The REAL eason why climate change is political

[toobfreak]

Billy O, why is it that your every thread is a total waste of time? The whole climate change thing started as another European scam just to get their hands into the pockets of America. Face up to it.

 

[Billy000]

You don't know shit about science. That's part of being a Trump supporter. Climate is complicated. Nothing changes the fact that the earth's rate of warming increased dramatically starting from the industrial revolution

That's funny. You claim that I don't know anything about science, but you don't even know that the Earth started warming in the 18th Century - long before the beginning of the Industrial revolution.

Hilarious!

Look at all the ice in the painting of Washington crossing the Delaware. Do you ever see ice like that today? Keep in mind the event depicted occurred on Christmas day, the beginning of Winter. The Deleware hasn't iced over like that for over 100 years.

Yeah just as I thought - you don't know science. It's evident by you using a fucking painting with ice in it. And sure there probably was ice on the river, but you're a moron if you think this artist was on the river painting this in real time lol. Good god dude. It's an interpretation

No, I don't think he was on the river painting in real time. He based the painting on accounts by the people who were involved. They, including Washington, all reported a heavy load of ice on the river..

The Delaware hasn't iced over in well over 100 years. The fact that winter was much colder during the Revolution than it was by the Civil War is simply undeniable, and it was colder during the Civil War than it is was during WW II.

Those are facts. They simply can't be denied by any rational intelligent person.

You made an ass of yourself claiming I don't know shit about science and then claiming the Earth started heating up at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Lol oh wow. So just so we are clear, you think winter was colder in the 1700s than the 1800s because there were chunks of ice in the Delaware?

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

 

[toobfreak]

That's funny. You claim that I don't know anything about science, but you don't even know that the Earth started warming in the 18th Century - long before the beginning of the Industrial revolution.

Hilarious!

Look at all the ice in the painting of Washington crossing the Delaware. Do you ever see ice like that today? Keep in mind the event depicted occurred on Christmas day, the beginning of Winter. The Deleware hasn't iced over like that for over 100 years.

Yeah just as I thought - you don't know science. It's evident by you using a fucking painting with ice in it. And sure there probably was ice on the river, but you're a moron if you think this artist was on the river painting this in real time lol. Good god dude. It's an interpretation

No, I don't think he was on the river painting in real time. He based the painting on accounts by the people who were involved. They, including Washington, all reported a heavy load of ice on the river..

The Delaware hasn't iced over in well over 100 years. The fact that winter was much colder during the Revolution than it was by the Civil War is simply undeniable, and it was colder during the Civil War than it is was during WW II.

Those are facts. They simply can't be denied by any rational intelligent person.

You made an ass of yourself claiming I don't know shit about science and then claiming the Earth started heating up at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Lol oh wow. So just so we are clear, you think winter was colder in the 1700s than the 1800s because there were chunks of ice in the Delaware?

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature.

No it doesn't! WHAT dramatic increase in temperature? No temperatures have changed here in my life and I'm 60 years old!!!

 

[Billy000]

Yeah just as I thought - you don't know science. It's evident by you using a fucking painting with ice in it. And sure there probably was ice on the river, but you're a moron if you think this artist was on the river painting this in real time lol. Good god dude. It's an interpretation

No, I don't think he was on the river painting in real time. He based the painting on accounts by the people who were involved. They, including Washington, all reported a heavy load of ice on the river..

The Delaware hasn't iced over in well over 100 years. The fact that winter was much colder during the Revolution than it was by the Civil War is simply undeniable, and it was colder during the Civil War than it is was during WW II.

Those are facts. They simply can't be denied by any rational intelligent person.

You made an ass of yourself claiming I don't know shit about science and then claiming the Earth started heating up at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Lol oh wow. So just so we are clear, you think winter was colder in the 1700s than the 1800s because there were chunks of ice in the Delaware?

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature.

No it doesn't! WHAT dramatic increase in temperature? No temperatures have changed here in my life and I'm 60 years old!!!

Christ dude. The increase refers to global average temperature.

 

[toobfreak]

No, I don't think he was on the river painting in real time. He based the painting on accounts by the people who were involved. They, including Washington, all reported a heavy load of ice on the river..

The Delaware hasn't iced over in well over 100 years. The fact that winter was much colder during the Revolution than it was by the Civil War is simply undeniable, and it was colder during the Civil War than it is was during WW II.

Those are facts. They simply can't be denied by any rational intelligent person.

You made an ass of yourself claiming I don't know shit about science and then claiming the Earth started heating up at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Lol oh wow. So just so we are clear, you think winter was colder in the 1700s than the 1800s because there were chunks of ice in the Delaware?

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature.

No it doesn't! WHAT dramatic increase in temperature? No temperatures have changed here in my life and I'm 60 years old!!!

Christ dude. The increase refers to global average temperature.

Ohh. Global average temperature. That is probably just the heat built up from all the bullshit spread around the world by cow farts, penguin poop and democratic climate sympathizers.

 

[Billy000]

Lol oh wow. So just so we are clear, you think winter was colder in the 1700s than the 1800s because there were chunks of ice in the Delaware?

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature.

No it doesn't! WHAT dramatic increase in temperature? No temperatures have changed here in my life and I'm 60 years old!!!

Christ dude. The increase refers to global average temperature.

Ohh. Global average temperature. That is probably just the heat built up from all the bullshit spread around the world by cow farts, penguin poop and democratic climate sympathizers.

I don't expect you to understand science. Thanks for trying at least.

 

[Billy000]

The ONLY reason why the rightwing initially doubted the science on climate change is because republicans in office told them to. That's it. And yes, I am referring to independent conservatives as well. The rightwing listens to anything those Neanderthals in office say.

Once republicans in office denied climate change because they were bought off by the fossil fuel industry, the republican dick-sucking network known as Fox News ran with it. From there, their simple minded stupid audience bought into it too.

If the fossil fuel industry never made the GOP their bitch in the first place, this wouldn't even be a political issue.

Then we have Trump in his typical 5 year old boy fashion, pulled the US from the Paris Accord and cited a made-up global conspiracy to undermine the US economically. God he is a moron. Oh and just in case you didn't know Trumpsters, the man you now worship used to publicly criticize Obama for not doing enough about climate change. Further proof that Trump has no core principles. Why do Trumpsters not see that by now?

When literally every government on earth says that climate change is real and the republicans are still in denial, you have to wonder if it is simply because repubs are too much of pussies to admit they were wrong about this issue all along. Maybe they are scared of the truth?

These 22 Republican Senators Got Paid By Exxon To Urge Trump To Ditch Paris Climate Accords

Oil and gas industry has pumped millions into Republican campaigns

Donald Trump once backed urgent climate action. Wait, what?

Actually that is NOT the only reason. The other reason is it's bad science.

You think you're informed on climate? Answer these 3 questions, and if you have to look up the answer to any of them then you haVe no standing in discussing climate change.

1) why is it hotter in the Summer than winter?
2) what caused the Little Ice Age?
3) what caused the Sahara desert to become a desert when 6000 years ago it was a green forested land with many mammals?

Um well 2 of these questions are irrelevant because man made climate change refers to the beginning of the industrial revolution. As for why it's hotter in summer, it's because seasonal change is irrelevant to the point. The GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE has increased increased at an unprecedented rate since the industrial revolution.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The ONLY reason why the rightwing initially doubted the science on climate change is because republicans in office told them to. That's it. And yes, I am referring to independent conservatives as well. The rightwing listens to anything those Neanderthals in office say.

Once republicans in office denied climate change because they were bought off by the fossil fuel industry, the republican dick-sucking network known as Fox News ran with it. From there, their simple minded stupid audience bought into it too.

If the fossil fuel industry never made the GOP their bitch in the first place, this wouldn't even be a political issue.

Then we have Trump in his typical 5 year old boy fashion, pulled the US from the Paris Accord and cited a made-up global conspiracy to undermine the US economically. God he is a moron. Oh and just in case you didn't know Trumpsters, the man you now worship used to publicly criticize Obama for not doing enough about climate change. Further proof that Trump has no core principles. Why do Trumpsters not see that by now?

When literally every government on earth says that climate change is real and the republicans are still in denial, you have to wonder if it is simply because repubs are too much of pussies to admit they were wrong about this issue all along. Maybe they are scared of the truth?

These 22 Republican Senators Got Paid By Exxon To Urge Trump To Ditch Paris Climate Accords

Oil and gas industry has pumped millions into Republican campaigns

Donald Trump once backed urgent climate action. Wait, what?

Actually that is NOT the only reason. The other reason is it's bad science.

You think you're informed on climate? Answer these 3 questions, and if you have to look up the answer to any of them then you haVe no standing in discussing climate change.

1) why is it hotter in the Summer than winter?
2) what caused the Little Ice Age?
3) what caused the Sahara desert to become a desert when 6000 years ago it was a green forested land with many mammals?

Um well 2 of these questions are irrelevant because man made climate change refers to the beginning of the industrial revolution. As for why it's hotter in summer, it's because seasonal change is irrelevant to the point. The GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE has increased increased at an unprecedented rate since the industrial revolution.

Prove it changed at an unprecedented rate...

 

[Wyatt earp]

The ONLY reason why the rightwing initially doubted the science on climate change is because republicans in office told them to.

Wrong it's because every prediction the left makes just doesn't pan out. The earth stops warming and you change the name to global climate change to cover all of the bases. At some point we have to ask wheres the beef?

The real problem is the fake solution that the left offered up. They used global warming as a cover for redistributing money, most from the U.S. That is all it was about. In fact, this plan to create a crisis of global proportions for bringing in socialism was thought of decades ago. They tried to convince people in the 70s that the earth was cooling but it didn't fly. This time, they had enough people pushing for it, entire countries, that they managed to alarm a lot of people.

The debate isn't about global warming. It's about their plan to rob American tax payers to fund governments in other countries that we should be talking about. And it does tie in to what Hillary was telling Wall Street people about - one world government.

100% wrong. It was an international solution to try to keep this planet livable as long as possible. If you're going to listen to the pathological liar and mouth his lies you'll always be wrong.

How is the planet no going to liveable?

.

 

[Chuz Life]

Hmmm, yeah, a river freezing over in the 1700s that never freezes in the 1800s indicates the climate was colder, but that isn't the only evidence. Even your douche bag "climate scientists" will admit exactly what I'm saying.

Lol this is too good. The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature. It's interesting you post the second graph because it seemingly contradicts the first and you use both as proof of your point lol. The secongraph shows no difference between 1700s and 1800s. The truth is however the second graph doesn't contradict the first. What it shows is CHANGE from one point to the other. Meaning, the reason why there's a big difference between 1900 and 1000 AD is because of the little Ice age that predated the industrial revolution.

Now the third graph you should show me is the increase in temperature through out the 20th century.

The first graph basically proves that the industrial revolution correlates with the dramatic increase in temperature.

No it doesn't! WHAT dramatic increase in temperature? No temperatures have changed here in my life and I'm 60 years old!!!

Christ dude. The increase refers to global average temperature.

Ohh. Global average temperature. That is probably just the heat built up from all the bullshit spread around the world by cow farts, penguin poop and democratic climate sympathizers.

I don't expect you to understand science. Thanks for trying at least.

Ummmmm.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US is relocating an entire town because of climate change. And this is just the beginning

Then again, if you don't want to believe the earth is warming, fine. Let's say it isn't.

Now make the argument that therefore pollution is okay, and that the development of renewable, clean energy sources is stupid.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If even a conservative state like Utah can see the light, how out on the fringe does that leave the sort of conservatives you see around here?

Salt Lake City Makes Historic Commitment to 100% Renewables by 2032

 

[fncceo]

The US is relocating an entire town because of climate change. And this is just the beginning

Then again, if you don't want to believe the earth is warming, fine. Let's say it isn't.

Now make the argument that therefore pollution is okay, and that the development of renewable, clean energy sources is stupid.

I'm all for renewables...

 

[fncceo]

If even a conservative state like Utah can see the light, how out on the fringe does that leave the sort of conservatives you see around here?

Salt Lake City Makes Historic Commitment to 100% Renewables by 2032

Because NO crazy ideas ever came out of Salt Lake City.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If even a conservative state like Utah can see the light, how out on the fringe does that leave the sort of conservatives you see around here?

Salt Lake City Makes Historic Commitment to 100% Renewables by 2032

Because NO crazy ideas ever came out of Salt Lake City.

See? The fringe thinks renewable energy is a crazy idea.

 

[Mac1958]

The ONLY reason why the rightwing initially doubted the science on climate change is because republicans in office told them to. That's it. And yes, I am referring to independent conservatives as well. The rightwing listens to anything those Neanderthals in office say.

Well, I disagree.

In all seriousness, I would replace "republicans in office" with "conservative talk radio".
.

 

[tyroneweaver]

If even a conservative state like Utah can see the light, how out on the fringe does that leave the sort of conservatives you see around here?

Salt Lake City Makes Historic Commitment to 100% Renewables by 2032

Because NO crazy ideas ever came out of Salt Lake City.

so tyroneweaver is some sorta freak now ehh ?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If even a conservative state like Utah can see the light, how out on the fringe does that leave the sort of conservatives you see around here?

Salt Lake City Makes Historic Commitment to 100% Renewables by 2032

There is nothing wrong with alternative energy except the price and reliability. When we can make fuel cheaper and cleaner, I don't think you'll find anybody against that.

Remember it's the left that politicized this issue and not the right. The left wants us to use alternative energy no matter what the cost, inconvenience, or negatives to it, and we on the right wish to keep our lower cost reliable energy because we don't believe that CO2 is all that much of an issue.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

The ONLY reason why the rightwing initially doubted the science on climate change is because republicans in office told them to. That's it. And yes, I am referring to independent conservatives as well. The rightwing listens to anything those Neanderthals in office say.

Once republicans in office denied climate change because they were bought off by the fossil fuel industry, the republican dick-sucking network known as Fox News ran with it. From there, their simple minded stupid audience bought into it too.

If the fossil fuel industry never made the GOP their bitch in the first place, this wouldn't even be a political issue.

Then we have Trump in his typical 5 year old boy fashion, pulled the US from the Paris Accord and cited a made-up global conspiracy to undermine the US economically. God he is a moron. Oh and just in case you didn't know Trumpsters, the man you now worship used to publicly criticize Obama for not doing enough about climate change. Further proof that Trump has no core principles. Why do Trumpsters not see that by now?

When literally every government on earth says that climate change is real and the republicans are still in denial, you have to wonder if it is simply because repubs are too much of pussies to admit they were wrong about this issue all along. Maybe they are scared of the truth?

These 22 Republican Senators Got Paid By Exxon To Urge Trump To Ditch Paris Climate Accords

Oil and gas industry has pumped millions into Republican campaigns

Donald Trump once backed urgent climate action. Wait, what?

And yet the biggest proponent of Global Warming Al Gore stands to make millions if not billions buy selling carbon credits, Scientist are misrepresenting or outright lying about data collected because governments are spend billions on Climate change.

Its not about maybe lowering the temperature 1 degree over the next 50 to 100 years it's about controlling the means of power production and transferring wealth to 3rd world countries.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US is relocating an entire town because of climate change. And this is just the beginning

Then again, if you don't want to believe the earth is warming, fine. Let's say it isn't.

Now make the argument that therefore pollution is okay, and that the development of renewable, clean energy sources is stupid.

It is stupid if you think that forcing everybody to use cleaner energy will do anything for temperature. If we switch to cleaner fuel because it makes economic sense, that's a different story.