hazlnut
Gold Member
- Sep 18, 2012
- 12,387
- 1,923
The Kurtz Republicans
His baldness bathed in gold, his body pooled in shadow, Kurtz murmurs: Are my methods unsound?
And Willard filthy, hollow-eyed, stunned by what hes seen replies: I dont see any method at all, sir.
His baldness bathed in gold, his body pooled in shadow, Kurtz murmurs: Are my methods unsound?
And Willard filthy, hollow-eyed, stunned by what hes seen replies: I dont see any method at all, sir.
![tumblr_lxjijoj2p51qe4lx7o1_500.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lxjijoj2p51qe4lx7o1_500.gif&hash=7acb5e2102254ed238981b3fc533fd67)
Every sensible person, most Republican politicians included, could recognize that the shutdown fever would blow up in the partys face. Even the shutdowns ardent champions never advanced a remotely compelling story for how it would deliver its objectives. And everything thats transpired since, from the partys polling nose dive to the frantic efforts to save face, was entirely predictable in advance.
The methodless madness distinguishes this shutdown from prior Congressional Republican defeats (the Gingrich shutdown, the Clinton impeachment), when you could at least see what the politicians involved were thinking. And it distinguishes it, too, from many of historys marches of folly as well.
You could compare the behavior of current House Republicans to the diplomatic sleepwalking that led to World War I, but at least, in that case, the various powers had reasonable theories of how they would actually win the ensuing war.
Or you could compare it to Paraguays decision in the 1860s to declare war on both Brazil and Argentina at once, but at least Paraguays armed forces managed to win some victories before being ground into defeat.
Now, admittedly, just because the Republican strategy has been irrational doesnt make it inexplicable. The trends that brought us to this point are clear enough: the discrediting of the Republican establishment during the Bush era; the rise of a populist right that often sees opposition as an end unto itself; the willingness of too many media figures, activists and politicians to stoke that wings worst impulses; and the current Republican leaderships desire both to prevent an intraparty civil war and avoid a true national disaster like default.
Given this underlying landscape, it may be that John Boehner chose a kind of rational irrationality these last two weeks accepting the Kurtzian shutdown strategy in order to demonstrate its senselessness and persuade his members to behave slightly more sensibly in the future.
But even if Boehners decision-making ends up looking like a least-bad approach under the circumstances, hell only have won a temporary reprieve. Kurtz Republicanism isnt likely to go away until somebody else within the party someone with more movement credibility than the speaker, and more subtlety and vision than Ted Cruz figures out how to take the energy driving the shutdown and redirect it to more constructive ends.
Its clear, right now, that the populists cant be trusted not to drive their party into a ditch. But neither can Republican leaders just declare war on their own base, as some moderates and liberals would have them do.