- Thread starter
- #241
How does anyone know if it's exposed? Do you? you're defending something that you don't know about because you weren't their. At least I have the common sense to question it. You dumb fuckHe took something from one of those who had just handle the nurse.His job is watch the workers. He is not handling the patient.Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPETry that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
And if whatever he took was not exposed to the virus, he does not need to worry. Since the virus is contained inside the hazmat suits, and the medical staff and patient were suited up in isolation, there is no hazard.
By your way of seeing it, they should have to destroy the tarmac where the people inside the hazmat suits walked.
The hazmat suits stop the virus.