The Right To Bear Arms

[danielpalos]

for-cause criteria in our at-will employment States?

UE isn't for quitters or never workers.

You have no state law or regulation that says it is, or you'd have posted it already.

It is a social safety net and more cost effective than welfare; stop whining about taxes for social spending, right wingers.

It is a social safety net

But it's not for quitters or never workers.

The bottom line is, solving simple poverty; it is termed and styled, a solution. No wonder the right wing, never gets it.

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Thank you for ceding the argument and the point, with your, nothing but, "nonsense" instead of a valid argument.

Nonsense is all that your posts deserve when you get to the flailing uselessly, spouting meaningless slogans point. Make a cogent argument and you might get a more substantive response. Until then, nonsense.

You have only fallacy, not a valid rebuttal.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

UE isn't for quitters or never workers.

You have no state law or regulation that says it is, or you'd have posted it already.

It is a social safety net and more cost effective than welfare; stop whining about taxes for social spending, right wingers.

It is a social safety net

But it's not for quitters or never workers.

The bottom line is, solving simple poverty; it is termed and styled, a solution. No wonder the right wing, never gets it.

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

 

[danielpalos]

It is a social safety net and more cost effective than welfare; stop whining about taxes for social spending, right wingers.

It is a social safety net

But it's not for quitters or never workers.

The bottom line is, solving simple poverty; it is termed and styled, a solution. No wonder the right wing, never gets it.

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is a social safety net

But it's not for quitters or never workers.

The bottom line is, solving simple poverty; it is termed and styled, a solution. No wonder the right wing, never gets it.

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

 

[danielpalos]

The bottom line is, solving simple poverty; it is termed and styled, a solution. No wonder the right wing, never gets it.

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market; if I can "quit on an at-will basis", for unemployment compensation purposes.

Comity means, the poor have to care how much the rich make and pay in taxes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Paying people who quit or never worked will increase poverty.

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market; if I can "quit on an at-will basis", for unemployment compensation purposes.

Comity means, the poor have to care how much the rich make and pay in taxes.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market

I don't care about your imaginary portfolio.
Or the UE benefits you'll never collect.

 

[danielpalos]

Of course it will, it only and merely, takes money. Only the right wing is that clueless and that Causeless about Capitalism.

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market; if I can "quit on an at-will basis", for unemployment compensation purposes.

Comity means, the poor have to care how much the rich make and pay in taxes.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market

I don't care about your imaginary portfolio.
Or the UE benefits you'll never collect.

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, with a fifteen dollar minimum wage; but for, "right wing hate on the poor"?

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

All the money previously spent on welfare hasn't eliminated poverty.
Paying slackers won't end it either.

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market; if I can "quit on an at-will basis", for unemployment compensation purposes.

Comity means, the poor have to care how much the rich make and pay in taxes.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market

I don't care about your imaginary portfolio.
Or the UE benefits you'll never collect.

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, with a fifteen dollar minimum wage; but for, "right wing hate on the poor"?

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour

Paying quitters and never workers unemployment compensation is bad economics and bad for state finances.

 

[danielpalos]

It is all about, the plan, Stan. Y'all only have, lousy social plans not fine capital plans, like the right wing should always have, to be "taken seriously under Any form of Capitalism."

It is all about, the plan, Stan.

I know. Your plan is to never work and collect UE benefits.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market; if I can "quit on an at-will basis", for unemployment compensation purposes.

Comity means, the poor have to care how much the rich make and pay in taxes.

Why should You care how much I make in the stock market

I don't care about your imaginary portfolio.
Or the UE benefits you'll never collect.

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, with a fifteen dollar minimum wage; but for, "right wing hate on the poor"?

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour

Paying quitters and never workers unemployment compensation is bad economics and bad for state finances.

Capital doesn't care; or, we could not have persons who have declared bankruptcies, elected. Why do you?

The poor should not have to care how much the rich make.

 

[hadit]

Thank you for ceding the argument and the point, with your, nothing but, "nonsense" instead of a valid argument.

Nonsense is all that your posts deserve when you get to the flailing uselessly, spouting meaningless slogans point. Make a cogent argument and you might get a more substantive response. Until then, nonsense.

You have only fallacy, not a valid rebuttal.

Nonsense.

 

[danielpalos]

Thank you for ceding the argument and the point, with your, nothing but, "nonsense" instead of a valid argument.

Nonsense is all that your posts deserve when you get to the flailing uselessly, spouting meaningless slogans point. Make a cogent argument and you might get a more substantive response. Until then, nonsense.

You have only fallacy, not a valid rebuttal.

Nonsense.

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, with a fifteen dollar minimum wage; but for, "right wing hate on the poor"?

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

 

[hadit]

Thank you for ceding the argument and the point, with your, nothing but, "nonsense" instead of a valid argument.

Nonsense is all that your posts deserve when you get to the flailing uselessly, spouting meaningless slogans point. Make a cogent argument and you might get a more substantive response. Until then, nonsense.

You have only fallacy, not a valid rebuttal.

Nonsense.

Why do you care if a person collects unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, with a fifteen dollar minimum wage; but for, "right wing hate on the poor"?

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

 

[danielpalos]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

 

[Papageorgio]

If you're poor because you choose not to work, there is a solution that doesn't require society to do anything at all. It requires effort from you, though, so many stoners living in their parents' basements and posting vacuous slogans online won't take it.

dude; you are simply resorting to right wing propaganda and rhetoric. our current president wants to make the rich richer and the poor, poorer, via Public Policy. You can't, "blame the poor", any more.

You don't have to take it from somebody else to make yourself successful… That's the fatal flaw with socialism.
Envy rules your sorry ass motherfuckers lives… LOL

our current president wants to make the rich richer and the poor, poorer, via Public Policy. You can't, "blame the poor", any more.

Robin Hood was a crook

A rich guy can "purchase" public office and "make himself richer while making the poor, poorer, is better?"

Long been that way, look at Clinton, Gore and Obama. They all have participated in this game and yet you claim it is right wingers.

 

[hadit]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

 

[danielpalos]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

Only the right wing has, "non sense". The left may have, "full sense".

 

[Rustic]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

Only the right wing has, "non sense". The left may have, "full sense".

The Left really want other people to pay for their shit… Fact

 

[hadit]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

Only the right wing has, "non sense". The left may have, "full sense".

You're more garbled than usual. Put the bong down and go outside for a walk.

 

[danielpalos]

Only lousy capitalists won't make it; capital Darwinism, all the way right wingers!

Nonsense.

Only the right wing has, "non sense". The left may have, "full sense".

The Left really want other people to pay for their shit… Fact

You need, fullsense, not nonsense.