Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Core Dishonesty of abortion opponants: millions of surplus embryos are destroyed every year or donated for research as a by product of invitro fertilization - more than are aborted. Yet, barely a peep of protest or discussion.
The Core Dishonesty of abortion opponants: millions of surplus embryos are destroyed every year or donated for research as a by product of invitro fertilization - more than are aborted. Yet, barely a peep of protest or discussion.
Sounds made up. Invitro fertilization is rare and options with spare clusters are discussed with the patient undergoing treatment. The claim that this has occurred more often than 50 million abortions is enough bullshit to fertilize crops in the California Central Valley for the next century.
1.7 million embryos created for IVF have been thrown away and just 7 per cent lead to pregnancy Daily Mail Online
What happens to extra embryos after IVF - CNN.com
Souls On Ice America s Embryo Glut and the Wasted Promise of Stem Cell Research Mother Jones
You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
The Core Dishonesty of abortion opponants: millions of surplus embryos are destroyed every year or donated for research as a by product of invitro fertilization - more than are aborted. Yet, barely a peep of protest or discussion.
Sorry, when they are in the womb and growing they are humans.......they have started growing....and will eventually become people......if you leave them alone you can later put them in mass graves...just give them a little time to grow.....
If we can't make it illegal, what we CAN do is win hearts and minds so women will NOT WANT to have an abortion.
And if you think this will somehow create a glut of unwanted children, tell me why you support Obama's immigration policy, which has created a glut of unwanted children.
Sounds made up. Invitro fertilization is rare and options with spare clusters are discussed with the patient undergoing treatment. The claim that this has occurred more often than 50 million abortions is enough bullshit to fertilize crops in the California Central Valley for the next century.
1.7 million embryos created for IVF have been thrown away and just 7 per cent lead to pregnancy Daily Mail Online
What happens to extra embryos after IVF - CNN.com
Souls On Ice America s Embryo Glut and the Wasted Promise of Stem Cell Research Mother Jones
You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
Having been a pro life advocate that's held a sign plenty of times in my life in public protests of abortion, I can tell you you're off base thinking we've not done enough to shed light on the plight of the unborn. We work legislatively and culturally to bring this to the attention of the public. Our effort cannot be measured simply by how many people are standing outside of a clinic.
The issue is actually still very new, relatively speaking, and probably should get more coverage, but if you look at pro life websites, nearly all of them address invitro as part of the fabric of moral evil and the culture of death. It doesn't go unaddressed. But in the hierarchy of priorities, a nascent form that's becoming self aware is accorded the highest level of protection, that is, babies with central nervous systems, hearts that pump their own blood, their own unique fingerprints, testing their muscles and exploring their bodies, and is capable of thoughts and dreams. We now know more than ever just how alive babies are before birth and we're bringing that information to the public in the hopes they'll recognize the humanity of the unborn and work to end abortion on demand.You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
Having been a pro life advocate that's held a sign plenty of times in my life in public protests of abortion, I can tell you you're off base thinking we've not done enough to shed light on the plight of the unborn. We work legislatively and culturally to bring this to the attention of the public. Our effort cannot be measured simply by how many people are standing outside of a clinic.
I believe you - you are one of the few that seems to be genuinely prop-life across the board. However the lack of discussion publically on invitro embryos is glaring - look at these boards.
Pro-choice likewise can not be defined soley by the criminal excesses of the Gosnell's of this practice. As someone who is pro-choice I don't take any particular glee from abortion.
The Core Dishonesty of abortion opponants: millions of surplus embryos are destroyed every year or donated for research as a by product of invitro fertilization - more than are aborted. Yet, barely a peep of protest or discussion.
Sounds made up. Invitro fertilization is rare and options with spare clusters are discussed with the patient undergoing treatment. The claim that this has occurred more often than 50 million abortions is enough bullshit to fertilize crops in the California Central Valley for the next century.
1.7 million embryos created for IVF have been thrown away and just 7 per cent lead to pregnancy Daily Mail Online
What happens to extra embryos after IVF - CNN.com
Souls On Ice America s Embryo Glut and the Wasted Promise of Stem Cell Research Mother Jones
We pro-lifers have to choose our battles. However, we are totally aware of the unethical practice of creating zygotes in a laboratory for IVF. The Catholic Church considers this as much of a sin as abortion of a fully grown fetus. Especially when zygotes are culled so that the mother has fewer children.
Most that are against abortion have jobs and families.Sounds made up. Invitro fertilization is rare and options with spare clusters are discussed with the patient undergoing treatment. The claim that this has occurred more often than 50 million abortions is enough bullshit to fertilize crops in the California Central Valley for the next century.
1.7 million embryos created for IVF have been thrown away and just 7 per cent lead to pregnancy Daily Mail Online
What happens to extra embryos after IVF - CNN.com
Souls On Ice America s Embryo Glut and the Wasted Promise of Stem Cell Research Mother Jones
You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
Most that are against abortion have jobs and families.
You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
I think that Mona Charen has captured the essence of the difference between those who see a baby with arms and legs, and a head and a heartbeat...and call it tissue, and those who see it as a human being...
The Core Dishonesty of Abortion Defenders - Mona Charen - Page 1
It's knowing that if the abortionist's hand were stayed for just a few more weeks, that child could live out his whole life.
That sentence points out the fact that we are not talking about tissue....that we are talking about a human being...
Tissue does not become a human being if the abortionist doesn't act.......
We schedule it in advance. January 23rd is a day I can plan to take off to demonstrate in front of Planned Parenthood.Most that are against abortion have jobs and families.You just proved yourself wrong, silly goose! You should really read your link before posting them, 1.7 million over 21 years does not even come close to exceeding the rate of elective abortions.
Gosh!
It's far newer than abortion - the rates will increase over time.
Still - we're talking millions of "murders" and the "selling" of baby parts and not a peep.
Incorrect. Pro life groups have been shedding light on the "extras" used in invitro fertilization and the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Exactly what hypocrisy have you been referring to, because we've been consistent advocates for the lives of all unborn and opposed the deliberate destruction of it.
Where are the mass protests outside of invitro clinics?
Yet that doesn't stop them from protesting outside of abortion clinics.
hmmm
