, of course, once a government body makes a decision, the rights of the governed to challenge no longer apply. That is your logic.
What a putz
Fascinating.....that you seem to have a "they look like" for those two categories. This looks like a pedophile to me:
Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)
Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.
Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil
^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.
When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.
I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.
Exactly. Now tell us.....how many of those exercising their constitutionally protected rights of public assembly and freedom of speech in Charlottesville were actually FROM Charlottesville? What were they REALLY doing there since they were not in any legal position to affect change in the Charlottesville city council decision?Where did you get your U.S. Government education? It really sucked. Of course the governed have options to challenge. One is to run for office to replace those who voted to move the statues with a campaign promise to reverse said ruling. Another is a petition to get the City Council to change their mind....show up at meetings...let them know en mass how the citizens disagree. Another is to offer to buy the statue and move it to private yet still quite visible property then the city no longer has a say. These are all completely legal, legit, and doable options.Sure they were....the city of Charlottesville voted to remove the statues....why did the KKK and NAZIS from out of town think it was their business?
Liar.........the city council took it upon themselves. You are claiming that the entire city populace voted in unison to remove the Lee statute and that makes you a liar........not that I didn't already know that.
And the city council is elected by the city populace. Just as they are in, say, New Orleans, which removed statues and a monument without incident. That's because the yellow-pole beaters and the James Fieldses were not yet organized to beat people with poles and run over people with cars.
The point is entirely valid --- what the fuck is James Fields from western Ohio doing running people down to oppose Charlottesvillé's decision? What the fuck business is it of David Duke's? Why can't Charlottesville make its own decisions about its own property just as New Orleans did?
And, of course, once a government body makes a decision, the rights of the governed to challenge no longer apply. That is your logic.
What a putz
And another is to exercise your constitutionally protected rights of public assembly and freedom of speech.
Damn you're a nitwit. And an avowed racist as well.
You and your racist stupidity are dismissed.
Imagine trying to get anyone to arrive at "largely agreed upon solutions" right now.The Regressive Left yes, not liberals.Antifa chant: "No Trump, no wall, no USA at all."
That clearly represents one (1) end of the current political spectrum.
Feeble denials & deflections notwithstanding.
.
And the left continues to enable them, although more and more some are seeing the truth, that antifa are the violent ones.
They know they're enabling it, and because they agree with so much of it, they'd rather deflect and deny.
.
The extreme left includes prejudice but wants a total upheaval of the system to combat institutionalized greed ect...
If people want a revolution, they better have some largely agreed upon solutions, which probably wont happen.
Not gonna happen, not any time soon.
.
Damn Silly Jilly why so nasty?Antifa is the modern equivalent of the Brown Shirts, Cheka, or NKVD.
only in your demented and lying little mind.
or do you need to be schooled on yet another conspiracy theory, snookie bear?
There ARE solutions...they just take effort and coordination not just anger and violence. I see the same issues with those angry over state PA laws.....they complain and threaten, but won't make the effort to organize to repeal such laws.Imagine trying to get anyone to arrive at "largely agreed upon solutions" right now.The Regressive Left yes, not liberals.Antifa chant: "No Trump, no wall, no USA at all."
That clearly represents one (1) end of the current political spectrum.
Feeble denials & deflections notwithstanding.
.
And the left continues to enable them, although more and more some are seeing the truth, that antifa are the violent ones.
They know they're enabling it, and because they agree with so much of it, they'd rather deflect and deny.
.
The extreme left includes prejudice but wants a total upheaval of the system to combat institutionalized greed ect...
If people want a revolution, they better have some largely agreed upon solutions, which probably wont happen.
Not gonna happen, not any time soon.
.
On top of that, Ive heard no specific solutions, all I hear is revolution.
Exactly. Now tell us.....how many of those exercising their constitutionally protected rights of public assembly and freedom of speech in Charlottesville were actually FROM Charlottesville? What were they REALLY doing there since they were not in any legal position to affect change in the Charlottesville city council decision?Where did you get your U.S. Government education? It really sucked. Of course the governed have options to challenge. One is to run for office to replace those who voted to move the statues with a campaign promise to reverse said ruling. Another is a petition to get the City Council to change their mind....show up at meetings...let them know en mass how the citizens disagree. Another is to offer to buy the statue and move it to private yet still quite visible property then the city no longer has a say. These are all completely legal, legit, and doable options.Liar.........the city council took it upon themselves. You are claiming that the entire city populace voted in unison to remove the Lee statute and that makes you a liar........not that I didn't already know that.
And the city council is elected by the city populace. Just as they are in, say, New Orleans, which removed statues and a monument without incident. That's because the yellow-pole beaters and the James Fieldses were not yet organized to beat people with poles and run over people with cars.
The point is entirely valid --- what the fuck is James Fields from western Ohio doing running people down to oppose Charlottesvillé's decision? What the fuck business is it of David Duke's? Why can't Charlottesville make its own decisions about its own property just as New Orleans did?
And, of course, once a government body makes a decision, the rights of the governed to challenge no longer apply. That is your logic.
What a putz
And another is to exercise your constitutionally protected rights of public assembly and freedom of speech.
Damn you're a nitwit. And an avowed racist as well.
You and your racist stupidity are dismissed.
Oh, and since you want to accuse me of being an "avowed racist"....where did that "avow" happen? Link my "avowing" please, since you've taken the time and effort to accuse me.
We're stuck in this party/ideology over country toilet right now.There ARE solutions...they just take effort and coordination not just anger and violence. I see the same issues with those angry over state PA laws.....they complain and threaten, but won't make the effort to organize to repeal such laws.Imagine trying to get anyone to arrive at "largely agreed upon solutions" right now.The Regressive Left yes, not liberals.And the left continues to enable them, although more and more some are seeing the truth, that antifa are the violent ones.
They know they're enabling it, and because they agree with so much of it, they'd rather deflect and deny.
.
The extreme left includes prejudice but wants a total upheaval of the system to combat institutionalized greed ect...
If people want a revolution, they better have some largely agreed upon solutions, which probably wont happen.
Not gonna happen, not any time soon.
.
On top of that, Ive heard no specific solutions, all I hear is revolution.
Sure you can...but we must question the motives of a group saying they are protesting the removal of a statue when it's not really their city, their business.Wait, are we going to say that no one can ever protest something that's not in their own state/city?
Shit, I'll jump all over that. No more lower 48ers crying and whining about our wildlife management, pulling oil out of the Arctic, no more EPA telling our folks in the interior that they can't burn fucking wood to heat their homes when it's 50 below, etc. etc. ALL of it comes from "foreign" states protesting. Folks up here know better than to bite our nose off to spite our face (aka destroy our natural beauty/wildlife/etc. for oil/urban smog)
No comparison, the KKK and white supremacist are by far the most notorious of the two groups and I have no use for their hatred and bigotry. ANTIFA is a young organization that is trying to suppress free speech by using violence.
I am against the violence used by any group, we all need to follow the rule of law and we must allow the most despicable speech to remain a free country.
Pelosi, who I think is one of the worst politicians in my lifetime has come out and condemns the ANTIFA violence on Sunday. A civil country has no room for this crap.
Pelosi condemns 'antifa' after Berkeley clashes
In the long run, Pelosi is wrong.
And you are wrong that ANTIFA "is trying to suppress free speech".
Using violence to stop another group from voicing and opinion is a trying to supress speech and expression.
Pelosi condemning a groups violence is the correct thing to do. I know you believe violence is the answer as long as you don't lift a finger, however others have higher morals and a deeper appreciation for the Constitution.
so we didn't kill nazis in WWII
again... one group marching out of hate.
another group protesting against that hate.
small percentage of opposition group has some violence.
not representative of the entire group of protesters.
and no justification for likening them to lowlife scum with torches screaming "blood and soil and jews will not replace us".
but keep defending the disgusting cross burners
It's time you got onboard with the growing list of Dimocrats that are condemning the Antifa inbreds.
I'd prefer lowlives like you condemned Nazis.
shill.
No comparison, the KKK and white supremacist are by far the most notorious of the two groups and I have no use for their hatred and bigotry. ANTIFA is a young organization that is trying to suppress free speech by using violence.
I am against the violence used by any group, we all need to follow the rule of law and we must allow the most despicable speech to remain a free country.
Pelosi, who I think is one of the worst politicians in my lifetime has come out and condemns the ANTIFA violence on Sunday. A civil country has no room for this crap.
Pelosi condemns 'antifa' after Berkeley clashes
In the long run, Pelosi is wrong.
And you are wrong that ANTIFA "is trying to suppress free speech".
Using violence to stop another group from voicing and opinion is a trying to supress speech and expression.
Pelosi condemning a groups violence is the correct thing to do. I know you believe violence is the answer as long as you don't lift a finger, however others have higher morals and a deeper appreciation for the Constitution.
so we didn't kill nazis in WWII
again... one group marching out of hate.
another group protesting against that hate.
small percentage of opposition group has some violence.
not representative of the entire group of protesters.
and no justification for likening them to lowlife scum with torches screaming "blood and soil and jews will not replace us".
but keep defending the disgusting cross burners
it's so cute how a Nazi apologist thought that was funny.
The only difference between Anitfa and the KKK isThose that are virulent opposers of this new ANTIFA, which was never heard of until about two months ago or less are somehow being compared to the VIOLENT, RACIST, TERROSTIC and PROVEN history of the KKK and White Supremacists.
Why is this being done? Well, to shut down PERCEIVED support, which doesn't exist of the ANTIFA group, which is just an abbreviation of Anti-Fascists, meaning the fascists that have comprised of the modern day KKK and White Supremacists, currently going by the more politically correct monikers of Alt-Right and White Nationalists respectively.
These virulent opposers of the ANTIFA, who coincidentally all are FOXNEWS watchers, GOP voters and mostly Trump supporters would have us all believe that ANTIFA is just as bad as the KKK and White Supremacists. However, at no point do they ever virulently oppose the KKK and White Supremacists, and even when and if they do, they say these people are no longer relevant, but just a "few" crazies scattered across America that nobody pays any attention to any more, when the opposite is proven to be the case.
Let us quickly review the history of these groups...
The KKK and/or white supremacists have a racist ideology based upon the belief that white people are superior in many ways to people of other races and that therefore white people should be dominant over other races. White supremacy has roots in scientific racism and it often relies on pseudoscientific arguments. Like most similar movements such as neo-Nazism, white supremacists typically oppose people of color as well as people of most non-Christian religions.
The term is also typically used to describe a political ideology that perpetuates and maintains the social, political, historical or institutional domination by white people (as evidenced by historical and contemporary sociopolitical structures such as the Atlantic slave trade, Jim Crow laws in the United States, and apartheid in South Africa).[1] Different forms of white supremacism put forth different conceptions of who is considered white, and different white supremacists identify various racial and cultural groups as their primary enemy.
White supremacy has ideological foundations that at least date back to 17th-century scientific racism, the predominant paradigm of human variation that helped shape international and intra-national relations from the latter part of the Age of Enlightenment (in European history) through the era of the White Man's Burden until the late 20th century (marked by decolonization and the abolition of apartheid in South Africa in 1991, followed by that country's first multiracial elections in 1994).
White supremacy was dominant in the United States even after the American Civil War and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[3] In large areas of the U.S. this included the holding of non-whites (specifically African Americans) in chattel slavery with four million of them denied freedom from bondage.[4] The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[5] and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[6] In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: "The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians."
The denial of social and political freedom continued into the mid-20th century, resulting in the Civil Rights Movement.[10] On the U.S. immigration laws prior to 1965, sociologist Stephen Klineberg cited the laws as clearly declaring "that Northern Europeans are a superior subspecies of the white race."[11] The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 dramatically opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional Northern European and Germanic groups, and as a result it would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.[11] Many U.S. states banned interracial marriage through anti-miscegenation laws until 1967, when these laws were invalidated by the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Loving v. Virginia. Additionally, white leaders often viewed Native Americans as obstacles to economic and political progress with respect to the natives' claims to land and rights.
You can get into more detail in these links...
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
White Supremacy and Terrorism | Slavery By Another Name Bento | PBS
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/Ku-Klux-Klan-A-History-of-Racism.pdf
A PROVEN history of terrorism of violence, not only in this country, but in others, namely Germany is what these virulent opposers of ANTIFA who were created to go up AGAINST the remnants of the KKK and White Supremacists. What have they done, other than disrupt a rowdy group of armed thugs from the White Supremacists that held a "Unite The Right" rally in Charlottesville, SC where of the thugs used his Dodge Charger as a weapon to mow down a bunch of anti-protesters, killing an innocent young white woman in the process.
These people would have you believe are actually WORSE than them, and are deserving of the harshest treatment and your most deepest hatred that you can muster in your heart.
WoW!!!
- The KKK was violent around the turn of the last century, mostly 1868-1975, but Antifa is violent today
- The KKK hates N****rs and Jews but Antifa hates everyone
- Democrats created both of them
I had not seen the photos of the car plowing into the crowd. After seeing those pictures, I don't blame the guy. That car was covered with attackers, mobbed with people armed with sticks and bludgeons. I'd shove my foot on that gas pedal so hard, I'd plow through that crowd like I had a cowcatcher.
