This is why you don’t elect Democrats

[P@triot]

appeals to ignorance are worthless.

Man have I learned that lesson trying to appeal to your ignorant ass.

 

[P@triot]

This is exactly why you don’t elect Democrats...

 

[busybee01]

Nothing ends in failure like idiotic left-wing policy...

As the minimum wage began to climb, the Manns faced tough decisions. First, they were forced to cut expenses, which meant letting go four of seven employees at the Seattle shop.

More than 50% of their workforce lost their jobs because left-wing government interfered with the free market and artificially inflated labor costs.

Seattle Couple Fears $16 Minimum Wage Could Doom Subway Franchise

Trump also wants to interfere in our free markets. When he talks about bringing manufacturing jobs back, that is interfering in our free markets. Tariffs are interfering in our free markets. Carrier stayed in the US but shed most of it's manufacturing jobs later down the road.

 

[busybee01]

This is why you don’t elect Dumbocrats...

Border Patrol wives blast Pelosi over wall refusal: 'Stop pretending that you care about federal workers'

Voters agree with Nancy Pelosi on this issue. Maybe Trump needs to work on voters. His attempts to do so have fallen flat.

 

[P@triot]

Tariffs are interfering in our free markets.

Uh...no they aren’t. They might interfere with China’s market. Or Mexico’s market. But not our market. The tariffs do not place a single tax, fee, or regulation on U.S. companies. Epic fail.

 

[P@triot]

Voters agree with Nancy Pelosi on this issue.

Bwahahaha! Obviously the voters don’t, or Donald Trump wouldn’t be sitting in the Oval Office as we speak. He ran on the wall.

 

[bendog]

This wouldn’t be an issue if Mitt Romney had been elected president. He accurately assessed that Russia was “the greatest geopolitical threat to the U.S.”. Barack Insane Obama - with unlimited access to national security briefings - mocked him.

This is a prime example why you don’t electe an amateur to the White House. Obama couldn’t see the forest for the trees and thought he could “kumbaya” the world into submission. Now Russia is more powerful and more emboldened.

Russia's Use of Nerve Agent Calls for Unified Western Response

yeah emboldend enough to hack an election for Trump. LOL

 

[busybee01]

It’s comical to watch left-wing lunatics here on USMB claim that Obamacare was successful when even the architects of Obamacare recognize it is a disaster...

Obamacare architect: We need to fix some of our mistakes that led to soaring costs

No one is claiming it succeeded entirely. That is why voters wanted it fixed not repealed. It did succeed in getting more people insurance. However Republicans have ignored voters' wishes.

 

[P@triot]

yeah emboldend enough to hack an election for Trump. LOL

That’s funny. However, if you wanted accurate you would have to change “Trump” to “Hitlery Clinton” in that sentence. Because that’s what really happened.

 

[bendog]

yeah emboldend enough to hack an election for Trump. LOL

That’s funny. However, if you wanted accurate you would have to change “Trump” to “Hitlery Clinton” in that sentence. Because that’s what really happened.

Well you were correct to the extent that Romney views Russia differently that Trump or Obama view it.

 

[P@triot]

No one is claiming it succeeded entirely.

Uh...that’s exactly what your fellow left-wing lunatics have claimed.

That is why voters wanted it fixed not repealed.

Barack Obama took a “shellacking” in the 2010 midterms because the voters never wanted Obamacare. It’s unconstitutional and idiotic. Stop trying to rewrite history like a typical idiot leftist.

It did succeed in getting more people insurance.

Yeah...and the expense of the 300 million who were already covered. Vintage left-wing “logic”. Sacrifice the 90% who did everything right for the 10% who did everything wrong.

However Republicans have ignored voters' wishes.

Now that part is true. Republicans failed to repeal Obamacare as they were sent to Washington to do.

 

[dudmuck]

Voters agree with Nancy Pelosi on this issue.

Bwahahaha! Obviously the voters don’t, or Donald Trump wouldn’t be sitting in the Oval Office as we speak. He ran on the wall.

Trump won because he concentrated on rural voters, needed for electoral college.
But that was two years ago. Today:

"When asked who they trust more on the issue, 50 percent of Americans said Democrats in Congress, compared with 41 percent who picked Trump, according to a poll published Tuesday by Quinnipiac University."
And Quinnipiac one of the least biased pollsters, with A- rating from 538.

 

[P@triot]

Trump won because he concentrated on rural voters

Exactly. The rural voters who recognize the Dumbocrats for the bat-shit crazy lunatics that they are. Only an asshole would proclaim that the U.S. should surrender their sovereignty. And yet that’s exactly what the left has declared.

 

[busybee01]

This is exactly why you don’t elect Democrats...

View attachment 243258

View attachment 243259

Voters agree with Nancy Pelosi on this issue.

Bwahahaha! Obviously the voters don’t, or Donald Trump wouldn’t be sitting in the Oval Office as we speak. He ran on the wall.

He may have run on the wall but that is not why he won. He won because he was less worse than Clinton. Voters thought both candidates were dishonest and untrustworthy. If none of the above were on the ballot and it meant that neither Clinton or Trump could not run, it would have won in a landslide.

 

[Papageorgio]

This wouldn’t be an issue if Mitt Romney had been elected president. He accurately assessed that Russia was “the greatest geopolitical threat to the U.S.”. Barack Insane Obama - with unlimited access to national security briefings - mocked him.

This is a prime example why you don’t electe an amateur to the White House. Obama couldn’t see the forest for the trees and thought he could “kumbaya” the world into submission. Now Russia is more powerful and more emboldened.

Russia's Use of Nerve Agent Calls for Unified Western Response

Wow RINO why are you trying to start a war with Russia?

Because repukes believe war improves the economy.

Isn't that why they helped to created the low class?

Ever since LBJ created the war on poverty, we have been losing.

 

[busybee01]

Trump won because he concentrated on rural voters

Exactly. The rural voters who recognize the Dumbocrats for the bat-shit crazy lunatics that they are. Only an asshole would proclaim that the U.S. should surrender their sovereignty. And yet that’s exactly what the left has declared.

You are a far-right wing kook. Trump also won because enough independents and suburban voters stayed with Republicans in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

 

[P@triot]

You are a far-right wing kook.

Only the bat-shit crazy left-wing lunatics say that. Everyone else just says to me “you are a traditional American”.

Trump also won because enough independents and suburban voters stayed with Republicans in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Uh...Pennsylvania and Michigan were the “blue wall” (as was Wisconsin). It speaks volumes that you radical lunatics lost all 3 of them to President Trump. Normal people are walking away from you and your party because the lot of you are radical lunatics. Insisting that gender is a state of mind. Insisting that shark be saved at all costs but the life of a baby can be terminated. Insisting that we should create an economy like Venezuela. Insisting on stuff like defunding ICE and campaigns of “fuck the police”. You’re a bunch of unhinged lunatics and people are waking away.

 

[P@triot]

He won because he was less worse than Clinton. Voters thought both candidates were dishonest and untrustworthy. If none of the above were on the ballot and it meant that neither Clinton or Trump could not run, it would have won in a landslide.

On that we can agree...

 

[P@triot]

The left continues to unconstitutionally push failed concepts from a failed ideology while ignoring their most basic constitutional responsibilities...

Extending tax subsidy provisions primarily benefiting wind and solar power would cost nearly $32 billion over the next four years, according to Joint Committee on Taxation estimates. Permanently extending these tax subsidies could add billions more to the tab. The committee estimates solar and wind tax subsidies will cost more than $7 billion in 2019.

So they want to unconstitutionally spend $7 billion this year alone for a failed concept while refusing to spend $5 billion this year for a proven concept that is a constitutional responsibility.

Schumer's Green Energy Subsidies Cost Much More Than Trump's Wall

 

[The Purge]

Just to be clear, THIS is the new point where DemonRATS say it is still safe to ABORT.....Any questions?