The Perception of Cheating is the Real Danger to Democracy

[XponentialChaos]

The proof is the present reality, you ignorant pawn.

And you idiots wonder why you keep getting laughed out of court.

 

[dblack]

Meanwhile back in reality...

The GOP is increasing their numbers in the House.

Obviously the result of rampant voter fraud.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The strong red elections do not at all count because the Republican would have won regardless.

Of course they "count." First of all because you have no way of knowing that they would have won regardless, or whether Trump's endorsement excited the voters enough to overcome Dem cheating. Second because if Trump's endorsement really were the kiss of death that Dems are pretending to believe it is, they would have lost.

When it comes to the competitive races that decided the election, those candidates either failed or the candidate won by a tiny margin. All these considered, Republicans failed to re capture the senate and their House control will be razor thin.

All the races were "competitive," unless the candidate ran unopposed. Another Dem talking point that is a meaningless grasping at a straw. You can tell, becuase they never include a link that gives the stats behind that claim.

Not only did the majority of those Trump-endorsed candidates win their general elections, many of them were supported in their primaries by the DNC giving them money, since they would all be such a "cinch to beat." Possibly the biggest political miscalculation in the 21st century so far.

Whose money? Democrat donors' money. If you were one of them, you would have a good case to demand a refund at this point.

 

[Slade3200]

What really happened for one. It was first reported as an intruder breaking into the home and assaulting her husband. As it unraveled, it turns out Paul answered the door when police arrived. Who called the police? What was the complaint? According to the latest reports, he didn't assault Piglosi until the police actually arrived. Who was this man and what was his relationship between him, Nancy and her husband? And what's going to happen to him? Did the Pelosi's press charges? What's going on there.

But again, as I predicted, once the election is over, don't look for any updates on that story.

Huh? Where are you getting all this from? Let’s start with Paul opening the door. Link that please

 

[Slade3200]

Chill. Learn to recognize irony.

I was agreeing with you and adding on my observations about how silly this whole thing is

 

[BS Filter]

And you idiots wonder why you keep getting laughed out of court.

Trump leaves office. No more BLM and antifa riots. No more problems with so called racist cops. No more kneeling for the National Anthem. Miraculously things settle down. Deranged immature brats.

 

[Coyote]

If the perception of cheating is dangerous for democracy then what does that say about those who perpetrate false claims of fraud, knowing they are false?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Trump leaves office. No more BLM and antifa riots. No more problems with so called racist cops. No more kneeling for the National Anthem. Miraculously things settle down. Deranged immature brats.

We haven’t had many high-profile police mistakes since Trump left office. That has nothing to do with Trump or your retarded conspiracy theories.

 

[chesswarsnow]

If the perception of cheating is dangerous for democracy then what does that say about those who perpetrate false claims of fraud, knowing they are false?

Sorry bout that,

1. There was no cheating, no fraud?
2. So you really think that a person who doesn't campaign, stayed holed up in his basement, for President, and when he sets up a rally, on the road, four people show up.
3. That person gets 81 MILLLION votes cast for him?
4. Really??? lol!!!!
5. LIAR!!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[BS Filter]

We haven’t had many high-profile police mistakes since Trump left office. That has nothing to do with Trump or your retarded conspiracy theories.

Yes, we have, but no one is going to exploit it for political purposes because a Democrat is in the White House. You can't be that naive.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Yes, we have, but no one is going to exploit it for political purposes because a Democrat is in the White House. You can't be that naive.

Sorry bout that,

1. The Democrats are dishonest LIARS.
2. They don't want to believe that their party is stealing elections.
3. They also don't want to think the liberal media is biased.
4. Wrong.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Coyote]

Sorry bout that,

1. There was no cheating, no fraud?
2. So you really think that a person who doesn't campaign, stayed holed up in his basement, for President, and when he sets up a rally, on the road, four people show up.
3. That person gets 81 MILLLION votes cast for him?
4. Really??? lol!!!!
5. LIAR!!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Again...what about thise claiming fraud when they know there wasn't?

 

[Billy000]

Of course they "count." First of all because you have no way of knowing that they would have won regardless, or whether Trump's endorsement excited the voters enough to overcome Dem cheating. Second because if Trump's endorsement really were the kiss of death that Dems are pretending to believe it is, they would have lost.

All the races were "competitive," unless the candidate ran unopposed. Another Dem talking point that is a meaningless grasping at a straw. You can tell, becuase they never include a link that gives the stats behind that claim.

Not only did the majority of those Trump-endorsed candidates win their general elections, many of them were supported in their primaries by the DNC giving them money, since they would all be such a "cinch to beat." Possibly the biggest political miscalculation in the 21st century so far.

Whose money? Democrat donors' money. If you were one of them, you would have a good case to demand a refund at this point.

I’m sorry do you even have the numbers on how many of Trump’s picks won? Either way, you can’t pretend solid red races would have gone to democrats if Trump hadn’t endorsed them. It sounds like you have a very dim view of your own party if that’s the case lol. Talk about yikes dude.

As far as the elections that were TOSS UPS, and not solid blue or red, Trump failed to have an effect that mattered.

 

[BackAgain]

The actuality of cheating is even worse.

 

[scruffy]

And if we allow these deranged perverts to keep indoctrinating children we aren't gonna have a USA.

We're not gonna have one anyway.

If this is the way things are going I'm going to reconsider how I can best use my remaining years.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yes, we have, but no one is going to exploit it for political purposes because a Democrat is in the White House. You can't be that naive.

Yea, like which ones?

 

[Seymour Flops]

If the perception of cheating is dangerous for democracy then what does that say about those who perpetrate false claims of fraud, knowing they are false?

If they know they are making a false claim of fraud, they are just as guilty as the people who know there is cheating and deny it.

Also equally bad are people who fight against any attempt to restore confidence in elections. I assume that their motivation is that they think cheating helps their side, but even if they are just doing it to be jerky, they are aiding and abetting the loss of comfidence in elections that could ruin our democracy.

 

[Billy000]

The actuality of cheating is even worse.

Fantasies of cheating are something real adults don’t have time to indulge. Provide the evidence voter fraud is rampant and widespread or shut up. It’s that simple.

 

[BackAgain]

Fantasies of cheating are something real adults don’t have time to indulge. Provide the evidence voter fraud is rampant and widespread or shut up. It’s that simple.

Fuck your self. It’s even simpler.

 

[Slade3200]

Of course it is not.It is completely legal and all the charges warrant investigations that never happen. Why it does not happen is as obvious as the fraud.

What do you want to investigate now?