Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
- Thread starter
- #41
Tyranny is now defined as the suppression of bigotry, apparently.
This is satirical comedy material.
How about the suppression of ideas and/or opinions.
Just saying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tyranny is now defined as the suppression of bigotry, apparently.
This is satirical comedy material.
I DON'T EXPECT ANYONE TO LIKE ANYONE. Not taking that dislike and screwing someone over or rejecting their business is another matter.
So if they baked a cake, but had up signs that homosexuality is immoral and that they believe homosexuals will go to hell, would be fine with you, so long as they baked them the cake?
No, you would throw the biggest, most limp wristed, HIV positive hissy fit the world had ever seen. You want to force people to accept deviants as being normal.
Always being in favor of equality, how about laws against KKK, closet tranny/gays like you, fundie christians. Why should I be forced to do business with people I consider to be sub-human anti-Americans?
And, hey, I wouldn't mind getting tax free status as a church so I can call it "religious belief"
Can't we just skip all the bullshit about public accommodation and cut to the chase? Why not just go where you really want and force your fascism down people's throats?.
not allowing you to impose your hatred on others outside of your own little hate-filled environment isn't fascism.
and fascism has a particular definition. it might be helpful for you to look it up.
There are already laws that prevent against discrimination race, or rather you're old. Why should someone be able to screw someone over for liking men?
I am against any law that takes a way freedom of speech.
I see you missed the point, what a surprise.
Say a compromise? Fags can force religious people to bake them gay wedding cakes, while the baker gets to have signs up saying gay men are the #1 leading cause of the transmission of HIV and put up pictures in the gay wedding catalogue of men with caposi's sarcoma?
Say a compromise? Fags can force religious people to bake them gay wedding cakes, while the baker gets to have signs up saying gay men are the #1 leading cause of the transmission of HIV and put up pictures in the gay wedding catalogue of men with caposi's sarcoma?
You can put up such signs as i already suggested. I just wish bigots and homophones had the guts to do it so everyone knows who you are. If their beliefs were valid they should have no problem dealing with the back lash they would get letting their beliefs be known. The problem is they lack conviction and courage.
Say a compromise? Fags can force religious people to bake them gay wedding cakes, while the baker gets to have signs up saying gay men are the #1 leading cause of the transmission of HIV and put up pictures in the gay wedding catalogue of men with caposi's sarcoma?
You can put up such signs as i already suggested. I just wish bigots and homophones had the guts to do it so everyone knows who you are. If their beliefs were valid they should have no problem dealing with the back lash they would get letting their beliefs be known. The problem is they lack conviction and courage.
is one a homophobe for acknowledging that gay men are much more susceptible to most STDs? Are facts bigoted?
You can put up such signs as i already suggested. I just wish bigots and homophones had the guts to do it so everyone knows who you are. If their beliefs were valid they should have no problem dealing with the back lash they would get letting their beliefs be known. The problem is they lack conviction and courage.
is one a homophobe for acknowledging that gay men are much more susceptible to most STDs? Are facts bigoted?
You are only a homophobe if you are afraid a gay person may tempt you to carry out your gay fantasies. If you are not gay why are you worried about it? Facts are not bigoted. Opinions are. People get the 2 confused pretty easily.
Novasteve only has sex with women, he's a bigot! It's discrimination.
Way back in the 80s, when I belonged to the ACLU that was the subject of a lecture on anti discrimination.
Novasteve only has sex with women, he's a bigot! It's discrimination.
I was reading some interview with a tranny, and the tranny said that cisgendered men who wouldn't consider dating a tranny border on transphobia...
Liberals are really getting this insane.
Novasteve only has sex with women, he's a bigot! It's discrimination.
I was reading some interview with a tranny, and the tranny said that cisgendered men who wouldn't consider dating a tranny border on transphobia...
Liberals are really getting this insane.
Richard Fowler was on Hannity discussing the Duck Dynasty flap. He said that any man who says in public that he prefers a woman's vagina instead of a man's anus has committed hate speech.
Should a chassidic baker be forced to bake a jesus cake?