Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 76,067
- 73,950
He knows, he just whining because he can't get laid.One ideological group stole choice away from men? That is hardly a supportable thesis.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He knows, he just whining because he can't get laid.One ideological group stole choice away from men? That is hardly a supportable thesis.
If she was beaten up, there was a fight of some sort... and someone lost... Therefore; not equal.Apparently it did in the specific example you gave. Forgive me for pointing out a clear fallacy presented in your comment.Demanding equality doesn't make it so. In your example, if she were equal; they'd have fought to a draw. Equality exists only in mathematics.So demanding that she is equal gets her beaten up? And that is her fault?
Because upper body strength makes the man superior in all ways, huh? The ability to beat someone up is the ultimate show of superiority?
If a woman is intelligent, educated and ambitious, some high school dropout can beat her up and its her fault for not being able to fight?
No. When I said "So demanding that she is equal gets her beaten up?" there was no mention of fighting abilities.
You contradicted yourself at the word "should"...No. "Must" is actually just a personal desire, and beholden only to current written law, and ones location. There is no biological imperative that enforces this "must".I said neither. You’re the one trying to saddle both with a metric. I simply accept reality, and recognize that they are different. As such, they can never be “equal”.And..?
And? If you think all men are vastly superior to women, you either haven't met a lot of idiot men or haven't met a lot of sharp women. Both are out there in good numbers.
There is as much difference between individuals.
The main thing is that the gov't must give each the same opportunities and require that in our society.
It has nothing to do with biological imperative. And yes, it must. That is not a personal desire, imho, but should be a requirement
"Pretty sure" frankly, isn't good enough a position to found an argument on. Not to mention who started it is irrelevant to the notion of "equality".If she was beaten up, there was a fight of some sort... and someone lost... Therefore; not equal.Apparently it did in the specific example you gave. Forgive me for pointing out a clear fallacy presented in your comment.Demanding equality doesn't make it so. In your example, if she were equal; they'd have fought to a draw. Equality exists only in mathematics.
Because upper body strength makes the man superior in all ways, huh? The ability to beat someone up is the ultimate show of superiority?
If a woman is intelligent, educated and ambitious, some high school dropout can beat her up and its her fault for not being able to fight?
No. When I said "So demanding that she is equal gets her beaten up?" there was no mention of fighting abilities.
I am sure that some arguments escalate because the woman hits the man. But I also am pretty sure that those are in the minority.
Demanding equality doesn't make it so. In your example, if she were equal; they'd have fought to a draw. Equality exists only in mathematics.Men should at all times protect and cherish women. We are usually stronger, bigger, faster and quicker but when the “modern” woman says, F Off I can take care of myself and some bad guy abuses her because she is weaker it’s not my fault as I offered to help but she told me she was “Ms. Independent”. Playing the equal card results in more abuses not fewer.
So demanding that she is equal gets her beaten up? And that is her fault?
Because upper body strength makes the man superior in all ways, huh? The ability to beat someone up is the ultimate show of superiority?
If a woman is intelligent, educated and ambitious, some high school dropout can beat her up and its her fault for not being able to fight?
I'm sorry....but what is the responsibility of the Democrats when "the modern man" refuses to grow up when women are self-sufficient?,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
I don't know if it's self-loathing....more like self-pity and blaming women for all his troubles.....blaming women for his inability to grow up.,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
So much self loathing packed into an OP...
Lol, you know that republicans are in power roughly half the time, right?,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
So why did you start the thread blaming liberals for it 100%?Lol, you know that republicans are in power roughly half the time, right?,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
Yep and both parties have major flaws
So why did you start the thread blaming liberals for it 100%?Lol, you know that republicans are in power roughly half the time, right?,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
Yep and both parties have major flaws
How has that struggle benefited us?So it was a long, and fairly recent struggle for women.
Insightful and well said. The question, though, is what we mean by "outmoded."Advances on any number of fronts, but especially technology and the sciences generally (including psychology), have not been adequately assimilated by current thinking and practice. Clinging to outmoded thinking is not the answer to the problems we face today.
Rounded, roughly 1/4 of reported domestic violence incidents involve a man doing violence to a woman, 1/4 a woman doing violence to a man, and 1/2 each doing violence to the other.I am sure that some arguments escalate because the woman hits the man. But I also am pretty sure that those are in the minority.
I don't know if it's self-loathing....more like self-pity and blaming women for all his troubles.....blaming women for his inability to grow up.,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
So much self loathing packed into an OP...
My bad, you aren't the OP.So why did you start the thread blaming liberals for it 100%?Lol, you know that republicans are in power roughly half the time, right?,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
Yep and both parties have major flaws
What thread?
Because they started this a generation ago by teaching white kids in the burbs to be PC pussified and play video games all day while living with mommy and daddy until they were 27.
1 in 4 women experience abuse. It isn't just the left who created this situation.
Bullshit. United States roared after WW2.,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
There were no good old days.
For a select group of people. Yep, girls who were pregnant still went to the country to visit relatives. Whole lot of stuff you are ignoring.
Yes, things were a lot closer to idyllic if you were White and straight, but every American benefited from the post-WWII boom.
That women who put out & got pregnant "went to the country to visit relatives" instead of unabashedly having children out of wedlock or unashamedly having the children's lives terminated was, overall, a good thing sociologically.
Bullshit. United States roared after WW2.,,,the modern man remains boy-like, perpetually playing video games and hopping from woman to woman but never settling down.
This is the world liberal Democrats have created.
There were no good old days.
For a select group of people. Yep, girls who were pregnant still went to the country to visit relatives. Whole lot of stuff you are ignoring.
Yes, things were a lot closer to idyllic if you were White and straight, but every American benefited from the post-WWII boom.
That women who put out & got pregnant "went to the country to visit relatives" instead of unabashedly having children out of wedlock or unashamedly having the children's lives terminated was, overall, a good thing sociologically.
It is pretty insulting the way liberals, assume that anyone they disagree with, knows nothing of nuance.
Making a statement about "the good old days" does not imply that a person is unaware that "good" does not mean "perfect" or "utopia".