The Washington Times says that Hillary Clinton is in a corner on suicide watch

[Bassman007]

EDITORIAL: Hillary Clinton's campaign on suicide watch - Washington Times

How long do we have to suffer as a nation, with this obvious lying criminal trying to be President? Is there not any way for America to defend itself from this mockery of it's electoral system? What can we do to be free of the disease called Hillary.

what has she lied about ... so far all we have heard from the right is she might have sent classified documents to her server ... might have, could have, maybe, isn't a fact its a unfounded accusation ....so far none of them have been proven to be classified at the time they were sent ... so what's your point, other then you hate Hillary .... she has stated she hasn't sent any classified documents to her private server to her knowledge ... how is that a lie ... do you automatically assume its a lie because of your hate towards Hillary ??? and you are hoping that its true, when clearly, so far its not...

She lied about turning over all work related e-mails, regardless of classification. She did this under oath and the lie is a felony. She also let State dept business come to her e-mail from Google, which means that Google has all of these e-mails on their servers as well, and these are all over the World.

please show us where she has lied about it so far ... nothing she has said was a lie ... you're just you hoping it is
correct me if I wrong here people, when and where did she go before a court of law and say she didn't send any classified documents to her server ... please Bassmann tell us where and when and what court.. the court of republican opinion doesn't count ... what she said to the press, which by the way isn't a court of law, she said to her knowledge she didn't send classified document to her private server ... to her knowledge ??? you are convicting her of something she hasn't been convicted of... just becasue of your hate of her ... so come back here when you have proof that she lied ... so far you and like all of your republican voters are hoping ... hoping and reality are two different things

She lied about only deleting only personal e-mails, as the FBI has now recovered deleted e-mails that were clearly work related. You are in denial, and think that your obstinacy will stop EVERY USA news organization from reporting this........... You lose little one

what they reported was the recovered them ... they haven't said they were work related oh by they way work related and classified are two doifferent things little one... you lose

And the New York Times says http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/u...ls-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0

 

[billyerock1991]

And tell me something dear Bass, if she didn't delete any work related emails, will you vote for her?

No, because Hillary Clinton rips the heads off of little poor babies, in order to fulfill her ideal of a perfect America.

Have you ripped the head off of a small baby yet today? you do know that this is your duty as a Democrap. So go find a small poor child, one with a dirty shirt perhaps and decapitate him or her, then you can join Hillary's campaign staff.

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

as I said come back when you have a good source ... Breitbart is a right wing, far right wing source ... they are all allegations ...not factual statements ... so far all you have done here today is spread the right wing propaganda seed as they see it ... and not the actual facts

 

[Bassman007]

No, because Hillary Clinton rips the heads off of little poor babies, in order to fulfill her ideal of a perfect America.

Have you ripped the head off of a small baby yet today? you do know that this is your duty as a Democrap. So go find a small poor child, one with a dirty shirt perhaps and decapitate him or her, then you can join Hillary's campaign staff.

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

as I said come back when you have a good source ... Breitbart is a right wing, far right wing source ... they are all allegations ...not factual statements ... so far all you have done here today is spread the right wing propaganda seed as they see it ... and not the actual facts

I already posted a NY Times link, you silly boy you. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/u...ls-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0 You gonna call the NY Times right wing too Bill?

 

[billyerock1991]

And tell me something dear Bass, if she didn't delete any work related emails, will you vote for her?

No, because Hillary Clinton rips the heads off of little poor babies, in order to fulfill her ideal of a perfect America.

Have you ripped the head off of a small baby yet today? you do know that this is your duty as a Democrap. So go find a small poor child, one with a dirty shirt perhaps and decapitate him or her, then you can join Hillary's campaign staff.

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

I'm sorry I didn't see hillary in a federal court with her hand up saying to tell the whole truth ... so far the FBI has dismissed her other emails ... that was in the news... but I'm sure you missed that one... so how can you say the FBI proved it, when she's hasn't been in a federal court yet ... were do you get to say she's guilty with out do process

 

[Bassman007]

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

as I said come back when you have a good source ... Breitbart is a right wing, far right wing source ... they are all allegations ...not factual statements ... so far all you have done here today is spread the right wing propaganda seed as they see it ... and not the actual facts

I already posted a NY Times link, you silly boy you. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/u...ls-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0 You gonna call the NY Times right wing too Bill?

Bill grabs a Cuban Cigar and thinks

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i can just vision Hillary getting into a vicious altercation with another 250 pound woman over the last 8 pack of "Bounty Extra Strength SuperWipes". kinda like what we saw in that other wal-mart video of two woman fighting over nothing and a 10 year old boy getting his licks in.

 

[Papageorgio]

Hillary has repeatedly stated she has turned over all her emails and every few weeks we find more she had not turned over. I call that lying. Maybe that is to simple to understand.

 

[billyerock1991]

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

as I said come back when you have a good source ... Breitbart is a right wing, far right wing source ... they are all allegations ...not factual statements ... so far all you have done here today is spread the right wing propaganda seed as they see it ... and not the actual facts

I already posted a NY Times link, you silly boy you. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/u...ls-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0 You gonna call the NY Times right wing too Bill?

what the time said is they recovered the emails then have bee all process yet ...what you said here is the fbi convicted her ...silly littler girl... that's a lie ... but that what you republicans do ... lie to justify your means ... show us here where the FBI has convicted her of lying under oath ??? show us where the FBI has charged her with any crime ??? all you have is a reported saying the recovered her emails .,. thats it... the FBI hasn't made any statement that hillary has lied... nor have the made any statement that they found classified documents ... after all that's what they are looking for classified documents, not work related document you idiot

 

[Bassman007]

No, because Hillary Clinton rips the heads off of little poor babies, in order to fulfill her ideal of a perfect America.

Have you ripped the head off of a small baby yet today? you do know that this is your duty as a Democrap. So go find a small poor child, one with a dirty shirt perhaps and decapitate him or her, then you can join Hillary's campaign staff.

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

I'm sorry I didn't see hillary in a federal court with her hand up saying to tell the whole truth ... so far the FBI has dismissed her other emails ... that was in the news... but I'm sure you missed that one... so how can you say the FBI proved it, when she's hasn't been in a federal court yet ... were do you get to say she's guilty with out do process

The e-mails prove their own existence, as they were retrieved from deleted ghost shadows (that are admissible in Federal Court). The do process that you speak of, is not a legal one, but one of American opinion which is now demonstrably negative on the serial liar known as Hillary Clinton. You want to call CNN right wing too Bill? New Hillary Clinton email chain discovered - CNNPolitics.com Have another puff of that Cuban Cigar Mr. Bill

 

[billyerock1991]

Hillary has repeatedly stated she has turned over all her emails and every few weeks we find more she had not turned over. I call that lying. Maybe that is to simple to understand.

I sorry here you are confused whats you have been seeing is the FBI pointing out emails that she turn over in the press ... the only thing to date was the ones she erased and so far they haven't found any classified document in them ... what you said here is as if she has this boat load of emails hidden ... they have thousands of them and they release what they might think as being classified ... so far the fbi has said so far none of them have been classified... you are a shooting a starter pistol to protect your life ... and you will lose

 

[Maryland Patriot]

i can just vision Hillary getting into a vicious altercation with another 250 pound woman over the last 8 pack of "Bounty Extra Strength SuperWipes". kinda like what we saw in that other wal-mart video of two woman fighting over nothing and a 10 year old boy getting his licks in.

do you honestly think that hillary's arms are long enough to reach all the way around those ass cheeks to wipe?
you might see her fighting over the last power washer at Home Depot, but I doubt you will see her fighting for a roll of Super Wipes.

 

[Bassman007]

Hillary has repeatedly stated she has turned over all her emails and every few weeks we find more she had not turned over. I call that lying. Maybe that is to simple to understand.

I sorry here you are confused whats you have been seeing is the FBI pointing out emails that she turn over in the press ... the only thing to date was the ones she erased and so far they haven't found any classified document in them ... what you said here is as if she has this boat load of emails hidden ... they have thousands of them and they release what they might think as being classified ... so far the fbi has said so far none of them have been classified... you are a shooting a starter pistol to protect your life ... and you will lose

Billy Billy Billy, nothing needs to be classified on the e-mails that were retrieved by the FBI. Sure it's worse if it were, but all of these e-mails are required by LAW to be turned over to the National archives, minus Hillary's personal ones, which the Obama administration said she could delete. Hillary deleted them and work e-mails as well, which need not be classified. Seriously I think that those Cuban Cigars are shrinking your brain. Is there brain Viagra yet? Did I mention that now Obama is hanging Hillary Clinton as well? Hillary Clinton E-mail Scandal: Obama Admin Finds Official E-mails Clinton Didn't Turn Over | National Review Online

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i can just vision Hillary getting into a vicious altercation with another 250 pound woman over the last 8 pack of "Bounty Extra Strength SuperWipes". kinda like what we saw in that other wal-mart video of two woman fighting over nothing and a 10 year old boy getting his licks in.

do you honestly think that hillary's arms are long enough to reach all the way around those ass cheeks to wipe?
you might see her fighting over the last power washer at Home Depot, but I doubt you will see her fighting for a roll of Super Wipes.

well I heard that Huma and Anthony take turns wiping Hillary being she cant reach down there.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Lefty Religious Nutters

 

[billyerock1991]

translation: democrat hater come back when you have a legitimate argument ... so far youre all mouth with nothing to back it up

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

I'm sorry I didn't see hillary in a federal court with her hand up saying to tell the whole truth ... so far the FBI has dismissed her other emails ... that was in the news... but I'm sure you missed that one... so how can you say the FBI proved it, when she's hasn't been in a federal court yet ... were do you get to say she's guilty with out do process

The e-mails prove their own existence, as they were retrieved from deleted ghost shadows (that are admissible in Federal Court). The do process that you speak of, is not a legal one, but one of American opinion which is now demonstrably negative on the serial liar known as Hillary Clinton. You want to call CNN right wing too Bill? New Hillary Clinton email chain discovered - CNNPolitics.com Have another puff of that Cuban Cigar Mr. Bill

first of all I don't smoke... never have ...second I haven't said they didn't recover any emails on her private server... what I have said and continue to say none of the recovered emails are considered classified documents ... you haven't a leg to stand on here... she has said to the press that to her knowledge she hasn't sent or deleated any classified documents ... to this date nobody has proved other wise ...you or anyone here ...all you have done here is state your opinion ... until you have a fact that she has been convicted of lying here, you don't have a leg to stand on ...

gotta go dogs to walk

 

[Bassman007]

Why I’ve written 50 posts on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails

Here's why:

1. Hillary Clinton began this race as the biggest non-incumbent front-runner for a party's presidential nomination in the post-World War II era. The job she held just prior to running for president was as secretary of state. The best way to understand how she handles everything from the mundane day-to-day activities of governance to the crises that present themselves from time to time is by studying not just her public actions at the State Department but the thinking behind those decisions. Her e-mails provide a written record of how she thinks, who she relies on and how she navigates sticky situations. Her e-mails are essential to who she is. And, therefore, very much worth looking into -- and writing about.

2. No secretary of state has ever used a private e-mail server exclusively. For all of Clinton's insistence that this was standard operating procedure for government officials, it wasn't. Yes, lots and lots of government officials have used both a government e-mail address and a private e-mail address. None before Clinton had used only a private server. That makes what she did anomalous -- and worth paying attention to.

3. The story about the e-mail server has changed. Repeatedly. When Clinton acknowledged the existence of the server back in March -- following a New York Times report revealing it -- she insisted that the private server need not be examined by a third party. She (finally) turned it over last month. She said that the handing over of the e-mails was a procedure that all former and current secretaries of state were undergoing at the same time. But, as reporting from The Post this week showed, the State Department specifically requested Clinton's e-mails after they realized she had used private e-mail exclusively. It wasn't until months later that requests for documents was made of other former secretaries of state. A story that keeps changing like that bears further analysis and investigation.

4. I write a blog. I write a lot of posts. On Friday, for example, I wrote three blog posts and did a live online chat. This is not to brag (quantity doesn't always mean quality). It is to say that 50 posts that mention "Hillary Clinton" and "e-mails" between March and mid-September sound like a ton, but they're really not. I guarantee you that I have written more than 50 posts about Donald Trump in that time.

I understand that organizations like Media Matters exist to work the referees. And, I also understand that plenty of people who are sympathetic to Clinton -- and maybe even some who are not -- think the e-mail server is a non-issue. But, I would ask you to think of this: If this controversy -- with the exact same circumstances -- was centered on a former Republican secretary of state who was the frontrunner for the GOP's nod, would you still think it was unfair?

All I can do is report and analyze as fairly as I know how. That's what I've done for the last 17 years -- and what I will continue to do for as long as I can

Thanks Chris.................

Yawning, as I watch Hillary squirm in her aneurism.

with all you boring post here, all I still see here she wasn't convicted of lying under oath, like you said she did, I fail to see anything accept right wing bull shit being spread by people who are making false statements, especially you when you say she was convicted of lying under oath ... that hasn't happen

Gowdy: Clinton's Sworn Statement That She Turned Over All Emails Is False - Breitbart You mean the post that I make that you keep responding too? Yawn, Hillary lied under oath, the FBI proved this already, as Hillary is too dumb to know that a deleted e-mail can be retrieved.

I'm sorry I didn't see hillary in a federal court with her hand up saying to tell the whole truth ... so far the FBI has dismissed her other emails ... that was in the news... but I'm sure you missed that one... so how can you say the FBI proved it, when she's hasn't been in a federal court yet ... were do you get to say she's guilty with out do process

The e-mails prove their own existence, as they were retrieved from deleted ghost shadows (that are admissible in Federal Court). The do process that you speak of, is not a legal one, but one of American opinion which is now demonstrably negative on the serial liar known as Hillary Clinton. You want to call CNN right wing too Bill? New Hillary Clinton email chain discovered - CNNPolitics.com Have another puff of that Cuban Cigar Mr. Bill

first of all I don't smoke... never have ...second I haven't said they didn't recover any emails on her private server... what I have said and continue to say none of the recovered emails are considered classified documents ... you haven't a leg to stand on here... she has said to the ppress the to her knowledge she hasn't sent or deleated any classified documents ... to this day nobody has proved other wise ...you or anyone here ...all you have done here is state your opinion ... until you have a fact that she has been convicted of lying here you don't have a leg to stand on ...

gotta go dogs to walk

Billy Billy Billy, you keep going back to classified documents being found. First of all this is of no matter, as all Hillary Clintons work e-mails had to be turned over, not just classified ones. Second is there were classified documents, and there were some already reported, the FBI would not disclose these because THEY ARE FRIKIN CLASSSIFIED AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC INCLUDES RUSSIAN SPIES THUS THE FBI IS NOT GOING TO DISCLOSE THESE CLASSIFIED E-MAILS.

PS. Stop being so silly....................

PSS. Did I mention that Hillary Clinton was an e-mail pen pal to David Petraeus? Hillary failed to turn over emails with Petraeus, officials say

 

[NLT]

Are you going to start a new thread about Hillary Clinton every single time you find some ridiculous Op-Ed to cut and paste?

Do they make you cry?

 

[Papageorgio]

Hillary has repeatedly stated she has turned over all her emails and every few weeks we find more she had not turned over. I call that lying. Maybe that is to simple to understand.

I sorry here you are confused whats you have been seeing is the FBI pointing out emails that she turn over in the press ... the only thing to date was the ones she erased and so far they haven't found any classified document in them ... what you said here is as if she has this boat load of emails hidden ... they have thousands of them and they release what they might think as being classified ... so far the fbi has said so far none of them have been classified... you are a shooting a starter pistol to protect your life ... and you will lose

I'm not seeing where I used the word classified. Hmmm... So far I find you less than honest.

 

[NLT]

What is it that you think google searches prove?


"Bassman is dumb piece of shit" returns 4,080,000 results.

Google

theDoctorisin is a whiny gash 38,800 results
Google

 

[Bassman007]

Hillary has repeatedly stated she has turned over all her emails and every few weeks we find more she had not turned over. I call that lying. Maybe that is to simple to understand.

I sorry here you are confused whats you have been seeing is the FBI pointing out emails that she turn over in the press ... the only thing to date was the ones she erased and so far they haven't found any classified document in them ... what you said here is as if she has this boat load of emails hidden ... they have thousands of them and they release what they might think as being classified ... so far the fbi has said so far none of them have been classified... you are a shooting a starter pistol to protect your life ... and you will lose

I'm not seeing where I used the word classified. Hmmm... So far I find you less than honest.

Billy is scared shit, and this is clouding his thoughts, classified has less to do with the issue now, but trust me, there is loads of classified info in the ghost shadow files.