The KKK and White Supremacists vs ANTIFA: Absolutely No Comparison

[Pogo]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

In the long run, Pelosi is wrong.

And you are wrong that ANTIFA "is trying to suppress free speech".

Using violence to stop another group from voicing and opinion is a trying to supress speech and expression.

Pelosi condemning a groups violence is the correct thing to do. I know you believe violence is the answer as long as you don't lift a finger, however others have higher morals and a deeper appreciation for the Constitution.

so we didn't kill nazis in WWII

again... one group marching out of hate.

another group protesting against that hate.

small percentage of opposition group has some violence.

not representative of the entire group of protesters.

and no justification for likening them to lowlife scum with torches screaming "blood and soil and jews will not replace us".

but keep defending the disgusting cross burners

It's time you got onboard with the growing list of Dimocrats that are condemning the Antifa inbreds.

I'd prefer lowlives like you condemned Nazis.

shill.

I've condemed them. Will you condemn Antifa ?

The Leftist Maniacs new Talking Points Memo is summed up as:

^^^^ The above is a basic follow on from the Leftist Maniacs Talking Points Memo:

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

 

[Pop23]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

 

[Pogo]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

 

[Pop23]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Pogo thinks Joe McCarthy was far far worse then Joe Stallin.

Forgive him

 

[Pogo]

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.


Read more at Unmasked: 11 antifa mugshots guaranteed to make your blood boil

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Nnnnnno dear, it's not "factually correct". If it were you could prove it.

Just to reduce it to basics ----- "communism" is an economic system. It's not even capable of killing anyone.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Dollars to donuts you will not see one. Trump. supporter. say nary a negative word about the KKK nor the White Supremacists, but will have a ton of links, crude, bad and harsh words and sentiments about ANTIFA, a new group never before heard of until about two months ago or less.

Watch....!


LoLz!!!

I denounce ws/nazis/racists and antifirstamendment violent anarchists and communists.

Neither has the moral high ground. Anyone who believes otherwise is a fool.

The bullshit over all of this is being pushed by the media. Houston is what the vast, vast majority of Americans are and live.

 

[Pogo]

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Pogo thinks Joe McCarthy was far far worse then Joe Stallin.

Forgive him

Still butthurt over post 189? Understandable.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Nnnnnno dear, it's not "factually correct". If it were you could prove it.

Just to reduce it to basics ----- "communism" is an economic system. It's not even capable of killing anyone.

It is factually correct, do your own research, why not purchase:

"Just to reduce it to basics ----- "communism" is an economic system. It's not even capable of killing anyone."

How morally bankrupt must you be to write such ^^^^

Not capable of killing anyone....so lets just take ONE example of how Communism kills people:

The Holodomor.

Between 1932-1933, some say it was 7 million who were deliberately starved to death in the Ukraine but the high end figure could be 12 million, over 3,000,000 children born between 1932-1933 died of starvation, all carefully planned, man-made.

Ukrainian 'Holodomor' (man-made famine) Facts and History

Holodomor: Memories of Ukraine's silent massacre - BBC News

Ukrainian Genocide of 1932-1933

This is the POS who was responsible for planning this Genocide.

Lazar Kaganovich - Wikipedia

"Responsibility for 1932–33 famine[edit]

Kaganovich (together with Vyacheslav Molotov) participated with the All-Ukrainian Party Conference of 1930 and were given the task of implementation of the collectivization policy that caused a catastrophic 1932–33 famine (known as the Holodomor in Ukraine). He also personally oversaw grain confiscations during the same time periods. Similar policies also inflicted enormous suffering on the Soviet Central Asian republic of Kazakhstan, the Kuban region, Crimea, the lower Volgaregion, and other parts of the Soviet Union. As an emissary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, Kaganovich traveled to Ukraine, the central regions of the USSR, the Northern Caucasus, and Siberia demanding the acceleration of collectivization and repressions against the Kulaks, who were generally blamed for the slow progress of collectivization. Attorney Rafael Lemkin in his work The Soviet Genocide in Ukraine tried to present the fact of Holodomor to the Nuremberg trials as a genocide of a totalitarian regime.[3]

On 13 January 2010 Kiev Appellate Court posthumously found Kaganovich, Postyshev, Kosior and other Soviet Communist Party functionaries guilty of genocide against Ukrainians during the catastrophic Holodomor famine.[4] Though they were pronounced guilty as criminals, the case was ended immediately according to paragraph 8 of Article 6 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine.[5]The importance of the case is its historical aspect that legally explains the particularity of that historical event[clarification needed]. By New Years Day, the Security Service of Ukraine had finished pre-court investigation and transferred its materials to the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. The materials consist of over 250 volumes of archive documents (from within Ukraine as well as from abroad), interviews with witnesses, and expert analysis of several institutes of National Academies of Sciences. Oleksandr Medvedko, the Prosecutor General, confirmed that the material gives clear evidence of the genocide occurring in Ukraine"

So far 25 nations have recognised this Genocide of Ethnic Ukranians.

"The Soviet famine of 1932–33 affected the major grain-producing areas of the Soviet Union, leading to millions of deaths in those areas and severe food shortage throughout the USSR. These areas included Ukraine, Northern Caucasus, Volga Regionand Kazakhstan,[2] the South Urals, and West Siberia.[3][4] Gareth Jones was the first western journalist to report the inhumane devastation.[5][6][a] The subset of the famine within the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Kuban, all of which were heavily populated by Ukrainians, is referred to as Holodomor.

The famine was the result of the actions of the Soviet state in the implementation of forced collectivization, in economic planning, and political repression in the countryside."

Soviet famine of 1932–33 - Wikipedia

"The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомо́р),[a] was a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 that killed an estimated 2.5–7.5 million Ukrainians, with millions more counted in demographic estimates. It was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1932–33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country.

During the Holodomor millions of inhabitants of Ukraine, the majority of whom were ethnic Ukrainians, died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine.[11] Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized by Ukraine[12]and 24 other countries as a genocide of the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet government.[13]

Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials varied greatly; anywhere from 1.8[14] to 12 million[15]ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine. Recent research has since narrowed the estimates to between 2.4[16] and 7.5[17] million. The exact number of deaths is hard to determine, due to a lack of records,[18][19] but the number increases significantly when the deaths inside heavily Ukrainian-populated Kuban are included.[20]Older estimates are still often cited in political commentary.[21] According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kyiv in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficit.[18]"

Holodomor - Wikipedia

Film Shows Ukraine Famine

Published: December 1, 1991

"KIEV, U.S.S.R., Nov. 30— "This film is my personal contribution to the Ukrainian independence referendum," said Oles Yanchuk, who worked for two years to produce his first feature film on a subject that was until recently erased from Soviet history.

Called "Famine 33," the film chronicles Stalin's forced collectivization of agriculture and the famine it caused in 1933. More than seven million people in the central and eastern Ukraine died in the famine.

Shown through the eyes of a young boy, the film made its debut on republic-wide television today, on the eve of a referendum in which Ukrainians are expected to vote overwhelmingly for independence from the Soviet Union.

"I wanted people to see what life was like in a colony, the inhabitants of which were mercilessly exploited in the name of a utopian ideology," Mr. Yanchuk said.

The Central Committee of the Ukrainian Communist Party only last year issued a resolution that officially admitted that the famine was caused by the seizure of crops. Previously, all accounts of the famine were either omitted from history books or referred to as a glorious triumph of Communism. Many Contributed Money

The 35-year-old Mr. Yanchuk said people throughout the Ukraine had donated a little over 400,000 rubles to help finance the film. Witnesses' accounts of the famine were often enclosed with the contributions.

The idea for the film originated when Mr. Yanchuk read a screenplay on the famine written by the Ukrainian playwright Serhy Diachenko. "As soon as I read the screenplay, I knew this was a film that had to be made," he recalled.

Others who helped in the writing of the film were Vasyl Barka, a Ukrainian emigre writer whose book, "The Yellow Prince," has become the classic novel about the famine, and Les Taniuk, a former director of the Moscow Art Theater.

James Mace, staff director of the United States Commission on the Ukraine Famine, was visiting the Ukraine when he heard about Mr. Yanchuk's plans to produce the film. He advised Mr. Yanchuk to go to the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute to find material he was denied access to in his own country's archives. Eventually, Mr. Yanchuk was able to get into Ukrainian archives, but only after a long wait."

Here's the rest of the article.

Film Shows Ukraine Famine

The whole film is available on You Tube, here it is.



Also re. KKK they are irrelevant, it is not 1926 when they numbered MILLIONS and were marching in Washington DC etc.

The Professional Hate Organisation aka the SPLC puts KKK members at approx 5,000 people.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Pogo thinks Joe McCarthy was far far worse then Joe Stallin.

Forgive him

Still butthurt over post 189? Understandable.

You know ogo you just are a sick fuck who is circling the drain.

You Funny The Holomodor. Onto Ignore you go you perverted Genocide supporting POS.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

Most of them are not worth even communicating with, thank goodness most of them have chosen not to breed, at most they might have two children but the majority have NO children.

This is good, we thank them for their act of Self-Genocide. This is the LAST generation of them.

The ones between 55-70 thank goodness are headed to the grave and good fucking riddance to that human filth.

 

[bodecea]

^^^^ They look like a typical combination of bull dykes and paedophiles.

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

How exactly does one "prop up homosexual sex".....share your techniques and strategies.

 

[bodecea]

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

Most of them are not worth even communicating with, thank goodness most of them have chosen not to breed, at most they might have two children but the majority have NO children.

This is good, we thank them for their act of Self-Genocide. This is the LAST generation of them.

The ones between 55-70 thank goodness are headed to the grave and good fucking riddance to that human filth.

Bravo! Masterful performance!

 

[Pogo]

When you Funny the below that makes you morally bankrupt.

Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one.

"Nope. That's not an argument. It just means I recognize a ridiculous bullshit Googly Image when I see one."

It is factually correct, I realise that Leftists have a problem with that type of thing, especially when it refers to the Communists that they consider as Heroes and wish to emulate given the opportunity.

Pogo thinks Joe McCarthy was far far worse then Joe Stallin.

Forgive him

Still butthurt over post 189? Understandable.

You know ogo you just are a sick fuck who is circling the drain.

You Funny The Holomodor. Onto Ignore you go you perverted Genocide supporting POS.

I have posted nothing about either genocide or humidors. You oose again. Maybe you should go back to sexual ad homs.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

Most of them are not worth even communicating with, thank goodness most of them have chosen not to breed, at most they might have two children but the majority have NO children.

This is good, we thank them for their act of Self-Genocide. This is the LAST generation of them.

The ones between 55-70 thank goodness are headed to the grave and good fucking riddance to that human filth.

Bravo! Masterful performance!

I agree

 

[Pogo]

When your argument reduces to fantasies of sex lives, in a point that has zero to do with sex ---- you're pretty much rhetorically bankrupt.

I was commenting what they look like, nothing to do with sex lives, they look like bull dykes and paedophiles.

And those predicate adjectives have nothing to do with sex?
Perhaps we're not clear on the terminology.

I done whupped you Oosie. Gimme a nice yelp of pain.

Um....no and no

Have you noticed the party that propped up homosexual sex is the same party that wanted to keep blacks slaves?

Hmmmmmmmmmm

No wonder they want their evil past destroyed?

I guess a good start would be desolving the party?

It would be the right thing to do.

Most of them are not worth even communicating with, thank goodness most of them have chosen not to breed, at most they might have two children but the majority have NO children.

This is good, we thank them for their act of Self-Genocide. This is the LAST generation of them.

The ones between 55-70 thank goodness are headed to the grave and good fucking riddance to that human filth.

Butthurt meltdowns get funnied too.

 

[sakinago]

Those that are virulent opposers of this new ANTIFA, which was never heard of until about two months ago or less are somehow being compared to the VIOLENT, RACIST, TERROSTIC and PROVEN history of the KKK and White Supremacists.

Why is this being done? Well, to shut down PERCEIVED support, which doesn't exist of the ANTIFA group, which is just an abbreviation of Anti-Fascists, meaning the fascists that have comprised of the modern day KKK and White Supremacists, currently going by the more politically correct monikers of Alt-Right and White Nationalists respectively.

These virulent opposers of the ANTIFA, who coincidentally all are FOXNEWS watchers, GOP voters and mostly Trump supporters would have us all believe that ANTIFA is just as bad as the KKK and White Supremacists. However, at no point do they ever virulently oppose the KKK and White Supremacists, and even when and if they do, they say these people are no longer relevant, but just a "few" crazies scattered across America that nobody pays any attention to any more, when the opposite is proven to be the case.

Let us quickly review the history of these groups...

The KKK and/or white supremacists have a racist ideology based upon the belief that white people are superior in many ways to people of other races and that therefore white people should be dominant over other races. White supremacy has roots in scientific racism and it often relies on pseudoscientific arguments. Like most similar movements such as neo-Nazism, white supremacists typically oppose people of color as well as people of most non-Christian religions.

The term is also typically used to describe a political ideology that perpetuates and maintains the social, political, historical or institutional domination by white people (as evidenced by historical and contemporary sociopolitical structures such as the Atlantic slave trade, Jim Crow laws in the United States, and apartheid in South Africa).[1] Different forms of white supremacism put forth different conceptions of who is considered white, and different white supremacists identify various racial and cultural groups as their primary enemy.

White supremacy has ideological foundations that at least date back to 17th-century scientific racism, the predominant paradigm of human variation that helped shape international and intra-national relations from the latter part of the Age of Enlightenment (in European history) through the era of the White Man's Burden until the late 20th century (marked by decolonization and the abolition of apartheid in South Africa in 1991, followed by that country's first multiracial elections in 1994).

White supremacy was dominant in the United States even after the American Civil War and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[3] In large areas of the U.S. this included the holding of non-whites (specifically African Americans) in chattel slavery with four million of them denied freedom from bondage.[4] The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[5] and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[6] In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: "The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians."

The denial of social and political freedom continued into the mid-20th century, resulting in the Civil Rights Movement.[10] On the U.S. immigration laws prior to 1965, sociologist Stephen Klineberg cited the laws as clearly declaring "that Northern Europeans are a superior subspecies of the white race."[11] The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 dramatically opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional Northern European and Germanic groups, and as a result it would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.[11] Many U.S. states banned interracial marriage through anti-miscegenation laws until 1967, when these laws were invalidated by the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Loving v. Virginia. Additionally, white leaders often viewed Native Americans as obstacles to economic and political progress with respect to the natives' claims to land and rights.

You can get into more detail in these links...
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
White Supremacy and Terrorism | Slavery By Another Name Bento | PBS
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/Ku-Klux-Klan-A-History-of-Racism.pdf

A PROVEN history of terrorism of violence, not only in this country, but in others, namely Germany is what these virulent opposers of ANTIFA who were created to go up AGAINST the remnants of the KKK and White Supremacists. What have they done, other than disrupt a rowdy group of armed thugs from the White Supremacists that held a "Unite The Right" rally in Charlottesville, SC where of the thugs used his Dodge Charger as a weapon to mow down a bunch of anti-protesters, killing an innocent young white woman in the process.

These people would have you believe are actually WORSE than them, and are deserving of the harshest treatment and your most deepest hatred that you can muster in your heart.

WoW!!!

No antifa did not "just appear" 2 months ago. They've been around since the 1930s at least. And they were/are the communist version of the brown shirts. And back then they'd wear masks and carry weapons, and beat up their enemies on the streets...surprise!!

Since when did we start cheering for rioters in masks, carrying weapons, acting like all around assholes? There's no need to try to defend NAZIs outside of their right to free speech, and there's no need to to try to defend antifa outside of their free speech. They're both jackass groups. Is one the lesser of 2 evils, sure, but there's no gun to our heads for us to be taking sides when the two groups are acting like straight up jackasses.

Just because you're anti something bad, doesn't make you good, nor does it make you be for something, I shouldn't have to remind people of that. Think, DONT REACT, but think for like 2 seconds. Take a breath and really be critical of what it is you're saying, and how you're reacting. If I'm anti-terrorist does that make me a good person, or make my cause a good one...I'm anti something bad right...well what if I was just a racist who didn't like muslims and I'd call them all terrorist?? Obviously that's not ok.

Once again, take a step back and think...the brown shirts were bad people, people who act like the brown shirts are probably bad people too. Groups who wear masks, and use weapons, and riot, and destroy private property, are not good qualities. MLKs approach was the approach that worked, not Malcom X's who later admitted that MLK had the right approach. Just take a step back and THINK, don't REACT.