The Personhood of the unborn needs to be settled

[BrokeLoser]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

They are not a person.

Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what a fetus becomes....Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what's inside an eagles egg.

No need to play stupid. The key word is becomes. Not is. And it night never become. Most pregnancies do not.

Hey look...I'm not debating the hair splitting twisted semantics you whackos hide behind to justify your filth...That said, do you think it's odd that you defend an eagles egg the way you do?

You are obsessed with filth. Stop projecting it on others. It is not semantics. Now keep your filthy hands off of our rights.

 

[satrebil]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

 

[BrokeLoser]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

They are not a person.

Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what a fetus becomes....Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what's inside an eagles egg.

No need to play stupid. The key word is becomes. Not is. And it night never become. Most pregnancies do not.

Hey look...I'm not debating the hair splitting twisted semantics you whackos hide behind to justify your filth...That said, do you think it's odd that you defend an eagles egg the way you do?

I totally defend an eagle's right to raise its egg. Likewise I totally support a woman's right to bear her child. I oppose forced abortions on any woman.

Sure you do...haha...what a poor attempt to deflect.

 

[EGR one]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

Neither. I see the question as irrelevant. We're talking about the contents of a woman's body. It doesn't matter to me whether that's a "person" or a "tribe" or an entire civilization of microbial "people" that someone thinks they need to save. The bottom line is that it's no one else's business.

So, in your humble opinion, on day of birth minus one, it is no one else's business, but on day of birth plus one, it is everyone's business?
Personally, I am of the opinion that parents should have the unabridged right to strangle their children at any time prior to their eighteenth birthday. That would solve a whole lot of society's problems. But, that is not the current debate.

A fetus is a human being. Both science and common sense have no doubt about that fact. Fetus, infant, toddler, child, teen, adult are just phases in the development of a human being. Our Constitution does not stipulate inherit rights to a human being before birth, but it does not prohibit rights either. Every society has the right to decide what value it places on unborn humans, and make laws according to that value.

My arm is an integral part of my body, but if I decide I wish to have it removed, without a medical necessity to do so, I would have a slim chance of finding a medical professional that would be willing to remove it, and society would probably put me in a loony bin for wanting to have it removed.

In most states, suicide is illegal. No control over my body there.

 

[Siete]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

must be a contest going on to see which RW'r can type the dumbest response ...

 

[EGR one]

Fuckin’ personhood?

You can’t expect anything else from nutters

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

so what do you call something that can’t survive on its own and derives its sustenance from an actual person?

I would call it a baby, a child, or an invalid.

 

[satrebil]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

must be a contest going on to see which RW'r can type the dumbest response ...

Sorry I just shot your narrative all to piss.

Why don't you just acknowledge your bullshit? How is it NOT a person if the mother kills it but it IS a person if I do it?

 

[dblack]

How about you decide for yourself and yours, I'll decide for myself and mine. Let's let that couple over there decide for themselves too......That couple over there, they don't want a baby, no person there. That other couple, they want a baby, it's a person.....to them.

The concept of freedom is lost on most people with political aspirations. Indeed, they get involved because they want to bully people.

 

[dblack]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

They are not a person.

So they are a parasite?

They are the contents of a person's body. The only way you can even know for sure that they are there is to pry open the mother's body and inspect its contents.

 

[dblack]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

They are not a person.

Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what a fetus becomes....Lets play stupid and pretend we don't know what's inside an eagles egg.

I don't think you're playing, BL.

 

[Siete]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

must be a contest going on to see which RW'r can type the dumbest response ...

Sorry I just shot your narrative all to piss.

Why don't you just acknowledge your bullshit? How is it NOT a person if the mother kills it but it IS a person if I do it?

why dont you just let people run their own life rather than trying to run it for them

aka

MIND YOUR OWN F'N BUSINESS AND STFU.

 

[satrebil]

How about you decide for yourself and yours, I'll decide for myself and mine. Let's let that couple over there decide for themselves too......That couple over there, they don't want a baby, no person there. That other couple, they want a baby, it's a person.....to them.

The concept of freedom is lost on most people with political aspirations. Indeed, they get involved because they want to bully people.

One of the core tenets of freedom is THE RIGHT TO LIVE. Derp.

 

[dblack]

My arm is an integral part of my body, but if I decide I wish to have it removed, without a medical necessity to do so, I would have a slim chance of finding a medical professional that would be willing to remove it, and society would probably put me in a loony bin for wanting to have it removed.

Yeah. That's the same basic argument. Should people have the right to do whatever they want with their body, or not? Should the government have the power to overrule our personal decisions because someone else objects?

 

[satrebil]

With the recent ruling in Alabama regarding abortion, and the eventual path towards SCOTUS to settle the issue, the obvious thing to do is to define what exactly the unborn is, something Roe vs. Wade shied away from doing. After all, the reason blacks were mistreated under the Constitution was because they were not identified as equals, they were 3/5 a human being.

There are but two possibilities from my vantage point.

1. They are a parasite, defined as an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism

2. Or they are a human being.

Which camp do you fall in?

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

must be a contest going on to see which RW'r can type the dumbest response ...

Sorry I just shot your narrative all to piss.

Why don't you just acknowledge your bullshit? How is it NOT a person if the mother kills it but it IS a person if I do it?

why dont you just let people run their own life rather than trying to run it for them

aka

MIND YOUR OWN F'N BUSINESS AND STFU.

Way to deflect.

And no, I will not mind my own business as millions of defenseless babies are slaughtered year after year on the altar of "women's rights". I will fight it in word and action. I will donate money to pro-life causes & I will vote for pro-life politicians. And there's not a FUCKING THING you can do about it.

 

[dblack]

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

You shouldn't be, no. Any more than if you interrupted her mid-coitus and prevented conception.

 

[satrebil]

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

You shouldn't be, no. Any more than if you interrupted her mid-coitus and prevented conception.

Preventing a pregnancy =/= terminating one.

But I gotta say, you're a pretty sick fuck to think it should be legally permissible to beat a woman into a miscarriage.

 

[dblack]

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

You shouldn't be, no. Any more than if you interrupted her mid-coitus and prevented conception.

Preventing a pregnancy =/= terminating one.

But I gotta say, you're a pretty sick fuck to think it should be legally permissible to beat a woman into a miscarriage.

I didn't say that, moron. I said they shouldn't be charged with homicide. Are you stupid, or deliberately lying? Guess it doesn't matter. Piss off.

 

[LoneLaugher]

And our resident RW nutbags stake their claim to the wrong side of history again.

 

[satrebil]

And our resident RW nutbags stake their claim to the wrong side of history again.

Says the baby killer.

 

[Siete]

There is no personhood

There. That’s settled

Settled, eh? So if I were to beat a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry, I would NOT be charged with a homicide?

must be a contest going on to see which RW'r can type the dumbest response ...

Sorry I just shot your narrative all to piss.

Why don't you just acknowledge your bullshit? How is it NOT a person if the mother kills it but it IS a person if I do it?

why dont you just let people run their own life rather than trying to run it for them

aka

MIND YOUR OWN F'N BUSINESS AND STFU.

Way to deflect.

And no, I will not mind my own business as millions of defenseless babies are slaughtered year after year on the altar of "women's rights". I will fight it in word and action. I will donate money to pro-life causes & I will vote for pro-life politicians. And there's not a FUCKING THING you can do about it.

I dont want to do a fucking thing about the way you vote you dumbass.

if try to run your miserable little life you bitch like a teenage girl

women running their own life, you bitch like a teenage girl.

admit it - youre a whiny bitch who loves to bitch.