The odds are in favor of Hunter Biden in imminent lawsuit against computer repairman

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Did those sluts on video give thei permission to be taped?
 
One of the first thing that was revealed to be on it. You willing to overlook it because he is a democrat?
There was no child porn verified as being on it. That was one of the many unsubstantiated claims made by RWNJ’s. If it were on it, the FBI would have acted on it well before the election instead of focusing on influence peddling and tax fraud. I couldn’t care less about Hunter Biden’s political affiliation.
 
This thing going anywhere near being against the shop owner, is total bull shit and a pipe dream. Once criminal conduct was found and the owner abandoned it, they have nothing to stand on in court.
 
There is no evidence that Joe Biden got any money from China or Ukraine. Why would it be relevant?





The FBI has traditionally not said anything about ongoing investigations, and especially before an election. Comey broke with that when he announced he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. That could very well have thrown the election to Trump, we will never know. The investigation turned up nothing in the end.

When DoJ FBI investigation is opened and ongoing, we don’t know if any crimes were committed or if any charges will be leveled. Everyone is presumed innocent. When this is in an election year, and the investigation concerns candidates, blabbing before the facts are known and the investigation is concluded could influence an election. Why should they do that?
No Comey admitted she broke the law, but didn't intend too.
 
The laptop repair shop did exactly what he should have done.

He notified the FBI who were slow on picking up the laptop. And then kept the information secret....(he didn't know that it was being deliberately suppressed and the FBI wasn't talking)
Since he now has reason to fear for his safety from the FBI....and reasonably he did....he gave a copy of the contents of the laptop to the Republicans....who would make enough noise about it to ensure that he would be safe from nefarious activity from the government agencies. (Not a bad plan at all)

Now where Hunter is sueing....anyone can sue anyone or even anything at any time....even a ham sandwich for having mustard and mayo. Getting a win or settlement is a whole number story.

But the most interesting information is Hunter's involvement with Burisma. The CEO is an Oligarch in Ukraine who also was just fired from his position as Vice Minister of Defense for paying outrageous prices for food for troops. And most of the Burisma executives are currently in trouble for embezzlement.
 
There was no child porn verified as being on it. That was one of the many unsubstantiated claims made by RWNJ’s. If it were on it, the FBI would have acted on it well before the election instead of focusing on influence peddling and tax fraud. How couldn’t care less about Hunter Biden’s political affiliation.
sure looks like underage girls to me,,

both joe and hunter should sue anyone thats called them a pedophile and prove they arent,,
 
Anyone who creates content of any kind - letters, photos, memos, etc., owns a personal copyright to the content created, and no one can use private and/or copyrighted materials without the prior written consent of the owners. This applies to songs, photos, and your own image, if used in broadcast or publication.

Every time you see a Dunkin' Donuts coffee cup on the TV or movie screen, Dunkin' Donuts signed a release for you to see it. And if you don't have a signed release, Dunkin' Donuts can sue your ass for copyright infringement. Everyone who's picture appears in a newspaper or magazine, has signed a release for that photo to be printed/broadcast.

There is an entire branch of the insurance industry devoted insuring television and movies productions from lawsuits for copyright infringement.


The is also true of magazine and newspaper publishing.
Nothing you posted is true, Dumbass. Nothing.

But then, you have never posted the truth on any topic, Simp.
 
There was no child porn verified as being on it. That was one of the many unsubstantiated claims made by RWNJ’s. If it were on it, the FBI would have acted on it well before the election instead of focusing on influence peddling and tax fraud. I couldn’t care less about Hunter Biden’s political affiliation.
Wrong again... Hunter was seen in the video having sex with a juvenile. You are reaching real far to protect this ass clown.
 
There was no child porn verified as being on it. That was one of the many unsubstantiated claims made by RWNJ’s. If it were on it, the FBI would have acted on it well before the election instead of focusing on influence peddling and tax fraud. I couldn’t care less about Hunter Biden’s political affiliation.
Lol, the fbi hid the laptop and silenced anyone mentioning it before the election. They even called it Russian disinformation, if they would do all of that. You really think they would arrest him?
 
Wrong again... Hunter was seen in the video having sex with a juvenile. You are reaching real far to protect this ass clown.
Wrong. That video claim never surfaced. All that was shown (and can never be unseen) were disgusting images of porn between adults. Not protecting him at all, but you don’t need to make shit up, there is more than enough evidence of actual illegal activity to justify an investigation.
 
Lol, the fbi hid the laptop and silenced anyone mentioning it before the election. They even called it Russian disinformation, if they would do all of that. You really think they would arrest him?
They never actually said it was Russian disinformation, only that it could be and they were in the process of verifying it, which is appropriate.
 
Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:


So the laptop is authentic.

Once again, cult fucks lied and were proven wrong.

How many times did OP lie about the laptop?

You should self ban for being a lying twat.
 

Forum List

Back
Top