This Is All I Want...

[Katzndogz]

Hey dumb fuck, President Obama will be an ex-President on 20Jan17. Then you can wail and gnash your teeth over President Hillary Clinton. I have some sackcloth and ashes on a dicount

Hillary Clinton will NOT be our next president.
Why is it you believe she is so superior to every other possible candidate?

No she won't. She's slipping among democrats who are now leaning Biden.

 

[AntiParty]

Very simple... here is the list... this would take care of 90% of what's wrong with America...

The least educated people in politics share this on FB daily. Because they don't want to think about politics at all, they want others to think about them for them.....

Poor soul. You are just too high strung.....due to Fox News..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE]I'm Your Huckleberry Tombstone - YouTube[/ame]

 

[bayoubill]

Hey dumb fuck, President Obama will be an ex-President on 20Jan17. Then you can wail and gnash your teeth over President Hillary Clinton. I have some sackcloth and ashes on a dicount

Hillary Clinton will NOT be our next president.
Why is it you believe she is so superior to every other possible candidate?

No she won't. She's slipping among democrats who are now leaning Biden.

lol... Biden for president...?

that should be fun...

I'm gonna put in a full stock of microwave popcorn... 'n make sure my cable connection is up to speed to catch all the gaffs from the goofy fucker...

 

[AntiParty]

Very simple... here is the list... this would take care of 90% of what's wrong with America...

So let's review;

1)What are you going to do when your nemesis is gone? Have you put 1 days thought into your next candidate, or do you still hate Obama and hoping for a reason to impeach?

2)Boarders closed huh. Tell me why that is an Obama issue. The problem has been around for ages. The Right Wing likes the Cheap Labor and the Left Wing likes the votes. Call it equal. Yet Obama took massive action and is now known in Mexico as the "Deporter in Chief" Make of that what you want.

3)Language is English already idiot. In fact our Language is a part of almost every Language in the entire world. They have to press 2 for English just like we have to press 2 for Spanish. Have you traveled at all? (probably broke)

4)Culture means "the arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively." Make of that what you want.

5) Welfare drug testing was TESTED! The result was that the expense was WAY more than the money saved. Because REAL harmful drugs leave your system way before Weed. If I remember right, crack leaves in 4 days and Weed sticks around for 30. So how much more do we spend? Test every month or? (I know, questions are hard, you just know "all I want)

6)You want a balanced budget. Yet I'll assume you were a part of the party that voted down the budget for people hired to balance the budget. (basic sabotage)

7) You want tax reform. Everyone does. The debate is how/when/where/why etc. Billion dollar corporations are getting tax money back because they invest in our politicians. But you think you are broke because you saw a YouTube video of a person that got $10k for stating he was a tax junkie.

8)Term limits..........Yep, you are finally correct and it's not complicated at all. Everyone wants this.

 

[Harry Dresden]

If she runs, she will be the next POTUS. You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.

actually if that happens Bill will probably be in his third term.....You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.....

You are making an incorrect assumption that Hillary is a weak woman. She is not.

oh i have no doubt she can be a bitch..... but she aint the politician her husband was either.....she will utilize him as often as possible...

 

[Harry Dresden]

If she runs, she will be the next POTUS. You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.

Ya ok..so what happened last time??why did she NOT win last time??

She wasn't prepared for the blindside attack from Obama. Nothing against Obama, he had a great strategy and those heading up Hillary's campaign did not take him seriously from the beginning. By the time they did it was too late. She won't make that mistake a second time.

well yea he wont be running....

 

[Harry Dresden]

You are making an incorrect assumption that Hillary is a weak woman. She is not.

Exactly what has she accomplished that is not related to riding Bill's coat tails?

What accomplishments can you show us from any of the potential Republican candidates? I can only think of one that has any real solid and significant accomplishments, and that would be Jeb Bush. Maybe you can throw Scott Walker in there also if you agree with him on being anti-union. As for the rest, they are just people with ideas, much like Hillary. Of course Hillary does have substantially more experience in foreign policy than anyone else, whether you like it or not.

yea she also has a guy who was liked by a lot of people the world over to make things nice for her and who has lots of foreign policy experience....those coat tails will be nice and comfy for her...just sayin....

 

[FA_Q2]

If she runs, she will be the next POTUS. You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.

An believe me it will divide this country even more. We don't need that.

Whereas a Republican President wouldn't.

I'm a uniter!

No. They might not. The assumption that you have made (incorrectly) is that she would divide the nation because she is a democrat. That is incorrect – she would divide the nation because she is divisive rather than a unifier. Obama and Bush are guilty of the exact same thing.

In your haste to label another as putting a partisan comment out, you have just went partisan.

There are a few that would defiantly be unites (something that we desperately need) but I don’t think any can win at this moment. Ryan is always put out there by the right but he is as divisive as Hillary. Christie would defiantly be a uniter but is unelectable because he made some monumentally asinine decisions.

 

[FA_Q2]

Rather than demonstrate you have the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker, let's get specific.

Are you willing to give up the mortgage interest deduction on taxes?

Yes. It is a payoff to the rich anyway and has no purpose other than market manipulation. Are you going to continue your thought or run when you get the answer that you didn’t expect?

 

[FA_Q2]

Rather than demonstrate you have the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker, let's get specific.

Are you willing to give up the mortgage interest deduction on taxes?

No and dont raise taxes either because its really really important to have a balanced...I mean, happy rich guys.

But what he will do is something bold and something only a true leader with balls can do. Kick the poors ass! Yeah!!!!

Cut taxes for the wealthy and blame the poor fucks for collecting food stamps, even if they are already working two jobs trying to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads. One of the biggest pissers for me is these assholes blaming poor people for being poor. I can understand the argument for smaller government and less spending, but bashing poor people is too much. It just shows what sick fucks some of these people are.

Then who has the responsibility for them being poor?

That really is the most asinine think that I think you have ever stated here. OF COURSE IT IS THE POOR’S ‘FAULT’ THEY ARE POOR. They are the ones that made the decisions and choices that put them there. No one else. You have the capability and the tools in this nation to succeed. We do not have classes and we are not locked into our socioeconomic status EVER.

That does not mean that social programs are unworkable or should not exist but the idea that ‘poor’ needs a patsy to blame outside of the individual is utterly asinine. More than anything they need to man up (or woman up), admit where they went wrong and fix it or they will forever be dependent on government handouts and in poverty.

 

[Freewill]

If she runs, she will be the next POTUS. You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.

An believe me it will divide this country even more. We don't need that.

And what candidate wouldn't?

Ronald Reagan

 

[Freewill]

An believe me it will divide this country even more. We don't need that.

Whereas a Republican President wouldn't.

I'm a uniter!

No. They might not. The assumption that you have made (incorrectly) is that she would divide the nation because she is a democrat. That is incorrect – she would divide the nation because she is divisive rather than a unifier. Obama and Bush are guilty of the exact same thing.

In your haste to label another as putting a partisan comment out, you have just went partisan.

There are a few that would defiantly be unites (something that we desperately need) but I don’t think any can win at this moment. Ryan is always put out there by the right but he is as divisive as Hillary. Christie would defiantly be a uniter but is unelectable because he made some monumentally asinine decisions.

She will, as has Obama, divide the country because that is how they win and to liberals that is all that matters. Obama did not have the qualifications but that didn't matter he divided the country according to race and won, all that matters. Hillary has no qualification for POTUS. Her term as Senator in a state she never lived was unremarkable. And as they say about Palin, and forget about with Obama, Hillary quit her job. Her role as SOS was an utter disaster. So there really isn't anything to recommend Hillary for the job. But, as I said, to the liberal it doesn't matter they think she can win on ideology alone and frankly, and sadly, they may be right.

 

[editec]

Politics is the art of the possible.

 

[kaz]

What does that mean?

Only liberals get more than one vote, if you're not a liberal, "you get one vote and that's all." Though you only get the vote if Democrats can't get it tossed on a technicality. Like if you're overseas military and they can get your write in vote invalidated like Gore did in 2000, then you don't even get one. Or if they can get ballots tossed out on technicalities in Republican counties like Gore did in 2000, then you don't get one vote either. But if you don't have an ID, bam, you're in! At least once, cause if you don't have an ID, you're probably voting Democrat...

More stupid drivel from the right. Oh, they are cheating us, they are cheating us. Give it a rest. The extremely small amount of voter fraud that does exist does not determine the outcome of any elections on either side. I get so sick of this argument from both sides.

LOL, the inability to recognize when you are being mocked is one of the charms of the left. Pull the stick out, you completely missed the point. Funny stuff.

 

[Redfish]

Only liberals get more than one vote, if you're not a liberal, "you get one vote and that's all." Though you only get the vote if Democrats can't get it tossed on a technicality. Like if you're overseas military and they can get your write in vote invalidated like Gore did in 2000, then you don't even get one. Or if they can get ballots tossed out on technicalities in Republican counties like Gore did in 2000, then you don't get one vote either. But if you don't have an ID, bam, you're in! At least once, cause if you don't have an ID, you're probably voting Democrat...

More stupid drivel from the right. Oh, they are cheating us, they are cheating us. Give it a rest. The extremely small amount of voter fraud that does exist does not determine the outcome of any elections on either side. I get so sick of this argument from both sides.

LOL, the inability to recognize when you are being mocked is one of the charms of the left. Pull the stick out, you completely missed the point. Funny stuff.

liberalism is a mental disease, the libs on this board prove it every day.

 

[007]

Hey dumb fuck, President Obama will be an ex-President on 20Jan17. Then you can wail and gnash your teeth over President Hillary Clinton. I have some sackcloth and ashes on a dicount

Hillary Clinton will NOT be our next president.
Why is it you believe she is so superior to every other possible candidate?

Because that's what he's been told to think.

Thinking independently isn't a trait of the modern day libroid.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Very simple... here is the list... this would take care of 90% of what's wrong with America...

Closed borders? So no more international trade cause we produce enough? Wow are you a moron.

 

[FJO]

No and dont raise taxes either because its really really important to have a balanced...I mean, happy rich guys.

But what he will do is something bold and something only a true leader with balls can do. Kick the poors ass! Yeah!!!!

I can easily balance the budget without raising taxes.

1. Raise the Social Security and Medicare eligibility ages to 70, with the eligibility age indexed to 9 percent of the population going forward. We are living decades longer than our ancestors, we should be working longer.

2. Ban all tax expenditures. Deductions, credits, subsidies, boondoggles, carve-outs, whatever you want to call them. Ban them. Every dollar of credit, subsidy, deduction given to someone has to come out of someone else's pocket or be borrowed from China, Japan, the Fed, etc.

3. Bring Defense spending back to Cold War levels. We have not spent this much on Defense since WWII. We are not in a World War, and we are not facing an existential threat as we did during the Cold War.


There. Not only would you not have to raise taxes, you could actually lower tax rates. For everyone.

Raise the Social Security and Medicare eligibility ages to 70

hey G....what if you just happen to have a physical job that takes a toll on your body and doing it up till 70 just may not be very realistic?.....not everyone sits behind a desk all day....

Actually, 70 may be a bit low.

 

[Redfish]

Very simple... here is the list... this would take care of 90% of what's wrong with America...

Closed borders? So no more international trade cause we produce enough? Wow are you a moron.

I think he means "secure" borders. but you knew that and are just being an asshole

 

[FJO]

If she runs, she will be the next POTUS. You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.

actually if that happens Bill will probably be in his third term.....You know it; I know it; everyone knows it.....

You are making an incorrect assumption that Hillary is a weak woman. She is not.

She is arrogant.

And arrogant people usually get their well-deserved comeuppance.