Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you admitting that you want to see Chrsitians burned at the stake?Check the screen name, moron. What's yer point?They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Wasn't this country settled when the consensus on the European continent was the monarchies derived their absolute powers from a divine right granted by the Christian God?
Let me save the trouble...yes they were...
Christians believe that Jesus is divine. Jesus was the Messiah.
Do you?
So your assertion is that Christians are wrong. Christians are worshipping a false god in the form of Christ.
So if Christians can't even get that right, why are you touting them as geniuses on anything else?
Your deflection to strawman arguments means you have lost this argument. Better luck next time, sappy.
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.Imposing values per the constitution.
You're free to buy an Island and found Christlandia.
Christians founded the United States, established a government upon Judea/Christian Principles.
Which contrary to your starkly limited understanding does not establish Christianity as the National Religion, only the principles which govern Christianity, as those which govern the United States.
You should TRY to understand what that means, but you should become comfortable with the reality that such is likely WELL beyond your means to understand. As a result, the weeping and gnashing of tooth by your cult of idiocy to 'HOPE TO CHANGE' that... , like you personally... is irrelevant.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Wasn't this country settled when the consensus on the European continent was the monarchies derived their absolute powers from a divine right granted by the Christian God?
Let me save the trouble...yes they were...
Do you deny that the divine right of kings was a Christian belief?
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.Christians founded the United States, established a government upon Judea/Christian Principles.
Which contrary to your starkly limited understanding does not establish Christianity as the National Religion, only the principles which govern Christianity, as those which govern the United States.
You should TRY to understand what that means, but you should become comfortable with the reality that such is likely WELL beyond your means to understand. As a result, the weeping and gnashing of tooth by your cult of idiocy to 'HOPE TO CHANGE' that... , like you personally... is irrelevant.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Wasn't this country settled when the consensus on the European continent was the monarchies derived their absolute powers from a divine right granted by the Christian God?
Let me save the trouble...yes they were...
Do you deny that the divine right of kings was a Christian belief?
In comparison to what? The Christian faiths were largely in on the matter, as it granted them a certain legitimacy within a system of kings as the holder of moral justification for a king's rule. The idea that the people weren't in on it is rather odd. As it would mean that on this ONE issue, but none of the others that they were taught as Christian dogma, they dissented.
And the evidence historically doesn't support that for centuries. Its not until the church's authority was wanning in all areas of life that political teachings began to wane with them.
Rendering your account implausible.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion on how the judicial system should work. Only brainwashed drones like you think Americans don't have the right to speak their minds.Actually we'd like a judicial system that worked as it was supposed to. Not one that concerned itself with imposing values by fiat.Contrary to the pretend principles the RWnuts are throwing around in this thread,
they would LOVE the judicial system, in principle, if it were packed with rightwingers they agreed with.
No, you want a judicial system that advances your agenda. And you are not the authority to declare how our judicial system is supposed to work.
Americans have spoken their minds. The Supreme Court as it exists is the product of the American voter elected certain presidents and certain senators who in fact decide who is on the court.
Americans voted against gay marriage whenever it came up for a vote.
The Supreme court is a collection of political hacks. You're admitting that their decisions have nothing to do with what the Constitution actually says.
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.Christians founded the United States, established a government upon Judea/Christian Principles.
Which contrary to your starkly limited understanding does not establish Christianity as the National Religion, only the principles which govern Christianity, as those which govern the United States.
You should TRY to understand what that means, but you should become comfortable with the reality that such is likely WELL beyond your means to understand. As a result, the weeping and gnashing of tooth by your cult of idiocy to 'HOPE TO CHANGE' that... , like you personally... is irrelevant.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Wasn't this country settled when the consensus on the European continent was the monarchies derived their absolute powers from a divine right granted by the Christian God?
Let me save the trouble...yes they were...
Do you deny that the divine right of kings was a Christian belief?
Do you understand that 'divine right' is a reference to God?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion on how the judicial system should work. Only brainwashed drones like you think Americans don't have the right to speak their minds.Actually we'd like a judicial system that worked as it was supposed to. Not one that concerned itself with imposing values by fiat.
No, you want a judicial system that advances your agenda. And you are not the authority to declare how our judicial system is supposed to work.
Americans have spoken their minds. The Supreme Court as it exists is the product of the American voter elected certain presidents and certain senators who in fact decide who is on the court.
Americans voted against gay marriage whenever it came up for a vote.
Maine, Maryland and Washington State have all voted in gay marriage by popular referendum. Minnesota rejected an amendment to ban same sex marriage. In fact, every time the matter has come to a vote since the shift in public opinion in 2010, gay marriage has won. And gay marriage has been voted in by the assemblies of 10 other states.
You....you realize that you don't actually know what you're talking about, right?
The Supreme court is a collection of political hacks. You're admitting that their decisions have nothing to do with what the Constitution actually says.
The Supreme Court is part of the constitution. And per Federalist Paper 78, the court's role is the interpret the constitution. That you dismiss them doesn't change their constitutional role. Remember, constitutionality isn't defined by your personal opinion.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
LOL!
Setting aside your erroneous attempt to answer your own question... wherein ya cited a notion that preceded the Magna Carta. (LOL! Ya poor dumbass...)
The Constitution rests directly upon the Charter of American Principles that set forth the principles which were issued as the moral justification requiring our separation from Britain.
What's more, every facet of American principle is risen straight from the scriptures Gilligan. From "No Taxation without Representation, to the construct of republican governance itself, come straight out of Exodus Gilligan.
The grace of God, brought to us by Christ, established the terms of divine rights, individual equality and the authority to exercise such, without permission and in defiance of tyrannical government.
Now, please by all means, take the time to dismiss the Charter of American Principles, as you tout the Constitution as sacrosanct, despite the logical certainty that absent the principles, the constitution is meaningless... (which is why the Left can find NO MEANING in the Constitution, except that which they conjure, which serves your own subjective needs).
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Wasn't this country settled when the consensus on the European continent was the monarchies derived their absolute powers from a divine right granted by the Christian God?
Let me save the trouble...yes they were...
Do you deny that the divine right of kings was a Christian belief?
Do you understand that 'divine right' is a reference to God?
Yes, it was a claim maintained by the monarchy. Whether the common fold entertained it is another issue. The French Revolution demonstrated that they held no such belief by the end of the 18th century.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion on how the judicial system should work. Only brainwashed drones like you think Americans don't have the right to speak their minds.No, you want a judicial system that advances your agenda. And you are not the authority to declare how our judicial system is supposed to work.
Americans have spoken their minds. The Supreme Court as it exists is the product of the American voter elected certain presidents and certain senators who in fact decide who is on the court.
Americans voted against gay marriage whenever it came up for a vote.
Maine, Maryland and Washington State have all voted in gay marriage by popular referendum. Minnesota rejected an amendment to ban same sex marriage. In fact, every time the matter has come to a vote since the shift in public opinion in 2010, gay marriage has won. And gay marriage has been voted in by the assemblies of 10 other states.
You....you realize that you don't actually know what you're talking about, right?
The Supreme court is a collection of political hacks. You're admitting that their decisions have nothing to do with what the Constitution actually says.
The Supreme Court is part of the constitution. And per Federalist Paper 78, the court's role is the interpret the constitution. That you dismiss them doesn't change their constitutional role. Remember, constitutionality isn't defined by your personal opinion.
Votes by the state legislature only demonstrates what kind of pandering politicians are willing to engage in. According to Wiki only Maryland and Washington approved gay marriage by referendum. In almost all the other state that have gay marriage it is court imposed.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
LOL!
Setting aside your erroneous attempt to answer your own question... wherein ya cited a notion that preceded the Magna Carta. (LOL! Ya poor dumbass...)
The Constitution rests directly upon the Charter of American Principles that set forth the principles which were issued as the moral justification requiring our separation from Britain.
What's more, every facet of American principle is risen straight from the scriptures Gilligan. From "No Taxation without Representation, to the construct of republican governance itself, come straight out of Exodus Gilligan.
The grace of God, brought to us by Christ, established the terms of divine rights, individual equality and the authority to exercise such, without permission and in defiance of tyrannical government.
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
Really? Then who decided that the divine right of kings was not a legitimate Christian belief?
Did God?
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.They are inherent in the belief of the worth of an individual qua individual. I realize an uneducated, narrow minded bigoted drone like you can in no ways appreciate that. But there it is.
Do you deny that the divine right of kings was a Christian belief?
Do you understand that 'divine right' is a reference to God?
Yes, it was a claim maintained by the monarchy. Whether the common fold entertained it is another issue. The French Revolution demonstrated that they held no such belief by the end of the 18th century.
It was also put to rest by the reasoning set forth in the Magna Carta, which effectively found that that everybody, including the king, was subject to the law... Which is to say that "All men are created Equal", which is... what Christ said.
Which was what the Pharisees used as a justification to turn Christ over to Pilot. Ya see, Caesar took a dim view of that principle.... (FYI Gilligan, Caesar preceded the Magna Carta, by roughly 1200 years.)
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
LOL!
Setting aside your erroneous attempt to answer your own question... wherein ya cited a notion that preceded the Magna Carta. (LOL! Ya poor dumbass...)
The Constitution rests directly upon the Charter of American Principles that set forth the principles which were issued as the moral justification requiring our separation from Britain.
What's more, every facet of American principle is risen straight from the scriptures Gilligan. From "No Taxation without Representation, to the construct of republican governance itself, come straight out of Exodus Gilligan.
The grace of God, brought to us by Christ, established the terms of divine rights, individual equality and the authority to exercise such, without permission and in defiance of tyrannical government.
Now, please by all means, take the time to dismiss the Charter of American Principles, as you tout the Constitution as sacrosanct, despite the logical certainty that absent the principles, the constitution is meaningless... (which is why the Left can find NO MEANING in the Constitution, except that which they conjure, which serves your own subjective needs).
True enough. What do you propose to replace it with, judge rule?Everyone is entitled to their opinion on how the judicial system should work. Only brainwashed drones like you think Americans don't have the right to speak their minds.
Americans have spoken their minds. The Supreme Court as it exists is the product of the American voter elected certain presidents and certain senators who in fact decide who is on the court.
Americans voted against gay marriage whenever it came up for a vote.
Maine, Maryland and Washington State have all voted in gay marriage by popular referendum. Minnesota rejected an amendment to ban same sex marriage. In fact, every time the matter has come to a vote since the shift in public opinion in 2010, gay marriage has won. And gay marriage has been voted in by the assemblies of 10 other states.
You....you realize that you don't actually know what you're talking about, right?
The Supreme court is a collection of political hacks. You're admitting that their decisions have nothing to do with what the Constitution actually says.
The Supreme Court is part of the constitution. And per Federalist Paper 78, the court's role is the interpret the constitution. That you dismiss them doesn't change their constitutional role. Remember, constitutionality isn't defined by your personal opinion.
Votes by the state legislature only demonstrates what kind of pandering politicians are willing to engage in. According to Wiki only Maryland and Washington approved gay marriage by referendum. In almost all the other state that have gay marriage it is court imposed.
lol, referendum? That's direct democracy, aka, mob rule, as the cons like to call it.
So Men get to decide what God is for or against?
Where is representative government and the principles of the Bill of Rights in Christianity?
LOL!
Setting aside your erroneous attempt to answer your own question... wherein ya cited a notion that preceded the Magna Carta. (LOL! Ya poor dumbass...)
The Constitution rests directly upon the Charter of American Principles that set forth the principles which were issued as the moral justification requiring our separation from Britain.
It was mostly the belief of monarchies.
Do you understand that 'divine right' is a reference to God?
Yes, it was a claim maintained by the monarchy. Whether the common fold entertained it is another issue. The French Revolution demonstrated that they held no such belief by the end of the 18th century.
It was also put to rest by the reasoning set forth in the Magna Carta, which effectively found that that everybody, including the king, was subject to the law... Which is to say that "All men are created Equal", which is... what Christ said.
Which was what the Pharisees used as a justification to turn Christ over to Pilot. Ya see, Caesar took a dim view of that principle.... (FYI Gilligan, Caesar preceded the Magna Carta, by roughly 1200 years.)
So Men get to decide what God is for or against?
That's pretty much an argument for the non-existence of God.
Men get to use the sound reason God granted them, to discern what God is... both for and against.
This of course excludes you, in that while you may be male, you've never been in a state which would have ever qualified you to claim the title 'Man'... because of your decidedly feminine disposition and your distinct lack of any discernible means to reason, soundly.
Do you understand that 'divine right' is a reference to God?
Yes, it was a claim maintained by the monarchy. Whether the common fold entertained it is another issue. The French Revolution demonstrated that they held no such belief by the end of the 18th century.
It was also put to rest by the reasoning set forth in the Magna Carta, which effectively found that that everybody, including the king, was subject to the law... Which is to say that "All men are created Equal", which is... what Christ said.
Which was what the Pharisees used as a justification to turn Christ over to Pilot. Ya see, Caesar took a dim view of that principle.... (FYI Gilligan, Caesar preceded the Magna Carta, by roughly 1200 years.)
So Men get to decide what God is for or against?
That's pretty much an argument for the non-existence of God.
Men get to use the sound reason God granted them, to discern what God is... both for and against.
This of course excludes you, in that while you may be male, you've never been in a state which would have ever qualified you to claim the title 'Man'... because of your decidedly feminine disposition and your distinct lack of any discernible means to reason, soundly.
So God is a creation of Man.
Goddam you're catching on.
