Watching Republican Senator's this morning on Morning Joe talking about this situation.
There was no letter on the bed. Senators asked the military and they said it had been fully investigated. It never existed.
One GOP Senator said that Bergdahl looked undernourished, drugged, was mumbling and appeared to be "coerced", but didn't seem to be in any imminent danger (huh"?). This from a 90 second video shown to all Senators.
And they were asked if the White House called them and apologized for any misunderstanding and they had the hardest time saying "yes".
Joe Scarborough attacked the parents of this kid while others at the table told him to leave the kid's parents alone. Joe said the parents should have called the Pentagon and demanded care for their son (after VA funding has been cut - like that's gonna happen).
What isn't clear is whether Republicans understand that it was al Qaeda that attacked the US. To an outside observer, after 9/11, the US then attacked Iraq and the Taliban but let the leader of al Qaeda go. I never could understand that.
And finally, isn't leaving an American in the hands of Islamic Extremists what Republicans accused Obama of doing?
I think in their zeal to attack the president, Republicans are setting themselves up for very difficult explanations. How do you think they will respond?
Republicans will continue to respond in all the wrong ways since they suffer from Obama Derangement Syndrome.
If Bergdahl is left in Afghanistan you'd have Republicans then pivoting to say that Obama "lets our heroes die!".
It is perplexing to any thinking person how it is that Saudi Arabian Al Qaeda dudes attacked us and we responded by capturing Taliban guys and attacking Iraq while Al Qaeda skipped town and went to Pakistan.
Republicans will continue to conflate two separate issues, that being our policy on POWs and the circumstances of individual POWs and their mindset or intentions, good or bad.
It may turn out that he deserves to be court martialed, but it doesn't change the fact that our policy is to bring our people home.
Personally, I think he was a deserter who felt our mission was deeply flawed. I don't believe he left to become a member of the enemy. But given those things, it's still better that we get him back so we can get closure on this stuff.
And it's better that the Taliban people who we can't charge with anything to release them and then drone their asses since we now have connections to the Afghan government and will no doubt help them take them out the minute they start doing things that go against reconciliation with their country's government.
It's win-win all around. We get to the bottom of the Burgdahl case. We empty and close Gitmo. We get to do away with some baddies who are returning to a landscape where almost all of their buddies have been killed by drones.