Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
geezus Dean.....you were on "vacation" for a couple of weeks.....you would have thought you would have dug up some new stuff to post.....instead you just dug up the same old shit...this is what?.....the 30th time you have posted this thing?....
And his boyfriend Lindsey Graham too.
Most Republicans simply don't believe Lindsey is gay. If they did, how long would he last? About as long as Romney's foreign policy advisor.
I seriously you'd actually support education instead of pretending to. Then I wouldn't have to read this nonsense when I want to have actual discussions with people.
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
geezus Dean.....you were on "vacation" for a couple of weeks.....you would have thought you would have dug up some new stuff to post.....instead you just dug up the same old shit...this is what?.....the 30th time you have posted this thing?....
He left his brain at his vacation spot.
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male
Amazing how they reproduce, isn't it skippy? Math and logic are not your forte.
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Tell me what liberal means when you say it.
But not one so skewed and misleading bordering on the "supernatural".
What Might Be Missing From Bush's Presidential Library
The common denominator for liberals is "American helping American" and for conservatives and Republicans, that translates into "socialism".
Now, your kind may come up with some nonsense like, "But we give more to charity" which means nothing. Just giving away stuff you don't want anyway isn't "help". Digging around in the pantry and passing on an unopened 5 year old can of creamed corn isn't really "helping" anyone.
The common denominator for liberals is "American helping American" and for conservatives and Republicans, that translates into "socialism".
Wrong. The common denominator for liberals is "American looting American." Liberalism is nothing but a grab bag of rationalizations for organized plunder. That is indeed what socialism is.
Now, your kind may come up with some nonsense like, "But we give more to charity" which means nothing. Just giving away stuff you don't want anyway isn't "help". Digging around in the pantry and passing on an unopened 5 year old can of creamed corn isn't really "helping" anyone.
Notice how I didn't do that?
But not one so skewed and misleading bordering on the "supernatural".
What Might Be Missing From Bush's Presidential Library
Barack Obama leaves Iraq war out of speech to honour George W Bush | World news | guardian.co.uk
Obama failed to mention Iraq once during his speech at the opening of the George W Bush library and museum in Dallas on Thursday. Instead, he opted for kind words about the man he once castigated day after day on the campaign trail, to cheers from Democratic supporters. In Texas, Obama spoke of Bush's "generosity", "strength", "resolve" and "compassion".
Bush library dedication: Presidents put politics on hold | abc7.com
Mr. Obama once criticized Bush for his "failed policies" and "disastrous" handling of the economy, for expanding budget deficits, and for drawing the nation into war in Iraq.
But Thursday, he instead praised Bush for his strength after 9/11, compassion in fighting HIV/AIDS in Africa, bipartisanship in pursuing education reforms and restarting "an important conversation by speaking with the American people about our history as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants."
The other presidents took a similar tone.
Clinton praised Bush for his efforts to combat AIDS in Africa, his work on global health and even for the paintings he's doing in retirement.
Carter praised Bush for his role in helping secure peace between North and South Sudan in 2005 and the "great contributions you've made to the most needy people on earth."
There are almost nothing but liberals in the Republican party
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Tell me what liberal means when you say it.
The common denominator for liberals is "American helping American" and for conservatives and Republicans, that translates into "socialism". Now, your kind may come up with some nonsense like, "But we give more to charity" which means nothing. Just giving away stuff you don't want anyway isn't "help". Digging around in the pantry and passing on an unopened 5 year old can of creamed corn isn't really "helping" anyone.
if they go full-tilt, eXtreme rw'er, like they did in 2012, then they'll lose more elections.
The common denominator for liberals is "American helping American" and for conservatives and Republicans, that translates into "socialism".
Wrong. The common denominator for liberals is "American looting American." Liberalism is nothing but a grab bag of rationalizations for organized plunder. That is indeed what socialism is.
Now, your kind may come up with some nonsense like, "But we give more to charity" which means nothing. Just giving away stuff you don't want anyway isn't "help". Digging around in the pantry and passing on an unopened 5 year old can of creamed corn isn't really "helping" anyone.
Notice how I didn't do that?
Didn't do what? Call liberals "looters"?
OK, how does "let him die" fit into conservatism?
It's a mistake to compare the two parties. There are no liberals in the Republican Party. They are not only not welcome, they wouldn't be tolerated
The Republican Party is 90% white with the majority being male. Those whites without college have moved towards the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party is a true coalition on the other hand, that has to work together. To assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a liberal is a mistake. There are the infamous "Blue Dogs", conservatives who belong to the Democratic Party. It is well known that some Muslims and some blacks within the Democratic Party don't like gay people. But that doesn't stop them from working together. Like it or not, the Democratic Party is a true coalition and the Republican Party is monolithic simply for the fact that party is 90% white. We already know how they tolerate gays compared to the Democratic Party.
You can't have a real debate unless you acknowledge the enormous differences between the two parties. Saying they are the same is like saying Bush and Obama are the same. If that were true, then why does the right fear and loathe Obama while enshrining George W. Bush? Clearly they are not the same.
Look at the US Chamber of Commerce. We know from the last election that they give to Republicans 10 to 1 over Democrats. If the two parties were the "same", they would give to the parties equally.
Like I said, to have an honest debate between the two parties, you have to recognize the vast differences. Studying the history of the two parties, especially the mass exodus in the mid 60's and who moved from party to party, explains much of why the two parties are so different today.
And I honestly don't understand why pointing out the differences between the two parties is such a "no-no". They are who they are.
A Closer Look at the Parties in 2012 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
100% bull shit.
I am a Classical Liberal, I am a Registered Republican. There are no Classical Liberals in the Democrat Party. They are progressives, not liberals.
Another in a long unbroken succession of rdean fail threads.
Tell me what liberal means when you say it.
The common denominator for liberals is "American helping American" and for conservatives and Republicans, that translates into "socialism". Now, your kind may come up with some nonsense like, "But we give more to charity" which means nothing. Just giving away stuff you don't want anyway isn't "help". Digging around in the pantry and passing on an unopened 5 year old can of creamed corn isn't really "helping" anyone.
Americans helping non Americans must be conservative then, am I right?
