"The Obamacare implosion is worse than you think"

[Amelia]

ZOMG

Thought Police: Firms must swear ObamaCare not a factor in firings | Fox News

So the reason for Obama's latest subversion of the law was to head off people who he suspected would lay off people to get under the 50 employee limit?

 

[william the wie]

ZOMG

Thought Police: Firms must swear ObamaCare not a factor in firings | Fox News

So the reason for Obama's latest subversion of the law was to head off people who he suspected would lay off people to get under the 50 employee limit?

Yeah, how bad do you think that will backfire?

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edZvKjoaMZg]WVIT-CT: Connecticut Woman Doesn't Have Access To Her Favorite Doctor On ObamaCare Exchange - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql3SXU82WyY]Obamacare Broken Promises Montage - YouTube[/ame]

 

[dblack]

One of the "promises" made in the campaign to sell us ACA, was the idea that the IRS was limited in its ability to actually collect the penalties associated with the individual mandate. They told us that, if you refused to pay the mandate penalty, the most the IRS could do was deduct it from any refund owed.

Now, setting aside the stupidity of passing a law with penalties that are relatively easy to dodge (or, even dumber, advertising it as a 'feature' of the law), do we really believe that? Even if it is, for now, the letter of the law, does anyone believe it would remain so, especially in the face of widespread civil disobedience?

 

[william the wie]

One of the "promises" made in the campaign to sell us ACA, was the idea that the IRS was limited in its ability to actually collect the penalties associated with the individual mandate. They told us that, if you refused to pay the mandate penalty, the most the IRS could do was deduct it from any refund owed.

Now, setting aside the stupidity of passing a law with penalties that are relatively easy to dodge (or, even dumber, advertising it as a 'feature' of the law), do we really believe that? Even if it is, for now, the letter of the law, does anyone believe it would remain so, especially in the face of widespread civil disobedience?

I suspect the Obamabots do believe that.

 

[Amelia]

Rosen: Don't let Mark Udall's Obamacare scandal slide - The Denver Post

 

[william the wie]

Rosen: Don't let Mark Udall's Obamacare scandal slide - The Denver Post

Stay cool, 6/30/14 we will have the last of the audited numbers for the first quarter, by 9/30/14 the earnings reports will cover everyone who signed up 1/1-3/31/14.
4/15/15 the first subsidy recapture nightmares will hit.
This turkey will not fly.

 

[Spoonman]

So dems are all about the people while republicans favor corporations. well maybe not.

Businesses get relief on Obamacare deadline. Here?s why consumers likely won?t | The Exchange - Yahoo Finance

Businesses get relief on Obamacare deadline. Here’s why consumers likely won’t

The Affordable Care Act, President Obama’s signature health reform law, has turned out to be friendlier toward businesses than many ever imagined. The White House has twice delayed the deadline by which companies must comply with major provisions of the law, for instance, while easing up on other requirements.

But individuals are unlikely to get a similar break. The deadline for all Americans to have health insurance is March 31, and with only about 3.3 million enrolled so far, that leaves more than 40 million Americans who don’t have health insurance. Some of them will qualify for exemptions from the “individual mandate,” as it’s known, but that could still leave more than 10% of the U.S. population in violation of the law as of April 1.

 

[william the wie]

This is getting exciting fast.

 

[Wyld Kard]

Everyone should be required to have one of these cards.

 

[Jroc]

Everyone should be required to have one of these cards.

Obama keeps those in his pocket

 

[Amelia]

Remember Obama Saying People With Pre-Existing Conditions Shouldn't Pay More? Yeah, Well? | | Independent Journal Review

 

[william the wie]

Remember Obama Saying People With Pre-Existing Conditions Shouldn't Pay More? Yeah, Well? | | Independent Journal Review

This is surprising?

 

[Politico]

Nope. He doesn't want them covered at all if possible.

 

[william the wie]

That should become fairly well known prior to the election.

 

[Amelia]

Mary Landrieu's campaign web site seems to be missing something « Hot Air

 

[Amelia]

Report: Major medical industry job loss under Obamacare | The Daily Caller

 

[emilynghiem]

Everyone should be required to have one of these cards.

It's called invoking the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Well that, and maybe a plane ticket to Russia to seek political asylum.

 

[Spoonman]

hey, remember when surprises used to be fun. well not anymore with obamacare

Obamacare's Latest Surprise for Taxpayers? - Bloomberg