The Rise of Intolerant Liberals

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Laugh at them, it's funny watching them ball their little hands up, stomp their feet and call you a bigoted, racist homophobic right winger.

You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?

It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!

No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.

Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot

And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.

Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"

Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.

Correct.

Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.

But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.

 

[Theowl32]

Every stupid liberal response proves the OP right.

Further proof that they cannot think for themselves.

All while thinking they are oh so smart.

Hilarious.

 

[9aces]

Liberls have declared themselves the moral and intellectual authority and claim that if you don't go along, you are uncaring and just plain mean. Their beliefs are not up for debate. Once they declare something as fact, they will be vicious to anyone who doesn't embrace it without question. Anyone who doubts any part of the liberal ideology can expect to be called greedy, racist or a host of other derogatory names. Even when their ideas prove to be faulty, they believe that their stated intentions are so honorable that they shouldn't be criticized for failure.

Washngton liberals are mean spirited and their programs haven't helped the poor or the minorities in decades. In fact, they've made things worse and the last 7 years have all but undone the advances made in race relations. Liberals need victims and problems and they are experts are creating both just so they can pretend to run to the rescue. It's not really about helping people or we would have seen progress. The only progress being made is on their agenda, which seems to be going okay, thanks to useful idiots.

The left has declared that liberal groups, like BLM, all liberals whether rich or poor, and Muslims as groups that are off limits when it comes to any kind of criticism. They call it hate speech when you express how fed up you are with the terrorist attacks and vitriol from Islamic leaders. While the left preaches tolerance and claims to abhor nasty comments, they continually bash Republicans, people from the south and wealthy people (who don't cozy up to Dems). They say the most vile things and are unapologetic, yet when someone even suggests that we should be more careful letting refugees in or that we should get people back to work instead of being on welfare, the left has a fit and claims that is evil.

Hypocrisy runs rampant through the Dem party. They cried foul when Palin had targets on a campaign map and claimed that promoted violence, yet they laughed at a movie about the assassination of Bush and said it was art. They ignored the violence in the OWS protests. They ignored the violence in Ferguson and other places. They had a fit when a Republican had a photo taken with a gun, but loved it when Beyonce had bullets on her arms during the Super Bowl show as she paid homage to some violent groups. The Black Panthers are responsible for killing a lot of cops over the years, but the left refuses to call them up on that or their intimidation at the polls. BLM has directly called for cops to be killed and too many members answered that call, yet Obama just praised them for their work. Libs had made comments about Palin and her daughters that are too vulgar to repeat, yet said it was wrong to mention Michelle Obama's weight when she was pointing her finger at our 'fat' country and telling us how to eat.

It seems that "truth" is whatever they say it is and that can change from day to day. They even talk about creating more hate speech laws that are designed to stop any criticism of their programs (wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the planet), their pet groups and their transformation of this country. We've seen this before in other countries and we all know how it ends. Unless we want America to eventually turn into a liberal wasteland, we need to fight against those who are practicing the Alinsky methods of shaming and ridiculing their political opponents. It's about silencing people who see through their bullshit and understand the real motivation behind their supposed benevolence. With the help of biased media, who selectively report and exaggerate some things and completely ignore others, they have some people afraid to speak their mind for fear of retribution. Neighbors of the San Bernardino terrorists felt that fear and never came forward with info that may have stopped the attack. Suspecting Muslims of being terrorists, no matter what actions you observe, is politically incorrect and likely to get you accused of profiling. People are slowly being trained to remain silent and it's all because of a growing fear of government. We fear punishment from government for merely exercising our rights. This is the very definition of tyranny.



"Why have liberals become so intolerant? They think nothing of denying someone as prominent as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from speaking on a college campus. They embrace activists who shut down speakers. They publicly shame people for the slightest deviation from liberal orthodoxy.

For them everything from science to the law is "settled" once they get into power. Progress is a one way street. Their mindset is the very definition of closed-mindedness.

The short answer is that it pays. A lot of people in and out of government benefit. Liberalism also makes people feel good. Whether you are politician dispensing government benefits or the citizen receiving them, liberalism hides the self-interest and sometimes even greed that motivate people.

But the devolution of liberalism into something now openly illiberal has causes far more complex than these familiar explanations provide.

For one thing, liberalism is no longer mainly about ideas but power—as in who has it and who doesn’t. Believing they already know the answers to all questions, liberals view politics and governing as mopping up operations."





The Rise of Intolerant Liberals

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/18/the-rise-of-intolerant-liberals/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thffacebook

Your word games are silly. People to the left of you don't tolerate your intolerance. Why should they?

Once upon a time people believed in this thing called freedom of speech. Liberals stopped believing in it many years ago, people are just starting to notice.

Too late.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There are plenty of honest liberals out there:

• Obama hits 'coddled' liberal college students
  
• Obama on Political Correctness: ‘A Recipe for Dogmatism’
• The political correctness cops are going to ruin the progressive cause
  
• Bill Maher Rails Against Crazy Political Correctness From Liberals Tells Media Matters to Shut The F ck Up Video RealClearPolitics
• Jerry Seinfeld says political correctness is hurting comedy - CBS News
• Don Lemon weighs in on PC culture Liberals are the most easily offended and the least tolerant - Salon.com
• Not a Very P.C. Thing to Say -- NYMag
• Liberal Turley against political correctness in News Forum
• Are Liberals Becoming Too Sensitive and Politically Correct
• Jim Webb says Democratic Party has lost its way - The Washington Post
• John Stuart Mill s Argument Against Political...
• Dem Blames Political Correctness for Fort Hood Workplace Violence Controversy - ABC News
• Is the New Political Correctness Already Dying -- NYMag
• I don t know what to do you guys Fredrik deBoer
• http://www.forwardprogressives.com/liberals-becoming-sensitive-politically-correct/
• http://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8706323/college-professor-afraid
• http://www.socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2012/06/12/a-leftist-critique-of-political-correctness/
• College Students Say Remembering 9/11 Is Offensive to Muslims
• How Diversity Police Halt Progress
  
• My view: Political correctness should not inhibit free speech
  
• http://scienceblogs.com/webeasties/2013/05/21/science-racism-and-political-correctness/
• http://www.hawkeyelounge.com/threads/liberal-columnist-leonard-pitts-asks-if-weve-overdone-political-correctness.130665/
• #CancelColbert and the Return of the Anti-Liberal Left
• REED: When liberals become illiberal
• PC Police Out Of Control In Possibly The Most Absurd Story I've Ever Come Across
• “Political Correctness” | The Progressive Professor
• How Liberals Ruined College
• Rushdie warns of new dangers to free speech in West
• Liberals Should Be Deeply Disturbed By Political Correctness Craze Sweeping College Campuses

lol

That's a lot of cherry picking.

This fails as a fallacy of exclusion, with hasty generalization thrown in for good measure.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Every stupid liberal response proves the OP right.

Further proof that they cannot think for themselves.

All while thinking they are oh so smart.

Hilarious.

As if on cue: the ignorant, hateful, intolerant conservative.

 

[konradv]

Every stupid liberal response proves the OP right. Further proof that they cannot think for themselves. All while thinking they are oh so smart. Hilarious.

STFU, you stupid pea-brain.

 

[Iceweasel]

Laugh at them, it's funny watching them ball their little hands up, stomp their feet and call you a bigoted, racist homophobic right winger

And while you do all that, watch the Democrats take the presidency again.

One way or another, right?

 

[Iceweasel]

Liberls have declared themselves the moral and intellectual authority and claim that if you don't go along, you are uncaring and just plain mean. Their beliefs are not up for debate. Once they declare something as fact, they will be vicious to anyone who doesn't embrace it without question. Anyone who doubts any part of the liberal ideology can expect to be called greedy, racist or a host of other derogatory names. Even when their ideas prove to be faulty, they believe that their stated intentions are so honorable that they shouldn't be criticized for failure.

Washngton liberals are mean spirited and their programs haven't helped the poor or the minorities in decades. In fact, they've made things worse and the last 7 years have all but undone the advances made in race relations. Liberals need victims and problems and they are experts are creating both just so they can pretend to run to the rescue. It's not really about helping people or we would have seen progress. The only progress being made is on their agenda, which seems to be going okay, thanks to useful idiots.

The left has declared that liberal groups, like BLM, all liberals whether rich or poor, and Muslims as groups that are off limits when it comes to any kind of criticism. They call it hate speech when you express how fed up you are with the terrorist attacks and vitriol from Islamic leaders. While the left preaches tolerance and claims to abhor nasty comments, they continually bash Republicans, people from the south and wealthy people (who don't cozy up to Dems). They say the most vile things and are unapologetic, yet when someone even suggests that we should be more careful letting refugees in or that we should get people back to work instead of being on welfare, the left has a fit and claims that is evil.

Hypocrisy runs rampant through the Dem party. They cried foul when Palin had targets on a campaign map and claimed that promoted violence, yet they laughed at a movie about the assassination of Bush and said it was art. They ignored the violence in the OWS protests. They ignored the violence in Ferguson and other places. They had a fit when a Republican had a photo taken with a gun, but loved it when Beyonce had bullets on her arms during the Super Bowl show as she paid homage to some violent groups. The Black Panthers are responsible for killing a lot of cops over the years, but the left refuses to call them up on that or their intimidation at the polls. BLM has directly called for cops to be killed and too many members answered that call, yet Obama just praised them for their work. Libs had made comments about Palin and her daughters that are too vulgar to repeat, yet said it was wrong to mention Michelle Obama's weight when she was pointing her finger at our 'fat' country and telling us how to eat.

It seems that "truth" is whatever they say it is and that can change from day to day. They even talk about creating more hate speech laws that are designed to stop any criticism of their programs (wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the planet), their pet groups and their transformation of this country. We've seen this before in other countries and we all know how it ends. Unless we want America to eventually turn into a liberal wasteland, we need to fight against those who are practicing the Alinsky methods of shaming and ridiculing their political opponents. It's about silencing people who see through their bullshit and understand the real motivation behind their supposed benevolence. With the help of biased media, who selectively report and exaggerate some things and completely ignore others, they have some people afraid to speak their mind for fear of retribution. Neighbors of the San Bernardino terrorists felt that fear and never came forward with info that may have stopped the attack. Suspecting Muslims of being terrorists, no matter what actions you observe, is politically incorrect and likely to get you accused of profiling. People are slowly being trained to remain silent and it's all because of a growing fear of government. We fear punishment from government for merely exercising our rights. This is the very definition of tyranny.



"Why have liberals become so intolerant? They think nothing of denying someone as prominent as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from speaking on a college campus. They embrace activists who shut down speakers. They publicly shame people for the slightest deviation from liberal orthodoxy.

For them everything from science to the law is "settled" once they get into power. Progress is a one way street. Their mindset is the very definition of closed-mindedness.

The short answer is that it pays. A lot of people in and out of government benefit. Liberalism also makes people feel good. Whether you are politician dispensing government benefits or the citizen receiving them, liberalism hides the self-interest and sometimes even greed that motivate people.

But the devolution of liberalism into something now openly illiberal has causes far more complex than these familiar explanations provide.

For one thing, liberalism is no longer mainly about ideas but power—as in who has it and who doesn’t. Believing they already know the answers to all questions, liberals view politics and governing as mopping up operations."





The Rise of Intolerant Liberals

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/18/the-rise-of-intolerant-liberals/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thffacebook

Your word games are silly. People to the left of you don't tolerate your intolerance. Why should they?

What word games? Liberals are highly intolerant and projection to mask it is what they do. Like what you just did.

 

[Iceweasel]

A rise of liberal intolerance? I can't remember ever being tolerant of douchebags like you.

You proved his point. You're probably too dumb to see it though.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Laugh at them, it's funny watching them ball their little hands up, stomp their feet and call you a bigoted, racist homophobic right winger.

You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?

It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!

No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.

Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot

And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.

Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"

Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.

Correct.

Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.

But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.

Your "tolerance" is showing

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This thread is like moths to the flame LOL

 

[Mac1958]

There are plenty of honest liberals out there:

• Obama hits 'coddled' liberal college students
  
• Obama on Political Correctness: ‘A Recipe for Dogmatism’
• The political correctness cops are going to ruin the progressive cause
  
• Bill Maher Rails Against Crazy Political Correctness From Liberals Tells Media Matters to Shut The F ck Up Video RealClearPolitics
• Jerry Seinfeld says political correctness is hurting comedy - CBS News
• Don Lemon weighs in on PC culture Liberals are the most easily offended and the least tolerant - Salon.com
• Not a Very P.C. Thing to Say -- NYMag
• Liberal Turley against political correctness in News Forum
• Are Liberals Becoming Too Sensitive and Politically Correct
• Jim Webb says Democratic Party has lost its way - The Washington Post
• John Stuart Mill s Argument Against Political...
• Dem Blames Political Correctness for Fort Hood Workplace Violence Controversy - ABC News
• Is the New Political Correctness Already Dying -- NYMag
• I don t know what to do you guys Fredrik deBoer
• http://www.forwardprogressives.com/liberals-becoming-sensitive-politically-correct/
• http://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8706323/college-professor-afraid
• http://www.socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2012/06/12/a-leftist-critique-of-political-correctness/
• College Students Say Remembering 9/11 Is Offensive to Muslims
• How Diversity Police Halt Progress
  
• My view: Political correctness should not inhibit free speech
  
• http://scienceblogs.com/webeasties/2013/05/21/science-racism-and-political-correctness/
• http://www.hawkeyelounge.com/threads/liberal-columnist-leonard-pitts-asks-if-weve-overdone-political-correctness.130665/
• #CancelColbert and the Return of the Anti-Liberal Left
• REED: When liberals become illiberal
• PC Police Out Of Control In Possibly The Most Absurd Story I've Ever Come Across
• “Political Correctness” | The Progressive Professor
• How Liberals Ruined College
• Rushdie warns of new dangers to free speech in West
• Liberals Should Be Deeply Disturbed By Political Correctness Craze Sweeping College Campuses

lol

That's a lot of cherry picking.

This fails as a fallacy of exclusion, with hasty generalization thrown in for good measure.

Yes, no doubt or surprise that someone like you, a hardcore left wing partisan ideologue, would have a problem with a list of honest liberals.

They make people like you look bad. Uh, worse.

And deflection noted.
.

 

[daws101]

It's the spectrum of the left wing folks.

First....they try to convince you to see it their way.

And it fails. Because liberalism is literally a mental disorder that science has confirmed.

SOO....they get mad.

And the next phase on the spectrum....is they decide they'll just force you to see it and do it their way.

That's where censorship comes in.
That's where forced income redistribution comes in.

That's how left wing communist regimes who slaughter masses rise to power.

Fantasize much?

 

[daws101]

I'm guessing that "intolerant Liberals" arose about the same time Comservatives took up shooting abortion doctors and blowing up federal buildings. After all, aren't those 'tolerant' acts of Conservatism?

Just because the press and idiots like you call those people conservatives does not mean that the things they did were under the advice or consent of any recognized conservative leaders.

All they were were kooks who did insane shit and the press stuck their thumbs up their ass, then held it in the wind and said 'Duh, must a been a conservative.'

Recognized leaders?
That contradicts the faux personal responsibility and rugged individualism dogma you assholes are constantly spewing.

 

[daws101]

lol, I just ran across this. sums things up nicely.

snip:
Liberals: They produce nothing. They create nothing. They are the parasites that live off other people’s honest labor
Because Growing Up Is So Very Hard To Do
By Ray DiLorenzo -- Bio and Archives February 19, 2016

​

Liberals like Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders represent the worst of America, children in grown-up positions, obstinate in their ignorance. They abhor free market capitalism, limited government, fiscal responsibility, faith-based anything except faith in government, self-determination, individual responsibility, anything traditional or time-tested. They assume they know everything and yet know nothing.

President Reagan rightly observed: “It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”

These liberals, like so many other liberals, personify the ne’er-do-well student who has been sleeping soundly in class, having missed most of the lecture, suddenly wakes up and blurts out some incoherent dribble to attempt to make the rest of the class think he/she has a grasp of the subject matter when every word uttered says the opposite.

Liberals like these seem to care nothing about history, what works and doesn’t work, and they insist that what they don’t like, you can’t have. They produce nothing. They create nothing.

They are the parasites that live off other people’s honest labor, get rich from it and then tell anyone who will listen that those same hard-working people are being taken advantage of by a brutal and unfair system.

Liberals are children who never grew up, the Peter Pan syndrome. Sanders and Clinton insist on playing the parental role even though they are still children themselves. They want government to take over where parents left off.

Everything needed should be given freely. Like children’s thought process, cost is never a concern. Liberals scream bloody murder when they don’t get their own way even when their way has been historically, obviously, traditionally, undeniably proven to be…wrong!

ALL of the article here:
Because Growing Up Is So Very Hard To Do | Canada Free Press

When getting your ass handed to you, call on the ghost of Reagan.
The problem with that is Reagan is no longer considered conservative enough by the "modern" republican party.
There by defeating the purpose.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Q. How tolerant is the author of this opinion piece, the OP and those who echo such carp.

A. Not a bit, but it does demonstrate the hypocrisy of crazy right wingers, and how foolish they have become. Unable to think for themselves, they line up to echo each other.

Pitiful and self righteous hypocrites best defines those who echo such falderal.

 

[Debra K]

Laugh at them, it's funny watching them ball their little hands up, stomp their feet and call you a bigoted, racist homophobic right winger.

You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?

It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!

No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.

Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot

And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.

Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"

Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.

Correct.

Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'

Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.

But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.

I agree. The opening post is an exercise in sophistry. "You're intolerant if you won't tolerate my intolerance of other people". That's meaningless crap they pull from their butts in their efforts to portray themselves as victims.

White supremacists have the right to believe their skin color makes them superior to others, but the constitution prohibits the government from depriving persons of equal protection under the law. Thus, opposition to Jim Crow laws (and their modern day equivalents) is justified. The proponents of oppressive laws might thump their bibles, stomp their feet, and cry a river. They might cry, "You assholes are intolerant because you oppose my efforts to codify my hate for a subset of the human population!" They engage in temper tantrums because they're denied the power to oppress. I have no sympathy for their allegations that they are the victims of the "political correctness police". They are not victims; they are oppressors. My sympathy and support stays with the people whom they seek to oppress.

 

[Nosmo King]

Conservatives would pound the round pegs of a diverse society like America into the square holes they believe America should be. What does not fit into the Conservative square hole? The individual rights of citizens to vote without the harassment of providing an ID, the rights of homosexual American citizens to enjoy the rights of all other Americans, the right of a woman to control her reproductive system, the rights of minorities to live in neighborhoods without the fear of aggressive and over-reaching police tactics, the right of the working poor to earn a living wage and live in simple dignity, the right of the people to live without hazardous pollutants fouling the air, water and soil.

That square Conservative hole readily accommodates the wealthy to amass greater wealth than they deserve for their efforts, the power to interfere in personal decisions about who can marry and who should bear children against their wishes, and flooding American streets with weapons designed for a battlefield and should be in the hands of well regulated militias not a cadre of Rambo wannabes and hero gunslingers.

Consevatives rail against what they perceive as 'political correctness'. Is political correctness nothing more that politeness? The avoidance of rudeness and the subtle opportunity to insult and dehumanize minorities? If think Conservatives miss those chances at the subtle or not so subtle insults. Standing up for your lack of basic human respect and manners! Way to pick your fights, Comservatives!

 

[Debra K]

Every stupid liberal response proves the OP right.

Further proof that they cannot think for themselves.

All while thinking they are oh so smart.

Hilarious.

You can laugh if you want, but I still oppose using the power of the state to oppress minorities. I support laws that ameliorate oppression. I have no sympathy for the oppressors who dress themselves in victim clothes. Your sophistry is transparent and subject to the ridicule it receives.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Once upon a time people believed in this thing called freedom of speech. Liberals stopped believing in it many years ago, people are just starting to notice.

Too late.

Back when liberals were moderately successful and claiming to be the champions of “free speech”, while painting conservatives as the enemies thereof, was a time when “free speech” was all about pornography, foul language, and other evil, degrading things completely removed from the true purpose of free speech. The broader liberal view of “freedom” in general, is similar—they are in favor of “freedom” to murder innocent children, to abuse harmful drugs, to engage in all manner of immoral sexual; perversions, to live as unproductive parasites at the expense of productive workers, and so on; while opposing genuine, meaningful, essential freedoms.