Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Wait for it.......here it comes..... WHO CARES??
"A lot of people like Sara Palin"...pheh...a LOT of people don't care one way or another.
Sara Palin is yet another meaningless distraction used by one side to keep the division going.
Both parties benefit greatly from the political division in America. In fact, they cannot exist without it. As long as each side is always looking at what the other side is doing wrong - they fail to see the pounding they are getting from their own.
Uhh no, no it isn'tHoly jesus. Idiocracy is not at all about inevitable progression of Socialism. It's a fucking comedy about intelligence being bred out of the gene pool.She's a typical American woman... .
Maybe in the movie 'Idiocracy'
Why would Sarah Palin be in a movie about the inevitable progression of Socialism?
Which by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
Uhh no, no it isn'tHoly jesus. Idiocracy is not at all about inevitable progression of Socialism. It's a fucking comedy about intelligence being bred out of the gene pool.She's a typical American woman... .
Maybe in the movie 'Idiocracy'
Why would Sarah Palin be in a movie about the inevitable progression of Socialism?
Which by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn'tHoly jesus. Idiocracy is not at all about inevitable progression of Socialism. It's a fucking comedy about intelligence being bred out of the gene pool.Maybe in the movie 'Idiocracy'
Why would Sarah Palin be in a movie about the inevitable progression of Socialism?
Which by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
yeah don't hold your breath, mouth breather.
You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn'tHoly jesus. Idiocracy is not at all about inevitable progression of Socialism. It's a fucking comedy about intelligence being bred out of the gene pool.Why would Sarah Palin be in a movie about the inevitable progression of Socialism?
Which by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn'tHoly jesus. Idiocracy is not at all about inevitable progression of Socialism. It's a fucking comedy about intelligence being bred out of the gene pool.
Which by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
ROFLMNAO! And the query advanced has been deflected from, thus yielded to, therefore the contributor has conceded to the standing point that the movie "Idiocracy" merely extrapolates from the concept of socialism, and projects into the future, the inevitable results of such.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Marvelous demonstration... and we can rest assured that the relevant contributor 'likes money!', as well. )
You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn'tWhich by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
ROFLMNAO! And the query advanced has been deflected from, thus yielded to, therefore the contributor has conceded to the standing point that the movie "Idiocracy" merely extrapolates from the concept of socialism, and projects into the future, the inevitable results of such.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Marvelous demonstration... and we can rest assured that the relevant contributor 'likes money!', as well. )
That comes to 35 times that you have posted that line in 2 weeks. Have you considered the damage that it does to your keyboard to overuse the same keys too often? I recommend that you at least change "summarily" to "totally", or something similar. The board will summarily thank you for the variation.
I'm about as conservative as you can get but I'm not one of Palin's fans. I find her somewhat obnoxious and I don't detect a high IQ when I hear her speak. Her voice is almost as annoying as Obama's voice is. I pay little attention to either.
See here's the point though.....whether you like her or not is irrelevant really... my guess is that you don't spend hours and days dwelling on it despite the fact that you have already made up your mind. For the left though this thing becomes the revealer, not of their political preferences but of their elan moral, their entire self identity that is most often carefully hidden under a modicum of civility and a pretense of caring. The " Palin " dope-o-matic reflex is just too much for them to resist dropping the veil and going on the attack in full on battle dress like the blood thirsty borg that is their real identity. As such it becomes the MVP of political tools for disenfranchising the left because it is something they will never change.
Thanks
JO
The liberal reaction to Palin reminds me of the Bevis & Butthead skits. Over the top, incredibly stupid & flat out hilarious
I'm about as conservative as you can get but I'm not one of Palin's fans. I find her somewhat obnoxious and I don't detect a high IQ when I hear her speak. Her voice is almost as annoying as Obama's voice is. I pay little attention to either.
See here's the point though.....whether you like her or not is irrelevant really... my guess is that you don't spend hours and days dwelling on it despite the fact that you have already made up your mind. For the left though this thing becomes the revealer, not of their political preferences but of their elan moral, their entire self identity that is most often carefully hidden under a modicum of civility and a pretense of caring. The " Palin " dope-o-matic reflex is just too much for them to resist dropping the veil and going on the attack in full on battle dress like the blood thirsty borg that is their real identity. As such it becomes the MVP of political tools for disenfranchising the left because it is something they will never change.
Thanks
JO
Bluster is not an argument...
There is no 'hate' for Sarah Palin, just incredulity that the right can be so enamored with someone THAT ill-equipped to be a heartbeat away from the button.
Bluster is not an argument...
There is no 'hate' for Sarah Palin, just incredulity that the right can be so enamored with someone THAT ill-equipped to be a heartbeat away from the button.
The Creepy Stalker.You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn'tWhich by the way is an excellent defintion of socialism!
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
ROFLMNAO! And the query advanced has been deflected from, thus yielded to, therefore the contributor has conceded to the standing point that the movie "Idiocracy" merely extrapolates from the concept of socialism, and projects into the future, the inevitable results of such.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Marvelous demonstration... and we can rest assured that the relevant contributor 'likes money!', as well. )
That comes to 35 times that you have posted that line in 2 weeks. Have you considered the damage that it does to your keyboard to overuse the same keys too often? I recommend that you at least change "summarily" to "totally", or something similar. The board will summarily thank you for the variation.
The Creepy Stalker.You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn't
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
ROFLMNAO! And the query advanced has been deflected from, thus yielded to, therefore the contributor has conceded to the standing point that the movie "Idiocracy" merely extrapolates from the concept of socialism, and projects into the future, the inevitable results of such.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Marvelous demonstration... and we can rest assured that the relevant contributor 'likes money!', as well. )
That comes to 35 times that you have posted that line in 2 weeks. Have you considered the damage that it does to your keyboard to overuse the same keys too often? I recommend that you at least change "summarily" to "totally", or something similar. The board will summarily thank you for the variation.
The liberal reaction to Palin reminds me of the Bevis & Butthead skits. Over the top, incredibly stupid & flat out hilarious
And Sara Palin reminds me of Saturday Night Live...the not ready for prime time players
The liberal reaction to Palin reminds me of the Bevis & Butthead skits. Over the top, incredibly stupid & flat out hilarious
And Sara Palin reminds me of Saturday Night Live...the not ready for prime time players
are we suppose to care about SNL? Man you people are so petty
Liberals love Palin, they think she's wonderful – the perfect example of everything wrong with conservative dogma and the failed agenda of the social right.I'm about as conservative as you can get but I'm not one of Palin's fans. I find her somewhat obnoxious and I don't detect a high IQ when I hear her speak. Her voice is almost as annoying as Obama's voice is. I pay little attention to either.
See here's the point though.....whether you like her or not is irrelevant really... my guess is that you don't spend hours and days dwelling on it despite the fact that you have already made up your mind. For the left though this thing becomes the revealer, not of their political preferences but of their elan moral, their entire self identity that is most often carefully hidden under a modicum of civility and a pretense of caring. The " Palin " dope-o-matic reflex is just too much for them to resist dropping the veil and going on the attack in full on battle dress like the blood thirsty borg that is their real identity. As such it becomes the MVP of political tools for disenfranchising the left because it is something they will never change.
Thanks
JO
Bluster is not an argument...
There is no 'hate' for Sarah Palin, just incredulity that the right can be so enamored with someone THAT ill-equipped to be a heartbeat away from the button.
Liberals love Palin, they think she's wonderful – the perfect example of everything wrong with conservative dogma and the failed agenda of the social right.I'm about as conservative as you can get but I'm not one of Palin's fans. I find her somewhat obnoxious and I don't detect a high IQ when I hear her speak. Her voice is almost as annoying as Obama's voice is. I pay little attention to either.
See here's the point though.....whether you like her or not is irrelevant really... my guess is that you don't spend hours and days dwelling on it despite the fact that you have already made up your mind. For the left though this thing becomes the revealer, not of their political preferences but of their elan moral, their entire self identity that is most often carefully hidden under a modicum of civility and a pretense of caring. The " Palin " dope-o-matic reflex is just too much for them to resist dropping the veil and going on the attack in full on battle dress like the blood thirsty borg that is their real identity. As such it becomes the MVP of political tools for disenfranchising the left because it is something they will never change.
Thanks
JO
Bluster is not an argument...
There is no 'hate' for Sarah Palin, just incredulity that the right can be so enamored with someone THAT ill-equipped to be a heartbeat away from the button.
You want me to debate you about whether intelligence being bred out of the gene pool is an accurate description of socialism?Uhh no, no it isn't
No?
Do tell us of the distinction... (Kids, DO NOT HOLD YOUR BREATH HERE! The fun is watching the clock tick as the query goes UNANSWERED!)
ROFLMNAO! And the query advanced has been deflected from, thus yielded to, therefore the contributor has conceded to the standing point that the movie "Idiocracy" merely extrapolates from the concept of socialism, and projects into the future, the inevitable results of such.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Marvelous demonstration... and we can rest assured that the relevant contributor 'likes money!', as well. )
That comes to 35 times that you have posted that line in 2 weeks. Have you considered the damage that it does to your keyboard to overuse the same keys too often? I recommend that you at least change "summarily" to "totally", or something similar. The board will summarily thank you for the variation.
have you considered you have become nothing but a TROLL?
You really should
Liberals love Palin, they think she's wonderful – the perfect example of everything wrong with conservative dogma and the failed agenda of the social right.
