The Republican War On Women

Yeah right. Look. this looks very nice as a campaign platform for the democrats. But it's total bullshit. And will fool only those not paying attention.
Abortion laws are not going to change. The Issue is a death bomb for all politicians. No one with a brain in their head( save the far right wackos and far left moon bats) will touch it.
BTW, those statements Wasserman Schultz made on Anderson Cooper's show? Romney NEVER made them and they are NOT part of the campaign.

Romney is on record as wanting Roe overturned. He was also on record as wanting to protect a woman's right to choose at one point but we have to sort of go with what he said last, right? Sort of like a ball on a roulette wheel...pro-life....pro-choice...you never know where he'll land next. But we should listen to the current statement about wanting Roe overturned.

He says that's what he wants. And it should be pushed back to the States.

Obviously Texas would be a pro-life state; for example... Lets say you're a woman who is offered a promotion. The only thing is that you have to move to Austin to take the new job...if you value your reproductive rights...you likely won't take that job. If you're the spouse of a woman who values the rights, you may not want to move your family down there.

WuerkM20120828_low.jpg

So what? THat is no where the same as "under no exceptions should abortion be legal".
What are "reproductive rights"?
What makes you believe that Texas would be a "pro life" state?
What IS a pro life state?
I think you people on the left have gotten yourselves whipped up into a frenzy over this abortion thing.
At the end of the day the majority of the people in the US are at least somewhat pro choice. The objection is that abortion procedures become another federal entitlement.
The same as the radical leftist feminists want birth control devices/medicines to become a federal entitlement.

Title X funding isn't used for abortions.

Federal funding of Title X is already a fact--hence the Governor wanting to cut it and thereby decrease women's access to contraception. And at the same time, repeal the ACA further injuring that access for lower income women. To top it off, he wants to repeal Roe. And you wonder why women vote democratic?
 
Your source is a leftwing propaganda site, so it can't be trusted. I've seen how leftwingers message number to make the say whatever they want them to say. I'm sure the definition of "military spending," in the case of the United States, is so loose that half the budget is counted. In fact, I've seen pie charts posted by leftwing turds in this forum that show military spending as half the budget.


Oh yeah, like getting rid of title funding would do away with this "money guzzling federal bureaucracy". Dream on.

Spending-by-country.jpg


Forty-Eight percent of every dollar spent on national defense is spent in this country...we have an outsized military relative to the threats from other countries on the list. Maybe they are all thinking of ganging up on us????

Spending nickels on contraception prevents spending dollars--thousands of dollars--on everything from public assistance to schools to prison cells later on. Almost all of that comes from state coffers; not federal intervention much less funding. Of course we'd be getting rid of a lot of federal level funding and intervention as well so whatever ill-preapredness the states suffer from when Romney turns off the spigot will have to fend for themselves. Meanwhile the "money guzzling federal bureaucracy"--replete with an INCREASE in spending under Romney--will chug along.

Defense is the biggest thing we spend money on. I've heard politicans say we have less ships and planes than we did 50 years ago, and that may be true, however our ships and planes can do more today then ever before.

If money translates into security, we're way overspending.
 
Your source is a leftwing propaganda site, so it can't be trusted. I've seen how leftwingers message number to make the say whatever they want them to say. I'm sure the definition of "military spending," in the case of the United States, is so loose that half the budget is counted. In fact, I've seen pie charts posted by leftwing turds in this forum that show military spending as half the budget.


Oh yeah, like getting rid of title funding would do away with this "money guzzling federal bureaucracy". Dream on.

Spending-by-country.jpg


Forty-Eight percent of every dollar spent on national defense is spent in this country...we have an outsized military relative to the threats from other countries on the list. Maybe they are all thinking of ganging up on us????

Spending nickels on contraception prevents spending dollars--thousands of dollars--on everything from public assistance to schools to prison cells later on. Almost all of that comes from state coffers; not federal intervention much less funding. Of course we'd be getting rid of a lot of federal level funding and intervention as well so whatever ill-preapredness the states suffer from when Romney turns off the spigot will have to fend for themselves. Meanwhile the "money guzzling federal bureaucracy"--replete with an INCREASE in spending under Romney--will chug along.

Defense is the biggest thing we spend money on. I've heard politicans say we have less ships and planes than we did 50 years ago, and that may be true, however our ships and planes can do more today then ever before.

Medicare and Social Security are both larger than defense.
Defense dwarfs them.
 
You RWers do realize that the GOP basically announced that they DO have a war on women last night right? By their blatant attempt to comfort women w/Ann Romney's "Gimme a 'W' for Women. Yay...Women!" speech right?

Too bad it's not going to work. A day late and a dollar short. :lol: *SMH*
 
Last edited:
The Best Darn Display Of Real Journalism On A Major Network We've Seen In A Really Long Time

The Best Darn Display Of Real Journalism On A Major Network We’ve Seen In A Really Long Time | MoveOn.Org

She was just terrific.

Yes..If you are a far left moonbat lib, you are very proud of O'Brien.
She is NOT a journalist. She is in the entertainment business.
She caters to a very small demographic. That being those who call themselves "liberals"..
Anything coming from moveon.org is immediately called into question because of the site's extreme left bias.
Stow it, sweetheart.
This gets ZERO mileage.
Case closed. End of story.
BTW, Soledad O'Brien used to be a reporter for NBC.
According to her bio, her family is very well educated and VERY wealthy.
I guess that makes her a hypocrite. Cuz all flaming libs claim to be for the "little guy" and opposed to those EEEEEEEVIL One Percenters.
What a laugh riot.
Rinny...You go ahead and keep your head buried up Soledad's ass.

You people just cannot help yourselves, can you???
 
You RWers do realize that the GOP basically announced that they DO have a war on women last night right? By their blatant attempt to comfort women w/Ann Romney's "Gimme a 'W' for Women. Yay...Women!" speech rich?

Too bad it's not going to work. A day late and a dollar short. :lol: *SMH*

You nailed it. Far better to tell women they only care about issues related to their vaginae like abortion and getting someone else to pay for their birth control. I mean they aren't real people who are affected by all issues, they only care about those.

So had Ann said that, women, vote your vagina like a Democrat tell you, that wouldn't have been condescending. Sure.
 
You can almost hear the EEG machine beeping hysterically with the above post.

GreenS20120828_low.jpg
Yeah right. Look. this looks very nice as a campaign platform for the democrats. But it's total bullshit. And will fool only those not paying attention.
Abortion laws are not going to change. The Issue is a death bomb for all politicians. No one with a brain in their head( save the far right wackos and far left moon bats) will touch it.
BTW, those statements Wasserman Schultz made on Anderson Cooper's show? Romney NEVER made them and they are NOT part of the campaign.

Romney is on record as wanting Roe overturned. He was also on record as wanting to protect a woman's right to choose at one point but we have to sort of go with what he said last, right? Sort of like a ball on a roulette wheel...pro-life....pro-choice...you never know where he'll land next. But we should listen to the current statement about wanting Roe overturned.

He says that's what he wants. And it should be pushed back to the States.

Obviously Texas would be a pro-life state; for example... Lets say you're a woman who is offered a promotion. The only thing is that you have to move to Austin to take the new job...if you value your reproductive rights...you likely won't take that job. If you're the spouse of a woman who values the rights, you may not want to move your family down there.

WuerkM20120828_low.jpg

Saw the clips the other night. There is Mitt Romney, plain as day, claiming to be pro-life and supporting Roe V. Wade. And so emphatic!!! What a mixed up man.
 
You RWers do realize that the GOP basically announced that they DO have a war on women last night right? By their blatant attempt to comfort women w/Ann Romney's "Gimme a 'W' for Women. Yay...Women!" speech right?

Too bad it's not going to work. A day late and a dollar short. :lol: *SMH*

War on Women All Star Team:

Gary Hart
Jesse Jackson
John Edwards
Ted Kennedy
John F. Kennedy
Bill Clinton
Wayne Hays
Neil Goldschmidt
Gary Condit
 
Obamacare- The Real War on Women

9/4/12
By Dr. Hal Scherz and Dr. Tod Rubin

The Obama presidential campaign has no choice, but to gloss over 4 years of failure in delivering on promises of hope and change, transparency and bipartisanship. His team must rely on a strategy which they are all too familiar and comfortable with- division and distraction. They have sought to manufacture schisms within our society, attempting to pit Americans against one another and blame Republicans, rather than engage in constructive debate and defense of their record. One such distraction is the phony "war against women", supposedly being waged by the GOP.

Who better to perpetrate this lie, than the new Democrat darling, Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke? She is a creation of the mainstream media who has manufactured outrage over the fact that taxpayers don't want to pay for her contraception. President Obama has contributed to the creation of this caricature by talking about her and campaigning with her. She is, in fact, scheduled to be a featured speaker at the upcoming Democratic National Convention. Ms. Fluke is a Democrat "flunkee"; an instrument that they are using to put a face on a specious argument - that the GOP does not care for women's reproductive rights. Ms. Fluke is a willing accomplice , all for that fleeting 15 minutes of fame.

---

Obamacare- The Real War on Women - Hal Scherz - [page]

 
You RWers do realize that the GOP basically announced that they DO have a war on women last night right? By their blatant attempt to comfort women w/Ann Romney's "Gimme a 'W' for Women. Yay...Women!" speech rich?

Too bad it's not going to work. A day late and a dollar short. :lol: *SMH*

You nailed it. Far better to tell women they only care about issues related to their vaginae like abortion and getting someone else to pay for their birth control. I mean they aren't real people who are affected by all issues, they only care about those.

So had Ann said that, women, vote your vagina like a Democrat tell you, that wouldn't have been condescending. Sure.

Surely you and Marc are being unkind.

Didn't Ann say that the women are the mothers, daughters, grandmothers, sisters etc?
She may not have expressly said that they can also be the job creators, the entrepeneurs, the visionaries, the providers for their families, the professionals, the politicians....but I'm sure it was implied.
But, then again, that isn't really women's work, is it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top