The real reason Dr. Seuss was cancelled

They responsibly acknowledged that what is acceptable in today's society is different than what was acceptable in times past.
Are you referring to the Democratic Party here? Because no, they have never acknowledged that at all.

Look at the context of the single sentence you quoted. It was not about the Democratic party. He was referring to Dr Seuss Foundation.

Cut dinger some slack. He's trying to hone his "right wing pundit" debating technique. That's where you randomly bounce between related and unrelated subjects till everything is muddled, and anything said about one of the subjects somehow gets applied to all the subjects. I'm sure that if I would have played along with his plan, as I should have, he would have roundly destroyed me by now, just like he promised. His batshit crazy claims are not at fault. I'm just not cooperating as I should. I sorry.
I'm the least partisan person here. You on the other hand are a partisan hack.
You won't even admit to voting for Trump. probably because you're embarrassed.
But I didn't vote for Trump, dummy. Feels dumb, don't it?
A bible thumper like you could be a Democrat. So what? The HomoJesus Party?
You really are into labels, huh?

One day you might learn to think for yourself but that will probably only happen once you reach rock bottom.
So talking to you on this communist board isn't rock bottom? :biggrin:
Not even close. You'll know it when you are there. Given your failed behaviors it can't be that far off.
So taking advice from you is rock bottom? Got it.
 
They responsibly acknowledged that what is acceptable in today's society is different than what was acceptable in times past.
Are you referring to the Democratic Party here? Because no, they have never acknowledged that at all.

Look at the context of the single sentence you quoted. It was not about the Democratic party. He was referring to Dr Seuss Foundation.

Cut dinger some slack. He's trying to hone his "right wing pundit" debating technique. That's where you randomly bounce between related and unrelated subjects till everything is muddled, and anything said about one of the subjects somehow gets applied to all the subjects. I'm sure that if I would have played along with his plan, as I should have, he would have roundly destroyed me by now, just like he promised. His batshit crazy claims are not at fault. I'm just not cooperating as I should. I sorry.
I'm the least partisan person here. You on the other hand are a partisan hack.

Thank you for sharing that with me. I often worry about what your deepest inner thoughts might be.
There's a reason you live alone, bro.
There's a reason no one here ever agrees with you, brah.
And I could not be happier about that, Taz. I'm not insecure like you.
No, that must be why you desperately try to find anyone to believe your kooky theories as fact.
I know it's important to you for people to agree with you because you need that validation, but not everyone is like that, Taz. Some people are able to think on their own and not be told what to believe by others.
Sheesh brah, we're actually trying to help you out of your fantasy world.
I have no doubt that you and Bulldog believe that, Taz.
 
They responsibly acknowledged that what is acceptable in today's society is different than what was acceptable in times past.
Are you referring to the Democratic Party here? Because no, they have never acknowledged that at all.

Look at the context of the single sentence you quoted. It was not about the Democratic party. He was referring to Dr Seuss Foundation.

Cut dinger some slack. He's trying to hone his "right wing pundit" debating technique. That's where you randomly bounce between related and unrelated subjects till everything is muddled, and anything said about one of the subjects somehow gets applied to all the subjects. I'm sure that if I would have played along with his plan, as I should have, he would have roundly destroyed me by now, just like he promised. His batshit crazy claims are not at fault. I'm just not cooperating as I should. I sorry.
I'm the least partisan person here. You on the other hand are a partisan hack.
You won't even admit to voting for Trump. probably because you're embarrassed.
But I didn't vote for Trump, dummy. Feels dumb, don't it?
A bible thumper like you could be a Democrat. So what? The HomoJesus Party?
You really are into labels, huh?

One day you might learn to think for yourself but that will probably only happen once you reach rock bottom.
So talking to you on this communist board isn't rock bottom? :biggrin:
Not even close. You'll know it when you are there. Given your failed behaviors it can't be that far off.
So taking advice from you is rock bottom? Got it.
When have you taken advice from me, Taz?
 
They responsibly acknowledged that what is acceptable in today's society is different than what was acceptable in times past.
Are you referring to the Democratic Party here? Because no, they have never acknowledged that at all.

Look at the context of the single sentence you quoted. It was not about the Democratic party. He was referring to Dr Seuss Foundation.

Cut dinger some slack. He's trying to hone his "right wing pundit" debating technique. That's where you randomly bounce between related and unrelated subjects till everything is muddled, and anything said about one of the subjects somehow gets applied to all the subjects. I'm sure that if I would have played along with his plan, as I should have, he would have roundly destroyed me by now, just like he promised. His batshit crazy claims are not at fault. I'm just not cooperating as I should. I sorry.
I'm the least partisan person here. You on the other hand are a partisan hack.
You won't even admit to voting for Trump. probably because you're embarrassed.
But I didn't vote for Trump, dummy. Feels dumb, don't it?
A bible thumper like you could be a Democrat. So what? The HomoJesus Party?
You really are into labels, huh?

One day you might learn to think for yourself but that will probably only happen once you reach rock bottom.
So talking to you on this communist board isn't rock bottom? :biggrin:
Not even close. You'll know it when you are there. Given your failed behaviors it can't be that far off.
So taking advice from you is rock bottom? Got it.
When have you taken advice from me, Taz?
Never, but that would be rock bottom of the barrel territory.
 
They responsibly acknowledged that what is acceptable in today's society is different than what was acceptable in times past.
Are you referring to the Democratic Party here? Because no, they have never acknowledged that at all.

Look at the context of the single sentence you quoted. It was not about the Democratic party. He was referring to Dr Seuss Foundation.

Cut dinger some slack. He's trying to hone his "right wing pundit" debating technique. That's where you randomly bounce between related and unrelated subjects till everything is muddled, and anything said about one of the subjects somehow gets applied to all the subjects. I'm sure that if I would have played along with his plan, as I should have, he would have roundly destroyed me by now, just like he promised. His batshit crazy claims are not at fault. I'm just not cooperating as I should. I sorry.
I'm the least partisan person here. You on the other hand are a partisan hack.
You won't even admit to voting for Trump. probably because you're embarrassed.
But I didn't vote for Trump, dummy. Feels dumb, don't it?
A bible thumper like you could be a Democrat. So what? The HomoJesus Party?
You really are into labels, huh?

One day you might learn to think for yourself but that will probably only happen once you reach rock bottom.
So talking to you on this communist board isn't rock bottom? :biggrin:
Not even close. You'll know it when you are there. Given your failed behaviors it can't be that far off.
So taking advice from you is rock bottom? Got it.
When have you taken advice from me, Taz?
Never, but that would be rock bottom of the barrel territory.
Only time will tell. ;)
 
Let's see. A company that owns all the rights to the Dr Seuss books, stopped publishing 6 out of 60 that were still being published. They did it voluntarily. The 6 books that are not longer being published were very weak ...
This is exactly how commies destroy the country. You guys do it in small progressive changes so we do not see it all at once, kinda like stinking up a bathroom. Just a small tax hike, just a little less freedom of speech, just 6 books, just a few million more illegal immigrants, just ban AR 15 rifles, just a few voting inconsistencies, just a few dollars for lefty caused in relief bills, just a little here and a little there. Eventually we end up with a shithole commie country.
 
debate me?
Debate you? I would demolish you. Which is why I will never see your sorry ass in the bull ring.
Just looking back over the discussion, and noticed you selectively quoted me out of context. Fix it bitch. I would never challenge someone from the children's table to a debate.
How did I misquote you exactly? Show me.

If you think I'm a bitch why don't you come and make me your bitch in person. We are both in Houston.

Of course you won't debate me in the bull ring, bulldog, but it ain't because I'm at the children's table. You talk a lot but you can't walk the walk.

No. I'm not in Houston. I know Houston. I made a lot of money in and around Houston. I often have reason to travel to Houston, but I'm not in or from Houston. I have no desire to make you my bitch. From reading your interactions here, you seem to have found your niche being everybody's bitch. I wouldn't want to interfere with that.
 
debate me?
Debate you? I would demolish you. Which is why I will never see your sorry ass in the bull ring.
Just looking back over the discussion, and noticed you selectively quoted me out of context. Fix it bitch. I would never challenge someone from the children's table to a debate.
How did I misquote you exactly? Show me.

If you think I'm a bitch why don't you come and make me your bitch in person. We are both in Houston.

Of course you won't debate me in the bull ring, bulldog, but it ain't because I'm at the children's table. You talk a lot but you can't walk the walk.

No. I'm not in Houston. I know Houston. I made a lot of money in and around Houston. I often have reason to travel to Houston, but I'm not in or from Houston. I have no desire to make you my bitch. From reading your interactions here, you seem to have found your niche being everybody's bitch. I wouldn't want to interfere with that.
Come see me any time.
 
Let's see. A company that owns all the rights to the Dr Seuss books, stopped publishing 6 out of 60 that were still being published. They did it voluntarily. The 6 books that are not longer being published were very weak ...
This is exactly how commies destroy the country. You guys do it in small progressive changes so we do not see it all at once, kinda like stinking up a bathroom. Just a small tax hike, just a little less freedom of speech, just 6 books, just a few million more illegal immigrants, just ban AR 15 rifles, just a few voting inconsistencies, just a few dollars for lefty caused in relief bills, just a little here and a little there. Eventually we end up with a shithole commie country.

So you say Dr. Seuss is a Commie organization out to destroy the country? That's quite a revelation.
 
Seriously. Just stop. What's amazing to me is we didn't see this as wrong even then.

dr-seuss.jpg
 
Seriously. Just stop. What's amazing to me is we didn't see this as wrong even then.

dr-seuss.jpg
Seriously? Are the illustrations not in keeping with all of the other illustrations he has ever done? Caricatures are not in and of themselves offensive without context. I grew up as a kid in a racially diverse neighborhood where ethnic stereotypes were frequently used. It was never what was said but how it was said and how it was intended to be taken which determined if it was familiar affection from a place of love or fighting words.

So, no. It's not amazing to me that we didn't see this as wrong even then. In fact, the fact that you see it as wrong now and not then says more about how you have been conditioned to find insults in everything even the things that were never intended to be insults.
 
Seriously. Just stop. What's amazing to me is we didn't see this as wrong even then.

dr-seuss.jpg
Seriously? Are the illustrations not in keeping with all of the other illustrations he has ever done? Caricatures are not in and of themselves offensive without context. I grew up as a kid in a racially diverse neighborhood where ethnic stereotypes were frequently used. It was never what was said but how it was said and how it was intended to be taken which determined if it was familiar affection from a place of love or fighting words.

So, no. It's not amazing to me that we didn't see this as wrong even then. In fact, the fact that you see it as wrong now and not then says more about how you have been conditioned to find insults in everything even the things that were never intended to be insults.

This is another example of how you just don't get it. You could convince every person here that your reasoning is correct, and it still wouldn't make a bit of difference. You need to convince the Dr. Seuss group. It's their books, and their decision to make. Perhaps a sign on a street corner, or a strongly worded letter to the editor of your local paper would yield more success for you.
 
Seriously. Just stop. What's amazing to me is we didn't see this as wrong even then.

dr-seuss.jpg
Seriously? Are the illustrations not in keeping with all of the other illustrations he has ever done? Caricatures are not in and of themselves offensive without context. I grew up as a kid in a racially diverse neighborhood where ethnic stereotypes were frequently used. It was never what was said but how it was said and how it was intended to be taken which determined if it was familiar affection from a place of love or fighting words.

So, no. It's not amazing to me that we didn't see this as wrong even then. In fact, the fact that you see it as wrong now and not then says more about how you have been conditioned to find insults in everything even the things that were never intended to be insults.

This is another example of how you just don't get it. You could convince every person here that your reasoning is correct, and it still wouldn't make a bit of difference. You need to convince the Dr. Seuss group. It's their books, and their decision to make. Perhaps a sign on a street corner, or a strongly worded letter to the editor of your local paper would yield more success for you.
Why do you think I am trying to convince anyone rather than expressing my opinions? I couldn't care less what they or you do or believe. The consequences of other people's actions do not attach to me. I couldn't be more happy for them to experience their predictable surprises.

Just because growth filled communities should explore all sides of an issue to arrive at objective truth does not mean I have to make them explore all sides of an issue. My obligation is satisfied when I express my opinion. What other people do or don't do with it is up to them.

I can't even understand why you would assume this was my job unless you believe that you must make others believe as you do. Good luck with that, dummy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top