Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?The patient is in a containment suit. The medical staff that will go with the patient are in containment suits. The person not in the containment suit is a protocol person, there to insure there are no trip hazards or other issues due to the suits. There will be one like that on the other end of the trip as well.
Why is that a problem?
You would think he should be in base level PPE, a mask, a disposable tyvek, and some gloves. He doesn't have to be in the Level C suit the rest of them are wearing, but he should have something.
For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?The patient is in a containment suit. The medical staff that will go with the patient are in containment suits. The person not in the containment suit is a protocol person, there to insure there are no trip hazards or other issues due to the suits. There will be one like that on the other end of the trip as well.
Why is that a problem?
You would think he should be in base level PPE, a mask, a disposable tyvek, and some gloves. He doesn't have to be in the Level C suit the rest of them are wearing, but he should have something.
For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
So what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?You would think he should be in base level PPE, a mask, a disposable tyvek, and some gloves. He doesn't have to be in the Level C suit the rest of them are wearing, but he should have something.
For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?You would think he should be in base level PPE, a mask, a disposable tyvek, and some gloves. He doesn't have to be in the Level C suit the rest of them are wearing, but he should have something.
For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
I think you mean your understanding of the protocol is not your strong suit. He shouldn't have anything on except his clothing.Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?You would think he should be in base level PPE, a mask, a disposable tyvek, and some gloves. He doesn't have to be in the Level C suit the rest of them are wearing, but he should have something.
For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Damn, I even underlined it for you. Derrrrp.
So what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
I think you mean your understanding of the protocol is not your strong suit. He shouldn't have anything on except his clothing.Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?For God's sake, common sense says he should have that on. Irrelevant the patient is in a containment suit, clipboard guy should take precautions. Dumb move.
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Damn, I even underlined it for you. Derrrrp.
My guess is I had more NBC training than any of themYeah, let`s listen to a bunch of redneck swampdwellers. I am sure they know more about medical science than actual professionals.
Fucking ridicilous!
I had NBC training as well. That is a very different situation. In an NBC attack, the entire outside area would be considered contaminated. That is not the case here. There is no Ebola on the tarmac. It is contained in the patient's suit.
Just asking, if so then why is everyone else wearing a suit?
So what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
one more time while on any job you are required by OSHA to wear your PPE NO MATTER WHAT YOUR TASK ISWrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
That applies for general PPE. A hazmat suit is specialized PPE and is not worn unless there is a reasonable expectation of exposure. In the situation shown in the OP, there is no reasonable expectation of exposure.
The spotter does not wear PPE for high voltage work, since he will not be within the range of the hazard.
When you wear hazmat gear to go into a tank, does everyone in the entire plant don hazmat gear?
He is not a worker. He is making sure the workers are not encountering any issues. If he was a worker he would be handling the patient. I dont think you know what you are talking about.So what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.Why do you ignorant people post? He is there to be their eyes and ears moron. How is he going to do that in a suit?
So he can't see or hear if he has some protective gear on? You going with that?
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
His job is watch the workers. He is not handling the patient.Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?Its obvious you have no clue about the protocol or what happens when you have on one of those suits. You should stop embarrassing yourself right about now.
A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
one more time while on any job you are required by OSHA to wear your PPE NO MATTER WHAT YOUR TASK ISWrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
That applies for general PPE. A hazmat suit is specialized PPE and is not worn unless there is a reasonable expectation of exposure. In the situation shown in the OP, there is no reasonable expectation of exposure.
The spotter does not wear PPE for high voltage work, since he will not be within the range of the hazard.
When you wear hazmat gear to go into a tank, does everyone in the entire plant don hazmat gear?
He took something from one of those who had just handle the nurse.His job is watch the workers. He is not handling the patient.Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?A level C suit up is a flimsy tyvek, a dust mask, some goggles and some gloves. I work in construction, I know the protection levels.
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
BS. You have no clue about what you are saying but at this point I think I will go with what the CDC says is protocol over your opinion.one more time while on any job you are required by OSHA to wear your PPE NO MATTER WHAT YOUR TASK ISWrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
That applies for general PPE. A hazmat suit is specialized PPE and is not worn unless there is a reasonable expectation of exposure. In the situation shown in the OP, there is no reasonable expectation of exposure.
The spotter does not wear PPE for high voltage work, since he will not be within the range of the hazard.
When you wear hazmat gear to go into a tank, does everyone in the entire plant don hazmat gear?
He took something from one of those who had just handle the nurse.His job is watch the workers. He is not handling the patient.Wrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPESo what?
What does that have to do with fact your sight is obscured? The point is for the guy to be able to observe everything with no distractions like a dust mask, goggles, or gloves.
Try that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
one more time while on any job you are required by OSHA to wear your PPE NO MATTER WHAT YOUR TASK ISWrong at all times on the job you always wear your PPETry that excuse with OSHA, "hey my workers need to see better, so they can't wear PPE" If you can't do a job with the right PPE, don't do it.
If you tell OSHA that the workers cannot see because of the PPE, they will tell you to find a way to minimize or eliminate the hazard and still use the necessary PPE.
That is what they have done. They have a person who watches for any hazards that could potentially damage the hazmat suits. Since he is not going on the flight, and the patient (source of the hazard) is contained inside a hazmat suit, he faces no hazards.
If an electrical lineman is going to be within range of energized equipment, he must wear PPE to prevent electrocution. If he cannot see all the hazards, a spotter will be assigned to watch for the hazards. The spotter does not need to wear the PPE to prevent electrocution. Same situation here.
That applies for general PPE. A hazmat suit is specialized PPE and is not worn unless there is a reasonable expectation of exposure. In the situation shown in the OP, there is no reasonable expectation of exposure.
The spotter does not wear PPE for high voltage work, since he will not be within the range of the hazard.
When you wear hazmat gear to go into a tank, does everyone in the entire plant don hazmat gear?
One more time, the PPE is required for a hazard. The protocol officer has no reasonable expectation of a hazard.
You say you have worn hazmat suits. Do you wear them every day, all day? Does everyone at your place of employment wear them every day?
Here is the OSHA requirement from the 1910 standard:
1910.132(a) "Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact."
1910.132 (d)(1) "The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:"
There is no hazard present, nor is there likely to be one.
