Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
Oh contraire, if Mitt is going to say 47% of the population pay no taxes and prefer to live off the government dole, then that includes GE, because they didn't pay taxes last year.Then you should not have brought it into the discussion under post 294:
I'm against any CEO or Board of Director's member of a mulit-national corporation from being part of any government of the United States. I also do not believe corporations should have any voice whatsoever in politics and elections. I think it should be illegal for any corporation to make any campaign donation of any size to any pac at any time and it should be a law that corporations may not have any meetings with any elected officials, unless it is done in a public forum.OldStyle brought up a valid point. Why does Jeffery Immelt, a great supporter of Obama, have a place within the administration while paying zero in corporate taxes. Seems that if corporate tax breaks is to become a major campaign issue to throw at Mitt Romney, Obama would start by cleaning his OWN house. Do you have an answer on that statement? ..... or do you enjoy throwing out your little comments about Romney, then change your tone and avoid the issue completely when someone brings up a valid issue concerning Obama's OWN administration? [calling the kettle black as it were, or finding yourself inside a glass house throwing stones, whichever metaphor you'd rather prefer] Do you have an answer to his claim with regard to Obama or not?
Yes, Obama has some house-cleaning to do. He can start by getting rid of Bush's Sec of Defense and shit-canning that neocon foreign policy agenda.
I also must add, republican's shouldn't be disrespecting CEO's of major corporations, they are far more corporate whores than the dems are. But both are owned by the multi-nationals.
Last edited: