This is the proverbial nail in the coffin

[AntonToo]

National debt - total horseshit, Trump hasn't done jack shit to seriously effect the deficts LET ALONE actually reduce debt.

How embarrassing for you. You continue to illustrate to everyone that you are one of the most ignorant and uninformed posters on USMB...

Amazing: US Debt Decreased by More Than $60 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

US Debt DECREASED by Almost $70 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

Amazing: U.S. Debt Decreased By More Than $60 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

Trump aftershocks: Debt falls $68 billion since inauguration

JUST IN: Trump Has DONE Something Extraordinary - Obama Livid!

U.S. Debt DECREASED By $68 BILLION In First Month Of Trump Presidency…Guess Who DOUBLED U.S. Debt During 8 Years In Office? » 100percentfedUp.com

Bullshit nonsence. Short term treasury account fluctuations mean exactly NOTHING.

If you do not understand that United States is still very much running deficits, then you are a total ignoramus.

The problem is that you don't understand our economy or Accounting in America because you pay for everything with Pesos, and not American Dollars.

lol, something is terribly, terribly wrong with you in the head. And no, that isn't the problem.

Let me explain something to you retard - your baseless assertions about me are not even worth the bits that express them.

But Muh Electoral College!

The lame stream media spent the entire election LECTURING US ABOUT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE and how Trump had no chance to win THE ELECTORAL VOTE.

Then after the slimy bitch lost, they switched tactics and talked about THE POPULAR VOTE when their threats to kill ELECTORS did not pan out.

Now it's about RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, and after that, to cover for the fact these pieces of shit do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ALL DAY....it will be another pile of Lefty Shit.

Hillary Clinton has 81% chance of defeating Trump, Nate Silver predicts

Clinton advisers see multiple paths to a commanding win

ELECTORAL MAP: Hillary Clinton is on track for a blowout win in November

Hillary Clinton Will Win Election By A Landslide, According To Moody’s Highly Reliable Election Model

Hillary Clinton Will Win by a Landslide Against Donald Trump

Electoral College Map Update: Pollster Predicts Hillary Clinton Landslide, Winning All Swing States Except Iowa, Ohio

These election experts are predicting a Hillary Clinton landslide over Donald Trump

Retard, what do election predictions have to do with what you are replying to?

Answer is nothing, but you got that disease of the mind that makes you regurgitate it anyway.

I could probably write a basic script that will post random responses and make more sense than you.

 

[P@triot]

What a shame you couldn't actually provide the evidence I asked for. I ask for a "final poll," since that's the only one that matters, and you post one from three months earlier, when Hillary had a much bigger lead.

She never really had a "lead", snowflake. You were duped into believing it because your left-wing masters know what a mindless little minion you are. You asked for the proof - I provided it. Everyone can see it. You continue to illustrate why you are the board jack-ass.

 

[P@triot]

Thanks for once again demonstrating you have no fucking clue how polls work.

You mean - like - Electoral Map polls? The one's you said "never" existed?

 

[peach174]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

 

[Faun]

Thanks for once again demonstrating you have no fucking clue how polls work.

You mean - like - Electoral Map polls? The one's you said "never" existed?

You're simply too rightarded. I never said such polls never existed.

 

[P@triot]

You're simply too rightarded. I never said such polls never existed.

That's exactly what you said. You said all polls were for the "popular vote" time and time again and have consistently mentioned how "accurate" they were by citing Hitlery carrying the useless popular vote.

 

[Faun]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

 

[Faun]

You're simply too rightarded. I never said such polls never existed.

That's exactly what you said. You said all polls were for the "popular vote" time and time again and have consistently mentioned how "accurate" they were by citing Hitlery carrying the useless popular vote.

Either quote me saying "there were never any electoral polls" or you once again prove for the forum that you're a complete idiot.

Bear in mind, I can easily link to posts I've made in the past were I posted electoral polls; so clearly, I never said what your delusions lead you to believe I said. You're just demented.

 

[peach174]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

Yes that's exactly what I said.

 

[peach174]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

When Trump asks congress for 4.2 trillion you get back to us, because we voted for less government.

 

[Faun]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

Yes that's exactly what I said.

LOL

Great, then it should be no problem for you to link the post where you said proposed spending for FY2017 was over $4 trillion....

 

[Faun]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

When Trump asks congress for 4.2 trillion you get back to us, because we voted for less government.

So $4.1 trillion is ok? $4.2 trillion is where it becomes a problem for you?

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018...

Trump’s Budget Cuts Deeply Into Medicaid and Anti-Poverty Efforts​

 

[peach174]

What part of spending less this year at 1.15 trillion and
Spending of last year at 4.1 trillion don't they get?
When spending goes down national debt starts to go down.

Obama's proposal 2016
2016 Federal Budget Pie-Chart - Bing images

Trumps proposal
pie chart federal spending 2017 - Bing images

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

When Trump asks congress for 4.2 trillion you get back to us, because we voted for less government.

So $4.1 trillion is ok? $4.2 trillion is where it becomes a problem for you?

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018...

Trump’s Budget Cuts Deeply Into Medicaid and Anti-Poverty Efforts​

How about waiting for tomorrow when he unveils it.
Then lets dissect it.

 

[Faun]

Imbecile.... you're actually comparing total spending in FY2016 with discretionary spending (a subset of total spending) in FY2017.

Furthermore, there's no date on when that FY2017 chart was created. Since FY2017 began under Obama, it's entirely possible that chart is based upon Obama's budget proposal and not Trump's. You don't know.

And lastly, when looking at discretionary spending, $1.15 trillion in FY2017 is the same as it was the prior fiscal year.

... your post is a complete and utter fail because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Seems you don't.
That is what their proposals were.
Not what they actually received or will receive from congress.
See the top proposed.
Obama's was over 4 trillion.

You idiots are simply too rightarded to know when you've made a fool of yourselves. As a result, you double down on stupid like you're doing here.

Imbecile, proposed total spending for FY2017 was also over $4 trillion...

When Trump asks congress for 4.2 trillion you get back to us, because we voted for less government.

So $4.1 trillion is ok? $4.2 trillion is where it becomes a problem for you?

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018...

Trump’s Budget Cuts Deeply Into Medicaid and Anti-Poverty Efforts​

How about waiting for tomorrow when he unveils it.
Then lets dissect it.

Why wait? You already started discussing it.

Not to mention ... you're fucking brain-dead -- he already unveiled it.

So? It's down a meager 2½% (from $4.2t to $4.1t) from the previous year's proposal.

That's what you meant when you said, "we voted for less government," is it?

 

[The Original Tree]

How embarrassing for you. You continue to illustrate to everyone that you are one of the most ignorant and uninformed posters on USMB...

Amazing: US Debt Decreased by More Than $60 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

US Debt DECREASED by Almost $70 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

Amazing: U.S. Debt Decreased By More Than $60 Billion Since Trump Inauguration

Trump aftershocks: Debt falls $68 billion since inauguration

JUST IN: Trump Has DONE Something Extraordinary - Obama Livid!

U.S. Debt DECREASED By $68 BILLION In First Month Of Trump Presidency…Guess Who DOUBLED U.S. Debt During 8 Years In Office? » 100percentfedUp.com

Bullshit nonsence. Short term treasury account fluctuations mean exactly NOTHING.

If you do not understand that United States is still very much running deficits, then you are a total ignoramus.

The problem is that you don't understand our economy or Accounting in America because you pay for everything with Pesos, and not American Dollars.

lol, something is terribly, terribly wrong with you in the head. And no, that isn't the problem.

Let me explain something to you retard - your baseless assertions about me are not even worth the bits that express them.

But Muh Electoral College!

The lame stream media spent the entire election LECTURING US ABOUT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE and how Trump had no chance to win THE ELECTORAL VOTE.

Then after the slimy bitch lost, they switched tactics and talked about THE POPULAR VOTE when their threats to kill ELECTORS did not pan out.

Now it's about RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, and after that, to cover for the fact these pieces of shit do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ALL DAY....it will be another pile of Lefty Shit.

Hillary Clinton has 81% chance of defeating Trump, Nate Silver predicts

Clinton advisers see multiple paths to a commanding win

ELECTORAL MAP: Hillary Clinton is on track for a blowout win in November

Hillary Clinton Will Win Election By A Landslide, According To Moody’s Highly Reliable Election Model

Hillary Clinton Will Win by a Landslide Against Donald Trump

Electoral College Map Update: Pollster Predicts Hillary Clinton Landslide, Winning All Swing States Except Iowa, Ohio

These election experts are predicting a Hillary Clinton landslide over Donald Trump

Retard, what do election predictions have to do with what you are replying to?

Answer is nothing, but you got that disease of the mind that makes you regurgitate it anyway.

I could probably write a basic script that will post random responses and make more sense than you.

You couldn't write a basic script but you sure as Hell read one every day after you are given your Dem talking points....err propaganda.

It just proves that you and your party are pathological liars and just cycle from one lie to the next 24-7, 365!

But Muh Landslide!