The Tolerant Left

[The Derp]

What exactly were the consequential, bigoted words? And what standard was applied?

1. "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50 percent representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business." - That's misogyny

2. "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren't just socially constructed because: They're universal across human cultures, they often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone, biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males." - That's more misogyny

3. "I'm simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don't see equal representation of women in tech and leadership."- That's more misogyny

4. "Women, on average, have more: Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance). This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs." - That's more misogyny

5. "Women on average show a higher interest in people and men in things." - That's more misogyny

6. "Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average. Unfortunately, as long as tech and leadership remain high status, lucrative careers, men may disproportionately want to be in them. Allowing and truly endorsing (as part of our culture) part time work though can keep more women in tech." - That's more misogyny

7. "Programs, mentoring, and classes only for people with a certain gender or race, a high priority queue and special treatment for 'diversity' candidates, hiring practices which can effectively lower the bar for 'diversity' candidates by decreasing the false negative rate." - so here's some racism mixed into the misogyny.

8. "We're told by senior leadership that what we're doing is both the morally and economically correct thing to do, but without evidence this is just veiled left ideology that can irreparably harm Google." - here's bigotry.


And here's what the Google HR rep said: "You have just created a textbook hostile workplace environment."

 

[The Derp]

No, idiots like him need to be countered with more speech, effective speech, not breaking things.

Because speech worked so well killing Nazis in WWII.

I’m still waiting for you to present his ‘bigoted’ words and in context, please.

Well, calm your tits since you just made the request of me a moment ago.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What exactly were the consequential, bigoted words? And what standard was applied?

1. "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50 percent representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business." - That's misogyny

2. "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren't just socially constructed because: They're universal across human cultures, they often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone, biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males." - That's more misogyny

3. "I'm simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don't see equal representation of women in tech and leadership."- That's more misogyny

4. "Women, on average, have more: Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance). This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs." - That's more misogyny

5. "Women on average show a higher interest in people and men in things." - That's more misogyny

6. "Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average. Unfortunately, as long as tech and leadership remain high status, lucrative careers, men may disproportionately want to be in them. Allowing and truly endorsing (as part of our culture) part time work though can keep more women in tech." - That's more misogyny

7. "Programs, mentoring, and classes only for people with a certain gender or race, a high priority queue and special treatment for 'diversity' candidates, hiring practices which can effectively lower the bar for 'diversity' candidates by decreasing the false negative rate." - so here's some racism mixed into the misogyny.

8. "We're told by senior leadership that what we're doing is both the morally and economically correct thing to do, but without evidence this is just veiled left ideology that can irreparably harm Google." - here's bigotry.


And here's what the Google HR rep said: "You have just created a textbook hostile workplace environment."

None of that is bigoted. Differing traits between men and women are a result of nature. Denying that in the name of gender neutrality is rooted in real bigotry.
Race quotas undermine credentials and is also bigotry.
So you have the bigotry accusation squarely on the wrong foot.
What’s more, a refusal to discuss these realities and observations is bigotry and fascism.
Denying the opportunity to discuss is more fascism.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What exactly were the consequential, bigoted words? And what standard was applied?

1. "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50 percent representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business." - That's misogyny

2. "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren't just socially constructed because: They're universal across human cultures, they often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone, biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males." - That's more misogyny

3. "I'm simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don't see equal representation of women in tech and leadership."- That's more misogyny

4. "Women, on average, have more: Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance). This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs." - That's more misogyny

5. "Women on average show a higher interest in people and men in things." - That's more misogyny

6. "Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average. Unfortunately, as long as tech and leadership remain high status, lucrative careers, men may disproportionately want to be in them. Allowing and truly endorsing (as part of our culture) part time work though can keep more women in tech." - That's more misogyny

7. "Programs, mentoring, and classes only for people with a certain gender or race, a high priority queue and special treatment for 'diversity' candidates, hiring practices which can effectively lower the bar for 'diversity' candidates by decreasing the false negative rate." - so here's some racism mixed into the misogyny.

8. "We're told by senior leadership that what we're doing is both the morally and economically correct thing to do, but without evidence this is just veiled left ideology that can irreparably harm Google." - here's bigotry.


And here's what the Google HR rep said: "You have just created a textbook hostile workplace environment."

OMG! HE SAID MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT!

The left are truly insane.

 

[The Derp]

one of that is bigoted.

Yes, it is. Clearly. And if you don't think it's bigoted, that's because you're a bigot.

Differing traits between men and women are a result of nature. Denying that in the name of gender neutrality is rooted in real bigotry.

First of all those traits aren't accurate or universal. Secondly, the conclusion Damore draws from those traits leads him to a bigoted and sexist conclusion. Thirdly, let's hear what an evolutionary biologist has to say about his shit:

"To an evolutionary biologist, the idea that sex differences are purely socially constructed is simply implausible. And the necessity of facing up to this is something I’ve talked about as well. That said, the argument in the document is, overall, despicable trash.”
(Suzanne Sadedin, BSc.(Hons) in Zoology; Ph.D. in evolutionary biology)

Race quotas undermine credentials and is also bigotry.

Google doesn't have race quotas. So this is a straw man. You know what a straw man is, right? You should since you've been arguing in defense of them. Secondly, the idea that an undeserving minority gets the job over a qualified white person is a myth and fantasy underachieving white people concocted to preserve the glass menagerie they call their egos. No qualified white people were placed behind underqualified minorities. You all tell yourselves that's the case because you don't want to admit that you're not half as clever, intelligent, or qualified as you pretend to be.

No minority took your job or anyone else's job. Your underachieving nature and lack of effort is why you didn't get the job.

So you have the bigotry accusation squarely on the wrong foot.
What’s more, a refusal to discuss these realities and observations is bigotry and fascism.

This wasn't a discussion, it was a manifesto written by a troll who lost his job because of it. Freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequences. That's what you clowns don't seem to understand.

Denying the opportunity to discuss is more fascism.

Shitting out a manifesto is not having a discussion, particularly one that draws false conclusions that evolutionary biologists scoff at.

 

[The Derp]

OMG! HE SAID MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT!The left are truly insan.

That is not the extent of what he said and pretending so is sophistry, which is your defining trait.

 

[Tilly]

The conservative organizers planned to incite violence and failed. A speaker was unplugged. No big deal.

Yes, someone not willing to parrot Soros or Stalin or Hitler would incite leftists to be violent.

Glad the police arrested the leftist moonbat.

She got a citation and they let her go. Well worth it.

How was it worth it? What did she achieve in your opinion?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

one of that is bigoted.

Yes, it is. Clearly. And if you don't think it's bigoted, that's because you're a bigot.

Differing traits between men and women are a result of nature. Denying that in the name of gender neutrality is rooted in real bigotry.

First of all those traits aren't accurate or universal. Secondly, the conclusion Damore draws from those traits leads him to a bigoted and sexist conclusion. Thirdly, let's hear what an evolutionary biologist has to say about his shit:

"To an evolutionary biologist, the idea that sex differences are purely socially constructed is simply implausible. And the necessity of facing up to this is something I’ve talked about as well. That said, the argument in the document is, overall, despicable trash.”
(Suzanne Sadedin, BSc.(Hons) in Zoology; Ph.D. in evolutionary biology)

Race quotas undermine credentials and is also bigotry.

Google doesn't have race quotas. So this is a straw man. You know what a straw man is, right? You should since you've been arguing in defense of them. Secondly, the idea that an undeserving minority gets the job over a qualified white person is a myth and fantasy underachieving white people concocted to preserve the glass menagerie they call their egos. No qualified white people were placed behind underqualified minorities. You all tell yourselves that's the case because you don't want to admit that you're not half as clever, intelligent, or qualified as you pretend to be.

No minority took your job or anyone else's job. Your underachieving nature and lack of effort is why you didn't get the job.

So you have the bigotry accusation squarely on the wrong foot.
What’s more, a refusal to discuss these realities and observations is bigotry and fascism.

This wasn't a discussion, it was a manifesto written by a troll who lost his job because of it. Freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequences. That's what you clowns don't seem to understand.

Denying the opportunity to discuss is more fascism.

Shitting out a manifesto is not having a discussion, particularly one that draws false conclusions that evolutionary biologists scoff at.

Challenging fascist decree with pointed responses rooted in the empirical and nature is not bigotry.
Men and women are inherently different and not only pertaining to genetalia. If you object, then discuss it. Denying the discussion as a result of your misguided indoctrination is fascism.
Your argument is hypocrisy.

 

[Tilly]

It’s freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences

So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflake.

Nah it could’ve been anything. If you go somewhere for no other reason than to insult people and piss them off, you should probably expect consequences.

What’s wrong with ‘using their words’?

 

[Weatherman2020]

OMG! HE SAID MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT!The left are truly insan.

That is not the extent of what he said and pretending so is sophistry, which is your defining trait.

Your post, not mine.

1. "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50 percent representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business."

100% accurate. Men and women are different and any attempt to defy nature is divisive.

Tell us again why women need to be protected from sexual harassment, Dufus.

 

[Mac1958]

In fairness, I don't recall hearing the hardcore Left claiming to be tolerant recently. Liberals, yes. The people in control of the party? No. If they don't like you or something you say or something you write, they'll come after you with everything they have, shut you down, punish you if they can, and then brag about it.
.

 

[The Derp]

Challenging fascist decree with pointed responses rooted in the empirical and nature is not bigotry.

First of all, there is no fascist decree. So you're hyperbolic-ally calling Google's diversity initiative a "fascist decree" because there's no other way to represent what Damore wrote than despicable trash unless you characterize that against which he's raging as such. Make no mistake; Damore is the fascist here, not Google and not the people criticizing him for drawing false conclusions through a tenuous grasp of facts and biology. It wasn't that he pointed out the differences, it was that he used that shit to draw a false conclusion and create a hostile work environment.

Men and women are inherently different and not only pertaining to genetalia. If you object, then discuss it. Denying the discussion as a result of your misguided indoctrination is fascism.

It was a manifesto, not a discussion. And there was a discussion of it; Google determined that it created a hostile work environment so they terminated his employment. Good for them. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

Your argument is hypocrisy.

You don't even know what that word means.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Challenging fascist decree with pointed responses rooted in the empirical and nature is not bigotry.

First of all, there is no fascist decree. So you're hyperbolic-ally calling Google's diversity initiative a "fascist decree" because there's no other way to represent what Damore wrote than despicable trash unless you characterize that against which he's raging as such. Make no mistake; Damore is the fascist here, not Google and not the people criticizing him for drawing false conclusions through a tenuous grasp of facts and biology. It wasn't that he pointed out the differences, it was that he used that shit to draw a false conclusion and create a hostile work environment.

Men and women are inherently different and not only pertaining to genetalia. If you object, then discuss it. Denying the discussion as a result of your misguided indoctrination is fascism.

It was a manifesto, not a discussion. And there was a discussion of it; Google determined that it created a hostile work environment so they terminated his employment. Good for them. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

Your argument is hypocrisy.

You don't even know what that word means.

Poor snowflakes must destroy anyone who dare thinks men and women are different.

 

[The Derp]

100% accurate. Men and women are different and any attempt to defy nature is divisive.

Again, you're being a sophist because his argument wasn't that men and women are different.

1Tell us again why women need to be protected from sexual harassment, Dufus.

Do you mean doofus? You try to insult me and you can't even do that right.

Women need protection from sexual harassment because people like you just don't know what it is, so you do it thinking it's normal because that's what you've been conditioned to do.

You're just an easily programmable robot. Which would explain how easy it was for Russia to hack your brain.

 

[The Derp]

In fairness, I don't recall hearing the hardcore Left claiming to be tolerant recently. Liberals, yes. The people in control of the party? No. If they don't like you or something you say or something you write, they'll come after you with everything they have, shut you down, punish you if they can, and then brag about it.
.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

You entitled assholes don't seem to think that's the case.

 

[The Derp]

Poor snowflakes must destroy anyone who dare thinks men and women are different.

It's sophistry to pretend that was Damore's point.

But sophistry is the only thing you're capable of doing...well...that and pedantry.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Poor snowflakes must destroy anyone who dare thinks men and women are different.

It's sophistry to pretend that was Damore's point.

But sophistry is the only thing you're capable of doing...well...that and pedantry.

His statement was straight to the point and 100% accurate.

 

[Lastamender]

Poor snowflakes must destroy anyone who dare thinks men and women are different.

It's sophistry to pretend that was Damore's point.

But sophistry is the only thing you're capable of doing...well...that and pedantry.

Pedant
A pedant is a person who is excessively concerned with formalism, accuracy, and precision, or one who makes an and arrogant show of learning.More at Wikipedia

You won't ever have that problem.

 

[Weatherman2020]

In fairness, I don't recall hearing the hardcore Left claiming to be tolerant recently. Liberals, yes. The people in control of the party? No. If they don't like you or something you say or something you write, they'll come after you with everything they have, shut you down, punish you if they can, and then brag about it.
.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

You entitled assholes don't seem to think that's the case.

Justifying violence against anyone who goes along with science. How leftist of you.

 

[The Derp]

His statement was straight to the point and 100% accurate.

Only if you pretend his statement was merely "men and women are different". That wasn't his statement, though. And you know that. Yet you continue pretending otherwise because you're a sophist.