The left: “we MUST protect children”. The left: “we have a right to kill children”

[NYcarbineer]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Unwittingly, you've just provided a good explanation as to why we have a Supreme Court.

 

[basquebromance]

"nobody except those who have lost children can understand what the loss really feels like, which makes the grief isolating. my world is now divided into before and after with the Sandy Hook massacre as point zero. before when i was in a theater watching a movie and after it's been like walking into a parking lot and trying to adjust to the bright lights from being so engrossed in this movie for so long. it's like the places i used to go to look different to me because it's this post-movie kind of thing" - Mother Of Sandy Hook victim

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

Try reading it again.

 

[basquebromance]

"one thing i do know: my brother will come back alive. Trump told me if you die, you came back alive." - Brother Of Parkland Massacre Victim

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Unwittingly, you've just provided a good explanation as to why we have a Supreme Court.

Which you people find unquestionably omniscient when it supports your nonsense.

You do recall that the SCOTUS was created as a co-equal branch of government that granted itself additional authority under Marbury v. Madison (1803), thereby breaking the model created by the Founders almost from the beginning?

Remember Dred Scott? One of yours.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Unwittingly, you've just provided a good explanation as to why we have a Supreme Court.

Which you people find unquestionably omniscient when it supports your nonsense.

You do recall that the SCOTUS was created as a co-equal branch of government that granted itself additional authority under Marbury v. Madison (1803), thereby breaking the model created by the Founders almost from the beginning?

Remember Dred Scott? One of yours.

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

Without the Supreme Court to be that authority, many places would have already lost their gun rights.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Gun rights and abortion rights are both constitutionally protected.

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

Try reading it again.

It's meaningless that a nut like you ignorant of the law thinks the Court made a 'bizarre' interpretation.

Is there a right to privacy or not?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

Try reading it again.

It's meaningless that a nut like you ignorant of the law thinks the Court made a 'bizarre' interpretation.

Is there a right to privacy or not?

Don't you know?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There is no “right” to commit murder. This is why I keep telling you to read the U.S. Constitution just once.

There is no definition of abortion as murder in the Constitution.

Indeed. Abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. The Court applied a bizarre interpretation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to push Roe v. Wade through.

Sort of the same switcheroo done with the obscure and intentionally misinterpreted "separation of church and state" phrase Jefferson coined to the nervous Danbury Baptists to assure them of no government interference. The Court flipped it to mean the opposite.

Unwittingly, you've just provided a good explanation as to why we have a Supreme Court.

Which you people find unquestionably omniscient when it supports your nonsense.

You do recall that the SCOTUS was created as a co-equal branch of government that granted itself additional authority under Marbury v. Madison (1803), thereby breaking the model created by the Founders almost from the beginning?

Remember Dred Scott? One of yours.

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

Without the Supreme Court to be that authority, many places would have already lost their gun rights.

The language of the Constitution and most of the Bill of Rights is quite plain. Nothing requires interpretation. It says what it says.

To say otherwise is no more than a plan to obfuscate.

 

[P@triot]

Hilarious.
Republican’s policies are designed to attack children.
Even most of them no longer bother to keep up the pretense.
Republicans care more about Russia than American children.

How do we know? Their policies tell us.

You said it! You entire post is "hilarious". Your sub-conscious even prefaced it as so. Deanrd is still pissed off that people are allowed to think for themselves, vote for themselves, etc. If you don't bow to the radical fascist will of Deanrd, he will attack you and he will lie about you. Typical of everyone on the left.

 

[P@triot]

I meant six. Only six percent or less of scientists admit to be Republican.

Yeah...exactly. The others have the typical left-wing fascist agenda to dupe you. And it worked. You are so easily duped. They tell you that the New York will be completely submersed in water by 2016. All you have to do is actually look at New York, but you're too dumb to do it. Instead, you would rather listen to the political activists masquerading as "scientists" and go "yep - 'Global Warming' is real - New York City is completely submersed in water".

 

[P@triot]

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

What does “the right to privacy” have to do with committing cold-blooded murder? Did you support Ted Bundy’s “right” to rape and murder as long as he did it on his own private property?

 

[P@triot]

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

We already have a “final authority” on what is constitutional or not. It’s called the U.S. Constitution. It was passed into law by the people and it clearly defines what is and what is not constitutional.

 

[P@triot]

Another dead child - all because the left is desperate for power and needs foreigners from other nations involved in our elections. I bet you won’t see a single march by the left to secure our borders. Hell, you won’t even see MSNBC, NBC, etc. cover this story for sixty seconds.

Toddler Dies After Drunk Driving Illegal Immigrant Smashes Into Ambulance

 

[JoeB131]

What does “the right to privacy” have to do with committing cold-blooded murder? Did you support Ted Bundy’s “right” to rape and murder as long as he did it on his own private property?

You are comparing women who get abortions to Ted Bundy? Really, Poodle?

Again, we didn't arrest women for getting abortions, even before Roe v. Wade.

Another dead child - all because the left is desperate for power and needs foreigners from other nations involved in our elections. I bet you won’t see a single march by the left to secure our borders. Hell, you won’t even see MSNBC, NBC, etc. cover this story for sixty seconds.

Hey, guy, the reason why we have illegals is because Rich People don't want to pay an American a far wage.

Nobody comes here because they want to vote.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you trying to claim that the Constitution in no way protects your right to privacy?

What does “the right to privacy” have to do with committing cold-blooded murder? Did you support Ted Bundy’s “right” to rape and murder as long as he did it on his own private property?

You're doing what is called 'begging the question'.

Look it up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

We already have a “final authority” on what is constitutional or not. It’s called the U.S. Constitution. It was passed into law by the people and it clearly defines what is and what is not constitutional.

You win dumbest post of the day.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

We already have a “final authority” on what is constitutional or not. It’s called the U.S. Constitution. It was passed into law by the people and it clearly defines what is and what is not constitutional.

Okay,

where in the Constitution does it say that laws against publishing child pornography are constitutional?

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you don't have a final authority on what is constitutional or not, then nothing is unconstitutional.

We already have a “final authority” on what is constitutional or not. It’s called the U.S. Constitution. It was passed into law by the people and it clearly defines what is and what is not constitutional.

Okay, so we don't need a Supreme Court to determine constitutionality?

So what happens, with no SCOTUS, if a state passes a law banning private ownership of handguns?