Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WTF does that even mean?Fascism was nothing more than a term the socialists (benito) made so the international form of socialism wouldnt be perverted by the national version.
The roots of fascism only helps the totalitarians cause.
Basically, the "definition" is meaningless. Us fighting over it only makes the totalitarians smile.
Can you please show your yellow defeated belly somewhere else?
Lefties love to change definitions.
They certainly changed the definition of "liberalism".
What you have now are pseudo liberals that are no longer about personal liberties but all about the "collective and the "greater good". They are not pissed that some seem to have it so bad as they are that some just seem to have it too good.
yes that's because they aren't liberals. Fascists are calling themselves "liberals". It's what totalitarian pigs do.
The definition of "pig" in the 1960s was "a police officer"
I changed the definition to include fascist pieces of shit who try to hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually apply to them.
The Problem With Using Fascist as a Political Insult
I don't agree with what the author says here, but you nor Merriam Webster have not defined the word to any useful degree
The same is true for "terrorism", no one can agree on a definition of that word.
You clearly don't grasp the basics of language
I'm saying you're the whiny bitch. You go around to these threads advising me to give up, that fighting is useless, it gets old. I get if you don't want to fight the fight, but kindly if that's so, just step aside and spare me your constant "don't waste time arguing this point it doesn't matter" nonsense. It does matter, and it serves to get this information out there. Even retards can learn.WTF does that even mean?Fascism was nothing more than a term the socialists (benito) made so the international form of socialism wouldnt be perverted by the national version.
The roots of fascism only helps the totalitarians cause.
Basically, the "definition" is meaningless. Us fighting over it only makes the totalitarians smile.
Can you please show your yellow defeated belly somewhere else?
Are you saying i am wrong? Look at the HISTORY of the word.
I had the same stance on this you have, up until a few weeks ago.
Quit being a whiny little bitch so we can discuss this like adults.
I am a liberal from the Haight Ashbury days of the 60's. What I see described as liberal here is not what a true liberal is. In my way of logical reasoning it is the conservative ideal to have one central governing body and a class of servant people. That is what most conservatives want in my view.
Not even possible.....American conservatives support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights which seek to limit and decentralize the power of government and to reign it in with checks and balances......and a separation of powers to prevent too much power accumulating in one place....
What you just described is what the left wing wants....and what they try to implement with each law they pass....
So much bigotry, combined with so much stupidity.I am a liberal from the Haight Ashbury days of the 60's. What I see described as liberal here is not what a true liberal is. In my way of logical reasoning it is the conservative ideal to have one central governing body and a class of servant people. That is what most conservatives want in my view.
Not even possible.....American conservatives support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights which seek to limit and decentralize the power of government and to reign it in with checks and balances......and a separation of powers to prevent too much power accumulating in one place....
What you just described is what the left wing wants....and what they try to implement with each law they pass....
The consitution enshrines capitalism and oligarchy, what the fuck are you smoking where you think this is true?
You're clearly descended from white trash, your ancestors were shit on by the Constitution. Not lifted up by it.
The original and historically "correct" interpretation of that text for the most part leaves almost all of us up shit's creek.
The first amendment wasn't very strong during ww1 much less 1776, neither was the second
I changed the definition to include fascist pieces of shit who try to hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually apply to them.yes that's because they aren't liberals. Fascists are calling themselves "liberals". It's what totalitarian pigs do.They certainly changed the definition of "liberalism".
What you have now are pseudo liberals that are no longer about personal liberties but all about the "collective and the "greater good". They are not pissed that some seem to have it so bad as they are that some just seem to have it too good.
The definition of "pig" in the 1960s was "a police officer"The Problem With Using Fascist as a Political Insult
I don't agree with what the author says here, but you nor Merriam Webster have not defined the word to any useful degree
The same is true for "terrorism", no one can agree on a definition of that word.
You clearly don't grasp the basics of language
Yeah that explains why I have worked as an editor, writer, and oh yeah, an English comp tutor.
I'm the one who doesn't understand "language" lol.
"Extreme counter-narrative on behalf of social justice is no vice, to rephrase Goldwater, because the ultimate veracity of those facts will always lie behind a veil of interpretations."
You take a few minutes to try to figure out what that means, skippy. You'll be a better person for it.
Why What Some Call Cultural Marxists Are Actually Pomofascists
More random nonsense that has nothing to do with what is going on right here, in this thread.now you're just spewing random words.
no------the book "1984" was written in 1949. It was popular and well known when I was
an adolescent
In other words, you are failing if you are attempting to communicate ideas. All you're doing is communicating your own disorganized thought patterns.
"disorganized thinking" is technical terminology. Try not to employ technical terms that you
do not understand.
Sorry, psychology isn't "technology" you fucking loon.
Please tell me you aren't a *mental health professional". Though I know you must be. "Mental Health" is another term that means the exact opposite of what it should mean, when nuts like you get ahold of it.
I am a health professional in the field of Neuroscience --------as was Dr Sigmund Freud
I changed the definition to include fascist pieces of shit who try to hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually apply to them.yes that's because they aren't liberals. Fascists are calling themselves "liberals". It's what totalitarian pigs do.What you have now are pseudo liberals that are no longer about personal liberties but all about the "collective and the "greater good". They are not pissed that some seem to have it so bad as they are that some just seem to have it too good.
The definition of "pig" in the 1960s was "a police officer"The Problem With Using Fascist as a Political Insult
I don't agree with what the author says here, but you nor Merriam Webster have not defined the word to any useful degree
The same is true for "terrorism", no one can agree on a definition of that word.
You clearly don't grasp the basics of language
Yeah that explains why I have worked as an editor, writer, and oh yeah, an English comp tutor.
I'm the one who doesn't understand "language" lol.
"Extreme counter-narrative on behalf of social justice is no vice, to rephrase Goldwater, because the ultimate veracity of those facts will always lie behind a veil of interpretations."
You take a few minutes to try to figure out what that means, skippy. You'll be a better person for it.
Why What Some Call Cultural Marxists Are Actually Pomofascists
LOL
Did you just imply being an editor of some no name publication that only white trash read means you have a better grasp of English than me?
No one who matters agrees on the definition of fascism
No one who matters agrees on the definition of terrorism
They're indefinable terms that implicate one group or another based on teh subtleties of the definition. Which is probably why no one ever agrees
How you think you magically did this I have no idea. But stop, it's terrible writing.
A 12 year old could tell you that.
Edit - and the liberals you're calling fascists hate teh state...they're the opposites of fascists. They're violent. Being violent alone doesn't make you a fascist, you dumb ****
No. I phrased it perfectly.I changed the definition to include fascist pieces of shit who try to hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually apply to them.yes that's because they aren't liberals. Fascists are calling themselves "liberals". It's what totalitarian pigs do.They certainly changed the definition of "liberalism".
What you have now are pseudo liberals that are no longer about personal liberties but all about the "collective and the "greater good". They are not pissed that some seem to have it so bad as they are that some just seem to have it too good.
The definition of "pig" in the 1960s was "a police officer"
I do not understand what "hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually
apply to them" means. Can you rephrase that statement?
fascism
The only official definition of Fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.
1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.
The use of militarism was implied only as a means to accomplish one of the three above principles, mainly to keep the people and rest of the world in line. Fascist countries are known for their harmony and lack of internal strife. There are no conflicting parties or elections in fascist countries.
Sounds like Obama.
What the holy fuck are you talking about? I am trying to help correct your ignorance. I appreciate when people correct me. I say thank you. Why do you hate self improvement?I'm saying you're the whiny bitch. You go around to these threads advising me to give up, that fighting is useless, it gets old. I get if you don't want to fight the fight, but kindly if that's so, just step aside and spare me your constant "don't waste time arguing this point it doesn't matter" nonsense. It does matter, and it serves to get this information out there. Even retards can learn.WTF does that even mean?Fascism was nothing more than a term the socialists (benito) made so the international form of socialism wouldnt be perverted by the national version.
The roots of fascism only helps the totalitarians cause.
Basically, the "definition" is meaningless. Us fighting over it only makes the totalitarians smile.
Can you please show your yellow defeated belly somewhere else?
Are you saying i am wrong? Look at the HISTORY of the word.
I had the same stance on this you have, up until a few weeks ago.
Quit being a whiny little bitch so we can discuss this like adults.
People like Rosie are the reason I say that the mental health field is a snake pit..and I'm not talking about the poor mentally ill slobs they abuse. Nobody is crazier than the nuts who infest it as *professionals*. Creepy.More random nonsense that has nothing to do with what is going on right here, in this thread.no------the book "1984" was written in 1949. It was popular and well known when I was
an adolescent
In other words, you are failing if you are attempting to communicate ideas. All you're doing is communicating your own disorganized thought patterns.
"disorganized thinking" is technical terminology. Try not to employ technical terms that you
do not understand.
Sorry, psychology isn't "technology" you fucking loon.
Please tell me you aren't a *mental health professional". Though I know you must be. "Mental Health" is another term that means the exact opposite of what it should mean, when nuts like you get ahold of it.
I am a health professional in the field of Neuroscience --------as was Dr Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Feud, the pedophile? His grandson was as well......fruit never falls far from the tree.
I changed the definition to include fascist pieces of shit who try to hide what they are by adopting terms that don't actually apply to them.yes that's because they aren't liberals. Fascists are calling themselves "liberals". It's what totalitarian pigs do.
The definition of "pig" in the 1960s was "a police officer"The Problem With Using Fascist as a Political Insult
I don't agree with what the author says here, but you nor Merriam Webster have not defined the word to any useful degree
The same is true for "terrorism", no one can agree on a definition of that word.
You clearly don't grasp the basics of language
Yeah that explains why I have worked as an editor, writer, and oh yeah, an English comp tutor.
I'm the one who doesn't understand "language" lol.
"Extreme counter-narrative on behalf of social justice is no vice, to rephrase Goldwater, because the ultimate veracity of those facts will always lie behind a veil of interpretations."
You take a few minutes to try to figure out what that means, skippy. You'll be a better person for it.
Why What Some Call Cultural Marxists Are Actually Pomofascists
LOL
Did you just imply being an editor of some no name publication that only white trash read means you have a better grasp of English than me?
No one who matters agrees on the definition of fascism
No one who matters agrees on the definition of terrorism
They're indefinable terms that implicate one group or another based on teh subtleties of the definition. Which is probably why no one ever agrees
How you think you magically did this I have no idea. But stop, it's terrible writing.
A 12 year old could tell you that.
Edit - and the liberals you're calling fascists hate teh state...they're the opposites of fascists. They're violent. Being violent alone doesn't make you a fascist, you dumb ****
Honey, I obviously have a better grasp of the language than you do.
Your repeated "white trash" references tell me that you're either a poorly educucated black, or an even more poorly educated, mentally ill, self hating antifa retard.
I am a liberal from the Haight Ashbury days of the 60's. What I see described as liberal here is not what a true liberal is. In my way of logical reasoning it is the conservative ideal to have one central governing body and a class of servant people. That is what most conservatives want in my view.
I am a liberal from the Haight Ashbury days of the 60's. What I see described as liberal here is not what a true liberal is. In my way of logical reasoning it is the conservative ideal to have one central governing body and a class of servant people. That is what most conservatives want in my view.
Not even possible.....American conservatives support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights which seek to limit and decentralize the power of government and to reign it in with checks and balances......and a separation of powers to prevent too much power accumulating in one place....
What you just described is what the left wing wants....and what they try to implement with each law they pass....
The consitution enshrines capitalism and oligarchy, what the fuck are you smoking where you think this is true?
You're clearly descended from white trash, your ancestors were shit on by the Constitution. Not lifted up by it.
The original and historically "correct" interpretation of that text for the most part leaves almost all of us up shit's creek.
The first amendment wasn't very strong during ww1 much less 1776, neither was the second
What the holy fuck are you talking about? I am trying to help correct your ignorance. I appreciate when people correct me. I say thank you. Why do you hate self improvement?I'm saying you're the whiny bitch. You go around to these threads advising me to give up, that fighting is useless, it gets old. I get if you don't want to fight the fight, but kindly if that's so, just step aside and spare me your constant "don't waste time arguing this point it doesn't matter" nonsense. It does matter, and it serves to get this information out there. Even retards can learn.WTF does that even mean?Fascism was nothing more than a term the socialists (benito) made so the international form of socialism wouldnt be perverted by the national version.
The roots of fascism only helps the totalitarians cause.
Basically, the "definition" is meaningless. Us fighting over it only makes the totalitarians smile.
Can you please show your yellow defeated belly somewhere else?
Are you saying i am wrong? Look at the HISTORY of the word.
I had the same stance on this you have, up until a few weeks ago.
Quit being a whiny little bitch so we can discuss this like adults.
Nice de-rail btw. Cant even discuss the substance from your own OP
fascism
The only official definition of Fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.
1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.
The use of militarism was implied only as a means to accomplish one of the three above principles, mainly to keep the people and rest of the world in line. Fascist countries are known for their harmony and lack of internal strife. There are no conflicting parties or elections in fascist countries.
Sounds like Obama.
I am a liberal from the Haight Ashbury days of the 60's. What I see described as liberal here is not what a true liberal is. In my way of logical reasoning it is the conservative ideal to have one central governing body and a class of servant people. That is what most conservatives want in my view.
Not even possible.....American conservatives support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights which seek to limit and decentralize the power of government and to reign it in with checks and balances......and a separation of powers to prevent too much power accumulating in one place....
What you just described is what the left wing wants....and what they try to implement with each law they pass....
The consitution enshrines capitalism and oligarchy, what the fuck are you smoking where you think this is true?
You're clearly descended from white trash, your ancestors were shit on by the Constitution. Not lifted up by it.
The original and historically "correct" interpretation of that text for the most part leaves almost all of us up shit's creek.
The first amendment wasn't very strong during ww1 much less 1776, neither was the second
Wow...the stupid is strong with you.......
