Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2017
- 46,062
- 29,788
Oh, Canada WE (The United States of America) Stand on Guard for THEEEEEE!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fuck that bitch. He can suck our collective dick.Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau says his new domestic policy will be to get baked and wait for the neighbours to their south to chill out a bit.
That's pretty much all those motherfuckers do. They sit around, get baked, and wait for us to do something, from which they benefit...SOLELY because they live next to us.
I think Canada should pay us tribute for the military protection we provide.
Otherwise, fuck them. They are a security risk. We go in, kick the shit out of them, and add 10 new states.
For alcohol yes. Not the same with pot...The test doesn’t determine if the person is impaired. It can only tell you that they have consumed it within the past 30 days or so... Which brings the parties to a rather interesting argument. Does the injured party have to prove sobriety at the time of the incident? Or does the insurance company have to prove actual impairment at the time of the incident? Hmmm...I worked in factories and heavy industry as a mechanical engineer for most of my adult live.I’m curious to see how this plays out when a person goes for a workman’s comp claim, or other insurance claim.
Anytime someone got seriously hurt they were required to give blood for a drug test. If the test came back positive for drug use. The person was automatically fired. Plus, if they tried to sue the company for their injury, the judge would rule against them because they were impaired when the accident happened. ....![]()
As it should be.
If you are impaired with alcohol or drugs then you should be held responsible for you actions whether at work or not.
Well for alcohol either a blood test or a breathalyzer test is used.
Its a blood test for drugs. They can tell how impaired you are with the blood test.
The least they can do.Fuck that bitch. He can suck our collective dick.Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau says his new domestic policy will be to get baked and wait for the neighbours to their south to chill out a bit.
That's pretty much all those motherfuckers do. They sit around, get baked, and wait for us to do something, from which they benefit...SOLELY because they live next to us.
I think Canada should pay us tribute for the military protection we provide.
Otherwise, fuck them. They are a security risk. We go in, kick the shit out of them, and add 10 new states.
Canadians were there, dying on the Beaches in Normandy.
They were the first to offer aid on 9-11 an unilaterally allowed our airliners to land.
They also provide lots of jobs for American companies in the Oil Patch.
I worked in factories and heavy industry as a mechanical engineer for most of my adult live.I’m curious to see how this plays out when a person goes for a workman’s comp claim, or other insurance claim.
Anytime someone got seriously hurt they were required to give blood for a drug test. If the test came back positive for drug use. The person was automatically fired. Plus, if they tried to sue the company for their injury, the judge would rule against them because they were impaired when the accident happened. ....![]()
Times change
Good thing huh? Progression is ALWAYS a good thing...right?
Plus, we all know people stay focused and are much better workers when they’re stoned...right?
For alcohol yes. Not the same with pot...The test doesn’t determine if the person is impaired. It can only tell you that they have consumed it within the past 30 days or so... Which brings the parties to a rather interesting argument. Does the injured party have to prove sobriety at the time of the incident? Or does the insurance company have to prove actual impairment at the time of the incident? Hmmm...I worked in factories and heavy industry as a mechanical engineer for most of my adult live.I’m curious to see how this plays out when a person goes for a workman’s comp claim, or other insurance claim.
Anytime someone got seriously hurt they were required to give blood for a drug test. If the test came back positive for drug use. The person was automatically fired. Plus, if they tried to sue the company for their injury, the judge would rule against them because they were impaired when the accident happened. ....![]()
As it should be.
If you are impaired with alcohol or drugs then you should be held responsible for you actions whether at work or not.
Well for alcohol either a blood test or a breathalyzer test is used.
Its a blood test for drugs. They can tell how impaired you are with the blood test.
And as soon as we do, let's be sure to make our next priority the elimination of those tobacco cigarettes. Because that's bad for you.
Liberals should just admit that they can't get their acts together.
Right. It’ll be in your system for around 30 days. Long, long after any intoxicating effect has run its course. So the booger will be proving whether or not the person actually was impaired at the moment in question.For alcohol yes. Not the same with pot...The test doesn’t determine if the person is impaired. It can only tell you that they have consumed it within the past 30 days or so... Which brings the parties to a rather interesting argument. Does the injured party have to prove sobriety at the time of the incident? Or does the insurance company have to prove actual impairment at the time of the incident? Hmmm...I worked in factories and heavy industry as a mechanical engineer for most of my adult live.
Anytime someone got seriously hurt they were required to give blood for a drug test. If the test came back positive for drug use. The person was automatically fired. Plus, if they tried to sue the company for their injury, the judge would rule against them because they were impaired when the accident happened. ....![]()
As it should be.
If you are impaired with alcohol or drugs then you should be held responsible for you actions whether at work or not.
Well for alcohol either a blood test or a breathalyzer test is used.
Its a blood test for drugs. They can tell how impaired you are with the blood test.
They can still tell if its in your system. Not sure how they rate it though.
Places where I worked an injury wasn't just a cut finger. People lost limbs and broke bones. Thankfully, never had anyone lose their life on my watch.Times change
Places where I worked an injury wasn't just a cut finger. People lost limbs and broke bones. Thankfully, never had anyone lose their life on my watch.Times change
Personally I didn't want to work around a co-worker who was drunk, hungover, or high. It was just too dangerous to trust my life around someone who wasn't 100% mentally in the game.
In fact if I thought they were impaired, I'd report their behavior myself. ...![]()
We don't need to do ANYTHING just because Canada is doing it. Fuck Canada.The United States needs to catch up with Canada
But, I agree that pot is no different than alcohol and should be taxed if sold, but growing it on your own, for your own consumption, should be legal and free.
I have never used pot. If it becomes legal I will not smoke it.
I will likely have some "special" brownies.
You potheads tell me if that's a good idea.
You can infuse it into everything. It not just for brownies anymore.
I worked in factories and heavy industry as a mechanical engineer for most of my adult live.I’m curious to see how this plays out when a person goes for a workman’s comp claim, or other insurance claim.
Anytime someone got seriously hurt they were required to give blood for a drug test. If the test came back positive for drug use. The person was automatically fired. Plus, if they tried to sue the company for their injury, the judge would rule against them because they were impaired when the accident happened. ....![]()
Times change
Good thing huh? Progression is ALWAYS a good thing...right?
Plus, we all know people stay focused and are much better workers when they’re stoned...right?
Bad idea.
American youth are already behind the education curve.
Legalizing weed will only make the situation worse. ...![]()
I agree. They can tax it and regulate it just like cigarettes. They will make a lot of money.
Places where I worked an injury wasn't just a cut finger. People lost limbs and broke bones. Thankfully, never had anyone lose their life on my watch.Times change
Personally I didn't want to work around a co-worker who was drunk, hungover, or high. It was just too dangerous to trust my life around someone who wasn't 100% mentally in the game.
In fact if I thought they were impaired, I'd report their behavior myself. ...![]()
You should report it if you think they are impaired.
Are you also pushing to ban booze again so you do not take the chance of working around a drunk or hungover person?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I agree. They can tax it and regulate it just like cigarettes. They will make a lot of money.
A "lot" of money? Maybe some, but not a "lot".
If they raise the Weed Tax to high levels that will be significant as far the budget, most of the money made will be expended to stop the flow of untaxed grass with counterfeit tax stamps.
A lot of people get their asses capped smuggling ciggies across jurisdictional lines, hijacking trucks, etc. Policing this kind of trade is expensive.
It may sound counterintuitive, but a modest reefer levy could probably net the government a lot more.
But employers can still refuse to hire, and/or fire for use if they so choose. And for many they have no choice because of the insurance that they have to carry.It's already legal for recreational purposes in several states (in amounts within reason, I assume). And a bunch more states it's legal with a medical card.