The suppressed news story that elected Biden

[Blisterfinger]

Federal agencies under a REPUBLICAN president. Giving their INITIAL assessment on a quite incredible story. Causing PRIVATE companies to TEMPORARILY block a hyperlink to an EXISTING and quite accessible media company is NOT a violation of free speech.

Private companies can manage their sites as they please. The government can even ask those companies to remove content. What they can't do is DEMAND they do so, unless that content is actually illegal. Just like YOU can ask to remove content on here you think goes against the rules here.

That's also protected under free speech.

Before you use terms know what they actually mean.

Treasonous federal agencies under a Publican government.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's for a different discussion though. The point is, if the media had done its job, we wouldn't even be discussing how many votes Biden got because he would never have won the election. The cheaters would never have been able to change or fake enough ballots to have made a difference.

The media did exactly what it was supposed to do. Defend Biden

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's been almost four years and the "strong evidence" of such things has yet to materialize from the laptop.

The laptop was used in the hunter Biden conviction. Simp

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Of course it did. We all know that now. Do you live in a cave?

No he lives in denial

 

[Blisterfinger]

The laptop was used in the hunter Biden conviction. Simp

Had the media covered the laptop like it should have Biden would have never been elected.

 

[Foxfyre]

The media did exactly what it was supposed to do. Defend Biden

That is not the media's job unless Biden deserves the defense. If Biden is wrongly accused or attacked, the media should provide the honest, accurate information that disputes the wrong accusation or attack. If the facts support the criticism/accusations, that should be reported too. All national figures and/or ordinary citizens should be treated in that way. They aren't.

 

[Marener]

The laptop was used in the hunter Biden conviction. Simp

Yes, because it showed Hunter Biden using drugs. At the time of the election, we all knew that Hunter Biden had been a drug addict.

The other poster was claiming it had evidence of bribes and all kinds of stuff related to Joe Biden. That's never been the case.

Try to keep up, dope.

 

[marvin martian]

So let's assume for the sake of argument that Biden won the 2020 election. Why did he win?

In October 2020 the New York Post broke the story of the contents of Biden's laptop.
The media and deep state and Democrats all went into full panic mode.
The Democrats put Facebook, Twitter, et al and all the media on notice to suppress the story. The alternate story put out by such as Politico, James Clapper, John Brennan et al is that the laptop was Russian disinformation and the MSM took that and ran with it.

Those of us on Facebook and Twitter had our posts removed and our accounts suspended for reporting the truth. We were even blocked from private messaging anybody re the laptop. We couldn't even discuss it in the private group rooms that Twitter provided so that we couldn't even chat 'anonymously' which obviously suddenly wasn't so anonymous.

And the November election came and went and those restrictions were never lifted while the Democrats set their sites on taking down Trump. Most Americans never saw the real laptop story.

Now because of Hunter's recent gun crime trial, the laptop is officially declared valid, untampered with, belongs to Hunter, and everything on it is admissible as evidence if pertinent to whatever charges are in play or should be in play.

Biden's DOJ of course won't touch it because they can't use the most damning information on it without screwing up whatever chances Joe Biden has for re-election, it would greatly help Trump, and they would be criticized for not investigating Biden for collusion, taking bribes, influence peddling and other illegal acts suggested or confirmed by the laptop.

And the media is still suppressing it. We of course can discuss it on X via Elon's free speech policy, but you still won't see it on Facebook or any of the other left leaning social media.

And now I will await the USMB troll brigade's 'fake news' icons and snarky denials, but the point is, if we had a free and open press in this country, Biden would not be President now and he would not be running for re-election.

The Media Buried What Was So Important About the Hunter Biden Laptop

The "so what" isn't Hunter's lurid photos. It's credible allegations of Joe's corruption.

drewholden.substack.com

I really hope prosecuting the "intelligence officials", media figures, and politicians who committed this act of treason is high on Trump's list of priorities in January.

 

[forkup]

The BIG GUY was confirmed as Joe Biden by Hunter Biden's business partner testifying under oath. That alone justified a serious investigation which the House has been doing and you never see in the media. If it was reversed and it involved the Trump family it would lead the evening news and be on the front pages everywhere every day. You obviously didn't have that information nor have millions of Americans because the media won't put it out there.

Oh really? First of all. And I took the time to check. It was disputed that Joe Biden ever got any money from the deal. And they checked the company bank records.

Secondly, on what ground would an investigation be warranted? Let's assume that that 10k was for Joe Biden and actually given. He wasn't Vice-President at the time. It's not illegal to do business abroad after a person leaves office. So, where's the potential crime?

I'll put it like this. See if you accept this as true. Jarod Kushner took 2 billion from Saudi-Arabia doing a job he never did before. Investment banking. He and his wife the president's daughter were unlike Hunter administration officials, Kushner responsible for the Middle-East. Trump also took money from Saudi-Arabia Trump Embraces LIV Golf, Backing a New Saudi Strategy (Published 2022)

This is influencing peddling and therefor shady, illegal and it can simply be assumed to be proof of criminal activity. Sounds right to you?

I think in this case you have zero problem noticing the difference between some vague notion of impropriety and actual proof of criminal behavior.

 

[Foxfyre]

Oh really? First of all. And I took the time to check. It was disputed that Joe Biden ever got any money from the deal. And they checked the company bank records.

Secondly, on what ground would an investigation be warranted? Let's assume that that 10k was for Joe Biden and actually given. He wasn't Vice-President at the time. It's not illegal to do business abroad after a person leaves office. So, where's the potential crime?

I'll put it like this. See if you accept this as true. Jarod Kushner took 2 billion from Saudi-Arabia doing a job he never did before. Investment banking. He and his wife the president's daughter were unlike Hunter administration officials, Kushner responsible for the Middle-East. Trump also took money from Saudi-Arabia Trump Embraces LIV Golf, Backing a New Saudi Strategy (Published 2022)

This is influencing peddling and therefor shady, illegal and it can simply be assumed to be proof of criminal activity. Sounds right to you?

I think in this case you have zero problem noticing the difference between some vague notion of impropriety and actual proof of criminal behavior.

I can't get past the NYT paywall so post the pertinent paragraph in full context please that supports your accusation there. The article is published in 2022 and Trump is not in office in 2022. Jared got no more from that Saudi $2 billion than any other partners in his investment firm. It was not given to him personally but was given to him to invest for the Saudis and was given to him AFTER he left the White House. There was no quid pro quo identified, no bribes, no violation of any law or ethics codes. The media wants that to look the same as what the laptop reveals.

Joe Biden was in the White House when all those deals revealed on that laptop were going on.

 

[JoeB131]

Joe and Trump went the same distance. Democrats of course defended Biden though Biden is actually very corrupt. Never fear this country's justice system will clear Trump.

Nope. Trump will be found guilty because he did exactly what he was accused of.

Meanwhile, you guys have been accusing Biden of everything, only to find a lot of misinformation spread by Russian and Chinese spies.

 

[eagle1462010]

It comes out in court about information being hidden to help Trump get elected in 2016.

So then we see this story, about information being hidden to help Biden get elected in 2020.

One difference, of course: One story has been proven in court, the other hasn't. But that's how the cult rolls: Just muddy the water to protect their god.

Laotop was hidden by peeps like the FBI, NSA, FacePlant, Twitter,

Where are they going to jail for election interference??

Oh thats right.....they Are'nt

 

[sartre play]

So let's assume for the sake of argument that Biden won the 2020 election. Why did he win?

In October 2020 the New York Post broke the story of the contents of Biden's laptop.
The media and deep state and Democrats all went into full panic mode.
The Democrats put Facebook, Twitter, et al and all the media on notice to suppress the story. The alternate story put out by such as Politico, James Clapper, John Brennan et al is that the laptop was Russian disinformation and the MSM took that and ran with it.

Those of us on Facebook and Twitter had our posts removed and our accounts suspended for reporting the truth. We were even blocked from private messaging anybody re the laptop. We couldn't even discuss it in the private group rooms that Twitter provided so that we couldn't even chat 'anonymously' which obviously suddenly wasn't so anonymous.

And the November election came and went and those restrictions were never lifted while the Democrats set their sites on taking down Trump. Most Americans never saw the real laptop story.

Now because of Hunter's recent gun crime trial, the laptop is officially declared valid, untampered with, belongs to Hunter, and everything on it is admissible as evidence if pertinent to whatever charges are in play or should be in play.

Biden's DOJ of course won't touch it because they can't use the most damning information on it without screwing up whatever chances Joe Biden has for re-election, it would greatly help Trump, and they would be criticized for not investigating Biden for collusion, taking bribes, influence peddling and other illegal acts suggested or confirmed by the laptop.

And the media is still suppressing it. We of course can discuss it on X via Elon's free speech policy, but you still won't see it on Facebook or any of the other left leaning social media.

And now I will await the USMB troll brigade's 'fake news' icons and snarky denials, but the point is, if we had a free and open press in this country, Biden would not be President now and he would not be running for re-election.

The Media Buried What Was So Important About the Hunter Biden Laptop

The "so what" isn't Hunter's lurid photos. It's credible allegations of Joe's corruption.

drewholden.substack.com

WHAT!!! ZERO story about JOE BIDEN, AND A LAP TOP.

 

[eagle1462010]

Federal agencies under a REPUBLICAN president. Giving their INITIAL assessment on a quite incredible story. Causing PRIVATE companies to TEMPORARILY block a hyperlink to an EXISTING and quite accessible media company is NOT a violation of free speech.

Private companies can manage their sites as they please. The government can even ask those companies to remove content. What they can't do is DEMAND they do so, unless that content is actually illegal. Just like YOU can ask to remove content on here you think goes against the rules here.

That's also protected under free speech.

Before you use terms know what they actually mean.

LOL Nice spin. Laptop real. FBI had it.

 

[JoeB131]

Laotop was hidden by peeps like the FBI, NSA, FacePlant, Twitter,

Where are they going to jail for election interference??

Oh thats right.....they Are'nt

No, because they didn't violate laws like Trump did.

The Laptop wasn't "hidden", it was published in the NY Post. It's just that other news sources - INCLUDING FOX NEWS - didn't lend it any credence.

Because Hunter's Dick Pics are not news.

 

[forkup]

I can't get past the NYT paywall so post the pertinent paragraph in full context please that supports your accusation there. The article is published in 2022 and Trump is not in office in 2022. Jared got no more from that Saudi $2 billion than any other partners in his investment firm. It was not given to him personally but was given to him to invest for the Saudis and was given to him AFTER he left the White House. There was no quid pro quo identified, no bribes, no violation of any law or ethics codes. The media wants that to look the same as what the laptop reveals.

Joe Biden was in the White House when all those deals revealed on that laptop were going on.

LIV GOLF BEDMINSTER EVENT | LIV Golf

Meta and OG description value

www.livgolf.com

This is its promotional page. This is directly backed by the Saudi Government. Trump was very friendly to Saudi-Arabia. Trump suggests 'rogue killers' possibly involved with Khashoggi, says Saudi King denies involvement
And now he's doing business with them. Who's to say this isn't a reward for his friendliness?

How do you know this is true?

There was no quid pro quo identified, no bribes, no violation of any law or ethics codes.

Just because you don't accept it doesn't mean it might not be true right. It's the same logic. I'm not trying to serve up a whataboutism. What I am trying to do is show how many assumptions you're making in the Biden case, by pointing out that you would NEVER apply this reasoning for Trump.

In my opinion this has an actual possible quid quo pro identified. If you're willing to make assumptions.

Feel free to site what quid quo pro (government action) you identify in the Biden case personally helpful to Hunters very much private Chinese business partner.

 

[22lcidw]

Nope. Trump will be found guilty because he did exactly what he was accused of.

Meanwhile, you guys have been accusing Biden of everything, only to find a lot of misinformation spread by Russian and Chinese spies.

Go live in the African village. Share everything in a pure equal way. Freaking frauds.

 

[Foxfyre]

LIV GOLF BEDMINSTER EVENT | LIV Golf

Meta and OG description value

www.livgolf.com

This is its promotional page. This is directly backed by the Saudi Government. Trump was very friendly to Saudi-Arabia. Trump suggests 'rogue killers' possibly involved with Khashoggi, says Saudi King denies involvement
And now he's doing business with them. Who's to say this isn't a reward for his friendliness?

How do you know this is true?



Just because you don't accept it doesn't mean it might not be true right. It's the same logic. I'm not trying to serve up a whataboutism. What I am trying to do is show how many assumptions you're making in the Biden case, by pointing out that you would NEVER apply this reasoning for Trump.

In my opinion this has an actual possible quid quo pro identified. If you're willing to make assumptions.

Feel free to site what quid quo pro (government action) you identify in the Biden case personally helpful to Hunters very much private Chinese business partner.

No quid pro quo and no ethics violations IDENTIFIED re Trump is pretty specific. Unless you can show ANY EVIDENCE whatsoever of such illegality or improper influence or whatever you are just repeating malicious political propaganda. And all your link shows is that Trump has an active golf course in Bedminster NJ that Trump established in 2004. He spends quite a bit of time there these days.

Again House of Representatives testimony that was fully publicized and is fully on the record, supported by now validated information on the laptop and corroborated by Hunter's business partner testifying under oath ON CAMERA, strongly suggests influence peddling and other unethical conduct directing foreign money to the Biden family and most likely Joe Biden himself. That information should not be suppressed by the media.

If Biden is found innocent after such investigation is completed, the media should explicitly say so. If Biden is guilty or compromised by such investigation, the media should explicitly say so.

 

[Foxfyre]

It's been almost four years and the "strong evidence" of such things has yet to materialize from the laptop.

How do you know? The media/social media has so suppressed any information about what is on that laptop, nobody who hasn't seen the information knows exactly what is there. It was so damning that the Democrats/media immediately for months/years put out the really dishonest premise that the laptop was Russian disinformation even though they knew that was a blatant lie. That the media did not and will not report the damning information on that laptop is the whole point of this thread.

Due to its use in the Hunter Biden trail by the DOJ prosecution to establish a basis for gun crime, the laptop has now been officially validated as Hunter's laptop, officially pronounced as untampered with, officially noted as not Russian disinformation in any way. And that makes it fair game to use for whatever evidence there is on it of any other crimes.

And yet the media/leftist social media continues to suppress it and pretend it is no problem whatsoever.

 

[westwall]

So let's assume for the sake of argument that Biden won the 2020 election. Why did he win?

In October 2020 the New York Post broke the story of the contents of Biden's laptop.
The media and deep state and Democrats all went into full panic mode.
The Democrats put Facebook, Twitter, et al and all the media on notice to suppress the story. The alternate story put out by such as Politico, James Clapper, John Brennan et al is that the laptop was Russian disinformation and the MSM took that and ran with it.

Those of us on Facebook and Twitter had our posts removed and our accounts suspended for reporting the truth. We were even blocked from private messaging anybody re the laptop. We couldn't even discuss it in the private group rooms that Twitter provided so that we couldn't even chat 'anonymously' which obviously suddenly wasn't so anonymous.

And the November election came and went and those restrictions were never lifted while the Democrats set their sites on taking down Trump. Most Americans never saw the real laptop story.

Now because of Hunter's recent gun crime trial, the laptop is officially declared valid, untampered with, belongs to Hunter, and everything on it is admissible as evidence if pertinent to whatever charges are in play or should be in play.

Biden's DOJ of course won't touch it because they can't use the most damning information on it without screwing up whatever chances Joe Biden has for re-election, it would greatly help Trump, and they would be criticized for not investigating Biden for collusion, taking bribes, influence peddling and other illegal acts suggested or confirmed by the laptop.

And the media is still suppressing it. We of course can discuss it on X via Elon's free speech policy, but you still won't see it on Facebook or any of the other left leaning social media.

And now I will await the USMB troll brigade's 'fake news' icons and snarky denials, but the point is, if we had a free and open press in this country, Biden would not be President now and he would not be running for re-election.

The Media Buried What Was So Important About the Hunter Biden Laptop

The "so what" isn't Hunter's lurid photos. It's credible allegations of Joe's corruption.

drewholden.substack.com

Yup, blanket conspiracy to interfere with the election.

Lock 'em all up.