The Republican ignorance on abortion

I agree other than the fact we never should have went to start with. Many proclaim that lives are worthy of protection but that all ends when it comes to looking after corporate profits.
Corporate profits that are global and under the globalist wing to start.
 
No, not at all.

But the tragic circumstances that led to those deaths are not any excuse for a much larger number of completely unrelated murders. You apparently are not in a position to grasp just how morally fucked-up you have to be, to even try to make that argument.

And I didn't. Oddly we do not have as much division over killing children elsewhere.
 
Right, kill them. Their lives really aren't worth anything.
It’s WAR bud…..there’s no war going down in brown barrios and black ghettos where bottom feeding filth use abortion as a contraceptive. You really didn’t know that? Is there anything else you would like me to teach you?
 
It’s WAR bud…..there’s no war going down in brown barrios and black ghettos where bottom feeding filth use abortion as a contraceptive. You really didn’t know that? Is there anything else you would like me to teach you?

Those little girls or really no one in Kabul ever did a thing to us.
 
Abortion is domestic. Over one million a year. The legality of it has caused that amount to be had through behavior issues. It could be less.

Yes, but the same people who oppose abortion, also oppose child tax benefits, universal health care, subsidized child care, family leave, and mandated maternity leave for women. All of these measures would reduce the number of abortions. This is why the "slaughter of innocents" argument is just another right wing red herring.

20 years after Roe v. Wade, the crime rate in the USA dropped by 10%, the biggest one year drop since they started keeping records. The crime rate continued to drop by 1% per year for each of the next 5 years. Since the vast majority of abortions are poor families, and the vast majority of crime is in poor neighbourhoods, the obvious conclusion was that poor families were having fewer children, and we better able to care for them, and raise them.

Last but not least, studies done on women who tried and failed to get an abortion, found that years later, none of the women were better off, either financially, or healthwise. Some were living in their cars. Many had mental health issues. None was in any shape to be a "fit parent" to the child they were forced to have, or their other children.



All of your concerns are about the "unborn". All of our concerns are about the children, the women, and what will become of all of them after the child is born. Every indication is that women are making responsible decisions for themselves and their families.

We believe that once a child is born, it has a right to a decent life, education and opportunity available in a first world country. Being able to control reproduction ensures the best possible outcome for poor families, and women whose pregnancies suffer complications.

And for society as well.
 
It's not murder. The "victim" depends on another live person for its existence. Last time I checked a live person can't be forced by the government to keep another living thing alive.
.

Only from the point of view of a leftist slut.

A leftist acquaintance of mine quit taking her BCP's in order to get pregnant and trap her well-off boyfriend into marrying her. Believe me, from day one, what was growing inside of her was a human BABY!

Once she was safely married and they had a daughter that her "husband" truly loved, she went on to be viciously pro-abortion.

It doesn't work when it only works sometimes.



.
 
Yes, but the same people who oppose abortion, also oppose child tax benefits, universal health care, subsidized child care, family leave, and mandated maternity leave for women. All of these measures would reduce the number of abortions. This is why the "slaughter of innocents" argument is just another right wing red herring.

20 years after Roe v. Wade, the crime rate in the USA dropped by 10%, the biggest one year drop since they started keeping records. The crime rate continued to drop by 1% per year for each of the next 5 years. Since the vast majority of abortions are poor families, and the vast majority of crime is in poor neighbourhoods, the obvious conclusion was that poor families were having fewer children, and we better able to care for them, and raise them.

Last but not least, studies done on women who tried and failed to get an abortion, found that years later, none of the women were better off, either financially, or healthwise. Some were living in their cars. Many had mental health issues. None was in any shape to be a "fit parent" to the child they were forced to have, or their other children.



All of your concerns are about the "unborn". All of our concerns are about the children, the women, and what will become of all of them after the child is born. Every indication is that women are making responsible decisions for themselves and their families.

We believe that once a child is born, it has a right to a decent life, education and opportunity available in a first world country. Being able to control reproduction ensures the best possible outcome for poor families, and women whose pregnancies suffer complications.

And for society as well.


A terrorist, by definition, is someone who is willing to kill or seriously harm innocent third parties, in pursuit of a political cause to which the targets of a terrorist act are not involved.

And that is exactly the position that you are taking, here, trying to hold the lives of innocents children's hostage, to a depraved and malevolent left wrong-wing political cause.

Basically, what your potion gets down to is a demand that we support causes that are harmful and destructive to society, to human rights, and to liberty, that rob the productive of what they have worked to earn in order to support parasites that will do nothing to carry their own weight; or else you will continue to advocate for the murder of innocent children.
 
There is a huge amount of misogyny behind the anti-abortion movement. Just look at post #52, or any post this revolting incel makes on the topic. His hatred of women just oozes out in every post.
You're so full of shit.

Every time there is a discussion around abortion, these asshole will say "If she just kept her legs closed".
Well? Isn't that true? Men and women choose to have sex, and when they choose to have sex, they choose to accept parental responsibility for the kids they create. Men don't get out of this expectation either.


Just read Carsomy's response to "Republican men think pregnancy is no big deal":

"It really isn’t. Complications can be big deals but they’re relatively rare, and the solution to them isn’t going to be *kill the kid*."
Yeah, honesty. I know it's anathema to you, scumbag.

complications are VERY common
No.
 
Fundamental truths never change.What does change is the ever changing societal norms. Who would of thought that we would defend the murderer and kill the innocent.......Yet, here we are.
'Fundamental truths' are a fiction. There has never been a time or place where murder and killing of innocent has not been defended.
 
'Fundamental truths' are a fiction. There has never been a time or place where murder and killing of innocent has not been defended.
Water is wet. That is fundamental truth…..oh no? What are the abortionist defending? The right to terminate a human life…..so yes Dorothy, evil will defend evil.
 
What incident are you referring to?
 
Water is wet. That is fundamental truth…..oh no?
Not for those at the South Pole.

What are the abortionist defending? The right to terminate a human life…..so yes Dorothy, evil will defend evil.
There was a law in ancient Rome that said if someone exposed a baby (leaving outside to die of exposure) it was illegal for someone to save it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top