“This is the Definition of Corruption”

[Doc7505]

“This is the Definition of Corruption” ​

AG Merrick Garland is Now Calling GOP Lawmakers, ​

Coercing Them Not to Vote for ‘Inherent Contempt’​

"This is the Definition of Corruption" — AG Merrick Garland is Now Calling GOP Lawmakers, Coercing Them Not to Vote for 'Inherent Contempt' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

GOP Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

21 Jun 2024 ~~ By Jim Hoft
GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said last week that she will bring force an inherent contempt vote to the House floor after the DOJ declined to prosecute US Attorney General Merrick Garland.
“Under inherent contempt proceedings, the House or Senate has its Sergeant-At-Arms, or deputy, take a person into custody for proceedings to be held in Congress,” according to the National Constitution Center.
The Justice Department won’t prosecute Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress over the Biden audio tapes.
In a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday, the department said, “The department has determined that the responses by Attorney General Garland to the subpoenas issued by the committees did not constitute a crime, and accordingly the department will not bring the congressional contempt citation before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the Attorney General.”

​

Commentary:
Personally, I'd like to see Garland raked over the voals for this act of defiance and contempt of Congress It's worse than jury tampering, suborning of perjury. It's treason against America and it's citizens. Garland has completely ignored the Constitution on a number of judicial cases including unlawful imprisonment of j6 protesters without a speedy trial and cruel and unusual solitary confinement.
Garland is Democrat Neo-Marxist poster child for judical impropriety and corruption. He's their version of Lavrenty Beria.
One has to thanks the Gods Harland was rejected as appointee to SCOTUS.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Garland is educating the lawmakers from making stupid moves.

 

[okfine]

Luna? You sure can pick the ripe ones.

 

[Votto]

I remember back when Garland was sold to the US as a moderate when the democrats tried to appoint him to the Supreme Court

Sadly, Garland is about as moderate as you will find in the Swamp.

In reality, Garland is just a representative of the massive corruption by the Deep State that has elevated itself above the law.

The people no longer have control over their government, and never will again.

The US federal government has become a government by and for the democrat party

We the democrat party, not you the people.

 

[Catsnmeters]

“This is the Definition of Corruption” ​

AG Merrick Garland is Now Calling GOP Lawmakers, ​

Coercing Them Not to Vote for ‘Inherent Contempt’​

"This is the Definition of Corruption" — AG Merrick Garland is Now Calling GOP Lawmakers, Coercing Them Not to Vote for 'Inherent Contempt' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

GOP Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

21 Jun 2024 ~~ By Jim Hoft
GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said last week that she will bring force an inherent contempt vote to the House floor after the DOJ declined to prosecute US Attorney General Merrick Garland.
“Under inherent contempt proceedings, the House or Senate has its Sergeant-At-Arms, or deputy, take a person into custody for proceedings to be held in Congress,” according to the National Constitution Center.
The Justice Department won’t prosecute Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress over the Biden audio tapes.
In a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday, the department said, “The department has determined that the responses by Attorney General Garland to the subpoenas issued by the committees did not constitute a crime, and accordingly the department will not bring the congressional contempt citation before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the Attorney General.”

​

Commentary:
Personally, I'd like to see Garland raked over the voals for this act of defiance and contempt of Congress It's worse than jury tampering, suborning of perjury. It's treason against America and it's citizens. Garland has completely ignored the Constitution on a number of judicial cases including unlawful imprisonment of j6 protesters without a speedy trial and cruel and unusual solitary confinement.
Garland is Democrat Neo-Marxist poster child for judical impropriety and corruption. He's their version of Lavrenty Beria.
One has to thanks the Gods Harland was rejected as appointee to SCOTUS.

Upholding EP is not cause for contempt.

 

[DGS49]

One wonders if, after he is inaugurated for the second time, President Trump will preside over a massive campaign to prosecute Bidenistas who flagrantly violated laws and the Constitution during this awful Biden Administration.

Refused to enforce the immigration laws (Unconstitutional),
Went ahead with "forgiving" student loans even after the USSC told him he couldn't,
Illegally appointed Special Counsels in violation of both law and the Constitution,
Embraced a treaty with Iran that was never ratified by the Senate, as required by the Constitution,
The list is quite long.

 

[ColonelAngus]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW…NOT EVEN MERRICK GARLAND.

Congress asked for the tape.

He refused.

HE HAS BEEN HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS.

If he does not comply….he goes to jail.

Pretty fucking simple.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump will never be inaugurated a second time but will go to prison.,

 

[Catsnmeters]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW…NOT EVEN MERRICK GARLAND.

Congress asked for the tape.

He refused.

HE HAS BEEN HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS.

If he does not comply….he goes to jail.

Pretty fucking simple.

He is upholding EP.

 

[Votto]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW…NOT EVEN MERRICK GARLAND.

Congress asked for the tape.

He refused.

HE HAS BEEN HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS.

If he does not comply….he goes to jail.

Pretty fucking simple.

But they are above the law.

Why is that?

 

[ColonelAngus]

He is upholding EP.

You still claim the laptop is fake. You claim the 51 experts did not lie.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You still claim the laptop is fake.

No I don't.

Why are you lying?

You claim the 51 experts did not lie.

They didn't.

You did in your posts.

Why are you lying?

 

[Mac1958]

One wonders if, after he is inaugurated for the second time, President Trump will preside over a massive campaign to prosecute Bidenistas who flagrantly violated laws and the Constitution during this awful Biden Administration.

Refused to enforce the immigration laws (Unconstitutional),
Went ahead with "forgiving" student loans even after the USSC told him he couldn't,
Illegally appointed Special Counsels in violation of both law and the Constitution,
Embraced a treaty with Iran that was never ratified by the Senate, as required by the Constitution,
The list is quite long.

Great. Go get 'em. Maybe this time something will actually be proven.

For a change.

 

[elektra]

One wonders if, after he is inaugurated for the second time, President Trump will preside over a massive campaign to prosecute Bidenistas who flagrantly violated laws and the Constitution during this awful Biden Administration.

Trump must or this kind of illegality will continue

 

[Marener]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW…NOT EVEN MERRICK GARLAND.

Congress asked for the tape.

He refused.

HE HAS BEEN HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS.

If he does not comply….he goes to jail.

Pretty fucking simple.

You guys really think it’s a good idea to start locking up administration officials because they exert claims of executive privilege?

 

[Marener]

Trump must or this kind of illegality will continue

Doesn’t Trump claim that the president is immune from prosecution?

 

[elektra]

Doesn’t Trump claim that the president is immune from prosecution?

Who said anything about Biden? Biden will have died of dementia by the time a trial comes along.

Biden is not leading, he is a puppet

 

[Marener]

Who said anything about Biden? Biden will have died of dementia by the time a trial comes along.

Biden is not leading, he is a puppet

Wouldn’t presidential immunity filter down to the administration officials who are enacting the president’s orders?

 

[elektra]

Wouldn’t presidential immunity filter down to the administration officials who are enacting the president’s orders?

No

 

[Marener]

No

But that doesn’t make any sense. What is the point of presidential immunity if the president can’t be prosecuted but their officers can be?

Maybe this whole presidential immunity thing is bullshit.